Colin Watson wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > Guido Guenther wrote:
> > > Just of out curiosity, is this in any way different from the shorter:
> > > if [ "$var" ]; then
> > var="-f"
> Have you tried that? No POSIX shell will have a problem.
You are confusing standards with portability. They are no
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:13:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:35:45AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > Would it be acceptable to fill a bug against each installer that do
> > not build a proper debian package when installing non-free software?
>
> How can they do so
on Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 11:07:39AM +1000, Craig Sanders ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:09:57PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:40:15 +1000
> > Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:04:39AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote
Firstly, this isn't really the right place to ask this kind of
question as this list is for maintainers of packages for the Debian
distributions.
Tar said, I am not sure that what you want to do is possible with
Telnet as the telnet protocol is content-free. That is to say that it
has no knowle
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> unless you think that it's better for the installer package to spit
> out a .deb somewhere which you then have to install separately,
> which seems to me like a step backwards in convenience.
Depends, generating a deb has some bright sides: 'dpkg -S'
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> > At this point, the question is not how to do it. I can think about 30
> > ways to do it, while I'm surely not the expert here.
>
> I asked you a question which could be answered quite simply by producing
> one of those ways. Go on. It's my honest be
Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:13:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:35:45AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > > Would it be acceptable to fill a bug against each installer that do
> > > not build a proper debian package
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> OK. How does one create an installer package which correctly does the
> following:
>
> * creates a Debian package for the thing it's installing
the installer contains a diff and dsc, downloads the orig source,
then builds a .deb
> * installs that pack
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 05:35:35PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > RUBY_LINK=`ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG["LIBRUBYARG_SHARED"]n'`
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts
> Config::CONFIG["LIBRUBYARG_SHARED"]'
> nil
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>ruby -v
> rub
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:45:15AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> James Michael Greenhalgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > (cd build && $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/gcc4arm/usr)
> >
> > Dunno about 'prefix=' ... I've always used 'DESTDIR='?
>
> Specifying prefix on the make command line
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 08:46:53PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> [ note: I have no interests in denying any of those packages, there is ]
> [ a result of digging through wnpp bugs]
>
> Hello,
> There are two packages looking similar:
> #206859: O: autotrace --
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:53, Marc Singer wrote:
> Tar said, I am not sure that what you want to do is possible with
> Telnet as the telnet protocol is content-free. That is to say that it
> has no knowledge of when the user is sending a password and when the
> user is sending some other type of data.
Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Specifying prefix on the make command line should work and not try to
> > install to /usr (though he appears to be using it incorrectly so
> > probably won't get what he wants).
>
> Using prefix is dangerous, because it may be compiled into the code or
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:41:14AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> why dont we just put up a page on www.debian.org with the requested sheet
> music (or, if it's copyrighted then appropriate links to sites where it
> can be found).
FWIW, I always enjoy it when it comes up again. Maybe I should start
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:18:44PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Adam Heath wrote:
> > > Guido Guenther wrote:
> > > > Just of out curiosity, is this in any way different from the shorter:
> > > > if [ "$var" ]; then
> > >
> > > var="-f"
> >
> > Have you tried that? No POSIX
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:17:13AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapot? :
> > I asked you a question which could be answered quite simply by producing
> > one of those ways. Go on. It's my honest belief that it can't be done
> > correctly; I'm open to hearing ways i
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:24:07AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> > * installs that package in such a way that it's registered in dpkg's
> > database
>
> do the install in the background when the dpkg DB area is unlocked
Yuck! Please, no! Error handling
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 12:37:04AM -0500, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:13:59AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:35:45AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > > Would it be acceptable to fill a bug against each installer that do
> > > not build a proper debian
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:21:18AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op vr 05-09-2003, om 09:16 schreef Martin Quinson:
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:44:08PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:15:57AM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote:
> > > > Are these actually used somewhere? If
El lunes, 8 de septiembre de 2003, a las 18:55, Jim Penny escribe:
> The problem, amazingly enough, is that he did google for "dueling
> banjos sheet music", and Debian is the number one and number two hit!
Does anybody know, when the next stable release for Debian, will be
"Deliveranced"? Maybe
Karsten M. Self wrote:
> [Using DNS RBLs to block spam is bad.]
> As many people have noted, for pretty much _any_
> given IP, your odds are good that most of the mail received from it is
> spam. It doesn't do much for the legit mail that comes through. Given
> that we now _do_ have good content
Hello,
Could you enlight me where "Depends: php4-rrdtool gcc-3.3 (not considered)"
comes from on http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/php4-rrdtool.html?
I have no gcc dependencies neither build-deps.
Cheers
Artur
--
szybszy niz najwyzszy budynek... inteligentniejszy od kuli w locie...
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:17:13AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapot? :
> > > I asked you a question which could be answered quite simply by producing
> > > one of those ways. Go on. It's my honest belief that it ca
Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:17:13AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
>> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapot? :
>> > > I asked you a question which could be answered quite simply by producing
>> > > one of those w
Artur R. Czechowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you enlight me where "Depends: php4-rrdtool gcc-3.3 (not considered)"
> comes from on http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/php4-rrdtool.html?
> I have no gcc dependencies neither build-deps.
On i386.
Check e.g. the binaries on arm, one of them (or
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:55:14PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Artur R. Czechowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have no gcc dependencies neither build-deps.
> On i386.
> Check e.g. the binaries on arm, one of them (or its dependencies)
> probably depends on libgcc1.
Thanks for hint. Probabl
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 07:49:36 +0100
> It's the same sort of thinking that's causing no end of trouble for people
> trying to communicate with AOL users:
> http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=96264
> http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/03/04/13/2215207.shtml?tid=120
I've g
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> > It could be something like debian/track where 'track' is a list of files
> > to be tracked by this package as if they were contained within it when
> > it was built (even though they are actually downloaded during the package's
> > postinst or by anoth
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:50:51 +0200
"Julian Mehnle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, you can't make such a general statement that using content-based filters
> is "better" than using DNS RBLs. It wholly depends on the listing policy of
> the RBL, and in most cases, content-based filters will be the
29 matches
Mail list logo
