I thought that the wiki was to be moved to mediawiki?
http://wiki.debian.net/?HelpMoveDebianWikiToMediaWiki
Will w.d.org be a replacement for w.d.net? With the latter
leading to the same page once the migration is done?
Best Regards,
Andreas
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
The wiki markup la
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:33:13AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Debian unstable & testing still carry around libc5, and some associated
> packages like altgcc, libdb1, ld.so and a few others.
Hmm, i386 only?
Bastian
--
No one may kill a man. Not for any purpose. It cannot be condoned
On 10401 March 1977, Andreas Fester wrote:
> Will w.d.org be a replacement for w.d.net?
Thats the intention of it.
> With the latter leading to the same page once the migration is done?
That depends on the one who has it right now, but would be the best, yes.
--
bye Joerg
[Clint]: I'm convin
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:52:34AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:33:13AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Debian unstable & testing still carry around libc5, and some associated
> > packages like altgcc, libdb1, ld.so and a few others.
> Hmm, i386 only?
Yes, the
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> I did not find migration scripts between the two wikis. Do they
> exist? Is someone who is familiar with both wikis interested in
> writing one?
Based on the text on the w.d.o frontpage it seems that Michael Ivey
has provided th
also sprach Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.09.03.1308
+0200]:
> Based on the text on the w.d.o frontpage it seems that Michael
> Ivey has provided the tar.gz with all the w.d.n contents.
... at which point it would make sense to discourage any further
edits to the old wi
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:16:48AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> As far as packaging goes, this means you get the following packages:
> libcurl3, providing libcurl3-openssl (linked against OpenSSL to avoid breaking
> sarge packages that use this functionality)
> libcurl3-gnutls (linked
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 08:29:03 +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> Coming directly after "wrong list" possibly helped that, although
> I didn't read it as such.
My mistake, Wouter has explained and I'm more than happy now ;-)
> Of course, now I'm posting... I disagree with Yavor that we should use
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:08:00PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > I did not find migration scripts between the two wikis. Do they
> > exist? Is someone who is familiar with both wikis interested in
> > writing o
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:10:57PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> I wonder whether with moin moin, there needs to happen anything else
> too, for example (index files rebuild or something?).
No, there are only cache files which are rebuilt if needed.
Bastian
--
Conquest is easy.
also sprach Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.09.03.1410 +0200]:
> member. I wonder whether with moin moin, there needs to happen anything else
> too, for example (index files rebuild or something?). Unfortunately I'm
From my experience, there are no indices.
--
Please do not send
On Sep 3, 2005, at 6:13 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
at which point it would make sense to discourage any further
edits to the old wiki
I have made it read-only, and am happy to use mod_rewrite to send
wiki.d.n requests to wiki.d.o ... or to change the CNAME to point
directly to wiki.d.o, as
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 14:34 +0200, W. Borgert wrote:
> And I wouldn't want that.
>
> I do not understand this discussion. Why on earth is someone
> so interested in the public availability of DDs location? This
> would only make sense when cross-connecting with other things,
> like belief, gende
Hi everyone,
I am working on packages for SDL 1.2.9, as I would like to get the buggy,
unstable version out of testing/unstable. I previously packaged SDL since
1.2.7, with Matthew Danish sponsoring the uploads. However, we have been both
busy recently and haven't had adequate time to address t
Hi
I checked your site out, thought it was great and would love
to trade links you!
You've got some great content related to the checks
resource I've just created.
In fact, I liked your site so much, I went ahead and added
you here:
http://www.checks-hq.com under http://www.checks-hq.com/checkp
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 04:04:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:24:18PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > > > - libcurl3 (GnuTLS, soname: libcurl.so.3)
>
> > > So the libcurl3 in sarge and etch will have ABI incompatibilities?
