Fwd: Regarding: packages.debian.org/testing/net/bcm5700-source

Have people seen these? Is this a new way to phish email address confirmations? The website exposes all the kinds of things that I do not want on the WWW... - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:37:57 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sub

Re: Is declaring correct deps/conflicts for versions not in stable really no longer needed?

At Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:03:00 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The bug _was_ in glibc, and not in php. It is not the job of php to > > force you to have a non-buggy glibc installed. > > This depends on point of view. > If a library < X.Y does not provide a feature needed

Re: ppp/ip-up vs. network/if-up

On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 23:28, Robert Collins wrote: > Does it hook into ppp to handle persistent ppp connections? (i.e. adsl). I am not sure what you mean. The new ifupdown uses pppd's updetach option. Run with this option, pppd only exits after it has made a connection. Since ifup runs "up" co

Re: Xsession doesn't use umask setting from /etc/login.defs

[Redirecting to debian-devel; followups set.] On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:29:32PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote: > Hi, > > After a fresh sarge install, I'm having problems with umask settings. In > /etc/login.defs I set umask to 002, and that works for logging in on the > console or remote via ss

Re: ..d-u support sponsorships, was: Problem with ppp keeping link up

Another possibility would be distribution based lists - e.g. debian-woody, debian-sarge - possibly debian-sid. Users of a specific distribution can use that list, without having to be asked 'which version are you running'. It will tend to automatically group the more advanced questions (or the

Re: Fwd: Regarding: packages.debian.org/testing/net/bcm5700-source

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:22:14AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > Have people seen these? Thousands of times. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ppp/ip-up vs. network/if-up

On Wednesday 13 October 2004 08.30, Thomas Hood wrote: > On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 23:28, Robert Collins wrote: > > Does it hook into ppp to handle persistent ppp connections? (i.e. > > adsl). > > I am not sure what you mean. > > The new ifupdown uses pppd's updetach option. Run with this option, > pp

Re: Fwd: Regarding: packages.debian.org/testing/net/bcm5700-source

also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.0929 +0200]: > > Have people seen these? > > Thousands of times. Have people responded? What do people think? -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud D

Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3

On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:56:25 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Under your scheme, Sarge would be bereft of all the packages > that build on SA that have not changed, at the cost of something > that has shown all evidence of being flakey and not ready for prime > time y

discover or alsa?

Lots of users are reporting that ALSA sound doesn't "just" work when they install it. The cause of the problem is the fact that discover loads OSS modules even when ALSA modules are available. This bug cannot be worked around consistently with policy because discover offers no mechanism for black

Re: discover or alsa?

[Thomas Hood] > Given these facts, what should the ALSA packaging team do? It seems > that the alsa packages should Conflict with discover and discover1. Isn't this only a problem with discover1? I thought discover (v2) had a mechanism to detect if OSS or ALSA was used. It is probably better to

Bug#221988 (makeinfo --xml outputs non-well-formed XML) and my patch

I submitted a patch for the bug #221988. Does anyone know when it will be considered? If this bug could be fixed in the Sarge release (I don't know if this is possible), this would really be fine. Thanks, -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: 100% accessible vali

Re: Bug#276229: RFH: ion2, ion3 -- Keyboard-friendly window manager with tiled windows

* Per Olofsson wrote: > I currently don't have the time and energy to maintain ion2 and ion3 > as well as I should, so I hereby request a co-maintainer for them. > There are no big problems with the packages as they are, but they > need to be updated to the latest upstream versions. Since I'm usin

Re: discover or alsa?

On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 10:57, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Thomas Hood] > Isn't this only a problem with discover1? I thought discover (v2) had > a mechanism to detect if OSS or ALSA was used. If there is such a mechanism then it isn't working. > It is probably better to discuss this with the

Re: Package idea, Debian-Firewall.

