Am Montag, 6. März 2006 08:05 schrieb Miles Bader:
> Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > represented by tabs and alignment (like multi-line function arguments)
> > should be done by spaces.
> > Gains: shows fine in _every_ editor, no need to set tab-width.
>
> Losses: doesn't work well
Hello folks,
I hope I am in the right forum for this. This probably concerns
debian-installer.
I've been running several Debian sarge machines originating back from when
sarge was in testing stage. Recently I had occasion to install Debian on
another machine. I just popped in a netinstall
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:42:19PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > GNOME seems to be more and more focusing on the entry-level Linux user,
> > and less and less on advanced users. Most unfortunate, its much prettier
> > than KDE.
>
> Indeed. Wasn't t
Hi Miles!
You wrote:
> Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > represented by tabs and alignment (like multi-line function arguments)
> > should
> > be done by spaces.
> > Gains: shows fine in _every_ editor, no need to set tab-width.
>
> Losses: doesn't work well with many indenting st
Hi Joey!
> I plan to file normal severity bugs on the following 252 packages, which
> all still create /usr/doc symlinks and which don't yet have a bug filed
> about this. 23 such bugs already exist in the bts.
[snip list]
Is this just the list from lintian.debian.org, or did you do somehting
m
Hello Debian folks,
again I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but let me ask anyway.
Recently I installed a Debian sarge system on a brand-new system. In the
end the X server wouldn't start up because the installer couldn't identify
the video hardware.
So I did what I've done for year
On Monday 06 March 2006 10:43, Daniel Haude wrote:
> In the end I found out what was wrong: I had used an old install CD
> back from sarge==testing days. My /etc/apt/sources list therefore
> pointed at "testing" resources which, without a proper "dist-upgrade"
> (which at no point I had wanted beca
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:40:22 -0500
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I plan to file normal severity bugs on the following 252 packages,
> which all still create /usr/doc symlinks and which don't yet have a
> bug filed about this. 23 such bugs already exist in the bts.
>
>
> Tim Dijkstra (tdy
Re: Daniel Haude in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> again I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but let me ask anyway.
Please don't hijack random threads. Start a new one.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Losses: doesn't work well with many indenting styles (e.g. it would be a
>> complete lose for stuff indented in GNU style).
>
> Can you explain that?
>
> Either the '{' and '}' are one indentation level down or the same indentation
> level.
Because t
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, I don't think GNOME bashing is really on-topic here.
It's not gnome "bashing", it's just airing of a very common gripe with
gnome. If there were indeed a viable fork that improved on some bad
thing about gnome, but kept the good things, I think
Am Montag, 6. März 2006 10:59 schrieb Miles Bader:
> If you attempted to view such code using an application which uses the
> standard tab size of 8 -- e.g., more or less in a terminal -- blocks
> would end up being indented by _16 spaces per block level_, which is
> (pardon my french) pretty fucki
Am Montag, 6. März 2006 11:39 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
> 8bit tab width
s/8bit/8 spaces/
me is confused
HS
pgpWd6uTc4ZU0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Can you explain that?
Either the '{' and '}' are one indentation level down or the same indentation
level.
Hah! Not in GNU.
The GNU coding standards want you to indent '{' and '}' x/2 spaces, while
the code inside is indented x. So, the result is:
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 13:42 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > GNOME seems to be more and more focusing on the entry-level Linux user,
> > and less and less on advanced users. Most unfortunate, its much prettier
> > than KDE.
>
> Indeed. Wasn't there a
Good Day sir. Am stanley from cameroon playing football. Sir i will like you to promote my talent in a proffessional way . Am a GOALKEEPER of age 17yrs old. I will be very happy if you make me show my talent to the world that am a real goalkeeper. Sir i want you
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:05:34PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyway, I don't think GNOME bashing is really on-topic here.
>
> It's not gnome "bashing", it's just airing of a very common gripe with
> gnome. If there were indeed a viable fork that imp
At 1141671548, Miles Bader wrote:
> If you attempted to view such code using an application
> which uses the standard tab size of 8 -- e.g., more or
> less in a terminal -- blocks would end up being indented
> by _16 spaces per block level_, which is (pardon my
> french) pretty fucking absurd.
