On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
>
> Yeah, but you can do that on any given port whether it's open or not. e.g.
>
> cat /dev/zero | nc -u victim 12345
>
> (nc in UDP mode seems to ignore "ICMP port unreachable" packets in my
> testing... if it doesn't you can alw
Source: pam
Section: base
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Standards-Version: 3.5.8
Build-Depends: cracklib2-dev, bzip2, debhelper, patch, libdb3-dev, libcap-dev
[!hurd-i386 !freebsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], libselinux1-dev
Build-Depends-Indep: linuxdoc-tools, linuxdoc-too
* Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-19 16:13]:
> Above is the Build-Depends for a package I am trying to rebuild. When I try
> and build it on my system which lacks cracklib2-dev the package builds
> (dpkg-buildpackage does not complain). dpkg-buildpackage works correctly in
It's pro
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:55:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> So all seems well, and to be in the hand of the autobuilders. The
Actually the situation is still the same, so I think that we should do
something.
I've never understood which is the right/polity way of requests for
triggering a new r
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 04:37:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > 88029
>
> yeah well. That is not all the dfiscussion there was on it. In
> March 2001, we had more than those comments on it:
Nah, I saw that one as well, and I'm fairly sure I answered it back then.
If not, please let m
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It's trivial to reconfigure it in nethack's option screen, just like any
> > other option. I'm not sure why this one should be special.
hjkl is extremely newbie-unfriendly.
Arrows require the player to manually t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Followup-For: Bug #214931
I'd like to take over the maintenance for this orphaned package.
--
Michael Potter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:20:33AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> this-and-that function of Make" (so far I remember only two of those, when
> the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS env. variable was added and when testing for existence
> of build-arch was added).
... which was a fiasco. Doogie finally implemented th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Followup-For: Bug #214931
> I'd like to take over the maintenance for this orphaned package.
Cool.
See http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for informations about
adopting.
cu andreas
--
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 11:53:18AM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> minit is already really small. All it does is running processes and
> restarting them when they die. There seems to be little difference
> between what i can do with minit and with multiple runsv.
> And yes, i do know about shared me
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:18:51PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > this-and-that function of Make" (so far I remember only two of those, when
> > the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS env. variable was added and when testing for existence
> > of build-arch was added).
>
> ... which was a fiasco. Doogie finally i
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:11:15AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > It's trivial to reconfigure it in nethack's option screen, just like any
> > > other option. I'm not sure why this one should be special.
>
>
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 02:57:44PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> > Yeah, but you can do that on any given port whether it's open or not. e.g.
> >
> > cat /dev/zero | nc -u victim 12345
> >
> > (nc in UDP mode seems to ignore "ICM
Op zo 19-10-2003, om 10:44 schreef Stefano Zacchiroli:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:55:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > So all seems well, and to be in the hand of the autobuilders. The
>
> Actually the situation is still the same, so I think that we should do
> something.
>
> I've never unders
本公司新进一批透视镜，有需要的朋友请速联系。
1、数码相机（或者摄像机）红外线透视镜，各种规格，戴上它，能穿透各种针织物品、纤维物品、塑料等。
价格：90元/片。
2、麻将透视隐形眼镜，在微弱的灯光下，就能清晰地看见所有麻将牌，随时都能让您想赢就赢。
价格：120元/付。
3、覆盖密码透视眼镜，戴上这眼镜，无需刮卡即可以清晰地看出任何充值卡等覆盖下的密码。
价格：85元/付。
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
精益公司
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: oneliner-el
Version : 0.3.5
Upstream Author : Kiyoka Nishiyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://oneliner-elisp.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL2
Description : Extensions of Emacs standard shell-mode
onel
Cc'd to debian-devel, because I'm honestly unsure about this...
On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 09:51, Adam Conrad wrote:
> Package: libtool
> Version: 1.5-3
> Severity: serious
>
> libtool fails to build from source on all the buildds[1] due to a missing
> build-dep on texi2html.
