Vivo a maior cobertura do Brasil!!
Promoção vivo e você na copa do mundo.
Você foi sorteado na promoção Vivo.
Esse email está com um vale presente Vivo.
Para participar é facil, não importa sua operadora,
a vivo esta sempre com você.
É só baixar o vale-presente e responder a seguinte per
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.03.2319 +0200]:
>> I have in the past had a server on a local area network where the
>> network administrators refused to assign a static IP address. But
>> they would set things up to promis
Hi
On 7/3/06, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I would like to use 'sim' package name for kde version and 'sim-qt'
>> > for qt-only version.
>> Also, wouldn't it be less confusing if the packages were named sim-kde
>> and sim-qt?
Why not name it sim-qt-only or -nokde like gnuplot-nox.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Free Ekanayaka) writes:
> This package contains a collection of drumkits for Hydrogen, a
> sample based drum machine/step sequencer.
>
This is not a single package but actually a collection of various
packages. I once packaged Erny's Percussion for private purposes and
noted
"Baruch Even" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
AIUI, there is no need to CC debian-devel with ITP's, as debian-devel
normally gets them anyway.
Hi,
Joe Smith schrieb:
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
AIUI, there is no need to CC debian-devel with ITP's, as debian-devel
normally gets them anyway.
Not quite. X-Debbugs-Cc: is how debian-devel gets a copy of ITPs.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
James Westby schrieb:
On (03/07/06 23:34), Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Jaldhar H. Vyas]
Is this is a good idea for Debian? I think it is but it doesn't make
sense to switch dovecot over unless all the other ssl-cert using
packages also do it. Is this possible in the etch timeframe?
Yes, it is
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 02:38:30PM +0200, "Uwe A. P. Würdinger" wrote:
> James Westby schrieb:
> >An estimate of the pacakages that generate a certificate in postinst
> >(lets hope there are none that include them in the package) I tried:
> >
> >$ grep-available -FDepends openssl -sPackage -n | sor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
My dillema:
1) compile docs pre-build-time; or
2) compile docs in build-time
Pros of 1: < build-time and < Build-Depends
Pros of 2: < diff.gz and unnecessary manual intervention of downstream
maintainer (me :) )
So, what are best practices
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 07:25:16PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1) compile docs pre-build-time; or
> 2) compile docs in build-time
Definitely the latter. We build stuff at build time for a reason,
architecture-specific or -independent alike.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 07:25:16PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 1) compile docs pre-build-time; or
>> 2) compile docs in build-time
>
> Definitely the latter. We build stuff at build time for a reason,
> architectu
tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 07:25:16PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> 1) compile docs pre-build-time; or
>>> 2) compile docs in build-time
>>
>> Definitely the latter. We build stuff at build time for a reason,
>> archite
Hi,
I am building a package in which one of the binary has
to have the setuid and setgid bits set. I wonder which
one of the following two is the more appropriate method
to use?
1. Use "install -m 6755 " in the install
target of the Makefile.
However, I already tried this method and it d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philip Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: alienbbc
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : Jules Taplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.x2systems.com/AlienBBC/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Descriptio
Hi,
> >
> > # apt-get install refit (when it enters past the NEW queue)
> > # gptsync /dev/sda
> >
> > I've temporarily put refit packages on:
> > http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/tmp/20060702/
>
> I chrooted into /target from the second console of d-i and
> copied the deb package I got from yo
tony mancill wrote:
>
> It seems like it would be quite taxing on the autobuilders to have to pull
> something like docbook (and its chain of dependencies) into a pbuilder just
> to recompile a manpage that doesn't change between architectures.
>
AIUI, the autobuilders use sbuild and don't purge
Почта
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs that were fixed or are to be fixed (even in unstable) shouldn't be tagged
wontfix.
What's the problem with simply marking the bugs as fixed in the right version?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 08:37:52PM -0400, LEE, Yui-wah (Clement) wrote:
> I am building a package in which one of the binary has
> to have the setuid and setgid bits set. I wonder which
> one of the following two is the more appropriate method
> to use?
>
> 1. Use "install -m 6755 " in the insta
Steinar H. Gunderson skrev:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 07:25:16PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) compile docs pre-build-time; or
2) compile docs in build-time
Definitely the latter. We build stuff at build time for a reason,
architecture-specific or -independent alike.
That depends a bit o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The copyright link is missing (http://wiki.debian.net/copyright.html)
but the copyright was broken anyway (see
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWikiIsNotGFDL). What is the copyright
on the wiki, and where is the correct link to the copyright notice,
that
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo skrev:
3. Use dpkg-statoverride in your postinst script.
Don't do this, just ship the file in the package with the correct
permissions. dpkg-statoverride is (mostly) an admin tool which lets you
change default permissions.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:34:02AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 08:37:52PM -0400, LEE, Yui-wah (Clement) wrote:
> > I am building a package in which one of the binary has
> > to have the setuid and setgid bits set. I wonder which
> > one of the following two is
23 matches
Mail list logo
