On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:54:33AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Sven Luther]
> > Anyway, just wanted to bring this to the attention of the general
> > public, not sure if this is the best way.
>
> Well, filing one grave bug to call attention to another grave bug seems
> a bit pointless.
We
On Thursday, 18 August 2005 07:29, Russell Coker wrote:
> For a long time we have had a broken kernel configuration in regards to SE
> Linux. Enabling audit does not change existing parts to the kernel ABI,
> merely adds new facilities (you can choose to not use it if you wish).
I filed a bug for
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:57:27AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du lundi 25 juillet 2005, vers 10:42,
> "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> > I pointed both bugs at the very start of july (or end of june?)
> > to both stable and testing sect
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 11:16:36AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> If you have nothing against a clear separation between the upstream
> source and the Debian packaging, when why are you objecting when I say
> you should have one?
I am still not objecting to a clear separation per se, just to ha
Hi,
I will prepare the upgrade from wordnet version 2.0 to 2.1. Happily upstream
added automake support. The new tarball is avialable at
http://wordnet.princeton.edu/2.1/WordNet-2.1.tar.gz
I faced the following problem:
Formerly (version 2.0) I compiled wordnet nicely with tcl8.4-dev Buil
[Jeroen Vermeulen]
> This is where we have our wires crossed: I'm still talking _only_
> about giving the Debian packaging a home in the same SCM repository.
> You'll remember that I said this is, from our point of view,
> primarily a Debian package and so the tarball is more of a byproduct.
> Whe
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:46:51 +0200, Wouter Verhelst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I disagree. If the maintainer is doing a good job on his (or her) own,
>then there is no need at all to take away their packages.
How do we find out whether a maintainer is doing his/her job well? For
example, are the
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:42:47 +0200, Wouter Verhelst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:20:32PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> You're missing an important case here: the one where the maintainer isn't
>> completely absent, but lacks the time to maintain the package in an
>> opt
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:53:44 +0200, Christian Perrier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>And now welcome to the wonderful world of angry translators, where you
>will find your stats approaching the 100% Nirvana without ever
>reaching it, thanks to the efforts of our fellow Debian developers who
>constantl
hi all,
with curl 7.14.0-5 currently in incoming, i added two new packages
libcurl3-gnutls and libcurl3-gnutls-dev. libcurl3 and libcurl3-gnutls
conflict each other since both install libcurl.so.3.0.0 in /usr/lib/.
doesn't this still scare you? then try to figure what will happen when
you insta
Il giorno gio, 18/08/2005 alle 10.38 +0200, Marc Haber ha scritto:
> As for changing the templates, are there automatisms in place to fire
> off e-mails to the translators and their mailing lists to inform them
> of changed templates?
Sure, have a look at podebconf-report-po (from po-debconf packa
On Aug 18, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> should i really let 7.14.0-5 be installed? should i change the soname of
> the gnutls variant? i suppose other packages already had this problem,
> any wise advice?
Stop building the openssl version *at all*.
Or if some broken program *real
On Thursday 18 August 2005 10:38, Marc Haber wrote:
> As for changing the templates, are there automatisms in place to fire
> off e-mails to the translators and their mailing lists to inform them
> of changed templates?
Take a look at podebconf-report-po.
pgpwaC00f2Goz.pgp
Description: PGP signa
Hi Sven...
Jose Luis Tallon email is bouncing because he seems to be using some
stupid RBL that bans every DSL user in the planet. Try sending mail from
other account and it will work.
Jose Luis is in the new maintainer process, and has been very active
with his packages, as you can see:
http://
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > [1] http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/pot
> > [2] http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/rank
>
> speacking of [2] and french :
>
> pt_BR 5745 (55%)
> portugais, tel qu'on le parle en Brésil
>
> this translation is awful .. I don
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:45:20AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> The previous maintainer, (which was not even a DD), has not been
> active since forever (well july 2004), and his email address bounces.
> Given that he did only one upload since timshell knoll left the debian
> project, and progreiser
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:41:57AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> against the wnpp pseudopackage. But it seems, from subsequent emails,
> that the maintainer is MIA. In any case, filing an RC bug about the
... is *not* MIA...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:30:36AM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> Hi Sven...
>
> Jose Luis Tallon email is bouncing because he seems to be using some
> stupid RBL that bans every DSL user in the planet. Try sending mail from
> other account and it will work.
Not likely, i mean, maintainers sho
> [1] http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/pot
> [2] http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/rank
speacking of [2] and french :
pt_BR 5745 (55%)
portugais, tel qu'on le parle en Brésil
this translation is awful .. I don't know who to bug for this, so I cc
this to debian-l10n-fren
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 05:35:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > libyaml-ruby (*)
> Needed by dnsdoctor, zonecheck, and sisu.
libyaml-ruby binary package is a dependency package built from
ruby-defaults source package and depends on libyaml-ruby1.8 (default
Ruby version); libyaml-ruby1.6 bina
Scripsit Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:42:47 +0200, Wouter Verhelst
>>Those are excellent reasons to give the package away and/or to start
>>looking for comaintainers.
> In theory, you are right. In practice, we have more than a couple of
> packages in that state with th
Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
>Hi Sven...
>
>Jose Luis Tallon email is bouncing because he seems to be using some
>stupid RBL that bans every DSL user in the planet. Try sending mail from
>other account and it will work.
>
>
Thanks, Rober... i'll have to remove that i think.
