Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: soundconverter
Version : 0.7.1
Upstream Author : Gautier Portet
* URL : http://soundconverter.berlios.de/
* License : GPL v2
Description : convert sound files to ot
Hello
When it comes to testing you have to ask yourself what you want
to test.
We have a couple of different types of tests:
* Component test:
Tests if a program component (object, function etc) is working as
specified. Normally this kind of tests are implemented in the same
programming la
Hello
> * Package name: soundconverter
> Version : 0.7.1
> Upstream Author : Gautier Portet
> * URL : http://soundconverter.berlios.de/
> * License : GPL v2
> Description : convert sound files to other formats
What about "converts between different sound
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2005 06:59 schrieb Paul TBBle Hampson:
> I just tried openswan-modules-source under 2.6.10 with make-kpkg, and it
> installed
> /lib/modules/2.6.10/kernel/net/ipsec/ipsec.o
> instead of
> /lib/modules/2.6.10/kernel/net/ipsec/ipsec.ko
Thanks for the hint - I have fixed a type a
Hello,
I renamed libtagcoll-dev to libtagcoll1-dev and libdebtags-dev to
libdebtags1-dev, and I'm considering uploading to unstable in a day or
two:
- it's too late for it to go in sid (good!)
- it doesn't break existing stuff (it's a new package)
- I can upload improved debtags and debtags-ed
Martin Schulze wrote:
> FWIW: This would mean to remove all of Mozilla and friends, since they
> don't receive any security support upstream, and neither the maintainer
> or the security team are in a position to backport all fixes and correcte
> all stuff in the older versions. (upstream does onl
* [ 08-04-05 - 15:38 ] Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is another thing that I don't understand often. Why
> are there linda and lintian?
> In my opinion this makes things difficulter. Both have to
> coordinate themselves and keep their policy rules up to
> date.
[...]
> The on
Hi Yas,
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2005 15:57 schrieb Yaacov Akiba Slama:
> openswan 2.2.0-4 still crashes when using 2.3.1 (your package from
> http://www.gibraltar.at/~rene/openswan/) as roadwarrior.
Yes, I have also noticed that and can currently reproduce it here on my
system. I have already bomba
On Apr 8, 2005 12:05 AM, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Expect people to whine. I personally don't see why "@daily" is
> significantly easier than "0 0 * * *" but apparently some people get all
> sweaty if they have to type an asterisk.
what about the "@reboot" extension? I think th
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 07:26:09PM +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> Sure. That's ok. I was more thinking of someone reading the existing
> firmware sources, writing a spec and a second person/group implementing
> the new free firmware based on the spec. AFAICS the implementors and the
> spec
Hallo Emanuele,
* Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-10 19:21]:
> * [ 08-04-05 - 15:38 ] Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is another thing that I don't understand often. Why
> > are there linda and lintian?
> > In my opinion this makes things difficulter. Both have to
>
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:44:00PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Peter 'p2' De Schrijver writes:
> > Or do you think it would be ok if the same people read the existing
> > non-free sources and reimplement its functionality in a new free
> > firmware?
>
> As long as they don't copy any protected cod
On 10-Apr-05, 10:55 (CDT), Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2005 12:05 AM, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Expect people to whine. I personally don't see why "@daily" is
> > significantly easier than "0 0 * * *" but apparently some people get all
> > sweaty
I wrote:
> As long as they don't copy any protected code you'll be fine.
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> That's the problem, I'm afraid. It's not unlikely that you'll have this
> 'great idea' which in reality is something you remember from reading the
> original source, but not remembering that this is
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Ok thats a reason. But why not merge these projects now? I
> really recommend this because in my opinion this are two
> projects which do the same job twice which is in my eyes
> contraproductive.
Actually that is how open source works. I often also feel
On Sunday 10 April 2005 12:08, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 10-Apr-05, 10:55 (CDT), Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 2005 12:05 AM, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Expect people to whine. I personally don't see why "@daily" is
> > > significantly easier than
Hi Bernd,
* [ 10-04-05 - 20:28 ] Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Ok thats a reason. But why not merge these projects now? I
> > really recommend this because in my opinion this are two
> > projects which do the same job twice which is
> Changes:
> 855resolution (0.3-4) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Add kfreebsd-i386 for supported architecture.
> (from Aurelien's request)
Thanks !
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PR
Hello Bernd,
* Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-10 22:17]:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Ok thats a reason. But why not merge these projects now? I
> > really recommend this because in my opinion this are two
> > projects which do the same job twice which is in my eye
Hallo Emanuele,
* Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-10 23:01]:
> * [ 10-04-05 - 20:28 ] Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > Ok thats a reason. But why not merge these projects now? I
> > > really recommend this because in my
> I know, that's not accessible to users, only the admin. OTOH, I can't
> think of any really good reason that user needs to do something
> *automatically* on reboot.
I see plenty : I have a mini daemon on one of my accounts that I really
need. but since I'm not root on the machine, I need to be
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:26:43PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Sure, but only if two projects have at least some differences; in 'The
> > Cathedral and the Bazaar' popclient becomes fetchmail.
> >
> > Whenever someone submits an ITP for the software A, whose functionality
> > is already provided
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Sure, but only if two projects have at least some differences; in 'The
> Cathedral and the Bazaar' popclient becomes fetchmail.
There are a lot differences between linda and lintian, especially the
programming language. Which is if course a big point if
On 10-Apr-05, 14:24 (CDT), "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know, that's not accessible to users, only the admin. OTOH, I can't
> > think of any really good reason that user needs to do something
> > *automatically* on reboot.
>
> Perhaps user-run services?
So run a script e
On 10-Apr-05, 16:30 (CDT), Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see plenty : I have a mini daemon on one of my accounts that I really
> need. but since I'm not root on the machine, I need to be able to use
> @reboot to restart
No you don't. See my reply to Wesley.
Steve
--
Steve
Hi Bernd,
* [ 10-04-05 - 23:33 ] Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a lot differences between linda and lintian, especially the
> programming language.
We would like to know which are these differences. :)
Nico's original question was "why are there linda and lintian?".
ht
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sometimes there is the case that major design decisions are
> too different from the original source so there is no other
> way. but is this the case with lintian and linda?
Yes. linda is written in Python and lintian in Perl. That's a major
difference and
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:33:24PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
[mjp: I sure didn't write this, but that's how it's been attributed...]
> > Whenever someone submits an ITP for the software A, whose functionality
> > is already provided in Debian by B, t
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
There are a lot differences between linda and lintian, especially the
programming language.
A very important difference. This might result in several further applications
doing the very same job (more or less) for several other programming languages
(Rub
Hi,
> > | I second suggestion given at #250202 and like to see "unpacked" and
> > | "patched" targets to hit Policy 4.8.
> >
> > If so, it should be «unpack» and «patch» to match the build and
> > install targets.
>
> Note that there are existing packages that use 'unpack' and 'patch'
> targets
30 matches
Mail list logo
