Le dimanche 10 juillet 2005 à 14:01 +0900, Junichi Uekawa a écrit :
> > The point of the LGPL is to avoid such incompatibilities. If you can
> > link it with proprietary code, you can also link it to code under the
> > OpenSSL license.
>
> Hmm... you can use a LGPL library, but a LGPL library cann
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Dpkg-cross is a tool to create cross-compile environment, useful to
>> > cross-compile debian packages and other software.
>> > One of dpkg-cross's functions is to process a native library or libdev
>> > package for some arch, and turn it in
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The multiarch and FHS proposals say that ${prefix}/${target}/* would
> pollute the / and /usr directories while the lib and include subdirs
> already have tons of files/dirs and the extra dirs won't matter.
>
> Matter of opinion probably.
Of cours
* Matthias Klose:
> With today's dinstall run, new gcc/g++ packages are entering the
> archives and GCC 4.0 is the default gcc/g++. Starting from now, please
> DON'T upload any C++ code, which build-depends on a library written in
> C++ that is not yet converted to the new C++ ABI. Details for th
On 7/12/05, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Matthias Klose:
>
> > With today's dinstall run, new gcc/g++ packages are entering the
> > archives and GCC 4.0 is the default gcc/g++. Starting from now, please
> > DON'T upload any C++ code, which build-depends on a library written in
> >
Le lundi 11 juillet 2005 à 17:57 +0200, Eduard Bloch a écrit :
> > Did you try to check where the problem is ? Did you try to prepare a
> > patch for us to apply ?
>
> It's not my beer, but... did you ask for one? Did you ask for help at
> all (since there seem to be real problems, my last request
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: bum
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author : Fabio Marzocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.marzocca.net/linux/bum.html
* License : GPL
Description : tool to m
> "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > Dpkg-cross is a tool to create cross-compile environment, useful to
> >> > cross-compile debian packages and other software.
> >> > One of dpkg-cross's functions is to process a native library or
> >> > libdev package for some arch, and
it was not my intention to state that Debian is about free beer, just
that I would need
some guidance and I am willing to pay if there is a DD in stockholm
who is interested
in giving assistance. I'd prefer a face-2-face "lesson" that's why I
offer money/beer in the
first place. (but also because I
* Olaf van der Spek:
>> I don't know if it's related, but roughly since the GCC 4.0 upload, I
>> get strange assembler warnings for perfectly valid C++ programs:
>
> I got them too but it seems they're now 'fixed' in unstable.
Seems to be the case, thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The multiarch and FHS proposals say that ${prefix}/${target}/* would
>> pollute the / and /usr directories while the lib and include subdirs
>> already have tons of files/dirs and the extra dirs won't matter.
>
> I think that following years-o
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 11.51, Mikael Olenfalk wrote:
> it was not my intention to state that Debian is about free beer
Sorry - you misunderstood me. I tried to make a (bad) joke, nothing more.
greetings
-- vbi
--
featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/smtp
pgpXlfH0UtbyY.pgp
Description: PGP sign
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 11:51:27AM +0200, Mikael Olenfalk wrote:
> it was not my intention to state that Debian is about free beer, just
> that I would need
> some guidance and I am willing to pay if there is a DD in stockholm
> who is interested
> in giving assistance. I'd prefer a face-2-face "le
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:15:42 +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> Boot-Up Manager is a graphical tool to allow easy configuration
> of init services in user and system runlevels, as far as changing
> Start/Stop services priority.
Consulting the documentation...
> 1. Activate a de-activated script
Hi,
I found three packages in my system they name itself in the Depends
field: libbonoboui2-0, libgail-common and libtextwrap1
What's the reason for a package to depend on itself? This makes it hard
for deborphan to detect them as orphaned. Should check lintian on this?
Have a nice day, Jörg.
--
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:13:17 +0200, Raphael Hertzog
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Le lundi 11 juillet 2005 à 09:17 +0200, Marc Haber a écrit :
>> Same goes for tracker ticket #301374 - open since three months, not a
>> bit of reply.
>
>I never said we were perfect. But alioth is not "unmaintained".
> >> The multiarch and FHS proposals say that ${prefix}/${target}/* would
> >> pollute the / and /usr directories while the lib and include subdirs
> >> already have tons of files/dirs and the extra dirs won't matter.
