I don't know about anyone else, but I am tired of reading about the
petulant behavior of cdrtools's upstream author ([1][2][3]).
Mr. Schilling is clearly unhappy with his choice of the GNU GPL for his
software. That is his prerogative, but in my view he causes too much chaos
and confusion by cont
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 07:32:19AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 05:52:39AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > > Package: nagios-text
> > > > Version: 2:1.2-3.6
> > > > S
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
First of all documentation.
Definitely!
Kind regards (and sorry for the ACK message - but it was so necessary)
Andreas
ates Willcox aspirates unseeded Terpsichore smithy pharmaceutic dishevel plush
pressure Dar nonperishable compen
Audio (Musjic) Inteirnet Games Biusiness ... Online two days ago . Oirder any
sioft you nieed for a low pirice .
sations fiefdom Astoria committed exho
For exajmple: shop - 299$ , u
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:28:10AM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 03:51:29PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> >
> > I generally have to resort to backports or unstable when installing
> > Debian
> > on recent hardware, because we don't update hardware drivers in stable.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 05:51:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we had some discussion about volatile, and I'm more and more considering to
> pick this task up. I think some issues are quite obvious:
>
> - packages should only go in in c
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:01:11AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Packages like virus checkers seem to be
> composed of 2 parts: the app program and the data where the data in
> this case are virus sigs and the app is say clamav. And the 'volitile'
> part is the virus sigs whereas the app (once it hits
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 08:47:27AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
>
> > > Would the kernel and X be candidates for volatile?
> >
> > I dont see any reason why not, if they can be marked as NotAutomatic.
> >
>
> Due to versioned dependencies, that could be impractical for X, which has
>
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:01:11AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > Packages like virus checkers seem to be
> > composed of 2 parts: the app program and the data where the data in
> > this case are virus sigs and the app is sa
* Jesus Climent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041009 11:10]:
> I meant for the
> kernel, which in some cases it could be tagged non automatic for updates, so
> that only the package is installed if the users wishes so. Making 2.6 kernels
> available for woody could have been an scenario where this approach
[ I'm not subbed to -devel, this was pulled from the archive -- please Cc me
on replies ]
Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Primitive? heh. And as for the rest, I haven't had trouble -- it's
> > just an infocmp away. In any case, switching the emulation is tr
Actually Ubuntu Linux uses pmount:
pmount is a wrapper around the standard mount program which permits
normal
users to mount removable devices without a matching /etc/fstab entry.
Together
with hal and gnome-volume-manager (or similar programs) this will
provide
fully automatic device handling wit
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 01:57:58PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> Do we have a "debian solution" about this issue? Or we want to use
> updtfstab?
What is updtfstab?
HAL upstream has fstab-sync as fstab wrapper, which will probably be
used in RedHat's upcoming Fedora Core distribution, seeing how th
I got this strange behaviour on Sid today while upgrading
kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686. Notice on the log that I answered "n" to "Do
you want to stop now? [Y/n]", and it aborted just like if I answered
"y".
The only thing noticeable is that I took a long time (a few minutes) to
answer. I suspect there
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:46:05PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> Il giorno sab, 09-10-2004 alle 12:23 +0200, Michael Banck ha scritto:
>
> > What is updtfstab?
> I use this on sarge/sid and works very fine:
> http://ccomb.free.fr/wiki/wakka.php?wiki=UsbMassStorageEnglish
It seems this one just uses
El sÃb, 09-10-2004 a las 00:04 -0500, Branden Robinson escribiÃ:
[...]
>
> It's time to fork. Let us work with the rest of the community to
> standardize on a new set of tools based on the last free version of
> cdrtools, thank Mr. Schilling for his valuable contributions, and leave him
> be to
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:57:46PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:46:05PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> > Il giorno sab, 09-10-2004 alle 12:23 +0200, Michael Banck ha scritto:
> >
> > > What is updtfstab?
> > I use this on sarge/sid and works very fine:
> > http://ccomb.fre
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 01:23:42PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:57:46PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:46:05PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> > > Il giorno sab, 09-10-2004 alle 12:23 +0200, Michael Banck ha scritto:
> > >
> > > > What
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 06:59:50AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> All such templates should probably go into a common set of debconf
> templates, provided by a very small package, which all these packages
> should depend upon, instead of constantly reinvent the wheeland
> make up, translator
Re: Henning Makholm in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Some things are not so obvious:
>
> Should volatile include updates of packages such as debian-keyring?
> debian-policy and developers-reference?
Those who need these packages will run Sid anyway.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.d
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:25:55PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 01:57:58PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> > Do we have a "debian solution" about this issue? Or we want to use
> > updtfstab?
>
> What is updtfstab?
