On Wed, 03 May 2006, Ondrej Sury wrote:
> (added openldap2.2 + gnutls to SummerOfCode2006 page)
>
> Status of sending notification mails:
> [fr] PhilBat: (421, 'Too many concurrent SMTP connections; please try
> again later.')
> [en] PhilippKern, RaphaelHertzog, AlphaPapa, AlexanderSchmehl,
> Stev
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
> getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way forward and xprint
> is widely (though not universally) considered a broken implementation.
Just out
On May 03, Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get tons of warnings like this when I run tiger(8):
Tools like this need to generate lots of warnings or people may start
thinking that they are useless...
> Security-wise it's probably a good idea to give as few users as possible
> a valid sh
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> So basically to trig it, you just have to set the right forward status
> for your bugs.
What is the "right" forward status? An URL for the upstream bug?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 12:06, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit :
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > So basically to trig it, you just have to set the right forward
> > status for your bugs.
>
> What is the "right" forward status? An URL for the upstream bug?
Exactly.
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 11:56, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> How to Help:
>
> You can also help me to make the btslink.cfg more complete and
> know about more bugzillas [7]
about that:
* private or mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are fine
* any bugzilla that is used for a project packaged in debi
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> Hi developers,
>
> Like many of you may have noticed, a quite big mail was processed by
> the BTS today [1]. This was generated by a new service I'm currently
> developing, called bts-link.
>
>
> This tool lists every BT
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 12:23, Alexander Sack a écrit :
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Hi developers,
> >
> > Like many of you may have noticed, a quite big mail was processed
> > by the BTS today [1]. This was generated by a new service I'm
> > currently devel
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:45:56AM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Security-wise it's probably a good idea to give as few users as possible
> a valid shell, all others should get /bin/false, right?
AFAIK, this is already being done in Red Hat, SuSE, FreeBSD and OpenBSD for
many system users. And is th
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:21:41PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> btslink will *never* close or reopen bugs. So it's pretty harmless IMHO,
> this won't resurect a RC bug for which you made a debian-only patch and
> that is still not fixed upstream.
>
> So just tell me if somethings looks illogi
Hi,
Re: Pierre Habouzit 2006-05-03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * as of tags, it only touches (like I explained) :
>- upstream: ensure it's always set
>- wontfix: try to guess if upstream tagged that bug wontfix, and
>set/unset it accordingly
>- fixed-upstream:
>
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 14:02, Alexander Sack a écrit :
> Anyway, I would have preferred to roll this out in a different
> fashion:
>
> 1. release it as a package so all maintainers can use the tool if
> they like.
I intended it like that at the begining. sadly, the tool uses a local
mirror of the d
Wouter asked:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
> > getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way forward and xprint
> > is widely (though not universally) considered a broken impl
* Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 14:28]:
> Automatically setting the 'fixed-upstream' tag is certainly a very
> nice idea that no one will object to.
Unfortunately, there are always corner cases. What if upstream marks
something as fixed, you get a Debian bug report that the bug i
Package: wnpp
Owner: Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
* Package name: python-visionegg
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Andrew D. Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.visionegg.org
* License
* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060503 14:45]:
> * Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 14:28]:
> > Automatically setting the 'fixed-upstream' tag is certainly a very
> > nice idea that no one will object to.
>
> Unfortunately, there are always corner cases. What if upstream mar
Hi,
if your program uses fontconfig to find the fonts, then you don't need
defoma. Otherwise, install defoma-doc and have a look at
/usr/share/doc/defoma-doc/defoma-script.html/ch2.html
about how to get a list of the installed fonts and how to write your
configuration file.
In both cases you sh
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Wouter asked:
> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
> > > getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way forward and
Hi there.
I think that this may be interesting to anybody that has to work with
computers that are not the latest/more recent as most people in richer
countries seem to have.
It seems to be that a good amount of people upgrade their computers in a
regular basis and, then, don't notice how things
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 14:28, Christoph Berg a écrit :
> Automatically setting the 'fixed-upstream' tag is certainly a very
> nice idea that no one will object to.
>
> For 'upstream', I don't really see a benefit of setting it since the
> bug is already marked as forwarded. I would just leave it alone n
On Wed, 03 May 2006, Rogério Brito wrote:
> One way to mitigate the memory consumption is to, among other things,
> compile packages with optimization of GCC set to -Os, instead of -O2,
What -Os is likely to give you is much better cache locality, which might
make the code run that much faster on
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 14:44, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> * Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 14:28]:
> > Automatically setting the 'fixed-upstream' tag is certainly a very
> > nice idea that no one will object to.
>
> Unfortunately, there are always corner cases. What if upstream marks
>
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
Wouter asked:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way fo
Hello,
As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
anymore:
Quoting lintian:
This is done to avoid conflicts with the cgi-bin script alias,
which is reserved for the local use of webmasters.
CGI
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> It currently only support bugzilla (which would still help kde, gnome,
> X.org, linux kernel, samba, mozilla, gcc Maintainers to cite only them),
> but is written so that adding new backend is not a difficult task.
