On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 05:04:43PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.09.1616 +0200]:
> > msmtp is an SMTP client that can be used as an "SMTP plugin" for Mutt and
> > probably other MUAs (mail user agents).
> > It forwards mails to an SMTP server
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the bplay package.
The package description is:
The bplay package provides a simple command-line utility for playing
and recording audio files in raw sample, VOC and WAV formats.
.
To use this program you need a soundcard of some kind and
Hi,
Daniel Freedman wrote:
> Anyway, just thought I'd see what people think of this, and how the
> Debian community wants to proceed. Is there some way to enable
> compability with this without downloading the firmware and violating
> the DFSG?
Since the tg3 driver doesn't work with my BCM5702 i
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the fpc package.
I'd prefer that Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who's the Free
Pascal Project's main man on Debian packaging and who has provided me
with most of the infrastructure needed to build FPC on Debian, take over
this package. Pe
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 07:10:33PM -0400, Daniel Freedman wrote:
> Unfortunately, I believe that my server board contains one of the rare
> on-board Broadcom chipsets that is completely unable to function (best
> as I can tell), without downloading this firmware, or without at least
> disabling the
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 04:46:10AM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> The only official interfaces SpamAssassin ever provided (to the best of
> my knowledge) are:
> 1) calling spamassassin directly (as a commandline tool)
> 2) calling the spamc client (again, as a commandline tool)
> 3) accessing spamd
* Sven Mueller
| Tollef Fog Heen [u] wrote on 07/10/2004 09:52:
| > * Duncan Findlay | Umm... I'd like to see that
| > 7122 root 15 0 660m 332m 4692 D 0.0 43.8 8:18.64 spamd
| > 7123 nobody15 0 287m 257m 4692 D 0.0 34.0 0:17.01 spamd
| > | Furthermore, you should use the
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 12:23:26PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I don't follow your logic here. First, you say that using SA via the Perl
> modules are not supported; then, you say that the SA Perl APIs were frozen
> and officially published seven months ago?
Oh, and checking on spamassass
* Sven Mueller
| Tollef Fog Heen [u] wrote on 07/10/2004 10:00:
|
| > * Sven Mueller | Well, perl modules don't have an SO name.
| > : [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib > apt-cache show libvideo-capture-v4l-perl|
| > grep ^Depends
| > Depends: perlapi-5.8.3, perl (>= 5.8.3-2), libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4)
|
On Saturday 09 October 2004 15:56, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:48:27AM +0200, Tilo Schwarz wrote:
> > Just one remark: When I was asked to enter a package server I would
> > have liked to enter my local package repository (with all the base
> > stuff in it), but either I couldn
Il dom, 2004-10-10 alle 01:32, Henning Makholm ha scritto:
> > I think that msmtp simply will take the place of sendmail binary called
> > by mutt.
>
> If it provides /usr/sbin/sendmail, then by definition it is a
> mail-transport-agent and should, if packaged, declare itself as such.
No. If you
Il sab, 2004-10-09 alle 17:48, martin f krafft ha scritto:
> > I think it's not a right comparison, nullmail is an MTA. and
> > AFAIK, msmtp is not an MTA:
>
> it transports mail to the next relay, right?
> nullmailer is a "simple relay-only mail transport agent."
>
> what's the difference?
Deep
Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sun, Oct 10, 2004:
> Deep difference. Our mail-transport-agents are able to behave as daemon,
> listening on 25 port. msmtp doesn't, and it's the same for nail. Do you
> think that nail could be an MTA? Do you think that any evolution of
> mail(1) could be se
also sprach Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.1321 +0200]:
> Do you know about a correct way to have a conversation with
> people? I don't like your attitude, I have simply exposed my idea
> about that program, reading its features. That's all.
I am sorry to have offended you, or a
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 01:21:44PM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> Il sab, 2004-10-09 alle 17:48, martin f krafft ha scritto:
> > > I think it's not a right comparison, nullmail is an MTA. and
> > > AFAIK, msmtp is not an MTA:
> >
> > it transports mail to the next relay, right?
