Package: wnpp
Owner: Joop Stakenborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: antennavis
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Ken Harker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://n5xu.ae.utexas.edu/antennavis
* License : GPL
Description : antenna visuali
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 09:08:10PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> It seems that /usr/bin/update-menus now runs in the background. I ran
> sudo apt-et install glade, and after it finished, I ran ps -ef |tail
> -5, and the last commands running were update-menus.real, and
> install-menu.
>
> Is it s
Le jeudi 24 mars 2005 à 21:08 -0500, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> It seems that /usr/bin/update-menus now runs in the background. I ran
> sudo apt-et install glade, and after it finished, I ran ps -ef |tail
> -5, and the last commands running were update-menus.real, and
> install-menu.
>
> Is it sup
Le Thu, 24 Mar 2005 21:08:10 -0500, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
> It seems that /usr/bin/update-menus now runs in the background. I ran
> sudo apt-et install glade, and after it finished, I ran ps -ef |tail
> -5, and the last commands running were update-menus.real, and
> install-menu.
>
> Is it sup
Am 2005-03-24 01:33:37, schrieb Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> Common problem unfortunately in the open source/Debian world... not that
> $what_you_want doesn't exist, but that you just don't know it exists nor
> where to find it :(.
Realy good spoken...
> --Jeroen
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 05:33:50PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Paul Hedderly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > What we have is source code (yes code that can be compiled) which is
> > unencumbered, we can modify,compile, distribute etc... whether it is
> > _harder_ to modify or not because of
Op do, 24-03-2005 te 20:01 +0100, schreef Daniel Baumann:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I don't know whether we have ports without /proc,
>
> the Hurd has no /proc.
Additionally, other kernels (such as the FreeBSD kernel) that do have
a /proc do not have it functionally overloaded like the Linux
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: confluence
Version : 0.10.4
Upstream Author : Tom Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.confluent.org/
* License : GPL
Description : language for sync
On 21-Mar-05, 14:45 (CST), Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HP still produces both workstations and servers with PA-RISK processors.
Yeah, we had one of those. I'm surprised they're still making them; the
PA-RISC series is lot
On 21-Mar-05, 12:39 (CST), David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 11:22:48AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> >
> > And that's what we do. But some other OSs (Solaris) do support strict
> > multihoming with a config parameter, it would be nice if Linux did.
>
> netdev
I just saw the attached email message on a LUG mailing list. It's the first
time I've heard of this, and it looks a bit worrying, especially since a lot
of newer machines are shipping SATA-only these days.
What I'm wondering is:
(a) Does the default sarge kernel run afoul of the problem
Le jeudi 24 mars 2005 à 11:13 +1100, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
> "Some would say that this has already happened". Not a fork, per se,
> but Ubuntu's licencing policy (and the general level-headedness of the
> people I know who are deeply involved in it) suggests that it may be
> the refuge you seek
Hello *,
curently I am coding a tool which run from cron (as root) periodicly
and if a $USER is loged into X it shows Messages.
My Problem is, HOW to find the $USER who is connected to a $DISPLAY.
If I start two xserver I have e.g. :0 and :1.
I was serching for a command which tell me which use
Ok, well it looks like some people just can't see progress, or
understand
bulk email law. well, even though I do include an opt-out mechanism for
people who do not wish to receive our newsletter. In any case, I am tired
of the harrasment and tired of people sending complaints to our host.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ipodder
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Adam Curry et. al.
* URL or Web page : http://ipodder.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : an Internet audio program ("podcast") download tool
iPodder is a Podcasting ap
On Friday 04 March 2005 17:47, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Source code is source code. Obfuscated or not does not change that. It
> > > fullfills at least the letter of DFSG#2. For it to violate DFSG#2 you
> > > would have t
Florian Zumbiehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> FLTK
Please consider this ambiguous (like FAQ), as upstream favors the
pronunciation "fulltick" (and makes a point of noting so on the main
http://www.fltk.org/ page because a lot of users nevertheless do spell
it out).
Thanks.
--
Aaron M. Ucko,
Hi,
I am planning to implement a script to obtain Debian source.
Is there anyone who has already done that ?
It is planned to have the following features:
1. wrapper to dpkg-source -x
2. heuristically parse debian/rules file to
extract and patch the Debian source as
dbs/dpatch requires.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 06:54:19AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Optional source patching is non-standard in Debian, and
> I would like a standard interface to interact with Debian
> source.
So would I. Which is why I filed #250202.
Be sure to read the whole bug -- there's quite some discussio
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The arch should still be available, but a big enough collection of
> existing machines will do here IMO. Not that this holds for mips as
> there are new MIPS based systems available. Both broadcom and PMC
> announced new MIPS based chips for ex
Hi,
> > Optional source patching is non-standard in Debian, and
> > I would like a standard interface to interact with Debian
> > source.
>
> So would I. Which is why I filed #250202
I have had a vague recollection that there was something
which had not been implemented yet; thanks for pointi
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:48:14PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> > Actually, I believe the Debian project as whole _wants_ to getting
> >
> >software released. That was at least the decision in all GRs where
> >people didn't hide the intents ("editorial changes").
>
> Indeed.
Scripsit Paul Hedderly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 05:33:50PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Scripsit Paul Hedderly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> What you are showing here is that "code that can be compiled" is not a
>> working defintion of "source code".
> It not only works, but has
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
> And one of the reasons for which licensing for documentation has not
> been discussed is that most people were not aware of the scope of the
> "editorial" changes, so there was no reason to discuss anything.
You can keep repeating that lie from now to e
On Mar 25, Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No matter how you feel about the term "editorial changes", it seems to me
> that if these changes were really so bad, and the majority of the project is
> now against them, they should be easy enough to roll back.
Adam, meet Apathy.
Apathy, meet
On Mar 24, 2005, at 2:39 AM, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
Hi all,
[Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to this list.]
As some have already noticed, openswan has been removed from testing a
while
ago, most probably because of bug #291274, which did not apply to
package
version 2.2.0-4
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:21:39 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul
Hampson) wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:36:52PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:47:22 +0100, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >* Marc Haber [Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:03:21 +0100]:
>> >> | Version Table:
>>
* Henning Makholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050326 00:55]:
> Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
> > And one of the reasons for which licensing for documentation has not
> > been discussed is that most people were not aware of the scope of the
> > "editorial" changes, so there was no reason to d
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
March 23, 2005. Associates News
Flozar Heart Health News:
Breakthrough Natural Cholesterol Reduction System:
60% of people are at risk. are YOU?
No Dangerous side effects such as dizziness, nausea, yellow skin & more.
http://healthwatch.anationpickle.com/2fl2/
Try Flo
29 matches
Mail list logo
