Re: StrongARM tactics

On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:21:46PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >Um... no. This is *porter* work; one does not have to be a buildd admin to > >analyze a build failure to see whether the package belongs in P-a-s, and > >there's no reason t

New postgrey Debian package uploaded - please test

Hi, (postgrey mailing list: this is totally irrelevant if you're not using Debian.) I've just uploaded a new version of the postgrey Debian package - 1.23-2 (really *just* uploaded it. You can get it from until it appears in unstable.) postgrey 1.23 has a

Re: StrongARM tactics

On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:33:34PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > [snip] > > > -grub2: !hppa !ia64 m68k# > > > bootloader > > > +grub2: !hppa !ia64 !m68k !alpha !mips !mipsel !s390 !sparc # > > > bootloader for i38

Re: postinst scripts failing because a new conffile wasn'taccepted: Is it a bug?

> My proposal to avoid such problem is to implement multilevel > configuration, where the package default configuration and the local > overrides are stored in separate files, making sure local > configuration do not affect changes to the package default, and thus > no question is asked during upg

Re: StrongARM tactics

On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:21:46PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > I can do the analyzing, but what should I do with the results? Put them on a webpage so anyone can see them, and if you don't find someone who'll give you an immediate response, track the issues over time so you can trivially demonst

Bug#342366: ITP: postgresql-filedump -- Utility to format PostgreSQL files

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: postgresql-filedump Version : 8.1 Upstream Author : Patrick Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/ * License : GPL Description : Utili

Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

Hi, I'll try to move forward in the direction of a more consensual proposal about the declassification. In this discussion, two points were made clear to me: 1) It would be really nice to have the d-p archives available to those who want to understand better how debian works, and from this pers

Re: StrongARM tactics

Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > +pcsx: i386# i386 > assembly AFAICT, this is only because its Linux/Makefile forces CPU to ix86 unconditionally. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAI

Bug#342466: ITP: rcairo -- Cairo bindings for the Ruby language

Package: wnpp Owner: Thierry Reding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Severity: wishlist * Package name: rcairo Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Evan Marin, Øyvind Kolås, MenTaLguY, Kouhei Sutou * URL : http://cairographics.org/rcairo * License : GPL Description : Cair

Re: StrongARM tactics

On Tuesday 06 December 2005 05:51 am, Thomas Viehmann wrote: >+%libopenspc: i386 kfreebsd-i386 # i386 assembler >+%xmms-openspc: i386 kfreebsd-i386# i386 dependency (libopenspc) >+pcsx: i386

Re: [kde-edu]: Sugg: Framework for Science Meters

Dear list, I would be delighted if anybody might contribute to this topic: who knows of existing projects evaluating measurement deviced connected to serial ports (chemistry, physics)..? Free software that is... -- forwarded -- Subject: Re: [kde-edu]: Sugg: Framework for Sci

Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

Daniel Ruoso: > I'll try to move forward in the direction of a more consensual proposal > about the declassification.=20 > > In this discussion, two points were made clear to me: You do not mention the copyright and ethical problems, but the proposal seems to address them, near enough. Is the OP

Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > So, my conclusion is that it would be nice to have two types of > publications: > > 1) Selected Readers > 2) Selected Content > > The first type of publication could embrace the entire content of > debian-private, but restrictions wi

Re: StrongARM tactics

On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:14:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Saying "that's the buildd admin's job" about tasks that don't *need* to be > done by the buildd admin is a pretty effective way of encouraging the > problems that the Vancouver proposal sought to address, where two or three > people

Re: cvs loginfo configuration for alioth?

Hi, > > > I'm looking for a 'loginfo' file configuration that works > > > for alioth. > > > I thought I have found a solution few days ago, but when > > > I came back, it no longer seems to work correctly: > > > > > The script used in debian-gis repo (pkg-grass) works like a charm. > Feel fre

Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > Hi, > > I'll try to move forward in the direction of a more consensual proposal > about the declassification. > > In this discussion, two points were made clear to me: > > 1) It would be really nice to have the d-p archives availab

Re: StrongARM tactics

On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:46:07 +1000, Anthony Towns said: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:21:46PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: >> I can do the analyzing, but what should I do with the results? > Put them on a webpage so anyone can see them, and if you don't find > someone who'll give you an immediate

Re: StrongARM tactics

Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:46:07 +1000, Anthony Towns > said: > >> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:21:46PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: >>> I can do the analyzing, but what should I do with the results? > >> Put them on a webpage so anyone can see them, and i

Re: StrongARM tactics

On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 07:51:20PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:46:07 +1000, Anthony Towns > said: > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:21:46PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > >> I can do the analyzing, but what should I do with the results? > > Put them on a webpage so anyone

Bug#342504: ITP: libjgrapht-java -- mathematical graph theory library for Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libjgrapht-java Version : 0.6.0 Upstream Author : Barak Naveh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://jgrapht.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL Description : mathematical g

Symantec AntiVirus/Filtering for Domino detected a virus in a document you authored.

Please contact your system administrator. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 00:08 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > > So, my conclusion is that it would be nice to have two types of > > publications: > > > > 1) Selected Readers > > 2) Selected Content > > > > The first type of publicatio

Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:39:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: >> I'll try to move forward in the direction of a more consensual proposal >> about the declassification. >> So, my conclusion is that it would be nice to have two typ