Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ti, 2005-12-27 kello 20:56 +0100, Florian Ludwig kirjoitti:
Hello,...
a short question:
has there to be a space between each dependes in the control field?
i thought so and field in a bugreport [1] and didnt get an answer jet...
florian ludwig
[1] http://bugs.debian
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dotproject
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Adam Donnison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://www.dotproject.net/
* License : GNU General Public License version 2 or later
Description : Web-based project man
Florian Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are some other packets with the same 'bug' - so i can fill a
> wishlist report?
Of course you can, but I'd recommend to spend your time on more
interesting bugs, or on writing your apt output parser...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Bio
ke, 2005-12-28 kello 10:59 +0100, Florian Ludwig kirjoitti:
> There are some other packets with the same 'bug' - so i can fill a
> wishlist report?
Since it is not really a bug, I'd rather you didn't file bugs about it.
The constructive thing would be to write a new test for lintian and/or
linda
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libfuse-perl
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~dpavlin/Fuse/
Description : Write filesystems in Perl using FUS
> The ssh-krb5 package is basically in deep freeze since it's likely going
> to get removed in favor of some sort of transition package to
> openssh-client.
This is more than fine for me (as long as security patches are issued in
the proper Debian way) - we use mostly Debian/stable precisely for t
Le Vendredi 23 Décembre 2005 09:11, Robert Luberda a écrit :
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Daniel Schepler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Yes, a Makefile with
> > all:
> > echo 'foo'\
> > 'bar'
> >
> > will pass to the shell:
> > (old make) echo 'foo''bar'
> > (new make) echo 'foo'\
> > 'bar'
> >
> > And bo
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ke, 2005-12-28 kello 10:59 +0100, Florian Ludwig kirjoitti:
>> There are some other packets with the same 'bug' - so i can fill a
>> wishlist report?
> Since it is not really a bug, I'd rather you didn't file bugs about it.
> The constructive thing woul
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hopefully this will work on both versions, but again I don't have easy access
> to an old make to test it. There's also the suggestion elsewhere in the
> thread to put the script in a make variable instead.
I really think that the maintainers of a c
ke, 2005-12-28 kello 13:48 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt kirjoitti:
> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ke, 2005-12-28 kello 10:59 +0100, Florian Ludwig kirjoitti:
> >> There are some other packets with the same 'bug' - so i can fill a
> >> wishlist report?
> > Since it is not really
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: graphicsmagick
Version : 1.1.7
Upstream Author : Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.graphicsmagick.org/
* License : MIT/X
Description : collection
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
ke, 2005-12-28 kello 13:48 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt kirjoitti:
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ke, 2005-12-28 kello 10:59 +0100, Florian Ludwig kirjoitti:
There are some other packets with the same 'bug' - so i can fill a
wishlist report?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Gea Milvaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dacco
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : ?
* URL : http://www.ibiblio.org/dacco
* License : LGPL
Description : catalan to english and english to catalan dictionar
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Gea Milvaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: qdacco
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Carles Pina i Estany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.catalandictionary.org/cat
Hi,
I would like to advertise at your website.
Please get back to me ASAP, I really want to close a deal today.
Thanks,
James Hunter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This communication contains information which is privileged and confidential
and is exclusively intended only for the individual or entity na
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hopefully this will work on both versions, but again I don't have easy
>> access
>> to an old make to test it. There's also the suggestion elsewhere in the
>> thread to put the script in a make variable i
Dear DDs,
Please advise since I am not sure against which package to file a bug.
First I mentioned weird behavior with hostname and filed a bug against
it (look below in the quotes). Apparently it might be not a bug of
hostname at all... There is something else weird is happening
*> rsh node19 '
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:24:14 +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hopefully this will work on both versions, but again I don't have
>>> easy access to an old make to test it. There's also the
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 01:03:09PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
|| Please advise since I am not sure against which package to file a bug.
|| First I mentioned weird behavior with hostname and filed a bug against
|| it (look below in the quotes). Apparently it might be not a bug of
|| hostn
Thank you Vincent,
But I am still wondering...
> So it runs the command /bin/echo with $1=. However, /bin/echo
> doesn't use $1, and only prints an empty line which you see.
so you mean that in case
*> rsh localhost /bin/sh -c 'hostname -i'
ravana
hostname doesn't have really *argv == "-i"
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:24:14 +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> Sorry that i didn't check this - I thought that you, Daniel, were
>> the make maintainer (thanks Adeodato). The rest of m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vincent Zweije) wrote:
> It's not a bug. It's a feature. :)
>
[...]
> /bin/sh -c '/bin/echo' ''
> /bin/tcsh -c '/bin/echo' ''
> /bin/tcsh -c '/bin/echo' ''
>
> So it runs the command /bin/echo with $1=. However, /bin/echo
> doesn't use $1, and only
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libcrypt-simple-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Marty Pauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~kasei/Crypt-Simple-0.06/
* License : GPL
Description
yikes... nice to learn something new everyday :-)
> cat zzz.sh
#!/bin/bash
echo "#1=$1"
> rsh localhost /bin/bash -c '/home/yoh/zzz.sh -k'
#1=
> rsh localhost /bin/bash -c '"/home/yoh/zzz.sh -k"'
#1=-k
> /bin/bash -c /home/yoh/zzz.sh sldkjf
#1=
heh heh
so it seems that not that $1==-k, it is
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:17:27 +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think that the change was made without thoroughly thinking
> about it. But in fact it seems as if there are no instructions for
> transitioning Makefiles that rely
Hi!
