Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For buildds, since I don't run one as either local or DSA admin, I couldn't
> tell you offhand. I know what I'd *expect* them to be doing, as general
> guidelines, which closely resembles what I do on servers I deploy facing
> the net, but I don't know wha
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
My basic idea is to have something similar to the testing migration
scripts, which takes the decisions of the "master" copy running on
ftp-master as an input. At a minimum:
I think it's easiest just to assume everything's on ftp-master; for
mirroring, stuff's already plan
Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fine, if you want to get pedantic, the following is a bare minimum of
> capabilities I would expect from any network processing on a 'real'
> (non-toy) network stack, where 'network stack' means everything between
> hardware driver and delivery of data to
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 11:17:42AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I was speaking specifically of porter uploads; my discussion is about
> the specific case of s390 complaining that they can't do their porting
> work (which includes simply compiling packages) because the w-b admins
> won't add
Frank Küster wrote:
Unless there is an arch-specific bug in that version. The code for
architecture tags in the BTS is available if I'm not mistaken.
I'll add "rc-s390" etc tags or similar to bugs.d.o the day sarge is
released, presuming this goes ahead. No complicated patching whatsoever
needed
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is simply a condition of ENOTIME. The buildd is setup, activate them
> needs 10 minutes, adding a entries to the ACL needs less. Setting up a
> w-b needs 1h, doing the work by hand needs much more time.
But that should not stop you from attacking the
Hi,
I found that LPhoto sounds like a nice program to have. The only link to the
source I found is at
http://software.lindows.com/emptypool//lindowsos/pool/main/l/lphoto
which points to a direct tarball in the Linspire pool archive and this
archive contains a GPL statement but contains verison
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 09:46:36AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Have we any proper way of doing multiarch setups ? The "proper" way to
> do ppc64 is to have both archs libs and 32 bits userland for most
> things, as ppc64 native code is slightly slower.
The packages are waiting for some
--Faites un voeu et puis Voila ! www.voila.fr
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 09:46:36AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 20:27 +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is a call for help from the 'ppc64' porters.
> >
> > On 05-Mar-14 16:14, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > Also, as with the amd64 port, there i
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:24:04PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 23:14 +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
>
> > On 05-Mar-16 22:01, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 22:48 +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > >
> > > My concern is the same as that of the P
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:10:59AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 00:31 +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > Moreover, I seriously doubt that this is an honest argument. I think you
> > just want to decide the architecture name yourself.
> >
> No, I would just prefer consi
On 05-Mar-17 09:31, Bastian Blank wrote:
> glibc 2.3.2 does not properly support powerpc64.
This is correct. Because of this, the ppc64 Port uses glibc-2.3.4.
The current Debian package has been patched to use version 2.3.4 for the
ppc64 port.
All patches used by the current Debian glibc which a
Martin Schulze wrote:
> > not to mention the time spent by the DSA/buildd admins and the security
>
> Thanks for asking the security team how much work it is to support 11
> architectures. Err... Huh? I wasn't asked? Uh?
>
> However, to clarify this for the readers who aren't involved in
> sec
* Mike Fedyk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050316 20:55]:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> >If that happens for a too long period, we might consider such an
> >architecture to be too slow to keep up, and will eventually discuss
> >about kicking it out of the architectures we wait for testing migration
> >at all, or
* Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050317 01:30]:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:44:49PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > >I have an e3500 to replace both auric and vore (and the raid), but I
> > >haven't gotten an ok from James to do so yet.
> > That wou
* Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050317 03:25]:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:31:19PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:44:49PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > > > >I have
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050317 10:54]:
> Ah, so why is vore down now for some time now? If it's so easy to
that should read as auric of course.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D
> > Sbapshots of unstable. And people would run that on their servers?
>
> Some, maybe. Are there lots of people running servers on m68k and arm?
>
Debian/ARM is becoming viable as a handheld platform as they get 400+
Mhz CPUs and gigabytes of storage (which is all available now).
Cheers,
Pe
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 09:52:35AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> 3) Only some people can install the patches.
[...]
> (3) raises the question: who chooses who can install the patches directly
> and who cannot?