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 06:13:36AM +0200, nicklas (smurfd) wrote: > Hey Debian-devels! > > I have had a package idea, for a long time now. The idea, was a > package, containing a "Flush-all" firewall script. Adding this script to > be ran at bootup. Just for the simplicity. I tend to keep forgett

Re: Common set of debconf templates

On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 10:05:40PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 12:59:01PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:36:40AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > SHARED TEMPLATES > > >It's actually possible to have a template and a question tha

Re: Is declaring correct deps/conflicts for versions not in stable really no longer needed?

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 03:23:51PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:03:00 +0400, > Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The bug _was_ in glibc, and not in php. It is not the job of php to > > > force you to have a non-buggy glibc installed. > > This depends on

Re: Package idea, Debian-Firewall.

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 11:39:29AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 06:13:36AM +0200, nicklas (smurfd) wrote: > > Hey Debian-devels! > > > > I have had a package idea, for a long time now. The idea, was a > > package, containing a "Flush-all" firewall script.

Re: discover or alsa?

On Oct 13, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lots of users are reporting that ALSA sound doesn't "just" work when > they install it. The cause of the problem is the fact that discover > loads OSS modules even when ALSA modules are available. This bug cannot > be worked around consistently

Re: Fwd: Regarding: packages.debian.org/testing/net/bcm5700-source

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:43:52AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.0929 +0200]: > > martin f krafft wrote: > > > Have people seen these? > > > > Thousands of times. > > Have people responded? What do people think? It's yet more spam. Why w

Re: RFD: Draft for a volatile.d.o policy

John Hasler mentions, > ... the non-existent backports.debian.org ... An existent backports.debian.org would seem a worthy aspiration. Were plans thereto afoot, I would encourage. (It has been surmised once or twice in this thread that few people here actually use stable. This may be so, but ju

Re: discover or alsa?

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:51:46AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 13, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Lots of users are reporting that ALSA sound doesn't "just" work when > > they install it. The cause of the problem is the fact that discover > > loads OSS modules even when ALSA mo

Re: Package idea, Debian-Firewall.

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 06:13:36AM +0200, nicklas (smurfd) wrote: > I have had a package idea, for a long time now. The idea, was a > package, containing a "Flush-all" firewall script. Adding this script to > be ran at bootup. Just for the simplicity. I tend to keep forgetting to > add it myself.

Re: discover or alsa?

|--==> Wouter Verhelst writes: WV> [1 ] WV> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:51:46AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: >>On Oct 13, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Lots of users are reporting that ALSA sound doesn't "just" work when >>> they install it. The cause of the problem is the fa

Re: Fwd: Regarding: packages.debian.org/testing/net/bcm5700-source

also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1334 +0200]: > It's yet more spam. Why would we respond or care? Well, I realise. I was just curious. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian dev

Re: Common set of debconf templates

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 11:51:00AM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote: > The package includes the template-package's templates at build > (debhelper style as suggested before). > > Then up to date translations can be ensured by installing a > debconf-translation-templates meta package or templates pack

Re: RFD: Draft for a volatile.d.o policy

Thaddeus H. Black writes: > An existent backports.debian.org would seem a worthy aspiration. Were > plans thereto afoot, I would encourage. I agree, but I try to avoid writing anything that could be construed as "somebody ought to do X" on debian lists. > It has been surmised once or twice in th

Re: discover or alsa?

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:14:24PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka said > |--==> Wouter Verhelst writes: > > WV> [1 ] > WV> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:51:46AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > >>On Oct 13, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Lots of users are reporting that ALSA sound doesn't "

Re: Bug#276057: ITP: mediawiki -- Wikipedia wiki engine

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Evan Prodromou wrote: * Package name: mediawiki Version : 1.3.5 Upstream Author : Mediawiki developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://wikipedia.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : Wikipedia wiki engine MediaWiki is the wiki

Re: Fwd: Regarding: packages.debian.org/testing/net/bcm5700-source

martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.0929 +0200]: > > > Have people seen these? > > > > Thousands of times. > > Have people responded? What do people think? I have assumed that they are live-address harvesting spam. It's so easy

Re: Wanted BTS feature: subscription to individual bug reports

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:37:37 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > Hello. > > I can't find a way to track more-or-less easilly all bugs in BTS that I am > somewhat involved into. > If by 'involved' you mean submitted, then this might be useful: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Wanted BTS feature: subscription to individual bug reports

On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 01:59:36AM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:37:37 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > I can't find a way to track more-or-less easilly all bugs in BTS that I am > > somewhat involved into. > > > > If by 'involved' you mean submitt

Re: discover or alsa?

