Le jeudi 26 janvier 2006 à 20:04 -0500, David Nusinow a écrit :
> On the other hand, adding languages only adds to the complexity and tools
> that a Debian developer should know to be effective.
Despite the days of nightmare I have spent on perl, I couldn't claim to
be "effective" with perl. When
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 09:42:47AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 26 janvier 2006 à 20:04 -0500, David Nusinow a écrit :
> > On the other hand, adding languages only adds to the complexity and tools
> > that a Debian developer should know to be effective.
>
> Despite the days of nightma
"Adeodato Simó" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can we please fast-track this clairvoyant NM?
Umm... I belive that is the policy. He needs to have his email read, and
then answer a few questions.
The process for returning emeritus Developers is intentionaly much
* Matt Zimmerman:
> One of the appealing things about the Python language is their "batteries
> included" philosophy: users can assume that the standard library is
> available, documentation and examples are written to the full API, etc.
Would this really be a problem if the minimal Python implem
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:16:20PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Matt Zimmerman:
>
> > One of the appealing things about the Python language is their "batteries
> > included" philosophy: users can assume that the standard library is
> > available, documentation and examples are written to the f
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 10:22 -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
> "Adeodato Simó" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Can we please fast-track this clairvoyant NM?
>
> Umm... I belive that is the policy. He needs to have his email read, and
> then answer a few questions.
> The
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006
7:05 AM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian-devel-digest
Digest V2006 #120
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> The point, however, is that it's rather silly to add yet another
> scripting language to the set of Essential packages. Sure, it'd be nice;
> but then tomorrow someone else will come along who will claim that
> Python is sucky and that Ruby is Teh Thin
Can someone tell me about the current status of kat in Debian? There
were multiple ITPs filed at some point of time
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=309068
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=340616
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=328610
Which tel
kamaraju kusumanchi a écrit :
Can someone tell me about the current status of kat in Debian? There
were multiple ITPs filed at some point of time
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=309068
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=340616
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Florian Weimer writes:
> * Matt Zimmerman:
>
> > One of the appealing things about the Python language is their "batteries
> > included" philosophy: users can assume that the standard library is
> > available, documentation and examples are written to the full API, etc.
which batteries do you mea
Le vendredi 27 janvier 2006 à 12:46 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> The point, however, is that it's rather silly to add yet another
> scripting language to the set of Essential packages.
Personally I don't care about the Essential status. However we have to
accept the use of python in more bas
Fathi Boudra wrote:
>> Can someone look into this and take appropriate action?
The problem is, that kat is working _only_ with sqlite3 < 3.2.6! Otherwise it
will crash!
So we are waiting for 0.7 because this version is an complete rewrite of kat,
and will work with all sqlite versions.
Roberto,
Jonas Genannt wrote:
Fathi Boudra wrote:
Can someone look into this and take appropriate action?
The problem is, that kat is working _only_ with sqlite3 < 3.2.6! Otherwise it
will crash!
So we are waiting for 0.7 because this version is an complete rewrite of kat,
and will work wi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libsocket++
Version : 1.12.12
Upstream Author : Herbert Straub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linuxhacker.at/socketxx/download
* License :
Description : a family of C++ cla
James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Copyright Notice:
> -
> Copyright (C) 1992-1996 Gnanasekaran Swaminathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Permission is granted to use at your own risk and distribute this
> software in source and binary forms provided the above copyright notice
> and
Hi,
> > Sure, it'd be nice;
> > but then tomorrow someone else will come along who will claim that
> > Python is sucky and that Ruby is Teh Thing, and we can start this all
> > over from the start again.
>
> I hear this argument against python all the time, and frankly, if people
> were listening
Hi,
cdebootstrap sid regression test has been failing for the last few days.
who's mounting /proc in postinst and leaving it ?
-> debootstrap finished
-> copying local configuration
-> Installing apt-lines
Refreshing the base.tgz
-> upgrading packages
-> mounting /proc filesystem
mount: /
18 matches
Mail list logo
