#include
* Eric Cooper [Mon, Nov 07 2005, 09:18:15AM]:
> > Is there a good alternative?
>
> I wrote approx for exactly this purpose. It's now in testing.
Update your package description please. Current apt-cacher does not
require Apache.
Eduard.
--
Elric: We are dreamers, shapers, singers, an
Quoting "Ivan S. Dubrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The problem is I can't find thorough documentation or some kind of "How To"
> there I can find how to write these extensions. Although they just simply
> pieces of make-files, I find it difficult to start understanding them. For
> example, the diffire
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cvsconnect
Version : 0.1
* URL : http://cvs.m17n.org/~akr/cvssuck/
* License : BSD
Description : CVS connection minimizer
CVSconnect enables you to do multiple CVS
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 04:56:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:28:41 +1000 Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:26:55PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > I disagree with your calling "licensing in a DFSG-free manner" as
> > > "giving up rights": this seems
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 06:59:41AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> > On Nov 13, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I think the best reason to ask or require contributors to licenses
> >> their papers in a DFSG form is so that Debian ca
Hi all,
it seems that just reading the policy again sometimes solves a problem...
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:25:01PM +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> was heard to say:
>>> we just received a bug r
Scripsit David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From reading the responses from Andreas, rather than people trying poorly
> to interpret him, it's pretty apparent that they'll be giving freely
> licensed talks a greater weight than non-free ones. They're also going to
> make it easy to choose a free
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Oh, and here's something else to ponder: Maybe, just maybe, James has
> more time to go to Ubuntu below zero than he has to handle keyring
> updates because he prioritizes by what gets the bills paid. As most of
> us do, I suppose.
Maybe, just maybe, someone else should be
Scripsit Anthony Towns
> In case you hadn't noticed, for the Debian project's purposes software
> is a synonym for computer programs; if it weren't the reversion of the
> social contract would have had no effect on the "non-free documentation
> in main" question.
I case you hadn't noticed, there
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 03:04:51PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > From reading the responses from Andreas, rather than people trying poorly
> > to interpret him, it's pretty apparent that they'll be giving freely
> > licensed talks a greater weight
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> If your old prerm fails, the new prerm should be called with
>>> "failed-upgrade" as its first argument (see Policy 6.4 and 6.5),
>>> so you can do any necessary workarounds there. Errors in postrm
>>> are handled similarly.
>>
>> But what would be th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sguil
Version : 0.5.3
Upstream Author : Bamm Visscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.sguil.org/
* License : QPL
Description : Realtime network security monitor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sancp
Version : 1.6.1
Upstream Author : John Curry [ john dot curry at metre dot net ]
* URL : http://www.metre.net/sancp.html
* License : QPL
Description : network s
On 11/14/05, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I case you hadn't noticed, there was a major _difference_ in opionons
> about how "software" was to be interpreted. The editorial
> clarification in 2004-003 removed the confusion by avoiding the
> ambiguous word "software"
Unfortunately n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: barnyard
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Andrew R. Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Roesch <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/barnyard/
* License
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:21:38 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 06:59:41AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>> > On Nov 13, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I think the best reason to ask or require contributors
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:04:51 +0100, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Scripsit David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> From reading the responses from Andreas, rather than people trying
>> poorly to interpret him, it's pretty apparent that they'll be
>> giving freely licensed talks a great
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 11:17:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 04:56:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > It resembles describing charity as "investment with no return".
>
> Perhaps; though there are differences. Charity does have returns: both
> emotionally/psychologica
Could anybody point me to some documentation or example of writing custom
rules/classes for CDBS?
BTW, is there other build systems like CDBS?
WBR,
Ivan Dubrov
The best I could find is
https://perso.duckcorp.org/duck/cdbs-doc/cdbs-doc.xhtml
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:25:01PM +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
>> we just received a bug report that is caused by a buggy prerm script
>> in the package in sarge (it fails because it doesn't handle read-only
>> /usr/local
[Sent to d-d-a as well, didn't arrive there yet]
Another round of package renamings of some libraries written in C++ is
needed. Background:
libstdc++6 is currently configured to use the mt allocator based on
discussions in April 2004 with upstream libstdc++ developers. This
configuration turned o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kitty
Version : 0.9.2
Upstream Author : KesieV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.kesiev.com/kittyguide/home/
* License : GPL
Description : a Qt/KDE based RSS podca
On 12:14 Mon 14 Nov 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
> [Sent to d-d-a as well, didn't arrive there yet]
Did you actually sign the mail to d-d-a?