On Oct 13, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Discover should not try to load drivers for PCI devices AT ALL, we have > > hotplug for this. > The reverse could be (and has been, on multiple occasions) said about > hotplug. Sure, many people say silly things. hotplug is needed on most s

Re: discover or alsa?

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:43:01 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:51:46AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> On Oct 13, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Lots of users are reporting that ALSA sound doesn't "just" work when >> > they install it. The cause of the problem

packages.debian.org version discrepency

The unstable link at http://packages.debian.org/freeguide shows version 0.8, but http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/freeguide shows version 0.7.2. Why is this? Cheers, Shaun

Bug#276376: ITP: gpsd -- a GPS service daemon

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: gpsd Version : 2.1 Upstream Author : Derrick Brashear Eric S. Raymond Russ Nelson Remco Treffkorn * URL : http://developer.berlios.de/projects/gpsd/ * Licens

Re: Wanted BTS feature: subscription to individual bug reports

Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:37:37 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > I can't find a way to track more-or-less easilly all bugs in BTS that I am > > somewhat involved into. > > > > If by 'involved' you mean submitted, then this might be useful: > > http://bugs

Re: discover or alsa?

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 06:07:49PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 13, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Discover should not try to load drivers for PCI devices AT ALL, we have > > > hotplug for this. > > The reverse could be (and has been, on multiple occasions) said about > > h

Re: discover or alsa?

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 07:26:32PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: [brown paper bag] > if want-module-load --package hotplug snd-ens1371 > then > modprobe es1371 > fi > > want-module-load would check configuration files and 'exit 0' or 'exit 1' > depending on whether it will allow hotplug to load

Re: packages.debian.org version discrepency

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:06:03 -0700, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The unstable link at http://packages.debian.org/freeguide shows > version 0.8, but http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/freeguide > shows version 0.7.2. Why is this? I see the same with the moodle package[0], it sho

Re: discover or alsa? Solution proposal.

On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 10:30 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > Lots of users are reporting that ALSA sound doesn't "just" work when > they install it. The cause of the problem is the fact that discover > loads OSS modules even when ALSA modules are available. This bug cannot > be worked around consisten

Re: discover or alsa? Solution proposal.

On Oct 13, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If ALSA is the preferred sound solution, then the alsa-base maintainer > should present a list in hotplug with all of the traditional "oss" > drivers names in a file called alsa-base. hotplug will indeed not load > these files. Guess what? This

Re: discover or alsa?

On Oct 13, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > will probably become mandatory very soon (hint: udev) and needs anyway > > to support PCI hotplugging for systems with an hotplug PCI bus. > That doesn't have anything to do with coldplugging. Also, AFAIK, udev is Sure it does. Why waste ti

Re: discover or alsa? Solution proposal.

On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 20:19 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 13, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If ALSA is the preferred sound solution, then the alsa-base maintainer > > should present a list in hotplug with all of the traditional "oss" > > drivers names in a file called alsa-ba

Re: discover or alsa?

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:18:45PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 13, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > will probably become mandatory very soon (hint: udev) and needs anyway > > > to support PCI hotplugging for systems with an hotplug PCI bus. > > That doesn't have anything to

Brazil Summer Time

Hi, I'd like to know if there is a version to convert the time of application Debian 3.0 to Brazil summer time. We use the version 3.0, its time has changed to summer time, but here, in Brazil, we haven't changed the time yet. It wil change at November 2nd

Bug#276391: O: vgabios -- VGA BIOS software for the Bochs and Qemu emulated VGA card

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I intend to orphan the vgabios package. The package description is: The goal of this project is to provide a Video BIOS for Bochs and Qemu. This VGA BIOS is very specific to the bochs/qemu emulated VGA card. It is NOT meant to drive a physical vga card. You wil

Bug#276392: O: bochs -- IA-32 PC emulator

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I intend to orphan the bochs package. The package description is: Bochs is a highly portable free IA-32 (x86) PC emulator written in C++, that runs on most popular platforms. It includes emulation of the Intel x86 CPU, common I/O devices, and a custom BIOS. .

