On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 13:28 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> I'm currently at the SAGE-AU annual conference, and Apple presented a
> paper about their Rendezvous technology, which is their
> implementation of Zeroconf[1].
>
> Is anyone working on getting Debian to do any of this sort of stuff?
T
* (Nathanael Nerode)
| However, not having enough time to chase down important bugs is no
| excuse for not reviewing simple patches to fix simple bugs, which
| doesn't take an awful lot of time at all. (It is a good excuse for not
| reviewing complicated or subtle patches.)
Once you have man
* Goswin von Brederlow
| How does a package become important? All the important stuf has been
| in debian for years. I doubt any NM can come up with a new package
| where people say: "Gosh, if we wouldn't have that we would be screwed."
Somebody ITP-ed cpufreq a little time ago. That's quite im
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 07:32:43 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Somebody ITP-ed cpufreq a little time ago. That's quite important if
> you are using a laptop (which a lot of DDs are) with ACPI and you
> don't want to burn all your battery.
> New tools get written all the time, ma
On Friday 08 August 2003 05:23, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Policy changes, voting and the internal discussions all need
> membership. Having NMs hang in limbo without due cause is denying them
> the right to those.
Voting yes. But to me it seems that most issues are discussed on the open
list
* Steve Lamb
(please trim your lines a little, 72 chars/line is considered
standard, to allow for a few levels of quoting before breaking the
lines on a 80 char wide terminal. TIA.)
| That is true, but that doesn't make the package "important" in
| the sense I got from his message. What I
* Goswin Brederlow
| Package name: debix
| Version : 0.1
| Upstream Author : Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| License : GPL
| Description : Live filesystem creation tool
| Sponsor : wanted
I might be interested in sponsoring this, since I nee
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 08:04:04 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Steve Lamb
> (please trim your lines a little, 72 chars/line is considered
> standard, to allow for a few levels of quoting before breaking the
> lines on a 80 char wide terminal. TIA.)
Please use a standard qu
On Friday 08 August 2003 04:09, Scott James Remnant wrote:
Thanks a lot for this one.
-- vbi
--
I'm personally quite happy with one stable release every two years, and
am of the opinion that trying to release more will mean we'll have to
rename the distro from "stable" to "wobbly".
-- Sc
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-08
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pconsole
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Walter de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.heiho.net/pconsole/index.html
* License : GPL
Description : parallel console s
* Steve Lamb
| Please use a standard quote character, which is >. In that way
| pretty much any modern editor in the past, say, 10 years, can reflow
| quoted lines to fit within 80 characters. 72 was for the ~10 years
| before reflowing of quotes.
So it can if you use | or : or some other
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:08:38AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Anybody who has to ask "Why should I/we/they contribute?" is not
> suitable for Debian. (The "answer", incidentally, is "because we can"
> or "because it's there", or some other variation; it is a goal in
> itself, and not a m
Hi, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Please use a standard quote character, which is >. In that way pretty
> much any modern editor in the past, say, 10 years, can reflow quoted lines to
> fit within 80 characters.
OTOH, most editors can be configured as to which characters they consider
to be quotes.
OTGH,
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 08:52:14 +0200
Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OTOH, most editors can be configured as to which characters they consider
> to be quotes.
True, but reflow across multiple levels tends to break when one has
different quote characters to contend with.
--
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 09:06:56 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So it can if you use | or : or some other random character as well.
> It's still a bit silly to have to reflow all your paragraphs at the
> first quotation level, but whatever.
Which I don't. Since the quoted text
* Steve Lamb
| On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 09:06:56 +0200
| Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > So it can if you use | or : or some other random character as well.
| > It's still a bit silly to have to reflow all your paragraphs at the
| > first quotation level, but whatever.
|
| Which I
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:46:20PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Anybody who has to ask "Why should I/we/they contribute?" is not
> >suitable for Debian. (The "answer", incidentally, is "because we can"
> >or "because it's there", or some other varia
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:58:10PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Andrew Suffield said:
> >On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:56:44PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> >> Wrong. There have been specific technical things I wanted to do
> >> which simply cannot be done easily as an outsider.
>
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:55:19PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > (The "answer", incidentally, is "because we can"
> > or "because it's there", or some other variation; it is a goal in
> > itself, and not a means to an end)
>
> That, however, is not enough in and of itself. I *could* very well
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 08:29:54 +0100
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, you have misconstrued it the other way. It really was "You
> like it therefore you should contribute".
No. There is a difference between these two statements:
I like Debian therefore I should contribute.
