Re: Free Game Console

On Saturday 30 April 2005 07.54, Dillinger wrote: > Hi, > I invented Macromedia Flash. [...] Can I get one of those things your're smoking? -- vbi -- Could this mail be a fake? (Answer: No! - http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/intro) pgp2E1218gns7.pgp Description: PGP signature

Compiling on a Debian machine

Hello, How do I use a Debian machine, such as bruckner, to test a source package by compiling for powerpc? I see bruckner has a sarge chroot. What's the magic command to start the build in this chroot? I know of pbuilder -- though I haven't used it much admittedly -- but there is no pbuilder comma

Re: Upgrade dependencies of a package

Shaun Jackman wrote: > Does apt-get have a command to upgrade all the dependencies of a > package? Currently I use 'apt-cache show package' and upgrade each of > the dependencies one by one, but it seems to me this is a job for > apt-get if ever there was one. If this requires a new command, perhap

Re: Compiling on a Debian machine

Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do I use a Debian machine, such as bruckner, to test a source > package by compiling for powerpc? I see bruckner has a sarge chroot. > What's the magic command to start the build in this chroot? I know of > pbuilder -- though I haven't used it much adm

Re: Compiling on a Debian machine

[Andreas Metzler] > There is no automatic building, you have change to the sarge chroot > using dchroot and use dpkg-buildpackage or whatever. I could have sworn I'd heard about logging into debian machines as 'username+sarge' or similar, to get into chroots. Is this not still generally supporte

Hey remember i told you about this Madeleine

To: Isaac I was checking my email and saw this advertisement in it. just like you I = was thinking this stuff will not work its all a gimmic.. but even with my other half telling me im wast= ing my money I went ahead and purchased it. and I can tell you right now with a straight face im big= g

Re: woody-to-sarge test upgrade

El Sábado 30 Abril 2005 01:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:46:39PM +0200, Guido Heumann wrote: > > Bill Allombert schrieb: > > > Hello Debian developers, > > > > [...] > > > > > Before I do more testing, I would like to make sure I know the proper > > > procedure: > > >

Re: Little help about Intel865PERLL with ICH5

[Ivan Adams] > Can you explain what do you mean? Thanks allot As Jacob said, what you have isn't really RAID. It's software RAID (meaning, all the work is done on the host CPU, not on the IDE chip), which loads a BIOS extension so that it works automatically in MS-DOS and derivatives. The Windo

Re: woody-to-sarge test upgrade

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 12:13:23PM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote: > El Sábado 30 Abril 2005 01:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > > > > Ah yes, aptitude dist-upgrade works much better and is non-interactive. > > That fix the problem with the needless removal of apache, etc. > > > > Thanks! >

Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture

Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry, but I still don't understand it: > > You could continue to offer the complete archive as it is today, and it > shouldn't be a big amount of work to offer one or more partial archives > (e.g. only stable or only i386) from different locations - and

Virus ricevuto -- Virus received

Questo messaggio e` stato automaticamente generato per informarvi che un messaggio da voi inviato (o inviato da un virus che ha falsificato il vostro indirizzo email) e` stato bloccato dall'antivirus installato su questo mail server. Di seguito potete trovare alcuni dettagli relativi al messa

Re: woody-to-sarge test upgrade

Hi Bill, On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 07:48:00PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Before I do more testing, I would like to make sure I know the proper > procedure: > 1) What is the recommend way to perform such upgrade ? I guess you've already got the answer for this. > 2) How can I produce useful pr

libsasl2 and libmysql* updates for sarge

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > Since dovecot, libnss-mysql, and libnss-mysql-bg have already been updated to > use libmysqlclient12, the main reason for *not* updating cyrus-sasl2, the > MTAs, and the ftp daemons (i.e.: segfaults from mixing and matching) no > longer applies. I would

Re: woody-to-sarge test upgrade

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 11:43:49AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Yes... I did not know "aptitude dist-upgrade" was different from "apt > dist-upgrade". The woody aptitude manpage does not mention any command > line directive, and the sid manpage does not document the dist-upgrade > target, this

Re: woody-to-sarge test upgrade

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 11:44:38PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 11:43:49AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Yes... I did not know "aptitude dist-upgrade" was different from "apt > > dist-upgrade". The woody aptitude manpage does not mention any command > > line directive

Bug#307079: ITP: libcarats-ruby -- Ruby Carats, the Ruby toolchest

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libcarats-ruby Version : 0.3.0 Upstream Author : Thomas Sawyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others * URL : http://calibre.rubyforge.org/ * License : Ruby, GPL, LGPL, MIT, or