> > nullmailer is
also sprach Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.0939 +0200]:
> ssmtp seems to be its competitor, not nullmailer. (ssmtp and msmtp
> appear to provide /usr/bin/sendmail only, while nullmailer appears to
> provide port 25 only.)
>
> But otherwise it's a good question..
Yes, which I would
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: acx100-kernel-src
Version : 0.2.0pre8
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://acx100.sourceforge.net/
* License : MPLv1.1/GPLv2
Description : kernel module for TI acx100 based wireless lan cards
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 07:05:45PM +0300, George Danchev said
> > oh well, msmtp has TLS and SASL and IPv6, so I guess it is more
> > featureful than nullmailer...
>
> and much more ... also has msmtpqueue which is a pair of very simple shell
> scripts that allows you to "queue" mails and send th
Sehr geehrte Kundin, sehr geehrter Kunde,
Ihre e-mail wird an den gewuenschten Empfaenger weitergeleitet.
Haben Sie vielen Dank, wir freuen uns, dass Sie diesen schnellen und
unkomplizierten Weg zu uns gewaehlt haben.
Gerne sind wir fuer Sie da und stellen Ihnen all die Informationen zur
Verfuegun
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:59:39 +0100, paddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 09:37:57AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> It will also happily write to /usr which is IMO a no-no for user
>> binaries.
>
>Where should it write to ?
>
>Would /var/lib or /usr/local be right ?
/usr/local is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libperlio-eol-perl
Version : 0.05
Upstream Author : Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : CPAN
* License : GPL/Artistic
Description : PerlIO layer for normalizing line endings
This layer normalizes any
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 12:36:48 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Not always. In the past many backports have been built including perfectly
>avoidable new dependencies. The volatile archive should have policy and
>deb tools frozen. So no new debconf, no new ucf and so on.
I
also sprach Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.1442 +0200]:
> > and much more ... also has msmtpqueue which is a pair of very simple shell
> > scripts that allows you to "queue" mails and send them all at a later time
> > (useful for dialup connections: write your mails offline and send the
Hello, thank you for contacting Technical support/Customer service. Please
click on the link below to go to our online support site.
http://support.vugames.com
Do not respond to this message as we will not see it.
Vivendi Universal Games-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 275388 general
Bug#275388: mounting at boot time under grub
Bug reassigned from package `devfsd' to `general'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 06:59:50 +0200, Christian Perrier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Could *please* maintainers of packages interacting with RDBMS
>establish a set of *common* debconf templates for prompting users ?
>
>-Database user
>-Password for this user
>-Database administrator username
>-Database
retitle 275192 ITP: acx100-source -- ACX100/ACX111 wireless network drivers
source
thanks
Hi Aurelien!
You wrote:
> Bas Zoetekouw a écrit :
> >Package: wnpp
> >Severity: wishlist
> >
> >* Package name: acx100-kernel-src
> > Version : 0.2.0pre8
> > Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTE
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libio-digest-perl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Chia-liang Kao (éåè)
* URL : CPAN
* License : GPL/Artistic
Description : Calculate digests while reading or writing
This module allows you to calculate dig
Hi,
would someone write me a sample code on how to get the ShortDesc and
LongDesc records from the PkgRecords class?
I think it should start with something like:
cache = apt_pkg.GetCache()
records = apt_pkg.GetPkgRecords(cache)
package = cache['my_pkg']
but I can't figure out how to go on.
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 02:53:58PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 12:36:48 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Not always. In the past many backports have been built including perfectly
> >avoidable new dependencies. The volatile archive should have polic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libfile-type-perl
Version : 0.22
Upstream Author : Paul Mison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : CPAN
* License : GPL/Artistic
Description : determine file type using magic numbers
File::Type uses magic numbers (t
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 10:43:14AM +0900, Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
>
> Furthermore, we should all know that Anti-Spam, Anti-Virus is a CPU &
> memory hog. It needs tons of memory and fastest cpu ... always.