Ind
At 1141304953, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > In any case, since the latest gnome has also disabled
> > the help system (or rather, the most up-to-date manual
> > is the accessibility guide for 2.8 and the user's guide
> > for 2.6), where has the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: geekast
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Frédéric Logier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gna.org/projects/geekast/
* License : GPL
Description : GNOME interface
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert J. Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libeqimbase
Version : 2004.12.15
Upstream Author : Tai Mai Shu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://teqim.sourceforge.net/?p=eqimbase
* License : GPL
Description :
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> > The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> > packages.debian.org service on a new machine. The system has been
> > donated by Schlund + Parner where it is hosted as well. It is a
> > DualCor
Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> packages.debian.org service on a new machine. The system has been
> donated by Schlund + Parner where it is hosted as well. It is a
> DualCore Opteron and only runs this servi
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> > > The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> > > packages.debian.org service on a new machine. The system has been
> > > donated by Schlund + Pa
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:38 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> It checks the User-Agent string.
What are the expected results for a user accessing the following URL
from IE running on a W2K terminal server? I didn't notice any
restrictions.
http://packages.debian.org/tuxpaint
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:07:25PM -0600, Bob Tanner wrote:
> Works on linux or Windows (compiles as-is with g++ and MS Visual Studio)
> Object-oriented design separates the protocol into its basic parts
> Base interface class to be used for the actual user interaction
> Keeps track of buddies,
Scripsit Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
>> It is a DualCore Opteron and only runs this service for Debian
>> users and developers.
> What does it mean that the machine runs this service only for Debian
> users and developers?
It proba
Hi,
Am Montag, den 06.03.2006, 15:11 -0400 schrieb Ben Armstrong:
> On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:38 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > It checks the User-Agent string.
>
> What are the expected results for a user accessing the following URL
> from IE running on a W2K terminal server?
I guess the orig
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 03:11:30PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > It checks the User-Agent string.
>
> What are the expected results for a user accessing the following URL
> from IE running on a W2K terminal server? I didn't notice any
> restrictions.
>
> http://packages.debian.org/tuxpaint
Ma
Martin Schulze wrote:
> The services in the backup are:
Are there any plans to add svn.debian.org / alioth to this set?
(/me is glad he's still backing up his svn repos on his own..)
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 06:29:29PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> packages.debian.org service on a new machine. The system has been
> [...]
really cool and thanks to schlund and partner, but the links to the
changelogs and the cop
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Is this just the list from lintian.debian.org, or did you do somehting
> more fancy to find them?
Only removed packages that already had bugs filed from that.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Scripsit Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> really cool and thanks to schlund and partner, but the links to the
> changelogs and the copyright file at the bottom of each packages page
> don't work. probbaly just something really minor...
Didn't such things use to be static and cronjob-maintained
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Genannt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: w3c-linkchecker
Version : 4.2.1
Upstream Author : Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~scop/
* License : W3C Software License
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > really cool and thanks to schlund and partner, but the links to the
> > changelogs and the copyright file at the bottom of each packages page
> > don't work. probbaly just something really minor...
>
> Didn't such things us
Joey Hess wrote:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> > The services in the backup are:
>
> Are there any plans to add svn.debian.org / alioth to this set?
No.
Alioth will have its own backup facility.
> (/me is glad he's still backing up his svn repos on his own..)
Good.
Regards,
Joey
--
Lif
Hi folks,
I'm happy to report that there's been some positive progress regarding
freetype's pending ABI transition since I last posted about it[1]. In
response to concerns from a number of vendors about the disruptive effect
this transition would have on desktop distributions, freetype upstream h
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xsltsl
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Steve Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://xsltsl.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description : XSLT Standard Library s
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> donated by Schlund + Parner where it is hosted as well. It is a
> DualCore Opteron and only runs this service for Debian users and
> developers.
I think/hope it should read "runs only this service".
Hope that helps,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://pe
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 19:04 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> > block 322762 with 355341
> Bug#322762: /usr/doc still exists (transition tracking bug)
> Was blocked by: 1
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006, Brian May wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 19:04 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> > > block 322762 with 355341
> > Bug#322762: /usr/doc still ex
hello all debian-devel,
This seems like a very basic issue, but I've searched through the
mailing lists and web and haven't found any help.
I'm trying to create a basic set of custom packages which will hold some
of our software, complied and customized as we like it for our machines.
We li
Mike Fogel wrote:
> hello all debian-devel,
>
> This seems like a very basic issue, but I've searched through the
> mailing lists and web and haven't found any help.
>
> I'm trying to create a basic set of custom packages which will hold some
> of our software, complied and customized as we like
"Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006, Martin Schulze wrote:
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> > The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> > packages.
Follow-up to myself:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 03:25:58PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm happy to report that there's been some positive progress regarding
> freetype's pending ABI transition since I last posted about it[1]. In
> response to concerns from a number of vendors about the disrupti
Hi,
Am Montag, den 06.03.2006, 22:31 +0100 schrieb Jonas Genannt:
> * Package name: w3c-linkchecker
> Version : 4.2.1
> Upstream Author : Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~scop/
> * License : W3C Software License
>
46 matches
Mail list logo
