The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 269 (new: 29)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 85 (new: 2)
Total number of packages request
Hi Vincent, hi d-d,
Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Package name: latex-utils
> Description : utilities for LaTeX/xfig
I think the package name is unfortunate, and the short description
doesn't help much. "latex-utils" could just as well be a collection of
nifty LaTeX s
* Manoj Srivastava
| The premise is also weak. Man, in the summer, I want to be
| out. Day trips. Picnics. Sports. County fairs. Winter is when one
| hunkers down in the warmth of the house and codes.
But in the winter you can go skiing! In the summer, there's no snow,
but nice and co
On 3/23/06, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The Australian timezone change is a couple of days away. If you are
> running servers depending on acurrate time, you will need to check
> or update them.
Quick question: If there's an update to the stable libc due a secur
Hi Martijn,
On Friday, 24 Mar 2006, you wrote:
> On 3/23/06, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The Australian timezone change is a couple of days away. If you are
> > running servers depending on acurrate time, you will need to check
> > or update them.
>
> Qui
Will Newton wrote:
This package hasn't had a maintainer upload in 12 months. It is currently at
version 2.1.7 whilst upstream is in the process of releasing 2.1.10. These
new releases include some quite critical bugfixes and visual improvements.
Is this package being actively maintained? I vol
_
Scan and help eliminate destructive viruses from your inbound and outbound
e-mail and attachments.
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines
Start
hi everybody
According to the latest [1] Microsoft announcement, Vista will be released
in Jan 2007; according to our schedule [2], Etch may be released in Dec 2006.
If we accomplish it, it will be a great feat: Debian will (possibly)
show it is able to relase two versions of its distribution si
On 10603 March 1977, A. Mennucc wrote:
[...]
Nice.
> I hope we do manage to release in Dec 2005 (and I thank people who
> work hard to this end).
We wont, im sure.
--
bye Joerg
Snow-Man: Please don't talk to me. You have demonstrated yourself
sufficiently. There is a serious matte
pe, 2006-03-24 kello 19:41 +0100, A Mennucc kirjoitti:
> I hope we do manage to release in Dec 2005 (and I thank people who
> work hard to this end).
The best form of thanking is hacking. Translate something[0], write a
patch to fix a bug[1], write a manual page[2], test the installer[3]. To
misq
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 07:41:39PM +0100, A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope we do manage to release in Dec 2005 (and I thank people who
> work hard to this end).
Coo - who's got the time machine? Releasing Etch in Dec 2005 could be
somewhat tricky without it.
*grin*
Brett.
--
T
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10603 March 1977, A. Mennucc wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Nice.
>
>
>>I hope we do manage to release in Dec 2005 (and I thank people who
>> work hard to this end).
>
>
> We wont, im sure.
Can you please elaborate on specific problems you think will not be
solved on time?
C
pe, 2006-03-24 kello 21:04 +0100, Luk Claes kirjoitti:
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > On 10603 March 1977, A. Mennucc wrote:
> >>I hope we do manage to release in Dec 2005 (and I thank people who
> >> work hard to this end).
> >
> > We wont, im sure.
>
> Can you please elaborate on specific problems
On 10603 March 1977, Luk Claes wrote:
>>>I hope we do manage to release in Dec 2005 (and I thank people who
>>> work hard to this end).
>> We wont, im sure.
> Can you please elaborate on specific problems you think will not be
> solved on time?
Hundreds of them.
> PS: Please, don't send this kin
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 18:06, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
[challenge response email systems]
> Would I be wrong in deciding not to make this
> confirmation?
Easy enough: if you receive a confirmation request identifying the message
far enough for you to decide that it was spam with your email
On Thursday 23 March 2006 00:56, Frans Pop wrote:
> Myself, I'm a KDE user currently, so why do I not propose to sync
> Debian's release to their release schedule? Or why not MySQL, or Apache
> or ...? Because I happen to know that releasing Debian involves a bit
> more than waiting for random ups
Yo!
No idea what this [below] is about exactly, but are you aware of the newly
formed Debian fonts task-force? Mailing list is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Greetings
-- vbi
On Friday 24 March 2006 19:19, Anthony Fok wrote:
> Will Newton wrote:
> > This package hasn't had a maintainer upload in 12 month
Hi,
The Emacs documentation is going to be moved to non-free since
it is GFDLed with invariant sections.
I'd like know how packagers who have the same problem usually
handle this, especially the non-free package.
The simplest way I can see is to take the pristine tarball and rename
to foo-non-fr
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:07:48PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10603 March 1977, A. Mennucc wrote:
> > I hope we do manage to release in Dec 2005 (and I thank people who
> > work hard to this end).
>
> We wont, im sure.
:-> gotme
but in the beginning of the email I got it right :-)
"
On 24 Mar 2006, Jérôme Marant told this:
> Hi,
>
> The Emacs documentation is going to be moved to non-free since
> it is GFDLed with invariant sections.
>
> I'd like know how packagers who have the same problem usually
> handle this, especially the non-free package.
>
> The simplest way I can see
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 11:57:58PM +, James Troup wrote:
> This Saturday (2006-03-25) between 13:00 - 21:00 UTC, the debian.org
> machines hosted by HP are going down due to maintenance in their cage
> on the power systems. The following machines and services are
> affected:
>
> o gluck - pe
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 11:57:58PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This Saturday (2006-03-25) between 13:00 - 21:00 UTC, the debian.org
> machines hosted by HP are going down due to maintenance in their cage
> on the power systems. The following machines and services are
> affected:
>
> o g
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 11:38:40PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:07:48PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > On 10603 March 1977, A. Mennucc wrote:
> > > I hope we do manage to release in Dec 2005 (and I thank people who
> > > work hard to this end).
> >
> > We wont, im sure.
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Esteban Manchado Velázquez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libtext-format-ruby
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Austin Ziegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rubyforge.org/projects/text-format/
* License : Ruby'
Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi *,
> I noticed on occassion on -devel and planet that folks mention in passing
> that "I'll be in MN in US from MAR 01 thru 05" and I'd like to have a
> beer and do keysigning. Would it be worthwhile to create a list like
> 'debian-meetup' (or debian-beer-meetup x-))that woul
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:28:47PM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Kevin Mark wrote:
> > Hi *,
> > I noticed on occassion on -devel and planet that folks mention in passing
> > that "I'll be in MN in US from MAR 01 thru 05" and I'd like to have a
> > beer and do keysigning. Would it be worthwhi
26 matches
Mail list logo