The people who run the show, just like any Free Software project. You earn
the tr
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 09:57:29AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Moving wanna-build to a mirror will mean that new source packages have
> > to be in the archive for at least one mirror pulse before they get
> > built. The m68k port has been w
On Thursday 17 March 2005 03:16, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
> ... and probably not for (that is, not unless you tell me otherwise):
> > HPGL
> > HTML
> > HTTPS
Traditionally I think these would use "an". Even if you pronounce "h" as
"haich" rather than "aich" as another poster pointed out, many wor
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:28:55PM +1100, Evan Cox wrote:
> My idea is to create a frontend program that is similar to the profile
> 'Midnight Commander' in Konqueror (ie screen splint into 3/4 top and
> 1/4 CLI) that begins with iconised area relevant to the
> administration task, and ends with
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php4-kadm5
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Holger Burbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/php-kadm5/
* License : GPL
Description : MIT
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:39:48 -0700, Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>* The first rule of securing a machine exposed to the wilds is "Deny by
> default, allow by need".
Which is pretty well accomplished by only running needed services. A
port without a services is an implicit "deny".
>Sorr
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:30:28 -0500, Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The requirement sucks, lets leave it at that. If the machine dies, I can
>have two to replace it within a day or two.
If you happen to be available at that time.
Greetings
Marc
--
--
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:59:34AM +, Will Newton wrote:
> On Thursday 17 March 2005 03:16, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
>
> > ... and probably not for (that is, not unless you tell me otherwise):
> > > HPGL
> > > HTML
> > > HTTPS
>
> Traditionally I think these would use "an". Even if you pronoun
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:47:15PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 12:11 +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > Package: samba-common
> > Version: 3.0.10-1
> > Severity: minor
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > i'm seeing there is file /etc/samba/gdbcommands. it looks like it
> > is install
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 01:17:28 +0100, Matthias Urlichs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Given the pace 2.6 is progressing at, I expect there not to be a "too
>late" in the next months.
However, upstream 2.6 is progressing fast. In the wrong direction.
Which is a big disturbance :-(
Greetings
Marc
--
-
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 01:10:53 +0100, Matthias Urlichs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Or packages are built by firewalled trusted build systems.
What is the advantage of having a correctly maintained system behind
a firewall?
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy c
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 23:20 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:59:34AM +, Will Newton wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 March 2005 03:16, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
[snip]
>
> An FAQ, too (not a fack).
> An SQL server, not "a sequel server" (my pet hate).
Well, you're 1/2 correct:
* Marc Haber:
> I am routinely running systems without any packet filtering capability
> on the network, and they are perfectly able to cope. They just only
> accept network connections for needed services.
This is a bit dangerous because any invocation of "apt-get install" or
"apt-get upgrade" c
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:44:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Op di, 15-03-2005 te 16:19 -0500, schreef Anthony DeRobertis:
> > Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >
> > | You misunderstood. I don't fight generic changes to the order; I just
> > | don't think it would be a good thing that a
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:52:23 +0100, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>* Marc Haber:
>> I am routinely running systems without any packet filtering capability
>> on the network, and they are perfectly able to cope. They just only
>> accept network connections for needed services.
>
>This is
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 06:47:09AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 23:20 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:59:34AM +, Will Newton wrote:
> > > On Thursday 17 March 2005 03:16, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > An FAQ, too (not a fack).
> > An
Hi David,
> o Other issues?
it might also be interesting to take a look at a OpenPGP Smartcard. I am
experimenting with such a card at the moment and they are quite cool.
On [1] you can take a look at the features. A HOWTO for those cards will
be available in the next days.
> o Especially on la
hi Andreas,
On 2005-03-17, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But there is no link or other sign of a downloadable source.
>
> Am I to stupid to find the source or do the people at this site have a
> different opinion about downloadable source than I. I wanted to issue an
> ITP if it is w
Before filing any bugs on this matter to the BTS, I'd like to check
who is responsible for changing the priority of a package? Is it the
ftpmasters or the package maintainer?
The package in question is k3b, which should depend on cdrdao, but
cdrdao is too low priority for that. So, either k3b need
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:20:12PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:59:34AM +, Will Newton wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 March 2005 03:16, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
> > > ... and probably not for (that is, not unless you tell me otherwise):
> > > > HPGL
> > > > HTML
> > > >
Hi, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> hey, we are near bug #30! (299925 currently. who'll ride the next?)
We're also near the Unix timestamp of 11, which will be at
2005-03-18 01:58:31 UTC.