>
> HAL upstream has fstab-sync as fstab wrapper, which will
Am Saturday, 9. October 2004 13:50 schrieb Sjoerd Simons:
> But as you rightfully said, this is Sarge+1 stuff.
So none of this will be done separately (faster) by the debian desktop team
first?
Is there still work beeing done to get the "desktop" branch up and running?
Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:57:46PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:46:05PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
Il giorno sab, 09-10-2004 alle 12:23 +0200, Michael Banck ha scritto:
What is updtfstab?
I use this on sarge/sid and w
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:04:10PM +0200, alphac wrote:
> I think hal + dbus-1 + fstab-sync works very well on debian, but the
> real missing feature is the possibility for users to mount remote file
> systems like cifs and smbfs without having root privileges or having to
> suidroot smbmnt, th
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:48:27AM +0200, Tilo Schwarz wrote:
> Just one remark: When I was asked to enter a package server I would have
> liked to enter my local package repository (with all the base stuff in
> it), but either I couldn't or I didn't see it. But, never mind ...
Scroll up to the
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 01:45:50PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 06:59:50AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > All such templates should probably go into a common set of debconf
> > templates, provided by a very small package, which all these packages
> > should depend u
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Thu, Oct 07, 2004:
> Ok, and a warning on all RPC programs not using a static port number?
> The only one I use right now is nfs-common, and I see following
> packages depending on portmap:
> rwalld am-utils nfs-common bootparamd nfs-user-server drac nis
>
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 08:19:24PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> On Friday, 08 Oct 2004, you wrote:
> > That's all for now. Comments and suggestions are welcome.
>
> i would like to see some "policy", what, when and under which
> circumstances gets included to volatile.d.n.
>
> Is for exampl
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:48:23PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> I got this strange behaviour on Sid today while upgrading
> kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686. Notice on the log that I answered "n" to "Do
> you want to stop now? [Y/n]", and it aborted just like if I answered
> "y".
>
> The only thing noti
also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.09.1618 +0200]:
> That sounds like a candidate for a stable update to me, not
> volatile.
You mean an r-release? The problem with those is that they have too
much inertia to be able to provide fixes quickly. So then our users
will have an inope
This one time, at band camp, Kevin Mark said:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:01:11AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > > Packages like virus checkers seem to be
> > > composed of 2 parts: the app program and the data where the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 275635 general
Bug#275635: How to increase the Threads Size in debian...
Warning: Unknown package 'how'
Warning: Unknown package 'to'
Warning: Unknown package 'increase'
Warning: Unknown package 'threads'
Warning: Unknown package 'size'
Warnin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: msmtp
Version : 1.2.3
Upstream Author : Martin Lambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://msmtp.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : smtp client which can be used as a smtp plugin with mutt
msmtp i
also sprach Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.09.1616 +0200]:
> msmtp is an SMTP client that can be used as an "SMTP plugin" for Mutt and
> probably other MUAs (mail user agents).
> It forwards mails to an SMTP server (for example at a free mail provider)
> which
> does the delivery.
How
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 04:44:05PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> paddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > But, I can see the case, as I describe before, where achieving the function
> > of a package places great pressure on the time to package, so much so that
> > if an interim, first cut pac
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 10:43:05AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Kevin Mark said:
> > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:01:11AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > > > Packages like virus checkers seem to
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sat, Oct 09, 2004:
> How does this differ from nullmailer? Why should we have Yet Another
> SMTP client in Debian?
Because it doesn't provide the same set of functionalities?
A quick look at nullmailer and msmtp homepages shows that msmtp
supports SASL, a
Il sab, 2004-10-09 alle 17:04, martin f krafft ha scritto:
> also sprach Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.09.1616 +0200]:
> > msmtp is an SMTP client that can be used as an "SMTP plugin" for Mutt and
> > probably other MUAs (mail user agents).
> > It forwards mails to an SMTP server (for e
also sprach Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.09.1730 +0200]:
> I think it's not a right comparison, nullmail is an MTA. and
> AFAIK, msmtp is not an MTA:
it transports mail to the next relay, right?
nullmailer is a "simple relay-only mail transport agent."
what's the difference?
oh
On Saturday 09 October 2004 18:48, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.09.1730 +0200]:
> > I think it's not a right comparison, nullmail is an MTA. and
> > AFAIK, msmtp is not an MTA:
>
> it transports mail to the next relay, right?
> nullmailer is a "
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 04:45:57PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > When spamassassin is upgraded, it's more than just the rules. Often
> > the method of parsing the message is changed -- leading to better
> > results, or support for different te
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 05:13:49PM +0100, paddy wrote:
> Elsewhere
> in the thread makes the point that hardware drivers could come
> into the 'useless' category, and I know exactly what he means: I've been
> there.
And seconds after I pressed the send button I got that horrible sinking feeling.
Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just another thought... You think that people looking at the code to backport
> a given set of features has a better clue about stability than the long time
> experienced upstream programers?