>
I'm using now bogofilter and razor, without CPU and memory problems at all.
So your
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 02:05:06PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.0939 +0200]:
> > ssmtp seems to be its competitor, not nullmailer. (ssmtp and msmtp
> > appear to provide /usr/bin/sendmail only, while nullmailer appears to
> > provide por
also sprach Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.1601 +0200]:
> ssmtp seems to support SSL/TLS connections also. The package depends on
> libssl and a quick glance at the source shows that support is there.
What ssmtp are you talking about?
cirrus:~> dpkg -p ssmtp | grep Depends
Depends
This one time, at band camp, Kevin Mark said:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 10:43:05AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Kevin Mark said:
> > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:01:11AM -0400, Kevin Ma
* Andreas Barth:
> - volatile is not "just another place" for backports, but should only
> contain changes to stable programs that are necessary to keep them
> functional;
Can volatile receive critical updates which are usually not applied to
stable because backports are not available for som
hi
* Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-10 15:46]:
> Daniel Freedman wrote:
> > Anyway, just thought I'd see what people think of this, and how the
> > Debian community wants to proceed. Is there some way to enable
> > compability with this without downloading the firmware and violating
>
* Loïc Minier:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Thu, Oct 07, 2004:
>
>> I think the best option would be to allow the system administrator to
>> statically allocate the ports used by RPC programs. This would help
>> packet filters, too.
>
> While I see the benefit of your suggestion, for p
Hi!
Michael Banck [2004-10-09 12:25 +0200]:
> But in the end, it depends on who does the work, so if Martin Pitt
> (pmount author) should volunteer to integrate this into Debian, that
> would be great I guess.
It'll be my pleasure! :-) Of course I would prefer it if Debian and
Ubuntu used the sam
Scripsit Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm not msmtp fan or user, but I lost two minutes to read the home page
> trying to understand the differences. msmtp is simply a way to delivery
> mail to a remote smtp server. For example you cannot have it listening
> on 25 port, so I cannot see i
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 03:18:52PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 06:59:50 +0200, Christian Perrier
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Could *please* maintainers of packages interacting with RDBMS
> >establish a set of *common* debconf templates for prompting users ?
> >
> >-Database us
Free Ekanayaka wrote:
would someone write me a sample code on how to get the ShortDesc
and LongDesc records from the PkgRecords class?
I think it should start with something like:
cache = apt_pkg.GetCache() records = apt_pkg.GetPkgRecords(cache)
package = cache['my_pkg']
Since there are no A
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 01:57:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I would suggest not naming it an "smtp plugin for mutt" though
> because it works equally well with every other product that uses
> /usr/sbin/sendmail.
I agree with the "smtp plugin for mutt" removal, I will adapt the description
t
As a happy use of rxvt-unicode-ml (thanks Zomb!), I am very annoyed
at times by softwares that have 'xterm' hardcoded. Obviously,
I report these as bugs to have it changed to x-terminal-emulator,
but then again, I consider 'xterm' to be somewhat of a generic name
by now that I think it should be pu
On 09-Oct-04, 20:06 (CDT), Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote:
> > I'm actually surprised it takes them that long.
> > debian-devel must be way down the target list.
>
> probably geeks don't buy viagra, home loans, online medicine, etc :)
Peopl
Marc Haber wrote:
> Do we have infrastructure to handle different answers for the same
> question? Maybe I'd like to have a different dbadmin password on my
> postgresql database than on mysql?
This discussion is about having a common set of chunks of text available
somewhere for use in the debco
martin f krafft wrote:
> What do you think of this proposal. Are there any string points
> *against* it?
I have written scripts that explicitly call xterm because other terminal
emulator programs under X (which I had preferred otherwise) couldn't
handle certain programs. So in those situations
also sprach Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.1934 +0200]:
> I have written scripts that explicitly call xterm because other
> terminal emulator programs under X (which I had preferred
> otherwise) couldn't handle certain programs. So in those
> situations it was not a generic name,
This is cory yearwood from Exsis. Please can you remove the e-mail from your
website..
