On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:19:03AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I've just tried to upgrade my testing distro, and aptitude is happy to
> remove gnome and all its dependents because the required version of
> sound-juicer has not migrated yet. Does anyone know why?
Because sound-juicer is tied up
> Just for the record: Credativ is surely a good company, but there are
> a lot more companies offering Debian support. To keep them all from
> publicly answering requests on mailing lists, thus cluttering them, it
> would be nice if we could restrict ourselves to pointers to the
> consultants page
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:12:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:31:55PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> >
> > Applications linked with libstdc++5 and using GTK segfault when using
> > SCIM[1] as input method, and neither GTK nor SCIM nor the apps seem to
> > be to blame.
>
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 03:46:34AM +, The Fungi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:18:01PM -0400, Angelina Carlton wrote:
> [...]
> > I was told on #debian-devel that, yes it is in-precise, so I am just
> > wondering why would it *not* list all the files? What defines if a file
> > is included
* Martin Schulze
| Maybe, if you don't want your output to be found on the Internet, you
| should not make it available on the Internet?
I think there is a difference between putting it all in one place with
a public archive and having the content available, but not organised
into a public archi
Henning Makholm wrote:
> I think this counts as abuse of the wontfix tag. Setting the tag is
> *never* a substitute for explaining (or referencing an explanation of)
> why one thinks the problem should not be solved.
I encountered this bug now, and asked myself - what should one do?
Obviously th
Hi David!
You wrote:
> Talking with adn on IRC, I've decided to launch an script that will
> close every opened ITP and RFP bug on the BTS with a lifetime greater
> than 600 days by tonight (or if anything goes wrong -I have an exam
> tomorrow noon-, by tomorrow night). I'll point to documentatio
Scripsit Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am taking the liberty to write this even though I am not a DD. Hope
> you would not mind.
Anyone who has relevant points to make are welcome on the -devel
lists. Only DDs can upload packages and vote, but that is about it.
> http://people.corn
Scripsit Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've fixed some of a), b) or c) with the help of Santiago Vila who is doing
> the Spanish translation but more peer review is needed here.
Note that the document at the official URL you quote is probably
obsolete; it identifies itself
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:48:07AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I've fixed some of a), b) or c) with the help of Santiago Vila who is doing
> > the Spanish translation but more peer review is needed here.
>
> Note that the docum
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:33:17AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:12:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:31:55PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > >
> > > Applications linked with libstdc++5 and using GTK segfault when using
> > > SCIM[1] as input m
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 03:01, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
--cut--
> Yes, I know there are some documents which are better than the FAQ for some
> issues (such as the Installation Manual or the Debian reference). But there
> are several reasons why I believe this document should be
David Moreno Garza wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
>>>But my intention was not to read the whole list and do this by hand!
>>>This should be done by the same script which sends the sem automated
>>>mails to the BTS.
>>
>>As there is a consensus that it is a goo
* Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050914 10:47]:
> | Maybe, if you don't want your output to be found on the Internet, you
> | should not make it available on the Internet?
> I think there is a difference between putting it all in one place with
> a public archive and having the content availa
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:36:11AM +0200,
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 168 lines which said:
>Known non-free documentation licenses are:
> - GFDL (at least up the current version 1.2)
> - CC licenses (at least up to the current version 2.5)
> - OPL an
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> >Known non-free documentation licenses are:
> > - GFDL (at least up the current version 1.2)
> > - CC licenses (at least up to the current version 2.5)
> > - OPL and OpenContent License
> > - the current lice
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:39:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:33:17AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:31:55PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Applications linked with libstdc++5 and using GTK segfault when using
> > > > SCIM[1] as
Vedran Furac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Moreno Garza wrote:
>> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
[...]
> - note that there is software that probably can't be packaged:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203211
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Christian Marillat wrote:
> Vedran Furac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>David Moreno Garza wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>>- note that there is software that probably can't be packaged:
>>
>>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Vedran Furac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Vedran Furac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Package already in Debian : gstreamer0.8-ffmpeg
>
> Ops, then it should be closed.
>
> Btw. why then mencoder, can't be packaged? Why are only ffmpeg -dev in
Normaly, encode
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:47:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...really interesting and insightful explanation snipped...]
> So: g++ is embedding an unversioned weak symbol in the library in some
> cases, which causes the linker to resolve it to the version from the lib
> used by the app, not
Hi,
I "manage" the HDAPS driver for the IBM ThinkPad's with the Active
Protection system. Now that our driver is in mainline -git (Thanks to Robert
Love), we might want to consider people to start making packages for our
utils.
Basically I have seen the whole semi-god process that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alejandro,
Il giorno 14/set/05, alle ore 18:21, Alejandro Bonilla ha scritto:
Can someone help me with making a deb package for the hdaps-utils?
(hdaps.sf.net) Download section / then click on IBM HDAPS Source
Download.
We are on the process
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> I'm interested in maintaining (and using) your drivers and utilities.
