Re: Having more than one key in the Debian keyring

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 16:57:20 -0400, Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 10:49:43PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: >> Change of $ORKPLACE, and a b0rken key policy regarding the old one. I >> wouldn't say the old key is probably compromised, but I feel better >> with an entirel

Re: Unmaintained Packages (was: Getting patches into packages, thought and ideas)

On 09 Aug 2003 05:11:39 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >ifupdown surely looks bad. Shouldn't someone else take over the package then? Greetings Marc, not feeling fit to take the package, but seriously thinking about a fork -- -- !! No

Re: About NM and Next Release

[on list, this time. sorry] On Saturday 09 August 2003 04:48, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > You can talk but you can't second a proposal. You somewhat can (or > could) make a proposal since that isn't signed and normaly noone > bothered to check if one was a DD. But thats more of a backdoor than >

A mount that follows a symlink at /etc/mtab

One of the remaining obstacles to running cleanly with root fs mounted read-only has been the mount program, which can only write the mtab file to /etc/. Currently, if /etc/mtab is a symbolic link then mount will not write to it. People have wished (# 94076, #154438) that mount would follow a sym