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 06:43:09PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> The procedure would be to upload a new 'xterm' package which moves
> /usr/bin/xterm to /usr/bin/xterm.real and introduces /usr/bin/xterm
> as alternatives symlink in addition to x-terminal-emulator. Then,
> progressively, the other
also sprach Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.2005 +0200]:
> Wouldn't it be better to file bugs against the packages that don't
> use x-terminal-emulator?
What if those bugs get ignored? see: #275527
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin
#include
* martin f krafft [Sun, Oct 10 2004, 06:43:09PM]:
> but then again, I consider 'xterm' to be somewhat of a generic name
> by now that I think it should be put under control of the
> alternatives system.
>
> The procedure would be to upload a new 'xterm' package which moves
> /usr/bin/xt
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 08:11:42PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.2005 +0200]:
> > Wouldn't it be better to file bugs against the packages that don't
> > use x-terminal-emulator?
>
> What if those bugs get ignored? see: #275527
Hmm, I
also sprach Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.2027 +0200]:
> Hmm, I don't know anything about how uml works but the answers
> seems to imply that fixing it in user-mode-linux suffices... But
> that's something you have to discuss with mdz and not with me.
Right, and I don't want to
#include
* Eduard Bloch [Sun, Oct 10 2004, 08:15:32PM]:
> which is not provided by mlterm. Though luck. In theory, every
Args, it should be pterm.
Eduard.
--
OpenBSD fails miserably in this respect, and makes for an example of how NOT
to work with the community on security issues. Their approa
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sun, Oct 10, 2004:
> > While I see the benefit of your suggestion, for packet filters, I don't
> > see how that would help average people experiencing the problem? Would
> > you require the admin to configure each port for each RPC service as it
> > is ins
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 08:27:34PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 08:11:42PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.2005 +0200]:
> > > Wouldn't it be better to file bugs against the packages that don't
> > > use x-
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 08:32:12PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Right, and I don't want to beat on this issue. user-mode-linux does
> fix it, but Manoj's kernel-package can also create UML kernels,
> which then call xterm. Thus, I would have thought this is best fixed
> in kernel-patch-uml.
>
also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.10.2101 +0200]:
> That bug was closed because it was _already fixed_ and the
> submitter didn't check before filing it.
I am sorry, Matt, but it was not fixed. You should have tagged the
bug wontfix and leave it open.
also sprach Matt Zimm
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 06:43:09PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>> The procedure would be to upload a new '
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> As a happy use of rxvt-unicode-ml (thanks Zomb!), I am very annoyed
> at times by softwares that have 'xterm'
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> martin f krafft wrote:
>> What do you think of this proposal. Are there any string points
>> *against* it?
> I have written scripts that explicitly call xterm because other terminal
> emulator programs under X (which I had preferred otherwise) couldn'
Paul Hampson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 07:10:33PM -0400, Daniel Freedman wrote:
>> Unfortunately, I believe that my server board contains one of the rare
>> on-board Broadcom chipsets that is completely unable to function (best
>> as I can tell), without downloading this firmware, or with
> Branden Robinson:
>
> It's time to fork. Let us work with the rest of the community to
> standardize on a new set of tools based on the last free version of
> cdrtools, thank Mr. Schilling for his valuable contributions, and leave him
> be to pursue his interests in proprietary software without
Nico Golde wrote:
> hi
> * Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-10 15:46]:
>> Daniel Freedman wrote:
>> > Anyway, just thought I'd see what people think of this, and how the
>> > Debian community wants to proceed. Is there some way to enable
>> > compability with this without downloading
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 01:18:50PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> El s??b, 09-10-2004 a las 00:04 -0500, Branden Robinson escribi??:
> > It's time to fork. Let us work with the rest of the community to
> > standardize on a new set of tools based on the last free version of
> > cdrtools,
Tollef Fog Heen [u] wrote on 10/10/2004 13:01:
* Sven Mueller
From the front page of spamassassin.org:
: Flexible: SpamAssassin encapsulates its logic in a well-designed,
: abstract API so it can be integrated anywhere in the email
: stream. The Mail::SpamAssassin classes can be used on a wide va
|--==> Igor Stroh writes:
IS> Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>would someone write me a sample code on how to get the ShortDesc
>>and LongDesc records from the PkgRecords class?