If you ever need a co-maintainer, just drop me a note.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the
Hi,
as nm.debian.org is now using https i would like to know, where i could
find the public part of the SSL root certificate of spi-inc.org online.
Greetings
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:43:19PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> as nm.debian.org is now using https i would like to know, where i could
> find the public part of the SSL root certificate of spi-inc.org
> online.
http://www.spi-inc.org/secretary/
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I am rebuilding my KDE packages for upload, so as to fulfil the
requirements of the C++ ABI transition in Sid, and i am encountering a
serious(IMVHO) problem: binaries get linked to *both* libstdc++5 (old
version) and libstdc++6 (new version,
* José Luis Tallón [Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:58:47 +0200]:
Hi,
(Was the direct mail necessary?)
> Any advice on how to proceed with this?? I have already succesfully
> uploaded *one* package, but Linda complained loudly on the rest...
> some library not already transitioned???
There's known trou
Hello *,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:58:47PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> I am rebuilding my KDE packages for upload, so as to fulfil the
> requirements of the C++ ABI transition in Sid, and i am encountering a
> serious(IMVHO) problem: binaries get linked to *both* libstdc++5 (old
> versio
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:47:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> so, the problem is caused by template instantiation shoving
> this symbol into the library that uses it
> the two possible solutions are (a) stop doing that, or (b)
> version the symbol
> so that's a g++ bu
Adeodato Simó wrote:
>* José Luis Tallón [Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:58:47 +0200]:
>
>Hi,
>
> (Was the direct mail necessary?)
>
>
>
>>Any advice on how to proceed with this?? I have already succesfully
>>uploaded *one* package, but Linda complained loudly on the rest...
>>some library not already tra
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> Well... this binaries *are* linked against both libstdc++5 *and*
> libstdc++6 ...
Probably something you are linking to still needs to undergo the C++
transition. Depending on what it is, just NMU its ass off...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One
Is it possible to configure a set of chroots (woody, sarge, whatever)
so that all of the chroot passwd/group DBs will stay in sync with each
other and with the host DB automaticall, so that, for example, a
useradd, usermod, or userdel, will automatically affect all of the DBs
simultaneously and sa
If I compile a trivial foo.c in the unstable chroot with gcc-3.4, and
then immediately try to run it, it segfaults. If I then exit the
chroot and re-enter, it runs fine.
(base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mkdir test
(base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot unstable
Executing shell in chroot: /org/chroo
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:39:35PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:47:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [...really interesting and insightful explanation snipped...]
> > So: g++ is embedding an unversioned weak symbol in the library in some
> > cases, which causes the lin
Hello. I have recently installed emacs-bidi on suse 9.1, kde 3.2.3. I have
it running, but when I try to type in Arabic script in the right-to-left, it
doesnt appear correctly
i.e. dont see anything on the screen, but I see
the cursor moving.
Any ideas? Thanks, and sorry for what must be such
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:04:36 +0200, Adeodato Simó uttered
> There's known trouble with this check linda producing false positives.
> Just upload if no binary of yours DT_NEEDs libstdc++5.
>
Is there really? This is the first I've heard of it, keeping in mind
I'm ignoring #179926.
Please file
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:34:51PM +0200, Vedran Furac wrote:
> Btw. why then mencoder, can't be packaged? Why are only ffmpeg -dev in
> debian: http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/ffmpeg.html?
Only ffmpeg-dev is in Debian as ffmpeg upstream recommends static linking
due to not having fixed the API/AB
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I object to the notion that
>
> | Testing is intended for Debian developers. If you are not a Debian
> | developer, then install unstable as opposed to testing.
>
> which rather permeates the document.
Yeah I agree, that's pretty wacky notion. Regardl
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 07:50 +0200, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> Wouldn't it make more sense to close bugs that hasn't recieved more info
> in X days than bugs that had their initial post in Y days?
>
> Some packages are trickier than others to create and may therefor take
> more time. As long as peo
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 12:03 +0200, Vedran Furac wrote:
> > than 600 days by tonight (or if anything goes wrong -I have an exam
>
> Before you do that:
Yeah, I know there are packages that should not be closed, probably, and
they could just hide from the view and be closed. What I really trust is
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 11:13:23AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I object to the notion that
> > | Testing is intended for Debian developers. If you are not a Debian
> > | developer, then install unstable as opposed to testing.
> > which rather permea
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:20:30PM -0700, Rob Browning wrote:
> If I compile a trivial foo.c in the unstable chroot with gcc-3.4, and
> then immediately try to run it, it segfaults.
You've hit #327780.
m68k-build: could anyone with root on crest please downgrade binutils in
all chroots to a worki
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 02:13:22AM +0200, Talal Al-Azem wrote:
> Hello. I have recently installed emacs-bidi on suse 9.1, kde 3.2.3.
Then you're on the wrong list. This is a list about Debian Development,
not about SuSE user support. For the latter, please go to
http://portal.suse.com/
--
The a
44 matches
Mail list logo
