* Henning Makholm:
> Scripsit Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> The GPL does fail the Dissident test because it does not permit
>> anonymous changes.
>
> Your copy of the GPL must have been garbled in transmission.
> Please fetch a fresh copy from a trusted source.
What is a trusted source?
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:17 +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > If you're interested in making this happen I'll be happy to give
> > you any info I can;
>
> OK, here are some questions.
>
> 1) The copy of britney in merkel:/org/ftp.debian.org/ does
Hi Steve,
>> Feel free to point me to false positives, as I haven't checked every
>> single one of them. I know that some of them already have respective
>> bugs filed against them.
>
> Indeed, at least some of these *are* false positives; there is nothing
> that prohibits the use of dashes in nat
Scripsit Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Henning Makholm:
>> Scripsit Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> The GPL does fail the Dissident test because it does not permit
>>> anonymous changes.
>> Your copy of the GPL must have been garbled in transmission.
>> Please fetch a fresh copy f
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:32:18PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >> Feel free to point me to false positives, as I haven't checked every
> >> single one of them. I know that some of them already have respective
> >> bugs filed against them.
> > Indeed, at least some of these *are* false positives
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feel free to move it; I subscribe to -legal too. The discussion is
> highly relevant, because licenses that do require that a contributor
> identifies himself posivtively are _not_ free.
This is, of course, a definition of "free" that's specific to som
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cl-arnesi
Version : 1:20051105-1
Upstream Author : Edward Marco Baringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://common-lisp.net/project/bese/arnesi.html
* License : BSD
Description : small Common Lisp uti
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:17:18PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > (We should move this discussion to -legal, or stop it right here.
> > It's not very productive.)
You can start CC'ing the conversation to -legal. Moving threads, in
my experience, generally doesn't work; besides, -devel can hand
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: SZALAY Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libzorpll3.0.6
Version : 3.0.6.2
Upstream Author : Scheidler Balázs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.balabit.hu/downloads/zorp/libzorpll-src/
* License : GNU/GPL + pe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: SZALAY Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libevtlog0
Version : 0.2.3+20051031
Upstream Author : Scheidler Balazs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.balabit.hu/downloads/syslog-ng/1.9/src/
* License : BSD
Desc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cl-fiveam
Version : 1:20051105-1
Upstream Author : Edward Marco Baringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://common-lisp.net/project/bese/FiveAM.html
* License : BSD
Description : simple regression t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cl-yaclml
Version : 1:20051105-1
Upstream Author : Edward Marco Baringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://common-lisp.net/project/bese/yaclml.html
* License : BSD
Description : Yet Another Commo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cl-qbook
Version : 1:20051105-1
Upstream Author : Edward Marco Baringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://common-lisp.net/project/bese/qbook.html
* License : BSD
Description : create HTML/LaTeX versi
Hi,
is anybody out there who is able to help compiling molphy for the
architectures mentioned below.
Thank you very much
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 18:36:43 +0100
From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PRO
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:55:18PM -0500, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> As I'm sure everyone knows, pure virtual entries in a Depends line are
> strongly deprecated, due to the fact that frontends have a tendency to pick
> a random provider of the package. What I'm not
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:55:18PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> (a) Is a pure virtual entry with no prior alternative in a Depends line an
> actual bug? i.e., do we have a consensus on this?
This will prevent the package from autobuilding, which is a bug.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: ht
Scripsit "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:17 +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
[Context for debian-dak readers who are not following the thread in
-devel: I am trying to get up to speed on how to contribute some code
to ftp-master that mails out testing migration notice
* Steinar H. Gunderson [Sat, 05 Nov 2005 19:46:21 +0100]:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:55:18PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > (a) Is a pure virtual entry with no prior alternative in a Depends line an
> > actual bug? i.e., do we have a consensus on this?
> This will prevent the package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: SZALAY Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libzorpll3.0.6-dbg
Version : 3.0.6.4
Upstream Author : Scheidler Balázs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.balabit.hu/downloads/zorp/
* License : GNU/GPL + permission
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libfile-modified-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Max Maischein, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/File/File-Modified-0.07.tar
> "Noah" == Noah Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Noah> Within the security team, there has recently been some talk
Noah> of pushing for per-user temp directories by default in etch.
Noah> I'd like to see what people's reaction to such a proposal
Noah> would be.
I have so
Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Nick Jacobs wrote:
>
>
>>In-Reply-To=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>You mean, it's seriously been proposed that a
>>significant amount of work should be done to restore
>>support for a processor that has not been manufactured
>>for 10 years? While slightly degrading performance
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:55:18PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> As I'm sure everyone knows, pure virtual entries in a Depends line are
> strongly deprecated, due to the fact that frontends have a tendency to pick
> a random provider of the package. What I'm not sure is if this is just "ugly"
>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 06:21:41PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:11:32AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > I read all of your points as criticisms of Linux. That is disappointing.
>
> Why is criticism disappointing? The goals of Linux and the Linux
Perhaps he meant tha
Hubert Chan wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:48:53 -0800, Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>
>>On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 12:18 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>>
>>>The GPL does not force developers to "contribute their changes back".
>>>That's exactly the *point*.
>
>
>>Explain please.
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
