Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ki-Heon Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mls
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Byoung-young La <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://kldp.net/projects/mls
* License : GPL
Description : Mls is a linux clone of Md
Hello,
I agree with you, that the documentation review team should have the
debtags approach in mind. Also debtags-edit being able to edit
descriptions would be desirable - however someone would need to
implement this, and Enrico is very busy ;-). Being able to edit the
package information in one
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Joey,
> Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>sane-backends
>tilp
I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Develop
Joey Hess wrote:
> Unless, of course, it's a shell library that would like to be reasonably
> portable without being wholey crippled by lack features that have been
> in every shell worth the name for ages.
I know that the debconf library used "local" (#242011) and I agree
that "local" is an exam
In short:
The udev from sid breaks ugrade process because it doesn't support kernels <
2.6.12. There is no kernel 2.6.12 packages in the distro, yet. As far as the
more packages depends on newer udev (i.e. alsa-base, usbmount) I have to hold
on more and more packages.
See Bug#317332. It seems
On 03/08/05, Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In short:
>
> The udev from sid breaks ugrade process because it doesn't support kernels <
> 2.6.12. There is no kernel 2.6.12 packages in the distro, yet. As far as the
> more packages depends on newer udev (i.e. alsa-base, usbmount) I ha
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Look down the thread -- your question was answered:
>
> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 16:03:03 +0200
> From: Arjan Oosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> It is, the orig.tar.gz is created if you do a
> FORCEEXPORT=yes svn-buildpackage
Works
W Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:49:54PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>> Look down the thread -- your question was answered:
>>
>> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 16:03:03 +0200
>> From: Arjan Oosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> It is, the orig.tar.gz is created if you
Hello,
I am trying to build my own package (containing only few shell
scripts) to make easier the system maintainance specific to our
department. I followed the instruction in the Debian New Maintainer's
Guide, but I probably misunderstood something, since I have the
following problems:
* I
Clément Stenac wrote:
> When several packages have more or less the same goal (in the news case,
> there are many news grabers and local servers), should their
> descriptions include a comparison to the other ones ?
I'd say yes: This information will be /very/ useful to the user.
>
> I don't th
A random observation: Every day, a few ITP's come in to -devel, and
often their descriptions need work. If we can't even keep up with the
new packages entering the archive, we don't stand much chance of
catching up with the over 10,000 description backlog already in the archive.
And, I suspect it
(You may - or may not - have more luck on [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
that kind of questions.)
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote:
> * I store all the scripts in a tarball,
Do you mean the .orig.tar.gz or do you mean a tarball in the unpacked
Debian sources (the result of d
Joe Smith wrote:
> How about if it meets the folowing critieria:
>
> 1. it has been in testing for 10 days (been in sid at least 20 days)
This means the security hole was disclosed at least 20 days ago,
probably more.
> 2. Iff it fixes a critical security problem, uploaded to security (This
> re
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
> only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.
You can do that only if those old debconf questions were never in a stable
release (i.e. they existed only during 'sid'
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote:
> * since the pakcage contains only few shell scripts, it should be
> architecture-independent. Therefore, I specified "Architecture: any" in
> the "control" file and also moved all the action in the "rules" file
> into the binary-in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek skrev:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:01:39PM +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote:
>> Andreas Barth skrev:
>>> * Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050802 13:41]:
And even then, appearently the DAM works like this: I
approve person X, let
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:58:33PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> I was finally able to acquire an SSP Build Host for you.
> If you are still interest. Please contact me.
A bit quick off the mark there, Greg! I think I've replied to all
your previous mails within a day or two...?
Anyway for
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 12:56:36PM +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote:
> Steve Langasek skrev:
> > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:01:39PM +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote:
> >> Andreas Barth skrev:
> >>> * Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050802 13:41]:
> And even then, appearently the DAM works like this: I
>
Dear
Sirs
We are a trading company in Bangladesh, trading as
agents for textile raw materials,primarily raw cotton and Polyester staple
fibre, plastics etc.
Our company has been in operation since 1986 and we
have slowly but steadily grown to reasonable size with steady gro
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Since so many packages need to be fixed, I may resort to additional
> private mails (or d-d-a mail) before I begin filing bug reports. The
A mail to d-d-a would probably be a good idea in any case - I can't be
the only person who's neve
Dear Debian Support,
We have just bought a brand news Dimension 5100 which contain a built-in Intel E100/V ethernet card (Windows driver : e100b325.sys).