I expect the Debian maintainers of such a package to understa
Thomas Bushnell BSG [u] wrote on 08/10/2004 18:18:
Will Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
My argument is just that even if you backport the important features
of a new release into an old codebase, it's hard to make any valuable
claims about the resulting product if the "backport" changes more than
The draft looks good, Sven. Please also include target # 5 as follows.
> Draft for a volatile.debian.org packaging and update policy.
>
> Target:
>
> volatile.debian.org (or short: v.d.o) is intended to be a repository for
> packages which degrade over time with respect to their usefulness. Th
Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doing a backport of some upstream change is usually a pretty difficult
> task (except for smaller security fixes). It's pretty easy to claim
> "no new command line feature added", but it is pretty difficult to
> claim "no new bugs added" or "all necessary
The unstable link at http://packages.debian.org/freeguide shows
version 0.8, but http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/freeguide
shows version 0.7.2. Why is this?
Cheers,
Shaun
-- Forwarded message --
From: Andy Balaam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Strange. At packages.debian.org/free
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 05:48:55PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > I think that msmtp simply will take the place of sendmail binary
> > called by mutt.
>
> oh, and calling it a plugin make is sounds so much better. are these
> guys marketing specialists or software hackers?
Well "plugin" may
also sprach Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.09.1907 +0200]:
> Well "plugin" may not be the appropriate word to define the msmtp
> function in mutt. But is there any *good* reason to make so much
> noise for just one word ?
No. But if you
- are aware of the Debian archive bloat,
- kn
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 04:18:36PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Conclusion, I am going to file bug reports of wishlist priority for the
> above packages, linking to this thread and suggesting a notice /
> warning that RPC port are not fixed and could collide with services
> that are installed o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leo "Costela" Antunes wrote:
| PearPC does not need MacOS X or other non-free operating system to be
| fully used, it can be used with Debian/PPC for example, so, does it need
| to stay in contrib?
And, whats about dosemu? dosemu not need a non-free ope
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sat, Oct 09, 2004:
> I don't think it's really sensible to have each and every package
> provide this warning. If we want to trigger this on package install
> it'd be better to arrange for a single warning rather than having a new
> one pop up for each package.
First use of email address: 2004-10-06 18:56 (UTC)
First spam received at email address: 2004-10-09 17:12 (UTC)
If you've been wondering how long it takes for an email address to
propagate from the Debian list archives to spammers, here's one
data point: less than 71 hours.
--
André Ma
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sat, Oct 09, 2004:
> you might understand my reaction.
Of course! Maybe the OP should have provided a better description, for
example with a listing of features, or with reasons why the software
distinguish itself from alternatives? But there's no need to
Thomas Bushnell BSG [u] wrote on 09/10/2004 19:12:
Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Doing a backport of some upstream change is usually a pretty difficult
task (except for smaller security fixes). It's pretty easy to claim
"no new command line feature added", but it is pretty difficult to
c
Colin Watson wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:48:27AM +0200, Tilo Schwarz wrote:
>
>
>>Just one remark: When I was asked to enter a package server I would have
>>liked to enter my local package repository (with all the base stuff in
>>it), but either I couldn't or I didn't see it. But, never
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
This is a little app which displays network activity in an icon in KDE's
system tray, which lets you know if something is taking a long time to
transmit or the connection just hung.
* Package name: knetworkled
Version : 0.5.1
Upstream Author : Bre
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 10:43:05AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Kevin Mark said:
> > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:01:11AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > > > Packages like virus checkers seem to
Ausgeführte Aktion:
Die Nachricht wurde isoliert und gegen einen Text ausgetauscht, der den
Empfänger über die ausgeführte Aktion unterrichtet.
An:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Von:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet:
-1729716224,29666868
Betreff:
***SPAM*** Mail Delivery (
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 04:37:14PM +0100, paddy wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 10:43:05AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Kevin Mark said:
> > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:01:11AM -0400,
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 09:03:22AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Indeed, this is a long time since I think about such "common debconf
> templates" package.
