hi everybody
thanks to help of many people
(both on debian-legal , debian-devel , and privately),
I have prepared a new debugged improved version of mplayer
for the Debian archive : namely version 1.0pre6-4
Simon McVittie , in particular, has tried my packaging in
powerpc : so he has provided
Le jeudi 10 mars 2005 à 08:17 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> The kernel could blacklist alsa modules by default and the alsa-base
> would divert that to blacklist oss. That sounds the simplest.
It isn't possible to divert files in /etc.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
:
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 09 mars 2005 à 11:23 -0800, Blunt Jackson a écrit :
>> I appreciate the clarification. What is desirable, then, is for the developer
>> to be able to statically link his or her own libraries, and third
>> party libraries,
>> but to dynamically pick up "system"
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:04:04PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> i would argue then that user should use a tool called "rm", or "mv" :)
Hmm, rm -rf: read mail, really fast?
Bastian
--
One does not thank logic.
-- Sarek, "Journey to Babel", stardate 3842.4
> Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If a fresh sarge/2.6 system lacks alsa-base then this would seem to be a
> > problem because in that case nothing enforces the mutual exclusion of OSS
> > and ALSA modules. If linux26 doesn't install alsa-base then perhaps it
> > should do so. Even
Hi folks
It seems that Anthony Foka is missing in action. He does not respond to
bugs which removes his packages from the release.
Current bug statistic:
grave: 13
serious: 14
important: 21
outstanding: 146
fixed in NMU: 26
Current package statistic:
count: 46
in woody: 40
in sarge: 40
same vers
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:46:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Considering you're talking about solutions that require updates to
> kernel-image packages *anyway*, why has no one suggested adding the
> necessary blacklist entries to these packages? Far better than removing
Thiemo,
The code builds OK. It even runs if I put less than 4 symbols
in a shared library (it works with 3 symbols for sure). I presume
multigot problem is unrelated to this...
Pjotr Kourzanov
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:32:38AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
> > D
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi folks
>
> It seems that Anthony Foka is missing in action. He does not respond to
> bugs which removes his packages from the release.
Have you asked [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Develo
Scripsit Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> laptop-net also contains a configuration file switching mechanism.
For that matter, so does ifupdown. I have a bunch of post-up 'ln -fs'
commands in the appropiate /etc/network/interfaces on my laptop.
Does switchconf do more than can be simulated easily
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 16:22 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Gergely,
>
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:56:10AM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > Just to chime in, not saying that maintaining a consistent state between
> > architectures is an easy thing and presents no problems, but Debian is
> > the o
I have often tried to argue my position on automake/autoconf in
packages' build dependencies: I do not think they belong there. If
a package does not build without automake or autoconf, it is broken
and should be fixed. However, bugs like #298336 seem to suggest that
other maintainers deem it entir
also sprach Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.10.1309 +0100]:
> > laptop-net also contains a configuration file switching
> > mechanism.
>
> For that matter, so does ifupdown. I have a bunch of post-up 'ln
> -fs' commands in the appropiate /etc/network/interfaces on my
> laptop. Does sw
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:10:12PM +0100, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ERROR: Removing 'trm290': Device or resource busy
> ERROR: Removing 'vis82cxxx': Device or resource busy
> pivot_root: No such file or directory
> /sbin/init: 432: cannot open dev/console: No such file
>
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:10:12PM +0100, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ERROR: Removing 'trm290': Device or resource busy
ERROR: Removing 'vis82cxxx': Device or resource busy
pivot_root: No such file or directory
/sbin/init: 432: cannot ope
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:48:55 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:10:12PM +0100, Andreas Tille
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ERROR: Removing 'trm290': Device or resource busy
> >> ERROR: Removing
Scripsit martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I seem to recall the devel-reference or some similar document to
> specifically address this issue, but I cannot find the location
> anymore.
Are you thinking about /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz?
--
Henning Makholm "They discussed
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:10:12PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
> I've got a new Dell machine which I was able to install with Kernel 2.4.27.
> It has a SATA drive but I disabled SATA in BIOS according to the manuals.
> All I write in the following has this SATA disabled BIOS setting.
> As I
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:52:45PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I have often tried to argue my position on automake/autoconf in
> packages' build dependencies: I do not think they belong there. If
> a package does not build without automake or autoconf, it is broken
> and should be fixed. Howeve
might be fixable by regenerating a new initrd for the 2.6 kernel:
mkinitrd -v /boot/initrd-2.6.x-x.img 2.6.x-x
make sure to add this line to the grube menue.lst:
initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.x-x.img
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:01:42 +1100, Paul Hampson wrote
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:10:12PM +0100, An
Hi all,
I have noticed debian has its own OID in IANA
and googling I could only find userdir-ldap.schema
in db.debian.org.