Re: Brazil Summer Time

Hi, I guess that you need tz-brasil package[0], but as you can see it wasn't packaged in time to woody. You can use "apt pinning" to install only tz-brasil from "testing" or install wget (its depends) and tz-brasil manually. You can ask me or debian-user-portuguese ML for further information. [0

Re: Brazil Summer Time

Hi, On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 03:50:44PM -0300, Rosilene Oliveira wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to know if there is a version to convert the time of > application Debian 3.0 to Brazil summer time. > We use the version 3.0, its time has changed to summer time, but here, > in Brazil, we haven't changed th

Re: Brazil Summer Time

> [...] > > [0] = http://packages.debian.org/tz-brasil/ I'm sorry, the right url is "http://packages.debian.org/tz-brasil"; that slash in the end doesn't exists. -- Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: discover or alsa?

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:30:47 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > Lots of users are reporting that ALSA sound doesn't "just" work when > they install it. The cause of the problem is the fact that discover > loads OSS modules even when ALSA modules are available. This bug cannot > be worked around consiste

Re: discover or alsa?

On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 11:12 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 10:57, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > [Thomas Hood] > > Isn't this only a problem with discover1? I thought discover (v2) had > > a mechanism to detect if OSS or ALSA was used. > > > If there is such a mechanism then i

Re: discover or alsa?

On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 10:51 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 13, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Lots of users are reporting that ALSA sound doesn't "just" work when > > they install it. The cause of the problem is the fact that discover > > loads OSS modules even when ALSA module

Re: discover or alsa?

On Wednesday 13 October 2004 02:18 pm, Marco d'Itri wrote: > udev will probably become mandatory At the moment, if your block devices aren't listed in /sys/block, udev seems to ignore them and to forbid you from creating them manually, at least in /dev. This made a CD writer inaccessible on a

Re: discover or alsa?

On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 12:53 -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:30:47 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > > Lots of users are reporting that ALSA sound doesn't "just" work when > > they install it. The cause of the problem is the fact that discover > > loads OSS modules even when ALSA modul

Re: ppp/ip-up vs. network/if-up

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:50:04 +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > I think Robert thought about if the scripts are rerun if pppd loses > connection and reconnects - typically with a different IP. FYI: The experimental ifupdown does not currently rerun "up" scripts if pppd reconnec

Re: discover or alsa?

On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 21:53, Joshua Kwan wrote: > Well, no. Now discover1 (as yet unreleased) has support for an > /etc/discover.d dir where you can have something akin to > /etc/hotplug/blacklist.d/alsa-base. Of course, once that discover1 upload > is made, the bug goes to the ALSA maintainers. >

Re: about volatile.d.o/n

On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:32:01PM +0100, paddy wrote: > > Hmm, deja vu ;) > > What happens to packages that become orphaned? What happens with a package orphaned from stable? -- Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Develop

Re: ppp/ip-up vs. network/if-up

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Thomas Hood wrote: > FYI: The experimental ifupdown does not currently rerun "up" scripts if > pppd reconnects. Is not the same true for DHCP ? > I can see why, in the case of PPP interfaces, that might be desired. I am > not sure that we should implement it, though. It wo

Re: about volatile.d.o/n

On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 12:34:02PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > > I see no reason for new packages to ever go into volatile. Such things > belong in backports. You seem to have missed a very important ground of volatile: add new packages in a controled way when backporting code to the version in

fishing hooks-samples

Dear Sirs:     We are here in Argentina wholesalers with a long chain of retailers that purchase our "Mystix" products. We are looking for a China factory that can provide us quality products. We buy habitually, 92611, 92641, 277E, 277F, 2320, 2330 and 3191 series (referred to Must