Bug#307078: ITP: libfacets-ruby -- Ruby Fantasic Atomic Core Extensions library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libfacets-ruby Version : 0.7.0 Upstream Author : Thomas Sawyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://calibre.rubyforge.org/ * License : GPL/Ruby (dual-licensed) Descripti

Bug#307080: ITP: libbreakpoint-ruby -- Ruby library for adding breakpoints to Ruby program

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libbreakpoint-ruby Version : 0.5.0 Upstream Author : Florian Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ruby-breakpoint.rubyforge.org/ * License : GPL/Ruby (dual-licensed)

PHP/WebApp policy/mailing list

Hi all, There's been a bit of discussion[0] recently on the debian-security list with regards to how include()ed files should be handled. I think that, due to the large number of packages that are webapps, a policy shoudl be created on how we handle these. To do this, it would be a good idea IMO

Re: PHP/WebApp policy/mailing list

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 05:32:35PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > There's been a bit of discussion[0] recently on the debian-security list > with regards to how include()ed files should be handled. and this for the most part is a good practice. if the file does not need to be directly accessed by

Re: PHP/WebApp policy/mailing list

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 01:00:18PM -0400, sean finney wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 05:32:35PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > > There's been a bit of discussion[0] recently on the debian-security list > > with regards to how include()ed files should be handled. > > and this for the most part is

Re: PHP/WebApp policy/mailing list

Neil McGovern a écrit : To do this, it would be a good idea IMO to have a maining list. This has already been suggested[1][2], and I agree that a debian-webapp list should be created. I also think this is a good idea. Several times in the past I'd loved to mail such a mailing list when I faced web

Re: PHP/WebApp policy/mailing list

This one time, at band camp, Alexis Sukrieh said: > Neil McGovern a écrit : > > >To do this, it would be a good idea IMO to have a maining list. This has > >already been suggested[1][2], and I agree that a debian-webapp list > >should be created. > > I also think this is a good idea. Several time

Outrageous Maintainer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, this is a maybe bit OT mail to this List but I think as improoving the quality of debian is a bit toppic of the list. The problem is that I do not know how to handle with a bug. The maintainer of this bug is not in the mood to fix the bug he r

Re: Outrageous Maintainer

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > The according bug is #306608. having read through the bug report, it seems to me the appropriate thing to have done all along was add a Conflicts statement, which really does no harm and does resolve the issue. HOWEVER, that said, th

Re: Outrageous Maintainer

Le samedi 30 avril 2005 à 15:06 -0400, sean finney a écrit : > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > The according bug is #306608. > > having read through the bug report, it seems to me the appropriate thing > to have done all along was add a Conflicts statement, which

Re: Outrageous Maintainer

Klaus Ethgen wrote: > The according bug is #306608. It looks like the issue there (trying to quickly read through it) is if package libwxgtk2.4-python nedds to declare a Conflicts: with package wxpython2.5.3. The reason being that both provide a /usr/bin/helpviewer. First off, this is a tad bit

Re: Outrageous Maintainer

(reply to public mail sent to d-devel). On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > The problem is that I do not know how to handle with a bug. The > maintainer of this bug is not in the mood to fix the bug he rather > slight the submitters (not only me) in the bugreport and also by private > mail.

Re: Outrageous Maintainer

On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, sean finney wrote: > having read through the bug report, it seems to me the appropriate thing > to have done all along was add a Conflicts statement, which really does > no harm and does resolve the issue. Wrong. The other package has a broken replaces header, without the req

Re: Outrageous Maintainer

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:36:29PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Wrong. The other package has a broken replaces header, without the required > conflicts header it needs to have. yeah, looks like i was. that said, the rest of my response (this should be forwarded to the tech committ

Re: Outrageous Maintainer

Anthony DeRobertis wrote: >Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > > >>The according bug is #306608. >> >> > >This is a bug, though possibly not in the libwxgtk2.4-python package. If >the relevant maintainers (libwxgtk2.4-python, wxpython2.5.3) and bug >sumitters can't work out a solution, then ask the Tech

Re: Outrageous Maintainer

Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Klaus Ethgen wrote: > >> The according bug is #306608. > > It looks like the issue there (trying to quickly read through it) is if > package libwxgtk2.4-python nedds to declare a Conflicts: with package > wxpython2.5.3. The reason being that both pr