I could try to arrange donation of one UltraSparc machine to Debian
project. I think that the transport would be to complicated from
Serbia to anywhere (because of our laws) but I can connect it to the
Net for DD's to use it.
Machine CPU is: (whatever it means)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 02:13:44PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
|| Thank you Vincent,
||
|| But I am still wondering...
||
|| > So it runs the command /bin/echo with $1=. However, /bin/echo
|| > doesn't use $1, and only prints an empty line which you see.
|| so you mean that in case
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why don't we add a status field into the PTS, where a maintainer can
> denote her "NMU policy" for a given source package? E.g. a
> selection box, ranging from "Don't dare to touch this, I bite" to
> "
A general note to everybody thinking of making hardware donations.
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 21:23, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> I could try to arrange donation of one UltraSparc machine to Debian
> project. I think that the transport would be to complicated from
> Serbia to anywhere (because of o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: checkgmail
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Owen Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://checkgmail.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Alternative Gmail
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The issue threatening the Debian Sparc port is not so much lack of
> hardware (and certainly not older hardware), but rather people who spend
> time on hunting down and fixing (kernel) bugs and working on architecture
> specific packages like silo.
Do
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ke, 2005-12-28 kello 13:48 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt kirjoitti:
>> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> ke, 2005-12-28 kello 10:59 +0100, Florian Ludwig kirjoitti:
There are some other packets with the same 'bug' - so i can fill a
>>>
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 23:21, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > The issue threatening the Debian Sparc port is not so much lack of
> > hardware (and certainly not older hardware), but rather people who
> > spend time on hunting down and fixing (kernel) bu
As you can see, %e will go away soon so /etc/udev/cd-aliases.rules will
not be supported anymore.
Some component of debian will have to install a rules file with static
aliases, and so far I think that this should be a task for d-i.
Comments and other ideas are welcome.
BTW, udevsend will go away
On 29/12/2005, at 8:22 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
A general note to everybody thinking of making hardware donations.
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 21:23, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
I could try to arrange donation of one UltraSparc machine to Debian
project. I think that the transport would be to compli
On Thursday 29 December 2005 01:00, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Some component of debian will have to install a rules file with static
> aliases, and so far I think that this should be a task for d-i.
Is this document still usable for writing udev rules?
http://www.reactivated.net/writing_udev_rules.htm
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I saw a comment a few days back that vore was back up (see below).
this really should be in the hosts database, it is hard to find information
if it is that distributed.
Thanks
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
On Dec 29, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this document still usable for writing udev rules?
> http://www.reactivated.net/writing_udev_rules.html
The basics are there, but since then many new features like support for
environment variables have been added (they are documented in the man
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:00:40AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> As you can see, %e will go away soon so /etc/udev/cd-aliases.rules will
> not be supported anymore.
> Some component of debian will have to install a rules file with static
> aliases, and so far I think that this should be a task for d
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:00:40AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > As you can see, %e will go away soon so /etc/udev/cd-aliases.rules will
> > not be supported anymore.
> > Some component of debian will have to install a rules file with static
> > aliase
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: checkgmail
> Version : 1.4
> Upstream Author : Owen Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://checkgmail.sourceforge.net/
> * Li
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Please not, that I had berween 12/1999 and 12/2004 a contract with a
Parisian ISP for a OC-3 and Hosting of one 19" Rack (210cm, 600kg).
I have payed including unlimited traffic 499.998 French Francs
(76.000 Euro) per month and my own Class-C Block registered at RIPE.
I
Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Please not, that I had berween 12/1999 and 12/2004 a contract with a
Parisian ISP for a OC-3 and Hosting of one 19" Rack (210cm, 600kg).
I have payed including unlimited traffic 499.998 French Francs
(76.000 Euro) per month and my own Class-C
Michelle writes:
> I heared (on debian-isp) that in the USA you can get a BGP4 routed STM4
> (622MBit) Fiber Optic for only 120.000 US$ PER YEAR !!!
Benjamin writes:
> Where can I get the fiber optic for $10/year?
I think you meant to write $10/month. However, Michelle is European and
uses '.' w
Hi all
I might be acting paranoid here but just want to clarify couple of
things. I was under the impression that, if I report a bug to
bugs.debian.org, any future correspondence on that bug will be CCed to
me automatically. Is this correct?
I have reported http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Hi all
>I might be acting paranoid here but just want to clarify couple of
> things. I was under the impression that, if I report a bug to
> bugs.debian.org, any future correspondence on that bug will be CCed to
> me automatically. Is this corr
46 matches
Mail list logo