- While installing Debian La Sarge 3.1r0a the process did not recognize any Network Ethernet card.
We have tried several proposed driver : no
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 04:12:40AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> More likely, the implication is that giving someone the necessary write
> access to LDAP is *equivalent* to giving them root access on the Debian
> servers.
No, only if the person is allowed to write the uidNumber entry.
> You'd ne
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 13:36, Jean-Matthieu Buton wrote:
> Dear Debian Support,
This is not a user support list.
> We have just bought a brand news Dimension 5100 which contain a
> built-in Intel E100/V ethernet card (Windows driver : e100b325.sys).
For installation issues, please file an i
(debian-user@lists.debian.org looks more appropriate. Please send
followups there _and_ to me. debian-devel is for development issues
and debian-user-french for user support issues in French.)
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Jean-Matthieu Buton wrote:
> We have just bought a brand new
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:03:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 17:35, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
> > We have some patches that have already be open sourced (ICH7) and are
> > in the 2.6.11 and above kernels.
> >
> > What we need to do is to provide a Driver Update Disk so that so
Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> gnutls changed their ABI again.
...
> Gnutls in Debian is properly versioned (as opposed to Upstream, which
> dropped the versioning script for no good reason), and thus I am
The change was discussed on the mailing list:
http://thread.gmane.
Michael writes:
> Adam, I'm kind of curious what you mean by that
I took it for a joke.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Simon Josefsson:
> > Gnutls in Debian is properly versioned (as opposed to Upstream, which
> > dropped the versioning script for no good reason), and thus I am
>
> The change was discussed on the mailing list:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/464
>
> If you
Benjamin Mesing wrote:
However I have to say that I disagree with you in some points. You are
correct, that the package description should be as non technical as
possbile, without underminining the usefullness of it.
Yes, I agree. Instead of the "absolutes" I proposed, perhaps it still
make
--
ACHTUNG: Dies ist eine automatisch generierte Antwort
--
Vielen Dank für Ihre Anfrage an Hood.de.
Bitte beachten Sie, dass die E-Mail Adressen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMA
Hello again,
thanks to all who replied to my previous mail. Using your advice I
solved/correct all the problems/bugs, but still there is one thing I
don't understand:
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote:
* I store all the scripts in a
Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The change was discussed on the mailing list:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/464
>>
>> If you had reported this problem to us, we would fix it.
>>
> Sorry about that -- I didn't read the list consistently.
> M
Hello
We got thousands software at low low price
visit us now
erevansoft.net
minibike
On 03-Aug-05, 04:11 (CDT), Adam Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it has been renamed from kernel-image to linux-image
Oh, sweet Jesus.
Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant "Feh!" to the genius who came
up with that idea.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:15, Steve Greenland wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant "Feh!" to the genius who came
> up with that idea.
Did you even think of asking for the rationale behind the name change?
Hint: check the archives of the kernel mailing list.
Cheers,
FJP
pgpyA
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> On 8/2/05, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unsolicited Commercial Email. Please pay the standard $2000 fee for
> > advertisments on Debian mailing lists.
>
> Adam, I'm kind of curious what you mean by that. What, if any, actual
> or propo
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, John Hasler wrote:
> Michael writes:
> > Adam, I'm kind of curious what you mean by that
>
> I took it for a joke.
So you take all spam for a joke?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/3/05, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:15, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant "Feh!" to the genius who came
> > up with that idea.
>
> Did you even think of asking for the rationale behind the name change?
>
> Hint: check
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 18:48 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:15, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant "Feh!" to the genius who came
> > up with that idea.
>
> Did you even think of asking for the rationale behind the name change?
>
> Hint: c
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 19:04, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> ... which, for the lazy and/or impatient starts here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/07/msg00192.html
To be honest, I was thinking more of:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/05/msg00403.html
pgpwqNMtXaRDY.pgp
Descr
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 14:02 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Closing, it isn't a bash against the kernel team. It isn't my point,
> my problem is with this "didn't you know, read X stupid!" approach.