>
libtool (and libtool1
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:20:26PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I'd be interested to see doogie's rationale, but it's amusing enough as it
> stands, because the policy still says:
>
> If one or both of the targets `build-arch' and `build-indep' are
> not provided, then invoking
Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I intend to hijack the gnugo package, and to ask for removal of the
> gnugo-dv package. Both packages were updated last time around 18 months
> ago, there are outstanding bug reports, none with a maintainer's comment,
> and I'd like to get the new upstr
Hi, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Sven Luther:
>> Well, we just need an arch: all autobuilder and that's it, or one of the
>> autobuilders building the arch: all stuff.
>
> Feel free to set up one.
I have my personal i386 autobuilder running that way for some months now.
It makes sense; I certainly ha
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 09:51, Adam Conrad wrote:
[...]
>> libtool fails to build from source on all the buildds[1] due to a missing
>> build-dep on texi2html.
> libtool (and libtool1.4) *have* a build-dep on texi2html (and texinfo):
> Build-Depends
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:11:15AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > hjkl is extremely newbie-unfriendly.
>
> And? Come on, this is *nethack*. It's the hardest game I know of, bar
> none. You have to learn a pile of keystroke commands when you first
> sta
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 09:39:05PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 03:32:41PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Its good for the autobuilders to check again if a package builds in a
> > mainly minimal environment.
>
> That's an argument for building it *once* in such a
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 03:22:11PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> It is noteworthy that the split build-arch/build-all seems to be next
> to useless, as dpkg-buildpackage invokes build (because the former two
> a optional) and "the build target should depend on those of the
> targets build-arch an
Graham Wilson wrote:
>
> Why exactly is this? Is this really the correct behavior? Shouldn't
> dpk-buildpackage be invoked using the -B option?
It is. `dpkg-buildpackage -B' invokes debian/rules clean, build, binary-arch.
... Adam
On 19-Oct-03, 04:20 (CDT), Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But it's a historic injustice,
Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
The Man is keeping me down!
Up with perl, down with make!
Power to the people!
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making
Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 03:22:11PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> It is noteworthy that the split build-arch/build-all seems to be next
>> to useless, as dpkg-buildpackage invokes build (because the former two
>> a optional) and "the build target should
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:50:41AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > But it's a historic injustice,
>
> Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
> The Man is keeping me down!
> Up with perl, down with make!
> Power to the people!
We share an enthusiasm for overloaded phrases, I see :)
but a small verbal
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:15:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op zo 19-10-2003, om 10:44 schreef Stefano Zacchiroli:
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:55:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > So all seems well, and to be in the hand of the autobuilders. The
> >
> > Actually the situation is still
refuses to start and the retry process fails
also...???
thanks for any advice.
stuart
stuart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 07:21:57PM +0100, stuart whittaker wrote:
> refuses to start and the retry process fails also...???
>
>
> thanks for any advice.
>
> stuart
>
> stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This sounds like a user question and not a dev question. No?
Usually x doesn't start because of pro
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 05:57:55PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 09:39:05PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 03:32:41PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Its good for the autobuilders to check again if a package builds in a
> > > mainly minimal
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:20:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 09:51, Adam Conrad wrote:
>
> > Package: libtool
> > Version: 1.5-3
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > libtool fails to build from source on all the buildds[1] due to a missing
> > build-dep on texi2html.
> >
* Marco d'Itri wrote:
> http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/
Any plans for an upload to unstable?
--
- nobse
Op zo 19-10-2003, om 20:04 schreef Sven Luther:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:15:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Op zo 19-10-2003, om 10:44 schreef Stefano Zacchiroli:
> > > I've never understood which is the right/polity way of requests for
> > > triggering a new rebuild of packages. Should
Op zo 19-10-2003, om 15:25 schreef Matthias Urlichs:
[...]
> For example, we
> could block a package from building when two other autobuilders have
> reported a failure on it. That would have the added benefit to place
> somewhat less load on already-overworked architectures like m68k.