Neither factoid is particularly helpful for getting Sargte's RC bug count
down. ;-)
--
Matthias Url
Hi, Marc Haber wrote:
> What is the advantage of having a correctly maintained system behind
> a firewall?
Umm, multiple (different) safety guards in sequence, which the attacker
would have to overcome, are assumed to be more secure than just one.
Accidents happen. So do security advisories.
--
Howdy to all database enthusiasts!
PostgreSQL 8.0 is out to the public for a few weeks now, and the
amount of emails asking "When can we get the debs?" is increasing
every day. In addition, the current structure and packaging of the
existing PostgreSQL 7.4 packages became too clumsy and inflexible
Am 2005-03-16 21:18:33, schrieb Ola Lundqvist:
> Hello
> Some people tend to have really large inboxes. I have had a number of
> customers that have several GB inbox. They tend to get quite a lot
> of attachments (reports etc) and do not have the time to delete mail.
> It will grow quite fast.
Yo
Evan Cox wrote:
Hi Guys,
I hope this is the right area to send this email. My apologies if I am
wrong. If so, please forward to the appropriate area.
I have fiddles with Linux distro's for approx 3 years, and found Debian 3
months ago. I adore it, and will be using debian from now on.
I wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Am Do den 17. Mär 2005 um 14:13 schriebst Du:
> > o Especially on laptops, it might be interesting to also encrypt all of
> > /home and/or other parts of the harddrive to make the data unusuable
> > without the USB key. But how to integrate this w
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:32:37PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Ok, I can guarantee that it never dies.
Sorry, but I do not believe you. "Never" is a very strong word.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/11/msg01926.html
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 21:45 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Mer 16 Mars 2005 21:36, Ron Johnson a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 21:18 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:45:47PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 00:53 +0100, Sa
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 00:41 +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:20:12PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:59:34AM +, Will Newton wrote:
> > > On Thursday 17 March 2005 03:16, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
[snip]
> not even consistent in my own usage. Pro
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 00:10 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 06:47:09AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 23:20 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:59:34AM +, Will Newton wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 17 March 2005 03:16, Florian Zu
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 05:58:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >My basic idea is to have something similar to the testing migration
> >scripts, which takes the decisions of the "master" copy running on
> >ftp-master as an input. At a minimum:
>
> I think it's easiest
Hello Marc,
* Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-16 15:43]:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:40:33 +0900, Junichi Uekawa
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Since I do care about dpatch, and I do use it a lot in my packages,
> >I will be willing to help out / adopt this package.
>
> After organizing on
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 09:31:12AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 05:58:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > One of the problems with this is that you wouldn't benefit from the
> > "hints" the release team prepares for britney; which might screw you
> > over completely.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:12:06PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Before filing any bugs on this matter to the BTS, I'd like to check
> who is responsible for changing the priority of a package? Is it the
> ftpmasters or the package maintainer?
>
> The package in question is k3b, which should depen
Hello,
we reached #30:
Bug#30: libcrypt-ssleay-perl: package description typo(s) and the like
--
NoÃl KÃthe
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
[ Please respect the list code of conduct; I don't request CCs, nor does ]
[ my M-F-T get set as such. In other words, don't send them. ]
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:16:27AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Fine, if you want to get ped
also sprach David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.16.1923 +0100]:
> * relaxing "arch-specific" to also be able to exclude KDE/GNOME
> from mips (until someone commits to properly support it for
> whatever reason he has)
Why do we make a package foo's entry to testing dependent on whether
foo
Vore isn't down.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:54:18AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050317 03:25]:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:31:19PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:44:49PM -080
Read my previous replies.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:01:07AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050317 10:54]:
> > Ah, so why is vore down now for some time now? If it's so easy to
>
> that should read as auric of course.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andi
Am 2005-03-17 16:40:10, schrieb Noèl Köthe:
> Hello,
>
> we reached #30:
>
> Bug#30: libcrypt-ssleay-perl: package description typo(s) and the like
Herzlichen Glückwunsch aus Strasbourg...
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
Michell
also sprach Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.16.1707 +0100]:
> What about requiring a binary upload with the source upload, but then
> rebuilding the binary on the buildd of the uploaded binary *anyway*?
It would also address a security/trust problem with which some
professional customer
Due to a severe lack of time, I've decided to orphan a bunch of my
packages.