Quoting http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/:
Only messages signed by a Debian developer will be accepted by this
list.
Cheers,
-
Matthias Klose a écrit :
* Once dependencies are fulfilled for all architectures, request
binNMU's for all other packages depending on a library package with
a changed package name.
If a source upload is necessary for other fixes, wait as well until
dependencies are fulfilled for all
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The same benefit that accrue from freedom of software still
> remain if that software bits represent a presentation; the
> software/presentation can be modified to suit a particular need, and
> redistributed, excepts can be used in other
* Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-14 18:46:50]:
> Hold on - does this mean I will or won't be able to do
> apt-get install debconf6-doc
you will, and most likely it will be 100% complete. if someone
packages it.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 08:40:04AM +0100, Brian May wrote:
> Is a back port available for sarge? If not, how feasible would it be
> to create on? Does it depend on anything not in sarge?
Approx needs the current version of libocamlnet-ocaml-dev,
but otherwise should compile and work OK in sarge.
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-14 18:46:50]:
>> Hold on - does this mean I will or won't be able to do
>> apt-get install debconf6-doc
>
> you will, and most likely it will be 100% complete. if someone
> packages it.
Uhhh, why would
Dear Webmaster I handle online
marketing for my clients As an ogoing process to increase the link
popularity of my client site, i am looking for some good quality sites to
exchange links..I would request you to kindly consider my client site and add
this to your link page with the followin
Dear Webmaster I handle online
marketing for my clients As an ogoing process to increase the link
popularity of my client site, i am looking for some good quality sites to
exchange links..I would request you to kindly consider my client site and add
this to your link page with the followin
Loudly promoting my own software here...
la, 2005-11-12 kello 10:39 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh kirjoitti:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Besides, depends/pre-depends and conflicts should be more than enough if
> > > done right.
> >
> > Yes, this is what is meant by sup
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> * Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-14 18:46:50]:
>>> Hold on - does this mean I will or won't be able to do
>>> apt-get install debconf6-doc
>>
>> you will, and most likely it will be 100% com
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:17:06 +1000 Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Well, it's not an inaccurate description (I think), but you would
> > use such a definition only if you think that charity is a stupid
> > thing to do...
>
> So, if I'm parsing you right, you're saying that a person (such as
> myself) wo
Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> * Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-14 18:46:50]:
Hold on - does this mean I will or won't be able to do
apt-get install debconf6-doc
>>
In the following email Chris suggests that I add support for bit
torrent magnet:// URLs under Gnome2 in the Azureus package by setting
the gconftool-2 parameter /desktop/gnome/url-handlers/magnet/command
to call Azureus. This seems like a pretty reasonable thing to do, but
it must be done for each
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:38:10PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 11:17:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 04:56:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > It resembles describing charity as "investment with no return".
> > Perhaps; though there are diff
Shaun Jackman wrote:
> In the following email Chris suggests that I add support for bit
> torrent magnet:// URLs under Gnome2 in the Azureus package by setting
> the gconftool-2 parameter /desktop/gnome/url-handlers/magnet/command
> to call Azureus. This seems like a pretty reasonable thing to do,
Scribit Manoj Srivastava dies 11/11/2005 hora 22:35:
> You gotta start trusting somewhere. Our web of trust starts with the
> Developers in the keyring, we trust these people not to muck with the
> binaries.
You trust them, but not any user of Debian will want to trust them so
much. Some will want
Scribit Josselin Mouette dies 12/11/2005 hora 18:37:
> It was already suggested to accept only source+binary uploads, but to
> rebuild the binaries on the upload's architecture anyway.
Has there been a consensus on rejecting that solution?
Curiously,
Nowhere man
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9
[redirecting this to -devel; discussions of ftp team NEW queue policies are
off-topic for -release.]
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:13:47PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > And thats what I asked for, yes. Drop the version from -dev|-dbg|-doc,
> > use the shlib system for the rest (which makes pac
40 matches
Mail list logo