I don't think pointing at the mailing list was an unreasonable reaction
to the "genius" comment, whi
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 19:16 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 August 2005 19:04, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > ... which, for the lazy and/or impatient starts here:
>
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/07/msg00192.html
>
> To be honest, I was thinking more of:
> http://lists.debian
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 19:02, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 8/3/05, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:15, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > > Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant "Feh!" to the genius who
> > > came up with that idea.
> >
> > Did you even think
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 04:42:33PM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote:
>>> * I store all the scripts in a tarball,
>> If you are using the .orig.tar.gz directly, you have misunderstood
>> the structure of a Debi
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:23:14AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:18:01PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
>>> Téléchargez le ici !
>> Non merci, je ne suis pas intéressé. Par contre, Debian
Am 2005-08-03 11:53:33, schrieb Adam Heath:
> So you take all spam for a joke?
YES me too, because I do not know, what I can do with p***s
for a longer thing, bought diploms (I have already BAC +12)
and I do not need millions of Dollars.
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:18:01PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > -
> > Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
> > Téléchargez le ici !
>
> Non merci, je ne suis pas intéressé. Par contre, Debian est assez
> opposé à ce qu
On 8/3/05, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > Closing, it isn't a bash against the kernel team. It isn't my point,
> > my problem is with this "didn't you know, read X stupid!" approach.
> > Just reply or let anyone else help the developer or user asking us.
> > Didn't he asked the ra
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 02:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:32:44PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > Unsolicited Commercial Email. Please pay the standard $2000 fee for
> > advertisments on Debian mailing lists.
>
> Y'know, it's fine if you think that Bruce's mail was inappro
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 14:18:01 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 14:02 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> Closing, it isn't a bash against the kernel team. It isn't my point,
>> my problem is with this "didn't you know, read X stupid!" approach.
>
> I don't think pointing at the mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:15, Steve Greenland wrote:
>> Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant "Feh!" to the genius who came
>> up with that idea.
>
> Did you even think of asking for the rationale behind the name change?
>
On 03-Aug-05, 11:48 (CDT), Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:15, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant "Feh!" to the genius who came
> > up with that idea.
>
> Did you even think of asking for the rationale behind the name change?
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:32:44PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> Unsolicited Commercial Email. Please pay the standard $2000 fee for
> advertisments on Debian mailing lists.
It appears as though this fee is no longer policy[1].. Looks like you're
going to have to block Bruce from posting and/or re
Anders Breindahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 03 August 2005 02:16, Steve
> Langasek wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:32:44PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
>> > Unsolicited Commercial Email. Please pay the standard $2000 fee for
>> > advertisments on Debian mailing lists.
>> Y'know,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Y'know, it's fine if you think that Bruce's mail was inappropriate for the
> list, and there's nothing wrong with saying so; but claiming that a message
> that isn't selling anything is UCE, and attempting to enforce against a
> member of the community
"Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8/2/05, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Unsolicited Commercial Email. Please pay the standard $2000 fee for
>> advertisments on Debian mailing lists.
>
> Adam, I'm kind of curious what you mean by that. What, if any, actual
> or prop
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: x3270
Version : 3.3.4
Upstream Author : Paul Mattes
* URL : http://x3270.bgp.nu
* License : other
Description : IBM 3270 terminal emulator for the X Window System
x327
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sim4
Version : 2003.09.21
Upstream Author : Liliana Florea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.bx.psu.edu/miller_lab/
* License : GPL
Description : tool
hi,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:49:31AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Unless, of course, it's a shell library that would like to be reasonably
> > portable without being wholey crippled by lack features that have been
> > in every shell worth the name for ages.
>
> I know that t
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 08:16 pm, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Unsolicited Commercial Email. Please pay the standard $2000 fee for
> > advertisments on Debian mailing lists.
>
> Y'know, it's fine if you think that Bruce's mail was inappropriate for the
> list, and there's nothing wrong with saying
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:51:19AM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> In short:
>
> The udev from sid breaks ugrade process because it doesn't support kernels <
> 2.6.12. There is no kernel 2.6.12 packages in the distro, yet. As far as the
> more packages depends on newer udev (i.e. alsa-base, usb
This one time, at band camp, sean finney said:
> hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:49:31AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Unless, of course, it's a shell library that would like to be reasonably
> > > portable without being wholey crippled by lack features that have been
> >
62 matches
Mail list logo