Re: Compiling on a Debian machine

On 4/30/05, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [Andreas Metzler] > > There is no automatic building, you have change to the sarge chroot > > using dchroot and use dpkg-buildpackage or whatever. > > I could have sworn I'd heard about logging into debian machines as > 'username+sarge' o

Re: Compiling on a Debian machine

On 4/30/05, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How do I use a Debian machine, such as bruckner, to test a source > > package by compiling for powerpc? I see bruckner has a sarge chroot. > > What's the magic command to start the build in this ch

Re: Outrageous Maintainer

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:06:31PM -0400, sean finney wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > The according bug is #306608. > having read through the bug report, it seems to me the appropriate thing > to have done all along was add a Conflicts statement, which re

Re: Free Game Console

Am 2005-04-30 09:51:09, schrieb Adrian von Bidder: > On Saturday 30 April 2005 07.54, Dillinger wrote: > > Hi, > > I invented Macromedia Flash. > [...] > > Can I get one of those things your're smoking? No Adrian, please, keep clean... You need your brain for better things. > -- vbi Greetings M

Re: Outrageous Maintainer

> "steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: steve> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:06:31PM -0400, sean finney steve> wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > >> The according bug is #306608. >> having read through the bug report, it

Re: Outrageous Maintainer

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:45:26PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > But you remove the package from testing doesn't mean we won't have > users with it installed since it was present there so, IMHO, the > Conflict is need. The bug is in the other package, packages are not required to wor

transcode

having problems installing trancode on debian testing -- Fred ike:~# apt-get install transcode Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable di

Re: transcode

Le samedi 30 avril 2005 à 20:22 -0300, Frederico Rodrigues Abraham a écrit : > having problems installing trancode on debian testing > -- Fred > > ike:~# apt-get install transcode This package isn't in the official Debian archive. You should probably contact directly the one who's providi

Re: libsasl2 and libmysql* updates for sarge

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:03:01AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Since dovecot, libnss-mysql, and libnss-mysql-bg have already been updated > > to > > use libmysqlclient12, the main reason for *not* updating cyrus-sasl2, the > > MTAs, an

Re: transcode

On April 30, 2005 08:22 pm, Frederico Rodrigues Abraham wrote: > apt-get install transcode Try apt-get install transcode libavifile-0.7c102/unstable and see if that helps. Stephen -- Debian the choice of a GNU generation. GPG Public Key: http://users.eastlink.ca/~stephencormier/publickey.asc

Ubuntu and its "appropriation" of Debian maintainers

Hi, I just search Google for me and I found this, https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/people/adamm/ Now, I never signed up to be a maintainer for Ubuntu. I don't understand why I am part of "people of Ubuntu" or why I am listed as a maintainer of any package on Ubuntu's website? I know Ubuntu is using

Re: transcode

Transcode is not in Debian because the codecs are not DFSG-compliant. Look at for an unofficial package. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Key Signing in Vancouver, BC

Alright! Let's all meet at 12:30 on Wednesday, May 4th at Kirin Sushi - across the street from the New Westminster SkyTrain station - 31 8th St - (604) 521-1833 Remember photo id & your gpg fingerprint http://cgi.sfu.ca/~jdbates/moin/moin.cgi/KeySigningParty Pete Lypkie is organizing another key

Re: Ubuntu and its "appropriation" of Debian maintainers

Adam Majer writes: > I just search Google for me and I found this, > https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/people/adamm/ They have a similar page for me. Nothing there indicates that I am not an Ubuntu employee. > Well, at least on pages like, > http://packages.ubuntu.com/hoary/misc/mysql-query-browser

Re: transcode

Le samedi 30 avril 2005 Ã 20:22 -0300, Frederico Rodrigues Abraham a Ãcrit : > having problems installing trancode on debian testing > -- Fred > > ike:~# apt-get install transcode transcode isn't an official debian package. I guess you have marillat's apt repository in your /etc/apt/sourc

Re: python-mysqldb in sarge and python2.2 support (for zope-mysqlda)

Hi Jonas, On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: > i've a problem with packaging python-mysqldb. version 1.2 is already > uploaded to unstable, and has no bugs while version 1.1.6 > - currently in testing - has a rc bug: #306906 > on the other side python-mysqldb 1.2 lacks

Re: SE Linux in Etch - was Release sarge now, or discuss etch issues?

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:13:54 +1000, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tuesday 15 March 2005 09:32, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The fact that the release team now sees the light at the end of the >> tunnel for the release of sarge means that now is the time we need >> to beg