Hello
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 07:45:31AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Sean Perry [Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:36:49 -0800]:
>
> > Source: mysource
> > Maintainer: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Maintainers: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I left the Maintainer in place to allow
On Monday 28 March 2005 00:04, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I suggest debian/README.Debian.Maintainers as the filename.
Hmm .. Following from README to README.Debian, wouldn't AUTHORS.Debian make
more sense?
Also, often this list is already present in debian/copyright ("packaged
by ...")
Regards, Da
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 12:01:05AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:23:29 +0200, Michelle Konzack
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Am 2005-03-27 20:12:37, schrieb Marc Haber:
> >> You should ask user-related questions on a user-related mailing list.
> >
> >I have asked here because
On Monday 28 March 2005 12:30, David Schmitt wrote:
> On Monday 28 March 2005 00:04, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > I suggest debian/README.Debian.Maintainers as the filename.
>
> Hmm .. Following from README to README.Debian, wouldn't AUTHORS.Debian make
> more sense?
>
> Also, often this list is already
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Mar 26, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm asking because of obstruction (from upstream) regarding the
>> application of a simple patch to allow yaboot to support it:
>>
>> http://bugs.debian
Am 2005-03-27 14:23:16, schrieb Sean Perry:
> Something akin to d-bus is one solution. You asked earlier how this
> works. The idea is that either the XDM (or workalike) or the user's
> .xinitrc or perhaps even the window manager / session manager would
> start a program which would announce th
Steve Langasek wrote:
One of the delays affecting getting lully.d.o back on line, AIUI, was a dead
power supply that was non-trivial to replace. This is a case of scarce
hardware impacting a port even *before* it has ceased to become available
for sale.
Well, N+1 redundancy is already required. Ma
* Ola Lundqvist [Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:37:33 +0200]:
> A common way is to list the contact address for the group
> as maintainer and each person responsible for uploads in Uploaders.
> You miss non official Debian developers this way though.
Nothing mandates that the Uploaders field is DD-only, A
On Mar 28, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The yaboot maintainer has been resisting for years all kinds of sensible
> > changes (like #233810), so I'm not really surprised.
> Is there anything that could be done about this? I don't think that
> it's acceptable for the package maintaine
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>
> > On Mar 26, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm asking because of obstruction (from upstream) regarding the
> >> applica
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 12:38:05AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 01:01:24PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:28:51PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > This adds up to a lot of effort for a dead-end architecture. Do
> > > you believe that such p
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 01:46:53AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> - there is no logging of init scripts (#169600) startup, so it's difficult
> to determine (post-boot) if all the system's elements started up correctly.
For the record, it is not true that there is no logging of ini
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 10:08:51AM -0300, Andre Filipe de Assuncao e Brito
wrote:
> >Sorry, 404 here.
> Yes. Recently, Michiel has changed his website, and the update-manager
> website has go down, but I talk to him and he'll put on the website
> more quickly possible.
Digging through Google I'
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 05:41:40PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 10:08:51AM -0300, Andre Filipe de Assuncao e Brito
> wrote:
> > >Sorry, 404 here.
> > Yes. Recently, Michiel has changed his website, and the update-manager
> > website has go down, but I ta
On 27-Mar-05, 14:01 (CST), Andre Filipe de Assuncao e Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Description : GNOME application that manages apt updates
>
> This is the GNOME apt update manager. It checks for updates and
> lets the user choose which to install.
apt-cache show apt-watch
Steve
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> (I already asked you to please stop Cc'ing me on every reply, what else
> do I need to do?)
Fix Debian's gnus. :)
> On Mar 27, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > We are unable to fix security bugs in hardware with non-modifiable
> >
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 02:24:03PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 01:46:53AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> > - there is no logging of init scripts (#169600) startup, so it's difficult
> > to determine (post-boot) if all the system's elements started up
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 02:24:03PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> For the record, it is not true that there is no logging of initscripts.
> The logging is perhaps not enabled by default and it is perhaps not
> detailed to the extent as suggested in the bugreport, but by running
>
> echo 'BOOTLOGD
Please talk to me soon. I wish I was with you right now. I can't get you and
how great we would be together out of my mind. I'm on my webcam right now if u
go to my site below we can talk on it right now. I can't wait to hear from you.
http://mjkt.greatmallusion.com/cs3/
___
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cuetools
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Svend Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://developer.berlios.de/projects/cuetools/
* License : GPL
Description : tools f
On Mar 29, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > one can enable initscript logging to /var/log/boot, which will show
> > everything that was sent to the console during bootup (excluding kernel
> > messages).
> *blink*, wow... why isn't this like on by default, and the package in
> q
Le Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:09:55 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 02:24:03PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> For the record, it is not true that there is no logging of initscripts.
>> The logging is perhaps not enabled by default and it is perhaps not
>> detailed to th
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 06:31 +0200, Alban Browaeys wrote:
> Le Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:09:55 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :
>
> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 02:24:03PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >> For the record, it is not true that there is no logging of initscripts.
> >> The logging is per
23 matches
Mail list logo