Re: about volatile.d.o/n

On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:22:15PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > > > To be fair, the issue is that if were just rules, there wouldn't > > be a need. > > Why not? I pretty much want to have the spamfilter rules on my mail > box updated from time to time. Currently that has lead me to put > a low

Re: about volatile.d.o/n

I wrote: > I see no reason for new packages to ever go into volatile. Such things > belong in backports. Jesus Climent writes: > You seem to have missed a very important ground of volatile: add new > packages in a controled way when backporting code to the version in > stable is far more difficul

Re: Common set of debconf templates

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:38:58AM -0400, sean finney wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 11:51:00AM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote: > > The package includes the template-package's templates at build > > (debhelper style as suggested before). > > > > Then up to date translations can be ensured by inst

Re: Common set of debconf templates

On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:38:58AM -0400, sean finney wrote: > if the templates are included at build-time by a debhelper-style script, > there's no need for a runtime dependency for these templates. > But for shared/* debconf templates this means that all packages using that template need to be

Re: Xsession doesn't use umask setting from /etc/login.defs

Branden Robinson wrote: [Redirecting to debian-devel; followups set.] On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:29:32PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote: Hi, After a fresh sarge install, I'm having problems with umask settings. In /etc/login.defs I set umask to 002, and that works for logging in on the console or r

Re: ppp/ip-up vs. network/if-up

On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 22:10 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:50:04 +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder > wrote: > > I think Robert thought about if the scripts are rerun if pppd loses > > connection and reconnects - typically with a different IP. > > > FYI: The experime

Bug#276410: ITP: png2ico -- converts .PNG files to Windows .ICO icon resources

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: png2ico Version : 0.0.20241208 Upstream Author : Matthias Benkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.winterdrache.de/freeware/png2ico/index.html * License : GPL Description : converts .PNG files to Win

(no subject)

CAN YOU TELL ME HOW TO MAKE MY ICONS SMALLER ON THE START MENU PLEASE   THANK YOU NANCY

Internet Egypt Server Notification

An e-mail you sent with message-id NOQUEUE was modified by our mail scanning software. The recipients were: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Here are the details of the modification: An attachment named [EMAIL PROTECTED] was removed from this document as it constituted a security hazard. If you require to se

Re: Common set of debconf templates

Brian Sutherland wrote: > What about a rule that says: > > - If the package name is the same as the directory in the debconf database > then use that package's templates take priority. > - Else, as before. Suppose that: 1. package A is preconfigured, and has an A/template 2. package B is preco

Re: Package idea, Debian-Firewall.

ons 2004-10-13 klockan 14.04 skrev Steve Kemp: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 06:13:36AM +0200, nicklas (smurfd) wrote: > > > I have had a package idea, for a long time now. The idea, was a > > package, containing a "Flush-all" firewall script. Adding this script to > > be ran at bootup. Just for the

Re: Package idea, Debian-Firewall.

ons 2004-10-13 klockan 11.39 skrev Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 06:13:36AM +0200, nicklas (smurfd) wrote: > > Hey Debian-devels! > > > > I have had a package idea, for a long time now. The idea, was a > > package, containing a "Flush-all" firewall script. Adding this

Re: Xsession doesn't use umask setting from /etc/login.defs

At Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:14:58 +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote: > > /etc/login.defs explicitly indicates that it is "Configuration > > control definitions for the login package", and many of its > > parameters are inapplicable to display managers, or already > > implemented in parallel (e.g., how long do wa

Re: Brazil Summer Time

At Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:50:44 -0300, Rosilene Oliveira wrote: > I'd like to know if there is a version to convert the time of > application Debian 3.0 to Brazil summer time. > We use the version 3.0, its time has changed to summer time, but here, > in Brazil, we haven't changed the time yet. It wi