>
> > at the release ti
also sprach Michael D. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.09.03.1550 +0200]:
> I have made it read-only, and am happy to use mod_rewrite to send
This is a good idea, but only if the migration can be completed
soon. Otherwise I suggest making it writable again until a migration
path exists, and then to
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> Fact is though that libc6 has been in Debian stable for over 7
> years, since hamm was releaed mid-1998,
This suggests that we should give it three more years or something
like that.
However, if the packages aren't covered by security support anyway, it
probably doesn'
* Blars Blarson:
> Would it be acceptable to reject or drop more non-spam? (We could
> reject on CBL, getting rid of about half the spam and rejecting about
> one non-spam per day. CBL is easy to get off of.)
CBL has the advantage that you can make a local copy of the list
(which reduces name
Le samedi 03 septembre 2005 à 19:47 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> * Package name: h4h5tools
> Version : 1.2
> Upstream Author : Jay Bonci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Em, no. It is developed by the NCSA and other contributors.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
>
>> Fact is though that libc6 has been in Debian stable for over 7
>> years, since hamm was releaed mid-1998,
>
> This suggests that we should give it three more years or something
Le vendredi 02 septembre 2005 à 13:45 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez a
écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 07:07:02PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I heard OpenSSL's license is incompatible with GPL. Does this apply to
> > binary package only or both binary and source pac
reassign 326404 wnpp
severity 326404 wishlist
retitle 326404 RFP: h4h5tools -- Conversion tools between HDF4 and HDF5 formats
thanks
Le samedi 03 septembre 2005 à 12:46 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit :
> > I've just uploaded h5utils 1.10, which now contains h4fromh5 and
> > h5fromh4. Is this eno
I wrote piuparts, a package installation, upgrading, and removal
testing tool, in June, and have been running it over etch since.
Most packages succeed, and many that fail do so because something
they depend on fails. (If piuparts notices a file left behind on the
filesystem that dpkg did not know
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:53:35PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> * Unconditional use of non-essential packages in postrm when a
> package is purged (policy, 7.2, description of Depends). One
> of the most common reasons is because the package uses ucf.
Which is because
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 21:55 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:35:55PM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > > 2) Someone with the proper hardware should test the several
> > > (there's at least 8 of them IIRC) drivers that ship inside the
> > > -dri package wit
* Roger Leigh:
> We can't provide proper security support, and by now, libc5 is likely
> full of holes, so IMO it's best if we drop it. It's not like there's
> any active maintenance or we can do any serious work on it: it's dead
> code.
>
> If users need it, they can always grab a sarge (or olde
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Some packages still don't use debconf for prompting, and
> instead do silly stuff that assumed it is OK to read and
> write /dev/tty.
Actually, the policy explicitly allows this:
| The maintainer scripts are guaranteed to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Genannt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php4-clamavlib
Version : 0.11
Upstream Author : Geffrey Velasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://phpclamavlib.org
* License : GPL
Description : PHP ClamAV Lib -
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:12:43PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 04:04:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:24:18PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > > > > - libcurl3 (GnuTLS, soname: libcurl.so.3)
> > > > So the libcurl3 in
Ich werde ab 27.08.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
12.09.2005.
Bitte wenden Sie sich während meiner Abwesenheit an meine Kollegen von der
IT-Abteilung unter der Telefonnummer: +49 (8272) 86-555.
Ihre Mail wird nicht automatisch weitergeleitet!
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Sascha Einlo
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 06:59:44PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> CBL has the advantage that you can make a local copy of the list
> (which reduces name server load and avoids the name lookup latency),
> but its license is somewhat non-free. Is this a problem for Debian?
spohr is already running
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:53:35PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Reading piuparts logs en masse is tedious and I would be extremely
> happy if all developers did it for their own packages. Go ahead,
> please prevent me from becoming a top ten bug reporter. :)
Since you've already run it, are the
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:52:53AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> The second way is to use a tag to select interesting bugs -- there's not
> really much use knowing that an lsb-core bug is lsb related, but being
> able to list all the lsb-compliance bugs no matter which package, well
> that sounds m
34 matches
Mail list logo