I wonder if there is a debian ldap schema to
store debian packages. Better yet,
are we going to have one ever?
cheers,
juan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Hi,
what is the status of the bonsai package? There a serious bugs (not
reported) and should be fixed. A new version of Bonsai is also available?
--
Raphael Bossek
--
DSL Komplett von GMX +++ Supergünstig und stressfrei einsteigen!
AKTION "Kein Einrichtungspreis" nutzen: http://www.gmx.net/de/g
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > Le mercredi 09 mars 2005 à 11:23 -0800, Blunt Jackson a écrit :
> >> I appreciate the clarification. What is desirable, then, is for the
> >> developer
> >> to be able to statically link his or her own libraries, and third
> >> party librari
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gourmet
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/grecipe-manager/
* License : GPL
Description : a recipe manager
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:33:32PM +0100, Raphael Bossek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what is the status of the bonsai package? There a serious bugs (not
> reported) and should be fixed. A new version of Bonsai is also available?
Well, please do file those bugs then! I see neither this serious bug,
nor a bug
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Jacob S wrote:
Which version of the Debian-Installer did you use? We had similar
symptoms on a new Dell recently at work and had to grab the latest daily
build to get a working version. I can check on the exact date of the
daily build we used, if you want.
On my desk I see only
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Thomas Schneller wrote:
mkinitrd -v /boot/initrd-2.6.x-x.img 2.6.x-x
I guess you mean here "s/-v/-o/", right?
Well, I did so
mkinitrd -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.10-1-686 2.6.10-1-686
(under
# uname -a
Linux wr-linux03 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Wed Dec 1 19:43:08 JST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > If a fresh sarge/2.6 system lacks alsa-base then this would seem to be a
>> > problem because in that case nothing enforces the mutual exclusion of OSS
>> > and ALSA modules. If linux26 doesn't install alsa-base then perha
Andreas Tille schrieb am Donnerstag, 10. März 2005 um 15:10:12 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a new Dell machine which I was able to install with Kernel 2.4.27.
> It has a SATA drive but I disabled SATA in BIOS according to the manuals.
> All I write in the following has this SATA disabled BIOS setting
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:04:55 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Jacob S wrote:
>
> > Which version of the Debian-Installer did you use? We had similar
> > symptoms on a new Dell recently at work and had to grab the latest
> > daily build to get a working v
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
> >On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
> >>On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Henning Glawe wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Moin,
> >>> just discovered a small problem in the xen-debian packages (2.0.4-4, from
> >>> people.d.o):
> >>
Goswin Brederlow writes:
> Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So to be clear the alternatives suggested so far are:
> >
> > 1. The two-package approach
> >
> > * oss blacklists ALSA modules
> > * alsa-base blacklists OSS modules
> > * alsa-base Conflicts with oss
> > * kernel-image
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Paul Hampson wrote:
> * timestamp skew means that the autobuilt makefiles will try
> to rebuild configure from configure.in even if configure is patched by
> dpkg-source at the same time as configure.in
> * A solution for this is in the above-mentioned README.Debian
New
This one time, at band camp, Adam Heath said:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
> > >On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
> > >>On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Henning Glawe wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> S20xend
> > >>> S20xendomains
> > >>> K20xend
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> -Wl,-static ... -Wl,-dy are equivalent and shorter :-)
Not for me, even though the ld manual claims they're the same. I have no
idea why. But the reason I went looking for a more elaborate solution
was the above not working in the first place.
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Thursday, 10 de March de 2005 15:10, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I tried to upgrade to a 2.6.x kernel but failed always with kernel_panic.
> I tried 2.6.8, 2.6.8 and 2.6.10 (here -1-386 and -1-686 versions) and
> all failed with the same result:
>
> ERROR: Removing 'trm290': Device or resource bus
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ext3rminator
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://glandium.org/debian/repository/experimental/
* License : GPL
Description :
Back history: I added xprt-xprintorg to the desktop task at the end of
January after receiving bug #226605 which stated that
More and more applications like Firebird, Thunderbird, Mozilla, Java,
Openoffice and more need it so the
default Debian desktop and print server installations should p
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
> painful to the installation team, I mostly wanted to ask: Is xprintorg
> still needed to print from mozilla, openoffice, firefox, etc, or has
> that been cleared up since january? Should I remove xprt-xprintorg from
> the desktop task again?