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 05:34:20AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > It's not like a developer could do anything more, in these two
>
> That being true still doesn't help non DDs to contribute.
Indeed, but it also means that they are not reasons why people should
be given accounts.
> > case
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:28:15PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> I'm currently at the SAGE-AU annual conference, and Apple presented a
> paper about their Rendezvous technology, which is their implementation of
> Zeroconf[1].
My experience of Rendezvous has been that it is a network-thrashing
t
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 08:21:48 +0100
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think you're going to get it, either. It's basically the same
> question as "Why do people write free software?", and if you come up
> with "altruism", "politics", or "respect" then you're barking up the
> wrong
I know I'm getting off topic but I don't know a better place to ask and
this subject might be interesting of other developers as well.
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 04:14, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > I just upgraded to the current Sarge and also got GCC 3.3. It seems this
> > version can't compile all the drivers
On Friday 08 August 2003 00:54, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:28:15PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > I'm currently at the SAGE-AU annual conference, and Apple presented a
> > paper about their Rendezvous technology, which is their implementation of
> > Zeroconf[1].
>
> My ex
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 04:21:42AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 08:21:48 +0100
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't think you're going to get it, either. It's basically the same
> > question as "Why do people write free software?", and if you come up
> > w
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:33:24 +0100
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bullshit. Our "community" consists of heckling each other until we get
> it right. Membership is about doing the damn work; I guess that's a
> form of "resources".
But I thought it was perfectly possible to perform wor
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:28:15PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> I'm currently at the SAGE-AU annual conference, and Apple presented a
> paper about their Rendezvous technology, which is their implementation of
> Zeroconf[1].
>
> Is anyone working on getting Debian to do any of this sort of stu
Hi, Otto Wyss wrote:
> I'd
> be good if warnings and error where duplicated into a log file.
"Were".
The solution is 'make 2>&1 | less' or similar.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.no
Hi, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> If you have an admin who has properly setup DNS, DHCP, etc zeroconf has
> little practical use.
Maybe not zeroconf, but somewhat-less-than-100%-manually-conf is good.
Consider printers, for instance. The home user wants to see printers
without configuring them. T
Hi,
In the next few weeks, I will replace my GPG key with a new one. Since
I suspect that the time it takes for a key to be exchanged in the key
ring needs to be measured in weeks or months[1], I would like to
submit the new key and to retract the old key once the new key has
made it into the Debi
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:39:52 +0100, Andrew Suffield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
>
>ppp *was* unmaintained, for a long period of time.
When exactly is a package (take ifupdown for
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-08
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: spip-eva
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Sylvain MICHEL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://spip-edu.edres74.net/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=22
* License : GPL
Descriptio
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:21:52PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> In the next few weeks, I will replace my GPG key with a new one. Since
> I suspect that the time it takes for a key to be exchanged in the key
> ring needs to be measured in weeks or months[1], I would like to
> submit the new key and to
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:33:24 +0100
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 04:21:42AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> > Membership is not about resources, its about community.
>
> Bullshit. Our "community" consists of heckling each other until we get
> it right.
This "
On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Do you think any DD reads those? Do DDs care about Bugs with patches?
>And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
ppp actually appears to be unmaintained. Many users requested essential
features like pppoa and kernel space pppoe su
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:40, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >Do you think any DD reads those? Do DDs care about Bugs with patches?
> >And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
>
> ppp actually appears to be unmaintained. Many users requested
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:44:18PM +1000, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone working on getting Debian to do any of this sort of stuff?
>
> There is already a project for zeroconf [1]. And a debian source
> package [2]. There is also a paper [3] presented at lca2003 [4] by Brad
> Ha
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:40:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Do you think any DD reads those? Do DDs care about Bugs with patches?
> >And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
> ppp actually appears to be unmaintained. Many
At Thu, 7 Aug 2003 18:25:27 -0400,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> However, not having enough time to chase down important bugs is no
> excuse for not reviewing simple patches to fix simple bugs, which
> doesn't take an awful lot of time at all. (It is a good excuse for not
> reviewing complicated or
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 11:50:11 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Otto Wyss wrote:
>
>> I'd
>> be good if warnings and error where duplicated into a log file.
>
> "Were".
> The solution is 'make 2>&1 | less' or similar.
>
make 2>&1 |tee logfile|less
PS: You should ask questions like this in [E
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 08:17:32AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I might be interested in sponsoring this, since I need such a tool for
> work. I won't be able to take a look until I'm back home (which is on
> Monday evening CEST time), though.
you might take a look at mindi/mondo, too.
