Hello,
[ I'm leaning somewhat out of the window here w/o being a law expert ]
On Wed, 12.07.2006 at 12:46:51 -0700, Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg clearly stands that:
>
> 1) Makefiles != scripts or at least it is unclear whether Makefiles may
> be called "scripts":
> ...
> M
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 11:01:09AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The specific example used was some spam source sitting in the same /27
> > netblock in a colo server room, and getting through the graylister because
> > a proper MT
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:25:53 +0200
Nicolas François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 05:34:16PM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> > Nicolas François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > Owner: "Nicolas François" <[EMAIL PROT
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 11:01:09AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
[...]
>> Ok, now I understand. As I've already said, graylisting on /27
>> netblocks amounts to inventing new network standards, which I believe
>> should go through the IETF standardi
This one time, at band camp, Andreas Metzler said:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 11:01:09AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> [...]
> >> Ok, now I understand. As I've already said, graylisting on /27
> >> netblocks amounts to inventing new network stand
On 7/15/06, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
The following setup would be in compliance with rfc2821 but would
not be able to deliver mail to a greylisting host:
- retrying every hour for up to five days
- messages are sent out from 120 different IP-addresses all living in
diff
also sprach Alan Woodland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.14.1436 +0200]:
> Flickrfs is a virtual filesystem which mounts on your machine like
> any other partition.
Partitions don't mount. On Unix, you mount filesystems.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`.
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/15/06, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> The following setup would be in compliance with rfc2821 but would
>> not be able to deliver mail to a greylisting host:
[...]
> I thought the point was that someone with such a se
Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Would sudokurse be better?
>
> Could be nice.
Please don't rename upstream software more than you must, this
only leads to confusion among users. Don't come up with funny
package names yourself. One should be able to see the relation
between t
* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060715 10:22]:
> I've tested this on sarge before, and it doesn't seem to work
> there. But the same package on etch/sid do work. I'm guessing
> the dynamic linker changed between sarge and etch.
That is strange. On my sarge boxes I get:
|$ ldd -r /usr/bin/ssh
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:54:30 +0200
Jorgen Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Would sudokurse be better?
> >
> > Could be nice.
>
> Please don't rename upstream software more than you must, this
> only leads to confusion among users.
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This in an extreme setup,
...or a setup designed to be used as an argument against greylisting.
--
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:25:53 +0200,
Nicolas François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 05:34:16PM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> > Nicolas François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * Package name: sudoku
> > Isn't this package name too general? I know that the upstrea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: jlj
Version : 2.12
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://patsy.cis.rit.edu/Software/perl/#jlj
* License : Freeware
Description : a command-line livejo
Hello,
Package asis (=3.15p-10) supports i386, kfreebsd-i386, sparc, and
powerpc.
I uploaded the next version (=2005-3) a couple of days ago. It adds
support for more architectures, namely: amd63, hppa, and ia64.
I notice that the buildds have successfully built the powerpc and
sparc packages,
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Ludovic
> Package asis (=3.15p-10) supports i386, kfreebsd-i386, sparc, and
> powerpc.
>
> I uploaded the next version (=2005-3) a couple of days ago. It adds
> support for more architectures, namely: amd63, hppa, and ia64.
You should contact the buildd mainta
internet marketers,
Do you dream about retiring early?
We have the leads, business, automated systems, and product to help you do it.
We charge nothing to send you more information.
Our team has over 8 years of proven success; we will share all.
Get more now::
http://windows.team-toolbox.net/
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greylisting already exists. This would just make it _less_ of a problem.
>
> By greylisting from /27 netblocks, you wouldn't block any additional
> mail as opposed to greylisting in general; quite to the contrary.
Yes, I understand. What I'm saying i
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suggest that when we find a domain that sends mail from 120 /27's
> (roughly a /20), we worry about it then.
An excellent strategy. Do you have some mechanism in place to detect
such a case when or if it happens?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 19:35 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Please install cpio 2.5 or higher to facilitate recovery from damaged
> gzipped tarballs.
I will drop the version from the description and add cpio to the
suggests.
I added the suggestion to the description because I guess that .tar.gz
will
Quoting Wolfgang Lonien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi all,
>
> this is maybe the wrong group for it (sorry in that case), but:
>
> Do we use greylisting on the @debian.org domain and especially on
> @lists.debian.org?
So, up to now, we've found Thomas Bushnell who seems really hardly
voting against
Hi all,
At https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NoMoreSourcePackages is a description of
the new world order for Ubuntu packages -- which will simplify making
changes to Ubuntu packages to a matter of simply committing the change
to the source repository with bzr, and running a new command something
like "src
22 matches
Mail list logo