It is not absolu
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 02:50:04 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Considering you're talking about solutions that require updates to
> kernel-image packages *anyway*, why has no one suggested adding the
> necessary blacklist entries to these packages?
k-i packages aren't the right place to put the blac
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:45:35PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Anyway, besides illistrating why new debconf questions can be pretty
> painful to the installation team, I mostly wanted to ask: Is xprintorg
> still needed to print from mozilla, openoffice, firefox, etc, or has
> that been cleared up si
hi,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:15:32PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I wonder if there is a debian ldap schema to
> store debian packages. Better yet,
> are we going to have one ever?
while i am not the maintainer of the debian oid arch, i wrote an
unofficial debian package schema some time b
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:57:11AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:46:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Considering you're talking about solutions that require updates to
> > kernel-image packages *anyway*, why has no one suggested adding the
> > ne
Around 14 o'clock on Mar 10, Joey Hess wrote:
> Back history: I added xprt-xprintorg to the desktop task at the end of
> January after receiving bug #226605 which stated that
>
> More and more applications like Firebird, Thunderbird, Mozilla, Java,
> Openoffice and more need it so the
> de
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 01:10:12 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Davide, would you agree with making gnome-media depend on something like
> "alsa-base | kernel-image-2.4", to ensure sound is working properly upon
> installation?
I don't see why gnome-media should be involved. This problem has nothi
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> The problem is larger then that. Leave it on task will require update
> of installation manual and update of all translations too.
Then we are best served by removing it. It is suggested, anyway...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find th
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:45:35PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Back history: I added xprt-xprintorg to the desktop task at the end of
> January after receiving bug #226605 which stated that
>
> More and more applications like Firebird, Thunderbird, Mozilla, Java,
> Openoffice and more need it so
|| On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:16:09 -0300
|| Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hdmh> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
>> painful to the installation team, I mostly wanted to ask: Is xprintorg
>> still needed to print from mozilla, openoffice, firefox, etc, or has
>> that bee
* Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-10 13:14]:
> > It seems that Anthony Foka is missing in action. He does not respond to
> > bugs which removes his packages from the release.
>
> Have you asked [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had dinner with Anthony last night. I'll follow up with more
information
|| On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:13:46 -0300
|| Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hdmh> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> The problem is larger then that. Leave it on task will require update
>> of installation manual and update of all translations too.
hdmh> Then we a
|| On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:56:46 -0800
|| Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kp> Around 14 o'clock on Mar 10, Joey Hess wrote:
>> Back history: I added xprt-xprintorg to the desktop task at the end of
>> January after receiving bug #226605 which stated that
>>
>> More and more applications
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Qingning Huo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libtorrent
Version : 0.5.1
Upstream Author : Jari Sundel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://libtorrent.rakshasa.no/
* License : GPL
Description : a BitTorrent library
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Qingning Huo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: rtorrent
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Jari Sundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://libtorrent.rakshasa.no/
* License : GPL
Description : ncurses BitTorrent cl
Hello,
I contacted Takashi Okamoto, the official maintainer of the jad
package ( http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/jad ). He can no
longer maintain it and has asked me to adopt it. However, I am not yet
an official maintainer, so I suggest that this package be orphaned.
The link from the pa
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:37:52PM +0100, Jared Boone wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I contacted Takashi Okamoto, the official maintainer of the jad
> package ( http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/jad ). He can no
> longer maintain it and has asked me to adopt it. However, I am not yet
> an official main
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:09:05PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > laptop-net also contains a configuration file switching mechanism.
>
> For that matter, so does ifupdown. I have a bunch of post-up 'ln -fs'
> commands in the appropiate /etc/network/
I noticed that kernel-patch-2.6.10-hppa and kernel-patch-2.6.10-s390
are now in Sarge. Should they be there? There is no corresponding
kernel-source-2.6.10 package in Sarge to which these patches could be
applied (as it is only in Sid). Just a question I had.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Not really. Like you did remember, exist some language that need it
> for printing and in this case i think it should be included.
What languages (and why)?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|| On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:37:16 -0500
|| Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jh> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Not really. Like you did remember, exist some language that need it
>> for printing and in this case i think it should be included.
jh> What languages (and why)?
Like Henrique, I don't re
Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
> I removed the xprint dependencies in debian-edu, cause it does not work
> out of the box, and it's confusing. Printing using cups works, both
> with mozilla (suite) and OOo.
Xprint works perfectly fine out of the box.
I don't remember receiving a bug report from you.
Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Not really. Like you did remember, exist some language that need it
> > for printing and in this case i think it should be included.
>
> What languages (and why)?
>
Xprint provides two (related) services, currently made use of by the mozillas
and ot
Drew Parsons wrote:
> The desktop task depends on x-window-system-core, not x-window-system,
> and therefore shouldn't be hauling in Xprint.
Like I said at the head of this thread I explicitly added xprt-xprintorg
to the deaktop task on user request. However, nothing I've seen so far
seems to be a
Around 12 o'clock on Mar 11, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Keith said Xprint is increasingly irrelevant, but I'm not aware how this
> language issue can be satisfactorily solved without Xprint.
Mozilla is currently integrating Pango support for complex text layout
issues; using that for printing would
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Kolovos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: torrentflux
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Qrome (to contact use:
http://www.torrentflux.com/contact.php)
* URL : http://www.torrentflux.com/
* License : GPL
Descriptio
64 matches
Mail list logo