> >
> > I think that following years-old de-facto standard of
> > cross-compilati
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 04:04:10PM -0400, Elizabeth Cherry wrote:
> http://master.debian.org/~ajt/oldbugs.html is linked to from the
> Developer's Corner on the web page, and I like to look at it when
> looking for bugs to poke at. But it hasn't been updated since
> September 2004.
It's been he
Joerg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I found three packages in my system they name itself in the Depends
> field: libbonoboui2-0, libgail-common and libtextwrap1
>
> What's the reason for a package to depend on itself? This makes it hard
> for deborphan to detect them as orphaned. Sh
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> The multiarch and FHS proposals say that ${prefix}/${target}/* would
>> >> pollute the / and /usr directories while the lib and include subdirs
>> >> already have tons of files/dirs and the extra dirs won't matter.
>> >
>> > I think that fo
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Joerg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I found three packages in my system they name itself in the Depends
> > field: libbonoboui2-0, libgail-common and libtextwrap1
> >
> > What's the reason for a package to depend on itself?
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> Joerg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I found three packages in my system they name itself in the Depends
>> > field: libbonoboui2-0, libgail-common and libtextwrap1
>> >
>>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:06:29PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Nevertheless, we're indeed currently working on such a framework as
> you mention. On our list of tests to run are currently install tests
> (with liw's piuparts), rebuild tests (with pbuilder I think) and
> lintian (perhaps linda
I approve
Drew Parsons wrote:
> I remember some of us belatedly suggested sarge should be Debian 4.0,
> though it was too late (May?) to accept that.
(it was me)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On 20050708T181259-0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
>>What signal is meant by 3.1 versus 4.0? Does your intended audience
>>have any concept of the distinction?
>
> The usual distinction, when it is made, is that bumping the major number
> indicates a disruptive upgrade
On 7/12/05, Andrea Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > On 20050708T181259-0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
> >>What signal is meant by 3.1 versus 4.0? Does your intended audience
> >>have any concept of the distinction?
> >
> > The usual distinction, when it is made,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:44:07PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> On 11/07/2005 Max Vozeler wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:33:12PM +0200, Javier wrote:
> > > - Encrypted root/swap on the d-i installation.
> >
> > I'm planning to work on this- probably during the next few weeks. I hope
> > to
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:15:42 +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> > Boot-Up Manager is a graphical tool to allow easy configuration
> > of init services in user and system runlevels, as far as changing
> > Start/Stop services priority.
>
> Consulting the documentation...
> > 1. Activate a de-ac
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Missing shlibs.local file and binaries in the lib package?
> >
> > That would be only a "reason" for a build-depends on itself, but not for
> >
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:22:30AM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found three packages in my system they name itself in the Depends
> field: libbonoboui2-0, libgail-common and libtextwrap1
>
> What's the reason for a package to depend on itself? This makes it hard
> for deborphan to detec
* Marc Haber:
>>I never said we were perfect. But alioth is not "unmaintained".
>
> A project which leaves bug reports completely uncommented (and
> unfixed) for three months is unmaintained.
Not necessarily. It's very poor communication, and a huge problem.
But without inside knowledge, you can
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexandre Fayolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-constraint
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Alexandre Fayolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.logilab.org/projects/constraint
* License : GPL
Descripti
Hi,
> > > The point of the LGPL is to avoid such incompatibilities. If you can
> > > link it with proprietary code, you can also link it to code under the
> > > OpenSSL license.
> >
> > Hmm... you can use a LGPL library, but a LGPL library cannot use
> > a non-compliant library. That's how LGPL
On 12/07/2005 Max Vozeler wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:44:07PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> > please consider to support luks too. the current cryptsetup package
> > supports only dm-crypt from christophe saout. luks from clemens
> > fruhwirth has many advantages over plain dm-crypt, and i g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: alps-full1
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Matthias Troyer et al.
* URL : http://alps.comp-phys.org/
* License : custom non-free (see below)
Description : Algorith
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Quite untrue. The LGPL doesn't make any difference between those two
>> cases.
>>
>
> But that will disallow one option that should be granted through
> the use of LGPL: the option to use GPL.
Not really. You can still take libssh and mak a derived w
On Monday 11 July 2005 22.18, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Monday 04 July 2005 11.51, Horms wrote:
> >> I am not sure about 3.4's ability to compile 2.4.27, but
> >> it seems unlikely to me that all of the gcc versions you mention above
> >> will be omit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Jordens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: alps-applications1
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Matthias Troyer et al.
* URL : http://alps.comp-phys.org/
* License : custom non-free cite-me/non-commercial (see belo
NMU's for all C++ libraries, not depending on any other C++ library
are now allowed.
