[Darren Salt]
> Back-porting to sarge using tools in sarge?
That doesn't sound so daunting. Anyone doing serious backporting will
need to start by backporting a few development tools, which is already
true from woody -> sarge - viz. debhelper 4.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mar 29, 2005 at 01:07, Joshua Kwan praised the llamas by saying:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: cuetools
> Version : 1.3
> Upstream Author : Svend Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://develop
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello fellow maintainers,
>
> with organisation in groups becoming more and more popular, IMO it is now
> time to find some convention for declaring the group members and
> guidelines inside of the Debian source package.
>
> Some people call that file MAIN
Dobrý den,
rád bych tímto požádal o urychlené odstranění odkazu
http://lists.debian.org/debian-lint-maint/2005/02/msg00049.html, který vede
proti mé vůli k mému soukromému e-mailu. Žádný požadavek na jeho zveřejnění
jsem nezadával a stalo se tak patrně omylem.
Děkuji za pochopení
Ivo Paulík
tel:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libapache-mod-dosevasive
Version : 1.10
Upstream Author : Jonathan A. Zdziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dosevasive/
* License
Hello.
I'm packaging adesklets stuff, and it cames with Vera.ttf font included.
We've got this font in ttf-bitstream-vera package, so I was wondering if is
it ok to duplicate it, since some packages are doing it already.
At least that's something what I got after `apt-file search Vera.ttf`.
wesno
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm packaging adesklets stuff, and it cames with Vera.ttf font included.
> We've got this font in ttf-bitstream-vera package, so I was wondering if is
> it ok to duplicate it, since some packages are doing it already.
A symlink and a dependenc
#include
* Frank Küster [Tue, Mar 29 2005, 02:25:03PM]:
> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Some people call that file MAINTAINERS, some README.svn or similar, and
> > some do not do this at all, so someone needs to ask somebody or get a
> > crystal ball to learn about the repository of
Op di, 29-03-2005 te 01:09 +0200, schreef Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 02:24:03PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > For the record, it is not true that there is no logging of initscripts.
> > The logging is perhaps not enabled by default and it is perhaps not
> > detailed to the
Vazeny pane Pauliku,
obavam se, ze Vasi zadosti nebude nejspise vyhoveno, a to z techto duvodu:
- pokud spravne jiz nekolik let ctu oba maillisty, tento postup je proti
zasadam lists.debian.org
- neni pravda, ze by Vas mail byl zverejnen bez Vaseho pricineni a proti
Vasi vuli, dival jsem se na odka
Title: FW: Contact Information
I am sorry to bother you again. I am just following up to see if there is any way you can direct me to the right contact. Your time and effort is greatly appreciated.
Annabelle Garcia
Inside Sales
4130 E. Wood St., Ste. 100
Phoenix, AZ 85040
602-437-5068,
> Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm packaging adesklets stuff, and it cames with Vera.ttf font included.
>> We've got this font in ttf-bitstream-vera package, so I was wondering if
>> is it ok to duplicate it, since some packages are doing it already.
>
> A symlink and
12 matches
Mail list logo