Please, no.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:15:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> You should first check what the status of your package is, by going to
> http://buildd.debian.org/stats/ . I wrote some documentation on what the
> different states actually mean; you can find it at
> http://people.debian.org/~woute
On 19-Oct-03, 13:03 (CDT), Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:50:41AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > > But it's a historic injustice,
> >
> > Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
> > The Man is keeping me down!
> > Up with perl, down with make!
> > Power to the pe
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> Our autobuilder architecture is only half-automated for a reason. I won't
> trust any computer to *reliably* decide whether a build failed because of
> a transitional problem (unresolved build-depends, network problems, ...),
> because it shouldn't be built ("architecture"
Hi, John Hasler wrote:
> Yes, but it seems to me that if a package fails on the first two (or maybe
> three) architectures
Thanks for the "first"; that additional word improves the heuristic
significantly.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer:
Il mer, 2003-10-15 alle 17:58, Sam Hocevar ha scritto:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: etw
> Version : CVS
> Upstream Author : Gabriele Greco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://etw.sourceforge.net/
> * License : GPL
> Description
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 03:58:19PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> I've yet to see a technical argument for allowing debian/rules to be a
> non-makefile.
I've yet to see a technical argument for disallowing debian/rules from being
a non-makefile.
See, those two statements make the same amount of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Followup-For: Bug #214946
Description: Display and edit lyrics with XMMS
This "X Multi Media System" (XMMS) plugin displays formated lyrics.
It also contains a lyrics editor, which can be used to tag timestamps
in a song.
Upstream Author: Jan-Marek Glogowski <[
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:35:04AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 03:58:19PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
Summary of the auction so far:
Steve bet on Manoj and Josip on Wichert.
Deuce.
> The interface to the rules file is defined well enough, there's absolutely
> nothing wr
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:08:11PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > And you also volunteer to replace the autobuilders and build _every_
> > package out there by hand on _every_ architecture ?
> >
> > Have you seriously thought about what you are proposing here ?
>
> What are you talking about?
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:53:15PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 01:40:51AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 11:04:31AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> >
> > It's pretty trivial with netkit-inetd as well; you edit /etc/inetd.conf and
> > comment out
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:37:58PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 09:32:54PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Yes, it receives data from the network and throws it away. But I don't see
> > how this figures into your example. If you can give me an scenario where
> > this s
debian-devel:您好!何不付2天的薪水雇佣一名忠诚高效的业务员?
工作能力：一、整套的营销方案，低成本高效率。
二、任何网上可以找到的客户，我都可以联系上。
三、让更多的客户主动来点击公司的网站。
本工作室铁定是您最佳的合作伙伴，给您带来很多客户资源，我们的目标是降低公司40%的广
告成本、成为公司销售第一名。请您联系我，没有我做不到，只有我想不到，如果您没有联系
我，我不会灰心，我会继续联系您，请原谅我的坚持，因为这是我的个性。
个人简历：
姓名：创艺网络营销工作室（三亿二千万邮件地址库，邮件群发软件，信息发布软件、
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Followup-For: Bug #120237
I intend to package jboss. I'll upload my.debgs to mentors.debian.org
because I'm not an official debian developer yet.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux morpheus.int.abacus.ch 2.4.21
Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Call me a wimp
wimp
> The problem lies not in the basic four directions (hjkl), but in the
> completely mad diagonals. They're plain unnatural and cumbersome to
> use
I _completely_ disagree -- I find the rogue diagonals astonishly smooth
and natural
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:39:58PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> Yes, I think you are the only one so far who thinks that this is any
> different, in terms of potential harm, from spraying exactly the same
> packets without anything listening on the discard port on the remote host.
Righto, bac
I had some preliminary modifications of the parallel loading system
proposed by James Hunt from IBM working for Debian, but it looked like
it would speed things up less than 10%, which wasn't enough to lure me
away from SysV, so I said it aside. I still have some of the files
around, if you wa
52 matches
Mail list logo