Matthias
Matthias Klose writes:
> For the time until all C++ libraries are converted, we use the
> following NMU policy for uploads related to the C++ ABI change:
>
> - - 0-day NMU's allowed for all C++ libra
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Monday 04 July 2005 11.51, Horms wrote:
>>> I am not sure about 3.4's ability to compile 2.4.27, but
>>> it seems unlikely to me that all of the gcc versions you mention above
>>> will be
Hi.
As many of you might remember, back in 2003 Matthew Wilcox created
an overview page for the last g++ transition from 2.95 to 3.2/3.3.
You can still find it at
http://people.debian.org/~willy/gcc-transition/ (but the log file
seems to have suffered during the harddrive failure of gluck)
I thin
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:27:34PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I think this has proven very helpful so I set up a only slightly
> modified version for the current transition from 3.3 to 4.0.
> You can find it at http://people.debian.org/~djpig/gcc-transition/
I think the addition of 4.0 numb
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 21:27, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Hi.
>
> As many of you might remember, back in 2003 Matthew Wilcox created
> an overview page for the last g++ transition from 2.95 to 3.2/3.3.
> You can still find it at
> http://people.debian.org/~willy/gcc-transition/ (but the log file
>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 09:50:38PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 July 2005 21:27, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > As many of you might remember, back in 2003 Matthew Wilcox created
> > an overview page for the last g++ transition from 2.95 to 3.2/3.3.
> > You can still find it at
> > http:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 02:43:36PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:27:34PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I think this has proven very helpful so I set up a only slightly
> > modified version for the current transition from 3.3 to 4.0.
> > You can find it at http:/
---
DebianTux23 lädt Sie ein, ein kostenloses Google Mail-Konto einzurichten.
Um diese Einladung anzunehmen und sich ein Konto einzurichten, gehen Sie zu
http://mail.google.com/mail/a-77659e1130-3d75571f5c-8a62303431
Wenn Sie Ihr
---
DebianTux23 lädt Sie ein, ein kostenloses Google Mail-Konto einzurichten.
Um diese Einladung anzunehmen und sich ein Konto einzurichten, gehen Sie zu
http://mail.google.com/mail/a-77659e1130-f128aeaa2a-0c1575868a
Wenn Sie Ihr
---
DebianTux23 lädt Sie ein, ein kostenloses Google Mail-Konto einzurichten.
Um diese Einladung anzunehmen und sich ein Konto einzurichten, gehen Sie zu
http://mail.google.com/mail/a-77659e1130-3390970a57-c72355d3a8
Wenn Sie Ihr
Hi Martin,
I just read this article[1] in the SMH. I think there are a few points that
you should keep when talking to the press in future:
- don't "slag" them off / don't complain aobut the press
- Just talk about Debian, unless explicitly asked for comments
on other t
On 12-Jul-05, 17:40 (CDT), Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>[deleted]
Hi Anand,
I just read your post to debian-devel, and here is something that you
should keep in mind when criticizing volunteers who spend a lot of their
personal time doing a thankless job:
- Don't sla
Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just read this article[1] in the SMH. I think there are a few points that
> you should keep when talking to the press in future:
>
> - don't "slag" them off / don't complain aobut the press
>
> - Just talk about Debian, unless explicitly a
Why are online drugs popular
http://hynm.rou2dark6jrhdar.muckerhbdil.com
The least deviation from truth will be multiplied later.
Hatred may be engendered by good deeds as well as bad ones.
Dreams are wishes your heart makes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On 13/07/05, Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I just read this article[1] in the SMH. I think there are a few points that
> you should keep when talking to the press in future:
>
> - don't "slag" them off / don't complain aobut the press
I don't see how his commen
Hi all,
Having managed to confirm on irc that the maintainer for GGI
(libggi/libgii) is sufficiently MIA, I'm now trying to work my way
towards understanding the old packaging and then updating the packages
to the newer upstream release(s).
Being new to packaging, I intend to to join the deb
heave
First we would like to say Thank You to al| of our avid
readers! We have had great success over the last few
months and have become one of the most wide|y read
investment newsletters in the wor|d. We have accomplished
this by providing timely, accurate financial information with
proven resul
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this has proven very helpful so I set up a only slightly
> modified version for the current transition from 3.3 to 4.0.
> You can find it at http://people.debian.org/~djpig/gcc-transition/
Does anyone have a script to sort the list by Depend
56 matches
Mail list logo