Greeti
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:34:05AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > If you have an admin who has properly setup DNS, DHCP, etc zeroconf
> > has little practical use.
>
> Maybe not zeroconf, but somewhat-less-than-100%-manually-conf is good.
>
> Consider printers, for instance. The home u
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:21:52PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> In the next few weeks, I will replace my GPG key with a new one.
> Since I suspect that the time it takes for a key to be exchanged in
> the key ring needs to be measured in weeks or months[1], I would like
> to submit the new key a
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 06:30:03AM -0500, BugScan reporter wrote:
> Bug stamp-out list for Aug 8 06:00 (CST)
>
> Total number of release-critical bugs: 822
[snip]
Whoa, sounds like time for another BSP!
T
--
The easy way is the wrong way, and the hard way is the stupid way. Pick one.
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 08:52:14 +0200
> Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>| OTOH, most editors can be configured as to which characters they
>| consider to be quotes.
>
> True, but reflow across multiple levels tends to break when one
> has diff
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:34:05AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Consider printers, for instance. The home user wants to see printers
> without configuring them. The large-office admin, on the other hand, might
> want the reverse, i.e. to have printers NOT show up when they're NOT
> there. ZC c
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 08:29:54AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:55:19PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> > That, however, is not enough in and of itself. I *could* very well
> > contribute to FreeBSD. I don't. Why? Because I don't like
> > FreeBSD. I like Debian. Yo
I'm going to the World Science Fiction Convention, torcon3,
(http://www.torcon3.on.ca) in Toronto, Onterio, Canada at the end of
the month. Is there any interest in a get-togther there or nearby?
[Is there a better place for these requests? As someone on the NM
queue, I don't have access to -pri
Not wanting to start yet another thread, but I not knowing where to tack it
on...
How about moving from the one-step application (one is non-dd or dd) two a two
stage process: introduce the 'Debian Contributor' brand with very easy entry
level, and only DC's (older than a month or something lik
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:25:21PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:39:52 +0100, Andrew Suffield
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
> >
> >ppp *was* unmaintained,
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:33:10AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On Friday 08 August 2003 00:54, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:28:15PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > > I'm currently at the SAGE-AU annual conference, and Apple presented a
> > > paper about their Rende
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 08:21:48AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:46:20PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Anybody who has to ask "Why should I/we/they contribute?" is not
> > >suitable for Debian. (The "answer", incident
* Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> How about moving from the one-step application (one is non-dd or dd) two a
> two
> stage process: introduce the 'Debian Contributor' brand with very easy entry
> level, and only DC's (older than a month or something like that -
Il ven, 2003-08-08 alle 14:46, Bernd Eckenfels ha scritto:
> you might take a look at mindi/mondo, too.
Probably we should look at it to have fixed and updated packages in
sid... :-)
bye
christian
--
Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio =
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 10:32:07AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > > * want to contribute something to a project they respect
> > > * want to help out Debian users
> > > * want to help promote the goals of Debian
> >
> > These are bad reasons.
>
> They are also the only reasons anyone would want to
On Friday 08 August 2003 10:59 am, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 10:32:07AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > Funny. I thought the FSF was, at least origionally, more or less
> > entirely about self-interest, altruism, and politics.
>
> The organisation might have been founded for tho
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 05:59:52PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 10:32:07AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > > > * want to contribute something to a project they respect
> > > > * want to help out Debian users
> > > > * want to help promote the goals of Debian
> > >
> > > The
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:59:42AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
> On Friday 08 August 2003 10:59 am, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 10:32:07AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> > > Funny. I thought the FSF was, at least origionally, more or less
> > > entirely about self-interest, a
Does someone have an ARM system that I could gain access to? I'd really
like to put the ARM specific bug[1] filed against the Jabber package to
bed once and for all. I've seen reports of Jabber running on ARM
systems and of course the bug report of it segfaulting.
Any assistance in this matter w
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:33:08PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> What we need is a database with simple mailing list function (similar to
> PTS) where willing sponsors for a certain package can subscribe and
> sponsorees with much motivation can send diffs for the next version
> upgrade. Easy to rev
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:55:11PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> Does someone have an ARM system that I could gain access to? I'd really
> like to put the ARM specific bug[1] filed against the Jabber package to
> bed once and for all. I've seen reports of Jabber running on ARM
> systems and of
Could you send me a lead sheet for Dueling Banjos?