>>
>>I think it should start with something like:
>>
>>cache = apt_pkg.GetCache() records = apt_pkg.GetPkgRec
On Oct 10, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Until they do one of these two things, the firmware is not safe to
> distribute. I don't know why upstream is distributing it; I believe they
> are simply being sloppy about licensing.
You know well that upstream is not "being sloppy", but
Le sam 09/10/2004 à 16:29, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:48:23PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> > I got this strange behaviour on Sid today while upgrading
> > kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686. Notice on the log that I answered "n" to "Do
> > you want to stop now? [Y/n]", and it ab
Johannes Rohr a écrit :
Dear all,
due to the ever increasing number of mozilla-based packages I wonder if
it would be a good thing to have a separate debian-mozilla mailing
list. Personally I have big difficulties understanding the hacked way
how mozilla extensions etc are being repackaged f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: tiff2png
Version : 0.91
Upstream Author : Willem van Schaik, Greg Roelofs
* URL : http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/apps/tiff2png.html
* License : BSD-like
Description : TIFF to PNG converter with alpha channel
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 04:27:21PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> This package can convert a TIFF image directly to a PNG image without
> the need of any intermediary format. Unlike the netpbm package,
> this program can preserve transparency information during the
> conversion.
What's the gain
> > The procedure would be to upload a new 'xterm' package which moves
> > /usr/bin/xterm to /usr/bin/xterm.real and introduces /usr/bin/xterm
Of course, you mean /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm...
> Mandrake did something like that a while ago(*) - broke the
> application name for X resources.
I
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:32:06AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 09-Oct-04, 20:06 (CDT), Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote:
> > > I'm actually surprised it takes them that long.
> > > debian-devel must be way down the target list.
> >
>
Steinar H. Gunderson [u] wrote on 10/10/2004 23:41:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 04:27:21PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
This package can convert a TIFF image directly to a PNG image without
the need of any intermediary format. Unlike the netpbm package,
this program can preserve transparency information
> I dropped all references to specific boot loaders since there
> are over a dozend different ones used with linux and people
> beagan to complain that I didn't mention the one they use.
To pull out a cliche, this is "letting the perfect be the enemy of the
good". Covering the two most popular bo
Hi,
Recent versions of automake add an option --disable-dependency-tracking
to the generated configure script. If you don't use that option, the
generated Makefile will wrap all calls to the compiler in a call to
'depcomp', which will generate a Makefile snippet in a .deps directory
to better trac
Once upon a time martin f krafft said...
>
> The procedure would be to upload a new 'xterm' package which moves
> /usr/bin/xterm to /usr/bin/xterm.real and introduces /usr/bin/xterm
> as alternatives symlink in addition to x-terminal-emulator. Then,
> progressively, the other x-terminal-emulator p
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The procedure would be to upload a new 'xterm' package which moves
>> > /usr/bin/xterm to /usr/bin/xterm.real and introduces /usr/bin/xterm
> Of course, you mean /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm...
I didn't notice that. Though the cygwin people have been m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/2004 07:29 AM, paddy wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:32:06AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
>
>>On 09-Oct-04, 20:06 (CDT), Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote:
>>>
I'm actually sur
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, wrote:
> new software for the best price for you
I am saying the same for my list
> Adobe Illustrator CS - 90.00
inkscape - 0.00
> Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional - 100.00
xpdf - 0.00
> McAfee Personal Firewall Plus 2004 v. 5.0 - 20.00
Why?
> Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.
82 matches
Mail list logo