>Jose Luis is in the new
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 10:33:53AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:46:51 +0200, Wouter Verhelst
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I disagree. If the maintainer is doing a good job on his (or her) own,
> >then there is no need at all to take away their packages.
>
> How do we find o
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:40:11PM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
> Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
>
> >Hi Sven...
> >
> >Jose Luis Tallon email is bouncing because he seems to be using some
> >stupid RBL that bans every DSL user in the planet. Try sending mail from
> >other account and it will work.
>
Scripsit Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I will prepare the upgrade from wordnet version 2.0 to 2.1. Happily upstream
> added automake support. The new tarball is avialable at
> http://wordnet.princeton.edu/2.1/WordNet-2.1.tar.gz
> I faced the following problem:
> checking for Tcl con
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Henning Makholm wrote:
./configure --with-tclconfig=/usr/lib/tcl8.4
Thanks.
DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS := --with-tclconfig=/usr/lib/tcl8.4
--with-tkconfig=/usr/lib/tk8.4
finally did the trick. ;-)
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> Maybe you are right with progsreiserfs, it is not my favorite package to
> fsck my filesystem, it has lots of bugs, but if there are fixes we
> should let Jose Luis or someone to fix them.
By the way, why do we have two separate packages for reiserf
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:42:47 +0200, Wouter Verhelst
>
> >>Those are excellent reasons to give the package away and/or to start
> >>looking for comaintainers.
>
> > In theory, you are right. In practice, we have more than a coupl
Em Qui, 2005-08-18 às 08:41 +0200, Andreas Tille escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> is there any reason that
>
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=maint&data=tille%40debian.org&archive=no
>
> shows two archived bugs? I guess the archived bugs are shown also on other
> queries, but thi
Sven Luther wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:40:11PM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
>
>
>
>Ok, but now that sarge is released, what are the plans for etch ? The question
>is if i keep parted without reiserfs support, or if i add it again ?
>
>
If there really is interest in support for Reis
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 05:37:48PM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:40:11PM +0200, Jos? Luis Tall?n wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >Ok, but now that sarge is released, what are the plans for etch ? The
> >question
> >is if i keep parted without reiserfs
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:57:18 +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Well, in fact, there was a quite harsh discussion re: progsreiserfs,
>> including upstream Hans Reiser himself.
> Mmm, i was under the impression that there are two different things,
> progreiserfs and reiserfsprog, one
Hi,
I've just set up a new site about e-commerce solutions, and when I was
researching the subject, I found your site. I think your site has
got some fantastic content, and it would be a great resource for
my visitors. Would it be alright if I traded links with you?
I was so excited about the
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:02:21AM -0600, Hubert Chan wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:57:18 +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> Well, in fact, there was a quite harsh discussion re: progsreiserfs,
> >> including upstream Hans Reiser himself.
>
> > Mmm, i was under the impression t
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:27:29PM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> > Maybe you are right with progsreiserfs, it is not my favorite package to
> > fsck my filesystem, it has lots of bugs, but if there are fixes we
> > should let Jose Luis or someone to
Hi,
Please CC: me as I am not on this list!
As I upgraded rscheme today to the final non-beta version I ran into
problems with the version numbering.
Eg:
old version (0.7.3.3.b30-1) in unstable >= new version (0.7.3.3-1)
Upstream names the betas for 0.7.3.3 as 0.7.3.3.b1-b30 - as you no doubt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luciano Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: opencvs
Version : unknown, posible release: 1st Sep
Upstream Author : Jean-François Brousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.opencvs.org/
* License : BSD
Descript
also sprach Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.18.2346 +0200]:
> Please CC: me as I am not on this list!
Please consider setting Mail-Followup-To accordingly.
> Upstream names the betas for 0.7.3.3 as 0.7.3.3.b1-b30 - as you no
> doubt already guessed.
This is why we now have the ~ operato
also sprach Luciano Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.18.2350 +0200]:
> OpenCVS is a FREE implementation of the Concurrent Versions System, the
What's non-free about the current implementation?
> most popular open source revision control software.
And among the most horrible ones.
I oppose to
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:54:45AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Luciano Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.18.2350 +0200]:
> > OpenCVS is a FREE implementation of the Concurrent Versions System, the
>
> What's non-free about the current implementation?
>
I think that the original i
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 06:50:47PM -0300, Luciano Bello wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Luciano Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: opencvs
> Version : unknown, posible release: 1st Sep
> Upstream Author : Jean-Fran?ois Brousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Based on what I've seen in other threads, the order in which packages
get built on a buildd is a function of, among perhaps other factors,
its priority and section. I uploaded icu several days ago and have
watched other packages (including my other uploads) sneak in front of
it that shouldn't hav
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:40:30PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Based on what I've seen in other threads, the order in which packages
> get built on a buildd is a function of, among perhaps other factors,
> its priority and section. I uploaded icu several days ago and have
> watched other packa
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:52:41AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.18.2346 +0200]:
> > Upstream names the betas for 0.7.3.3 as 0.7.3.3.b1-b30 - as you no
> > doubt already guessed.
> This is why we now have the ~ operator.
Is that ready for use?
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:00:41AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> with curl 7.14.0-5 currently in incoming, i added two new packages
> libcurl3-gnutls and libcurl3-gnutls-dev. libcurl3 and libcurl3-gnutls
> conflict each other since both install libcurl.so.3.0.0 in /usr/lib/.
If the problem i
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 185 (new: 10)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 90 (new: 1)
Total number of packages request
46 matches
Mail list logo