They are,
o hp48cc
o electric
o vipec
o libmad
o madplay
o libid3tag
I've filed bugs orphaning them, and have uploaded packages with the
maintainer set to QA.
Justificatio
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 16:51 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.16.1923 +0100]:
> > * relaxing "arch-specific" to also be able to exclude KDE/GNOME
> > from mips (until someone commits to properly support it for
> > whatever reason he has)
>
> Why
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:35:27AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:29:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ideally we would see forming a little NEW-reviewing comittee which would
> > facilitate the job of the ftp-masters. This is also in accordance of the
> > small-team pro
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:56:58PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 March 2005 19:14, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > Hi, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > As far as a NEW-review team, when I raised this about a week ago, aj said
> > > that you'd effectively be ftpmasters, so why not be an ftpma
Will Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 17 March 2005 03:16, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
>
> > ... and probably not for (that is, not unless you tell me otherwise):
> > > HPGL
> > > HTML
> > > HTTPS
>
> Traditionally I think these would use "an". Even if you pronounce "h" as
> "haich"
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:09:33PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:39:48 -0700, Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >* The first rule of securing a machine exposed to the wilds is "Deny by
> > default, allow by need".
>
> Which is pretty well accomplished by only running
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:36:25PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> - check that the package names are sane, don't conflict, and
> aren't gratuitiously many (a -doc package for 10 kbytes of
> documentation...) (what's the current opinion on that, anyway?)
Don't you think maintainers are big en
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (This might be a topic without a possible conclusion!)
> Funny, but although I'd say "an HTML file" or "an HTTPS url" or
> similar, I'd say "a history achievement".
Ah, in "a history achievement", you accent the first syllable of
"history", which pr
Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you have all of the filtering rule support, then why is this even an
> issue? Write the user-space tool and you should be golden; you've got a
> useable firewalling implementation.
>
> What's the problem?
Who said there was a problem? I was asking ex
also sprach Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.17.1734 +0100]:
> This it what I see as the attitude of *some* people: "It works on
> x86, x86-64 & ppc. Who cares about lame old and/or arches like
> m68k, arm, hppa & sparc?"
Well, there seem to be no more than two ways to get rid of this
pr
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 18:00 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.17.1734 +0100]:
> > This it what I see as the attitude of *some* people: "It works on
> > x86, x86-64 & ppc. Who cares about lame old and/or arches like
> > m68k, arm, hppa & sparc?"
>
Hi,
Sven Luther:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:36:25PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > - check that the package names are sane, don't conflict, and
> > aren't gratuitiously many (a -doc package for 10 kbytes of
> > documentation...) (what's the current opinion on that, anyway?)
>
> Don't yo
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050317 17:10]:
> Why can't we have separate sid->testing propagation for each arch,
> then freeze testing as before, get rid of RC bugs, and release?
Because than the security team may need to fix 11 different source
packages (or how many architectures we act
Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Mike Fedyk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050316 20:55]:
> > Andreas Barth wrote:
> > >If that happens for a too long period, we might consider such an
> > >architecture to be too slow to keep up, and will eventually discuss
> > >about kicking it out of the architectures we wait for
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 06:43:52PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Luther:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:36:25PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > > - check that the package names are sane, don't conflict, and
> > > aren't gratuitiously many (a -doc package for 10 kbytes of
> > >
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:02:16 +0100, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-16 15:43]:
>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:40:33 +0900, Junichi Uekawa
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Since I do care about dpatch, and I do use it a lot in my packages,
>> >I will be w
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:03:15 -0700, Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:09:33PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> I am routinely running systems without any packet filtering capability
>> on the network, and they are perfectly able to cope. They just only
>> accept network
Andreas Barth wrote:
* Mike Fedyk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050316 20:55]:
Andreas Barth wrote:
If that happens for a too long period, we might consider such an
architecture to be too slow to keep up, and will eventually discuss
about kicking it out of the architectures
Hi Christian,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:11:11PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Sigh, I *knew* someone would say this..:-)
>
> Well, I may be unlucky enough for the tutorial about "i18n/l10n
> handling for maintainers and translators" I proposed at debconf
> to be accepted. If it is, I *wil
* Andreas Tille
| On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Karsten Merker wrote:
|
| >> Some, maybe. Are there lots of people running servers on m68k and arm?
| > ^^^
| > Perhaps not on m68k, but at least I do on sparc and mipsel, and I doubt
| > that I am the on
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:14:27PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:03:15 -0700, Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:09:33PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> I am routinely running systems without any packet filtering capability
> >> on the network,
On 10231 March 1977, Sven Luther wrote:
>> - check that the package names are sane, don't conflict, and
>> aren't gratuitiously many (a -doc package for 10 kbytes of
>> documentation...) (what's the current opinion on that, anyway?)