Could you plea
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 17:54, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > It currently only support bugzilla (which would still help kde,
> > gnome, X.org, linux kernel, samba, mozilla, gcc Maintainers to cite
> > only them), but is written so th
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> Wouter asked:
>> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
>> > > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
>> > > getting any new dev
* Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 15:49]:
> IMHO, in his case, he should remove the forward, tag the bug
> upstream, and mention in the bug history that this is related to the
> upstream bug "foo". set the forwarded state of a bug does not makes
> sense to me, if you dont adhere to
* Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 16:30]:
> after more pondering, what really miss for me, is a BTS
> "closed-upstream" tag, meaning that the bug is closed on the remote
> BTS, but not necessarily "fixed".
I don't think this distinction is helpful. Also, it's exactly
opposite to w
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 19:45, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Em Seg, 2006-05-01 às 17:54 +, Gonéri Le Bouder escreveu:
> > I did some test. My repository is here:
> > http://gloria.rulezlan.org/debian/ update_tarballs.pl updates the index_*
> > files and the tarballs.
> > For the moment it doesn't creat
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 18:55, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> * Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 15:49]:
> > IMHO, in his case, he should remove the forward, tag the bug
> > upstream, and mention in the bug history that this is related to
> > the upstream bug "foo". set the forwarded state o
hey alexis,
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 05:46:26PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
> web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
> anymore:
> CGIs must be put under /usr/lib/cgi-lib now.
i'd hold off on that
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
> web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
> anymore:
>
> Quoting lintian:
>
> This is done to avoid conflicts with the cgi-bin script alias,
> which is reserved for the
Package: general
Severity: minor
Somewhere during an hours long apt-get dselect-upgrade, some package,
I can't tell which, changed the permission of /tmp from 1777 to 755.
stat(1) at best reports the time some file was moved in or out of
/tmp, obscuring the time of chmod, so I can't check in dpkg.
Hi,
I will be in Helsinki from 8/5 till 14/5.
If someone wants to meet for a drink or some keysigning drop me an email.
Greetings, Joost Damad
--
The planet Andete is famous for it's killer edible poets.
pgp5MB0sA5Ouh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 03 May 2006, Ondrej Sury wrote:
> > (added openldap2.2 + gnutls to SummerOfCode2006 page)
> >
> > Status of sending notification mails:
> > [fr] PhilBat: (421, 'Too many concurrent SMTP connections; please try
> > again later.')
> > [en] PhilippKern, RaphaelHertzog
It seems the gnokii package is unmaintained and its maintainer doesn't do
anything.
Should the package be orphaned so other interested developers can take it?
Prueba el correo Terra ( http://www.terra.es/correo ); Seguro, rápido, fiable.
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:48:33PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> In any case, you could use noshell (already available in Debian) or nologin
> (see #298782) instead of /bin/false.
nologin is now distributed with login.
I've closed the ITP.
Kind Regards,
--
Nekral
--
To UNS
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:53:01PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Sunday 23 April 2006 20:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > What we need and what should have been done a long time ago, is to
> > > modularize profile to /etc/profile.d/ where e
Re: Joey Hess 2006-05-03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I won't discuss here the goodwill of this change, I just want to
> > point out that by now, 110 packages are RC bug candidates because of
> > this [2] (422 files installed inder `/usr/lib/cgi-bin').
>
> Policy uses a "should" for this, so at most th
Hello Roberto,
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 22:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It seems the gnokii package is unmaintained and its maintainer doesn't do
> anything.
> Should the package be orphaned so other interested developers can take it?
The package is currently up for adoption by the current
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It seems the gnokii package is unmaintained and its maintainer doesn't do
> anything.
> Should the package be orphaned so other interested developers can take it?
It is already orphaned (with a pending ITA). Please so some research
before pos
Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 19:33 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> You can't right now because GnuTLS support is only available for 2.1. 2.2
>> and later will need substantial reworking of that support, and without it,
>> the OpenSSL licensing issues cause too man
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:20:27PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Somewhere during an hours long apt-get dselect-upgrade, some package,
> I can't tell which, changed the permission of /tmp from 1777 to 755.
> stat(1) at best reports the time some file was moved in or out of
> /tmp, obscuring the time
Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
As you might have noticed, the last policy version (3.7.0) says that
web application packages must not put CGIs under `/usr/lib/cgi-bin'
anymore:
Given that apache2 has almost a magnitude more installations than all
the other web servers in Debian (sans apache 1) combine
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jacob Luna Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ifpgui
Version : 0.10.7
Upstream Author : Jim Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ifpgui.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL, BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Desc
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 15:23 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Wouter asked:
> > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > > > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not
> > > > g
Frank wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >> Wouter asked:
> >> >
> >> > Just out of curiosity, could you point me to arguments in favour of
> >> > Xprint?
> >>
> >> http://www.dailynews.co.th/
> >>
> The
> CUPS queues print those thai (?) letters very nice
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>> >> Wouter asked:
>> >> >
>> >> > Just out of curiosity, could you point me to arguments in favour of
>> >> > Xprint?
>> >>
>> >> http://www.dailynews.co.th/
>> >>
>> The
Hi
I do still have the problem with ADS that it does not accept any input from
keyboard after the upgrade to xorg 7.0. I am using it in a chroot
environment, without problems but I would like to get it working as before
the upgrade. All other programs are working perfectly with xorg 7.0
I
Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Is there a way to use fc-match to locate a Type1 font (pfb) and also its
>> associated font metrics (the afm file)?
>
> I may be wrong, but as fontconfig was designed for Xft which doesn't
> make use of the .afm file but only uses the .pfb directly, I think
> fontconfig
51 matches
Mail list logo