Thanks. Elmer Olenick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:21:52PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> In the next few weeks, I will replace my GPG key with a new one. Since
> I suspect that the time it takes for a key to be exchanged in the key
> ring needs to be measured in weeks or months[1], I would like to
> submit the new key and to
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:00:37PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:55:11PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > Does someone have an ARM system that I could gain access to? I'd
> > really like to put the ARM specific bug[1] filed against the Jabber
> > package to bed once and
I demand that Steve Lamb may or may not have written...
> On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 08:52:14 +0200
> Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OTOH, most editors can be configured as to which characters they consider
>> to be quotes.
> True, but reflow across multiple levels tends to break when on
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:33:05PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:00:37PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:55:11PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > > Does someone have an ARM system that I could gain access to? I'd
> > > really like to put the
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:45:10PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
>
> So, you want the Jabber server installed on an ARM system so that you
> can connect to it and either a) verify that it crashes, or b)
> demonstrate that it doesn't.
That's about the size of it.
> If this is so, then I can do this f
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 07:34:26PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > altruim, [sic]
>
> Self-delusion. (It's invariably a form of 'By doing this I can better
> fit the sort of person I would like to think I am'. People who
> disagree with this interpretation are probably committing it. Get o
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:11:58 -0400, Kyle McMartin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Why are you replacing your key?
Change of $ORKPLACE, and a b0rken key policy regarding the old one. I
wouldn't say the old key is probably compromised, but I feel better
with an entirely new key created in a well-known "c
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 10:49:43PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Change of $ORKPLACE, and a b0rken key policy regarding the old one. I
> wouldn't say the old key is probably compromised, but I feel better
> with an entirely new key created in a well-known "clean" environment.
>
Fair enough, though pu
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-08
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dvdauthor
Version : 0.5.3
Upstream Author : Scott Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dvdauthor.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : create DVD-Video
Hi, Blars Blarson wrote:
> I'm going to the World Science Fiction Convention, torcon3,
> (http://www.torcon3.on.ca) in Toronto, Onterio, Canada at the end of
> the month. Is there any interest in a get-togther there or nearby?
"Ontario". Me too. Yes.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 17:59:52 +0100
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 10:32:07AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> Start with the things about Debian which are distinctly different from
> other projects. You should be able to find some things which you want
> to do which d
A.F.S.I FACTORING Latin factoring letter.doc
Description: MS-Word document
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:38:43PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 07:34:26PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> > > altruim, [sic]
> >
> > Self-delusion. (It's invariably a form of 'By doing this I can better
> > fit the sort of person I would like to think I am'. People
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 23:39:25 +0100
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two pounds of flax.
Oh, you play A Tale in the Desert?
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.* packages
> every time python* is mentioned? :P
Actually I'm more reminded of the perl* packages and the complete mess
that followed. And I keep expecting to see the same set of problems
affect python.
--
see
Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>How about moving from the one-step application (one is non-dd or dd) two a
>>two
>>stage process: introduce the 'Debian Contributor' brand with very easy entry
>>level, and only DC's (older than a month or
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:39:25PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:38:43PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 07:34:26PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >
> > > > altruim, [sic]
> > >
> > > Self-delusion. (It's invariably a form of 'By doin
Joey Hess writes:
> Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.* packages
> > every time python* is mentioned? :P
>
> Actually I'm more reminded of the perl* packages and the complete mess
> that followed. And I keep expecting to see the same set of pro
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 02:04:52AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Joey Hess writes:
> > Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > Am I the only one who has a disgusting reminiscence of netscape*.*
> > > packages
> > > every time python* is mentioned? :P
> >
> > Actually I'm more reminded of the perl* packages and
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:47:48AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> There is an alternative... only support one version of python... and be
> stuck at python 2.1 until everything uses it, or lose things like zope
> etc.
Alternatively the python developers could try to keep backwards
compatibility :-
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 08 August 2003 05:23, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Policy changes, voting and the internal discussions all need
> > membership. Having NMs hang in limbo without due cause is denying
> > them the right to those.
>
>
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-09
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I intend to package develock.
* Package name: develock
Version : 0.20
Upstream Author : Katsumi Yamaoka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jun'ichi Shiono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yasuta
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 05:34:20AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> If you actually dig into the list, you'll find that many of the bugs
> with patches fall into the same category as these two. Most of the
> rest actually need significant attention
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:39:52 +0100, Andrew Suffield
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
> >
> >ppp *was* unmaintained, for a long period of
87 matches
Mail list logo
