Hi all.
Applications can be listed in the non-debian menu of desktop managers
such as Gnome and Kde by dropping a applicationname.desktop file in
/usr/share/applications/.
There is a lot activity in Ubuntu to provide applicationname.desktop
files to packages which lack them, so I decided to write
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:58:05 -0400, David Nusinow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I agree and I take full responsibility for the issue. I'm sorry for the
>trouble. I'm fully willing to put back the .la files on request from the
>release team, who I should definitely have coordinated with beforehand.
>N
hey whats up ready for some hot sex
Dear experts,
I am trying to build my own debian packages with GPG signature. I set
up gnupg, ran gpg and gpg --gen-key and also filled the variable
default-key with my generated keyID in ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf. I thought that
this is all I have to do, since Debian Maintainer's guide claims that
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 10:19:33AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> dpkg-deb: building package `sshguard' in `../sshguard_1.0.0-4_all.deb'.
> signfile sshguard_1.0.0-4.dsc
> gpg: skipped "Tomas Davidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>": secret key not
> available
> gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed:
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Manoj Srivastava:
>
>> Not quite correct. Policy has the job of docmenting what is
>> technically correct, and selecting one of a number of equally viable
>> technical options where numerous possibilities exist. The primary
>> purpose of
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As other people have pointed out later in the thread, my point was
> that I was _not_ having an epoch with dots in it; my version string
> was 0:1.2.7:1.2.8-1, which is explicitly allowed by policy (if there
> is an epoch, then the upstream version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 10:19:33AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> dpkg-deb: building package `sshguard' in `../sshguard_1.0.0-4_all.deb'.
>> signfile sshguard_1.0.0-4.dsc
>> gpg: skipped "Tomas Davidek <[EMA
hi
auf der debian-devel liste findet gerade eine diskusion ueber einen
debian light desktop. hier der stein des anstosses.
jan-david
"André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi !
>
> I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
> machines with poor hardware
On 14 Apr 2006, Florian Weimer spake thusly:
> * Manoj Srivastava:
>
>> Not quite correct. Policy has the job of docmenting what is
>> technically correct, and selecting one of a number of equally
>> viable technical options where numerous possibilities exist. The
>> primary purpose of policy is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear experts,
>I am trying to build my own debian packages with GPG signature. I set
> up gnupg, ran gpg and gpg --gen-key and also filled the variable
> default-key with my generated keyID in ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf. I thought that
> this is all I have to do, since Debi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Dear experts,
>>I am trying to build my own debian packages with GPG signature. I set
>> up gnupg, ran gpg and gpg --gen-key and also filled the variable
>> default-key with my generated keyID
Charles...
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:38:59AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Applications can be listed in the non-debian menu of desktop managers
> such as Gnome and Kde by dropping a applicationname.desktop file in
> /usr/share/applications/.
>
> There is a lot activity in Ubuntu to provide app
Hello
I think that we have a problem when the common library between XFree and
/usr/lib are update in /usr/lib.
I currently have XFree 4.5, when the library libfontconfig1 was update
to version 2.3.2-1 was also updated
the file libfontconfig.so to the version 1.0.4 but in the XFree
(/usr/X11
Hi Kamaraju,
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:33:09AM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354032
>
> asking for the latest version (0.8.0) of gerris which has been
> available since Oct 17, 2005. I have not received any reply to this
> bug report e
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sks
Version : 0.92-1
Upstream Author : Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pagina.de/sks
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libcrypt-openssl-bignum-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Ian Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cpan.org/
* License : same as Perl
Programming Lang: Perl
Des
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:54:27PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> As other people have pointed out later in the thread, my point was
>> that I was _not_ having an epoch with dots in it; my version string
>> was 0:1.2.7:1.2.8-1, which is expli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> - I personally always run dpkg-buildpackage with -uc -us and use
> debsign -kkeyid foo_changes to sign the /final/ packages
> afterwards. I usually build the packages more than once before
> uploading as I often find som
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Well, I haven't followed the rest of the thread (the part where people
> wonder which package could pertain to a "Light desktop" task) but I've
> seen Joey suggest himself to turn it into a task.
So have I. But I am against it nevertheless.
Do not get me wrong. I am no
Re: Felipe Sateler 2006-04-14 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Shouldn't package maintainers close these bugs when they have
> received help?
Yes, definitely. If you are aware of any "solved" RFH bugs, could you
ping the maintainers?
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Des
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Apt on the other hand (wrongfully) tracks explicitly if you have not
>> epoch or an epoch of 0.
>
> Crap. :-( I forgot to remove the explicit zero epoch from my next
> upload. Are you telling me that if I leave no epoch in my following
> upload, ap
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Damián Viano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: yeahconsole
Version : 0.3.4
Upstream Author : knorke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://phrat.de/yeahtools.html
* License : GPL2
Description : drop-down X terminal e
Package: libgtk2.0-0
Version: 2.8.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.4
Hi,
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
native package the upstream changelog should not be here.
If I
24 matches
Mail list logo