> The current way of handling common templates by the use of shared/* is
> not optimal ATM, as all packages using shared/* templates mus
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:44:41AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> Generally, new packages could be added to volatile, as long as there is
> a very good usage of them. However, if I see how painful security
> updates for the kernel currently are for the security team, I think we
> should better re
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Andre Majorel wrote:
> First use of email address: 2004-10-06 18:56 (UTC)
> First spam received at email address: 2004-10-09 17:12 (UTC)
>
> If you've been wondering how long it takes for an email address to
> propagate from the Debian list archives to spammers, here'
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:25:11PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > First use of email address: 2004-10-06 18:56 (UTC)
> > First spam received at email address: 2004-10-09 17:12 (UTC)
> >
> > If you've been wondering how long it takes for an email address to
> > propagate from the Debian l
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:54:11PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 04:37:14PM +0100, paddy wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 10:43:05AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > This one time, at band camp, Kevin Mark said:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Francesco Paol
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 10:48:15PM +0100, paddy wrote:
> maybe there is a place for this, but my understanding is the evolution
> of data formats is coupled to changes in the scaning engine and backward
> compatibility is maintained upstream for as long as the upstream
> maintainers deem reasonable
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Jesus Climent wrote:
> Santiago has a bit of rationale... Some obfuscation in the list archives might
Won't work. Spammer-database-feeders nowadays either subscribe to the
mailinglists (not common), or get the data for a pletora of spyware in
Winblows computers (really, REALL
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 12:33:23PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> Nils wrote in his bug report:
>
> ,
> | The postinst script:
> | /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-base.postinst
> | fails if you set bash's "noclobber" (say in your .bashrc via set -o
> noclobber).
> | (yes, I set noclobber in root's .b
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:44:13PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 10:43:05AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Kevin Mark said:
> > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:01:11AM -
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:33:47PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:48:27AM +0200, Tilo Schwarz wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Just one remark: When I was asked to enter a package server I would have
> >>liked to enter my local package repository (with all the
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:05:40PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > | /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-base.postinst
> You should do this carefully:
> if [ -n "$PS1" ]; then
> # set whatever interactive things you want
> fi
Why is the shell invoked by dpkg executing the .bashrc in the first place?
Fi
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 07:11:02PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Jesus Climent wrote:
> > Santiago has a bit of rationale... Some obfuscation in the list archives
> > might
>
> Won't work. Spammer-database-feeders nowadays either subscribe to the
> mailinglists
Hi,
I'm writing regarding the issue of inclusion of TG3 binary firmware in
the Debian-distributed Linux post-2.6.5 kernels. I understand this
has been a contentious topic, and I've read most of the mailing list
archives on it, so I'm not trying to restart the debate, but merely
adding some additi
Scripsit Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> msmtp is not an MTA:
> I think that msmtp simply will take the place of sendmail binary called
> by mutt.
If it provides /usr/sbin/sendmail, then by definition it is a
mail-transport-agent and should, if packaged, declare itself as such.
If it pro
Tollef Fog Heen [u] wrote on 07/10/2004 09:52:
* Duncan Findlay
| Umm... I'd like to see that
7122 root 15 0 660m 332m 4692 D 0.0 43.8 8:18.64 spamd
7123 nobody15 0 287m 257m 4692 D 0.0 34.0 0:17.01 spamd
| Furthermore, you should use the -m option to limit the number of
Here I go, replying to myself again ...
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 10:48:15PM +0100, paddy wrote:
> clamav is a really good example of a very self-contained, at least in
> some setups. two pipes, no privs (someone corrrect me if I'm wrong).
> In the case of clamav, what i believe is at issue is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote:
> I'm actually surprised it takes them that long.
> debian-devel must be way down the target list.
probably geeks don't buy viagra, home loans, online medicine, etc :)
lg, clemens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
V
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/09/2004 10:04 PM, alphac wrote:
> I think hal + dbus-1 + fstab-sync works very well on debian, but the
> real missing feature is the possibility for users to mount remote file
> systems like cifs and smbfs without having root privileges or havi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/07/2004 01:43 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * martin f krafft
>
> | What do you think?
>
> API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well.
>
> Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my
> system. Per
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just uploaded another version, which resulted in receiving
> the attached message. Note the NEW status, and the warning. Is this
> a katie bug? Or did I do something wrong?
It's a James-is-a-moron problem. I broke (read: deleted)
experimental's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/08/2004 07:25 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Duncan Findlay
>
> | A lot of that is shared, but not reported as such by top/ps due to
> | changes in how the kernel reports shared memory. The kernel only
> | reports memory that is used in shared
Tollef Fog Heen [u] wrote on 07/10/2004 10:00:
* Sven Mueller
| Well, perl modules don't have an SO name.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/lib > apt-cache show libvideo-capture-v4l-perl| grep
^Depends
Depends: perlapi-5.8.3, perl (>= 5.8.3-2), libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4)
Seems like perl provides an API that
Sven Mueller [u] wrote on 10/10/2004 04:46:
Go learn perl, than come back.
Sheesh, I shouldn't write mail after prolonged discussions with my boss...
I apologize for the rudeness of that comment. Even though it was meant
somewhat jokingly, I realize it probably was too harsh. Sorry.
cu,
sven
Jesus Climent [u] wrote on 09/10/2004 02:28:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 03:51:29PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
I generally have to resort to backports or unstable when installing Debian
on recent hardware, because we don't update hardware drivers in stable.
Would the kernel and X be candidates fo
84 matches
Mail list logo
