On Fri, Jan 06, 2006, Frans Jessop wrote:
> Ubuntu's launchpad is amazing. Do you think it would be helpful if all
> DD's worked through it on their projects? Wouldn't that keep things more
> organized and efficient? Or perhaps Debian could build its own version of
> launchpad which is better
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 08:21:14AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
>> Oh, the explanation for current practice is that if the key doesn't
>> change in practice, apps that look at the keys won't cope well with the
>> key changing, and when that becomes important, such as in the event
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 09:14:50PM +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> We're already doing security rX updates to Sarge anyway, surely we just
> need to synchronise the key rollover with those releases? And maybe an
> rX release if the current archive key becomes compromised?
This is inconsistent w
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.01.07.1132 +0100]:
> This is inconsistent with Debian's past policies wrt stable releases,
> namely, that it should be possible for a user to skip all point releases and
> security updates (at the peril of their system's security...) and still be
Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
I just upgraded Sid and rebooted, after that, logging into Gnome told me if I
wanted to migrate to a Single file that will give me better performance, so of
course I said yes. It logged me off and everytime that I need to log back in,
it kicks me out.
I don't have any s
Quoting Loïc Minier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> (I don't think the "non-free" argument is here of importance
> considering it's a web service, in the same way as Google or
> buildd.net. I shall get flamed for these remarks.)
As long as Debian doesn't want to build its own launchpad, sure.
But th
Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe the one-true-stable-key idea is the way to go after all...
One key by distribution?
Gruss
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 06 January 2006 19.47, Karl Vollmer wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I apologize if this is the incorrect list to use for this purpose,
> however a few months back I posted an ITP as I thought I would
> actually have time to package up Ampache (http://www.ampache.org)
> However that hasn't happe
* Bernd Eckenfels:
> Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Maybe the one-true-stable-key idea is the way to go after all...
>
> One key by distribution?
If this means one key per suite (sarge, etch, ...), and no yearly key
rollover, I agree. 8-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Daniel:
> is there anybody - preferred German speakers - who is willing and able
> to package this OR to give assistance to me (i would try packaging when
> there is somone helping me)???
Hi Daniel!
An 'ITP' is supposed to be filed in the Debian bug tracking system. Best
just use the 'reportbug
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tioga
Version : 1.0.i
Upstream Author : Bill Paxton (email omitted)
* URL : http://theory.kitp.ucsb.edu/~paxton/tioga.html
* License : LGPL
Description : tioga :
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> /usr/lib/libgconf2-4/gconf-sanity-check-2: error while loading shared
> libraries: libpangocairo-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
> file or dir
> gconf-sanity-check-2 did not pass, logging back out
I've filed a serious
Le vendredi 06 janvier 2006 à 14:28 -0600, Alejandro Bonilla a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded Sid and rebooted, after that, logging into Gnome told me if I
> wanted to migrate to a Single file that will give me better performance, so of
> course I said yes. It logged me off and everytime that I
Le vendredi 06 janvier 2006 à 15:11 -0500, Gillings, Marcus a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> My name is Marcus Gillings. There was an email sent from me
> on your website. Can you please delete it and the contents in it,
> please.
No, as explained on http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ we don't
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I'm wondering if the passwd package should be essential or not.
[...]
> So, passwd was virtually essential because bash had a
> dependency on it, but now it doesn't anymore.
> So why do I think passwd needs to be essential?
> There are several
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 04:32:29PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:22:50AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Michael Vogt]
> > > Sorry for the delay. I'm preparing a new upload that adds the 2006
> > > archive key to the default keyring.
> >
> > Sounds good. Will t
James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The aptitude in unstable and testing has a feature that lists suggested
> ways to fix broken packages.
Unfortunately, the feature doesn't work very well.
Frequently I say "aptitude remove XXX" and the first several
suggestions that aptitude comes up with
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 12:51:55AM +0100, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 19:50:14 +0100, Linas Zvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >Jiri Palecek wrote:
> >>How does aptitude decide which one to choose? Shouldn't it
> >>prefer to do something that
* Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060106 11:56]:
> * Bernd Eckenfels:
>
> >> IOW using the old key to sign the new key only requires that the old
> >> key be "good" at one point during the new year, whereas continuing to
> >> use the old key requires that it be "good" all year.
> >
> > Yes, bu
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060106 13:05]:
> The exposure of the archive key is higher, because it sits on an
> Internet-connected, ssh-accessible server. Also, you don't have to trust
> AJ's key; in contrast with Florian's assessment of the NM-suitability of the
> three ftpmasters, one
* Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060107 14:13]:
> Description : tioga : a powerful plotting system in ruby
First of all: This is not against you, Vincent. :-)
I am just wondering if we shouldn't be more chary of using
meaningless (or soliciting) phrases like "powerful" in
package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cue2toc
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Matthias Czapla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cue2toc.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : converts CUE files
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 12:16:36PM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Maybe the one-true-stable-key idea is the way to go after all...
> One key by distribution?
Well, I meant a different one for each stable, which I guess logically
becomes "yes"...
[Paul TBBle Hampson]
> Although as Steve Langasek has pointed out, the Sarge->Etch upgrade
> will be hard unless the etch key becomes available to Sarge users
> who've not touched their system since Sarge r0a... I guess this comes
> down to making the etch key available in some kind of Sarge-signe
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:19:42PM -0500, Frans Jessop wrote:
> Ubuntu's launchpad is amazing. Do you think it would be helpful if all
> DD's worked through it on their projects? Wouldn't that keep things more
> organized and efficient? Or perhaps Debian could build its own version of
> launc
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 23:52 +0100, Juergen Salk wrote:
> I am just wondering if we shouldn't be more chary of using
> meaningless (or soliciting) phrases like "powerful" in
> package descriptions in general.
Sounds like something that should be added to lintian. I suggest filing
a wishlist bug
Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although as Steve Langasek has pointed out, the Sarge->Etch upgrade will
> be hard unless the etch key becomes available to Sarge users who've not
> touched their system since Sarge r0a... I guess this comes down to
> making the etch key available in
27 matches
Mail list logo