> Don't you think maintainers are big enough to know how to h
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now the idea was to find some way to help them along, and this may be the
> solution to it. Notice that they still have veto right so nothing can get past
> them if thet don't want.
>
> Having them take positive action to counter the NEW review team or the
Quoting Torsten Landschoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> May I suggest reporting your HOWTO mail as a bug in the developers
> reference? That way it is at least recorded somewhere. I'd do it but I
> don't want without permission.
Feel free to do so...this will probably be a good motivation for me to
wr
Hello
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:36:21PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 21:18 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:45:47PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 00:53 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > >
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:31:39PM +0100, Remi Vanicat wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Now the idea was to find some way to help them along, and this may be the
> > solution to it. Notice that they still have veto right so nothing can get
> > past
> > them if thet don't wan
I packaged Freevo for Debian and uploaded it some time ago. It has now
seen some attention from the FTP masters, but I've since started using
MythTV instead of Freevo. If anyone's interested in taking over the
package and uploading it, drop me a message.
Cheers,
Shaun
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Mike Fedyk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050316 20:55]:
>> Andreas Barth wrote:
>> >If that happens for a too long period, we might consider such an
>> >architecture to be too slow to keep up, and will eventually discuss
>> >about kicking it out of the architec
On Thursday 17 March 2005 02:59, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> > That's for sure but I want to be able to do automatic upgrades for the
> > simple cases. And at least help the admin by dumping the directory
> > before starting the upgrade and taking care of the old database files in
> > case he deci
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
[snip]
> > Okay, so we've got a new suite; is that global for all scc arches, or
> > separate, a la "subtesting-s390", say? The question there is "Will s390
> > have a different version of the package to m68k, if one or the other is
> > being more aggressively maintained
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 20:12 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:36:21PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 21:18 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:45:47PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2005-02
On Thursday 17 March 2005 01:19, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, David Schmitt wrote:
> > Collecting tidbits of
> > information concerning the various packages rotting in NEW and making
> > that information public.
>
> A list of packages-in-NEW is available on the Web, including binary
> package name
On CÃad, 2005-03-16 at 02:33 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Alastair,
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:30:58PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > >* Steve Langasek
> > >
> > >| If you are planning any other transitions that will affect a lot of
> > >| packages, please let us know in advance.
On Mar 17, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, we are not expecting the DSA people to keep the system
> secure; SCC non-released arches don't need to provide developer
> machines.
I do not believe that this is limited to debian hosts. If an OS lacks
the basic security feature
Hello Marc,
* Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-17 21:45]:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:02:16 +0100, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-16 15:43]:
> >> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:40:33 +0900, Junichi Uekawa
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Since I
On Thursday 17 March 2005 00:21, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:51:16PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> "libraries transitioned" is a big point against testing:
>
> Transitions of API-compatible libraries are a pain _only_ due to
> testing. In unstable, such a transition can easily b
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 20:12, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> What would really win, of course, is "Architecture: !hurd-i386". But
> negative declarations are currently not yet supported. They should
> be.
Research the problem (especially on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-{dpkg,release}/, but
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 09:04:14AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (This might be a topic without a possible conclusion!)
> > Funny, but although I'd say "an HTML file" or "an HTTPS url" or
> > similar, I'd say "a history achievement".
> Ah, i
On 10231 March 1977, David Schmitt wrote:
>> > Collecting tidbits of
>> > information concerning the various packages rotting in NEW and making
>> > that information public.
>> A list of packages-in-NEW is available on the Web, including binary
>> package names, bugs closed, et al.
>> Nothing more
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:57:11PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10231 March 1977, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >> - check that the package names are sane, don't conflict, and
> >> aren't gratuitiously many (a -doc package for 10 kbytes of
> >> documentation...) (what's the current opinion on tha
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
