Re: new cogito package, OpenSSL license issue resolved

2005-05-14 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:44:05PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > I've updated the Cogito package to compile against the upstream-included > GPL SHA1 implementation lifted from Mozilla, instead of the (possibly) > GPL-incompatible OpenSSL code. Thanks to Florian Weimer and Anibal > Monsalve S

Re: packages missing from sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Thomas Hood
On Wed, 11 May 2005 12:30:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Completely MIA maintainers are one part of the problem. > > But then there's the class of maintainers who manage to upload a new > upstream version and perhaps fix some RC bugs every few months but are > not able to properly handle all bug

eSecure Online Pharmacies

2005-05-14 Thread Dorothy
refill your prescription online http://jiga.pmsit8pi4hpxbqp.meshednlngh.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello

2005-05-14 Thread Olga
Hello!!! My name is Olga. I live in Russia. I have seen your profile and decided to get to know you better. A few words about myself: I am searching serious relationships - if you want just to play with me I ask you not to answer on this letter! But if you want to find LOVE -my email: [EMAIL PR

Re: RC bug #308477 and MIA maintainer (?)

2005-05-14 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:59:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > severity 308477 important > thanks > > You are correct that it is a policy violation. However, not all policy > violations are release-critical for a given release; see Maybe I will sound procedural or something, but I would reall

Re: RC bug #308477 and MIA maintainer (?)

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 05:59:07AM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:59:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > severity 308477 important > > thanks > > You are correct that it is a policy violation. However, not all policy > > violations are release-critical for a given rel

Re: RC bug #308477 and MIA maintainer (?)

2005-05-14 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 04:23:02AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 05:59:07AM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:59:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > severity 308477 important > > > thanks > > > > You are correct that it is a policy violation.

Re: new cogito package, OpenSSL license issue resolved

2005-05-14 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:44:05PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > > I've updated the Cogito package to compile against the upstream-included > > GPL SHA1 implementation lifted from Mozilla, instead of the (possibly) > > GPL-incompatible OpenSSL co

alioth mailing list moderation broken for extended period of time

2005-05-14 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, since more than a month now, mailing list moderation on alioth is broken. $LIST-admin bounces, and so the list admin does not receive any notice about messages being in the moderation queue, unnecessarily delaying message running times and making communication harder. A corresponding ticket i

Re: alioth mailing list moderation broken for extended period of time

2005-05-14 Thread Martin Mewes
Hi Marc, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > So I need to ask here whether it would be a better idea to move > mailing lists away from obviously broken, unmaintained and > unsupported infrastructure like alioth currently is. If there is any $LIST-admin-position somewhat orphaned I would hap

Re: packages missing from sarge

2005-05-14 Thread =?iso-8859-1?q?Fran=E7ois-Denis_Gonthier?=
On May 7, 2005 09:03 pm, Joey Hess wrote: > erlang Erlang and the related erlang-manpages and erlang-doc-html are being put up-to-date by me. I have a package ready which should be uploaded by my sponsor in the coming week. I guess that means that the package that reverse depends on Erlang wo

=?windows-1251?B?xfm4IOLu7/Du8fs=?=

2005-05-14 Thread Vadim Petrunin
Всем доброго времени суток Спасибо за отвёты на прёдыдущёё письмо, но я, правда, не увидел ответов на 1-й вопрос. Сделал вывод, что очевидно ответ на вопрос #2 относится также и ко 1-му вопросу. На всякий случай спрошу еще раз, с уточнениями: Для того чтобы перевести что-то на русский язык необ

Please, sorry

2005-05-14 Thread Vadim Petrunin
Sorry! I have mixed addresses up in my previous message. It was not for debian-devel Vadim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: packages missing from sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 05:44:33PM -0400, François-Denis Gonthier wrote: > On May 7, 2005 09:03 pm, Joey Hess wrote: > > erlang > Erlang and the related erlang-manpages and erlang-doc-html are being put > up-to-date by me. I have a package ready which should be uploaded by my > sponsor in the

Against which package should this go?

2005-05-14 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
I have recently come to the conclusion that it would be nice for messages that are to the BTS and get reflected via email have a URL for the bug itself. I thought I would file a wishlist bug for it, but I am not sure against which pacakge it should be filed. Is there a BTS package? Would that be

Re: Against which package should this go?

2005-05-14 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > I have recently come to the conclusion that it would be > nice for messages that are to the BTS and get reflected > via email have a URL for the bug itself. I thought I > would file a wishlist bug for it, but I am not sure > against which pacakge it should be filed. Is

Re: Against which package should this go?

2005-05-14 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Roberto C. Sanchez] > If the BTS sends out an email (to -devel, the submitter, wherever) > that is a reflection of a new bug report or something that was added > to a bgu report, a URL should be included. That is, if I submit a > bug report and it is assigned #123456 and that report is then sent

Re: Against which package should this go?

2005-05-14 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Roberto C. Sanchez] > >>If the BTS sends out an email (to -devel, the submitter, wherever) >>that is a reflection of a new bug report or something that was added >>to a bgu report, a URL should be included. That is, if I submit a >>bug report and it is assigned #123456 a

Re: Against which package should this go?

2005-05-14 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Maybe its completely superfluous, but I thought I would > at least bring it up. I think it is a good idea. Even if we dont move to a web based system there is no harm to support us web browser users a bit :) And consider especially the end-user. Greet

gwrapguile: Question about suitability of changes for sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Andreas Rottmann
[Resent message, first one seemingly didn't get thru] Hi! I prepared an upload for gwrapguile and fix #308499. The changelog looks like this: * Move /usr/bin/g-wrap-config to libgwrapguile-dev (closes: #308499). * Include manpage for g-wrap-config. * Make libgwrapguile-dev depend on guile,

Re: adduser: what is the difference between --disabled-password and--disabled-login

2005-05-14 Thread Brian May
> "Marc" == Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marc> If that option is switched off, an account created with Marc> adduser --disabled-login is impossible to ssh into (log Marc> entry "sshd[14704]: User testuser not allowed because Marc> account is locked") while an account

Re: adduser: what is the difference between --disabled-password and--disabled-login

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 11:19:12AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > > "Marc" == Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Marc> If that option is switched off, an account created with > Marc> adduser --disabled-login is impossible to ssh into (log > Marc> entry "sshd[14704]: User testuse

Re: adduser: what is the difference between --disabled-password and--disabled-login

2005-05-14 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 07:22:56PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I also think it would be really "cool"(TM) if the system could display > > a message "password expired" or "account is locked" if the user > > successfully authenticates to the system but is unable to authorize > > the user to use

Re: adduser: what is the difference between --disabled-password and--disabled-login

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:33:28PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 07:22:56PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > I also think it would be really "cool"(TM) if the system could display > > > a message "password expired" or "account is locked" if the user > > > successfully auth

Re: RC bug #308477 and MIA maintainer (?)

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 07:33:01AM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 04:23:02AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 05:59:07AM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:59:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > severity 308477 importa

Re: alioth mailing list moderation broken for extended period of time

2005-05-14 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, 14 May 2005 22:06:42 +0200, Martin Mewes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : >> So I need to ask here whether it would be a better idea to move >> mailing lists away from obviously broken, unmaintained and >> unsupported infrastructure like alioth currently is