Christoph Berg wrote:
> The problem that one doesn't want things like .bash_completion read
> there is easily solved by
>
> # check whether we run interactively
> [ "$PS1" ] || return
>
> (Something like that exists in Debian's /etc/skel/.bash_profile.)
Uh, no. You are thinking of /
Hi,
It's better to write POSIX standards - compliant shell scripts than just
explicitly use /bin/bash, IMHO, especially for bash-isms as simple as
this one. Just replace ">& /dev/null" with "> /dev/null 2>&1".
Cheers,
Timshel
--
Timshel Knoll
Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.o
Re: Re: [custom] Some issues for custom debian distributions [Bob Proulx
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 11:10:40PM -0600, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> > # check whether we run interactively
> > [ "$PS1" ] || return
> >
> > (Something like that exists in Debian's /etc/skel/.bash_profi
hi my name is tom and i saw your name at this site
so i figured maybe u could send some pics and stuff so my email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
later
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: charva
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Rob Pitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://www.pitman.co.za/projects/charva/
* License : LGPL
Description : java windowing toolkit for text terminals
Java framewo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jaxe
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Damien Guillaume, Bodo Tasche, Léa Guillon, Bertrand
Delacretaz, Sven Kitschke.
* URL or Web page : http://jaxe.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : xml
It might be a good idea to reject MIME messages in -devel? Do we need
attachments? (patchs can be inserted in the message body)
[It might also be a good idea to wrap your postings]
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote:
> It might be a good idea to reject MIME messages in -devel? Do we need
> attachments? (patchs can be inserted in the message body)
GPG/MIME is nice. And attached patches make thing
Xavier Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might be a good idea to reject MIME messages in -devel? Do we need
> attachments? (patchs can be inserted in the message body)
pgp signature *should* be attached
-- Arnaud Vandyck
http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/
pgp6Q8YBVPiDi.pgp
Des
Re: Re: hey [Xavier Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:07:46PM
+0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> It might be a good idea to reject MIME messages in -devel? Do we need
> attachments? (patchs can be inserted in the message body)
/me would miss his gpg signature
Christoph
--
Christoph
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote:
> It might be a good idea to reject MIME messages in -devel? Do we need
> attachments? (patchs can be inserted in the message body)
Even the BTS understands attachments now. I wouldn't be a fan of
rejecting them from -devel. In particul
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-28
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: sins
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Petr Malat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://petrm.host.sk/sins.html
* License : GPL
Hello!
What is the current status of mplayer's ITP? After the opendivx driver
removal, has anyone investigated wether it's fully free software?
--
Robert Millan
"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mas
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: libi18n-java
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Jean-Hugues de Raigniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL or Web page : http://jhraigniac.freesurf.fr/i18n-lib/
> * License : ACME
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Seems db.debian.org is still offline. Is there any way I can change my
> mail forwarding without it? It forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> currently bach is broken, so bounces are going all over the place
> (mailing list subscriptions). I n
At end of every message posted there are instructions to remove your
email from this list.
[]'s
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 13:05, SCORDATO, C. wrote:
>
>
>
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 08:42:37PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>>...
>> I contacted the SRM about the possibility of inclusion of gimp-print
>> 4.2.5-1woody0 in a point release, but I've not had any reply yet. It
>> doesn't meed the usual criteria for a sta
Is anyone willing to maintain lvm2? Its last upload was over a year ago
and its listed maintainer does not seem to be a Debian developer
according to db.debian.org .
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is har
Despite claims otherwise, I'm actually alive, w/ experimental packages
at http://sloth.voxel.net/~dilinger/lvm2/. Various things (bugs, loss
of an internet connection, upstream developers going on vacation) have
kept me from uploading; however, after talking w/ upstream, I'm going to
do an upload
Oh, also, the last upload was 5 months ago; I typo'd in the changelog,
putting 2002 instead of 2003. :)
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 14:58, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Is anyone willing to maintain lvm2? Its last upload was over a year ago
> and its listed maintainer does not seem to be a Debian developer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:57:46PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 08:42:37PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >>...
> >> I contacted the SRM about the possibility of inclusion of gimp-print
> >> 4.2.5-1woody0 in a point release, but I'v
* Wichert Akkerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030728 21:32]:
> Is anyone willing to maintain lvm2? Its last upload was over a year ago
> and its listed maintainer does not seem to be a Debian developer
> according to db.debian.org .
According to packages.qa.d.o was the lastest upload in 2003 (though it
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-28
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ocamldap
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Miles Egan, Eric Stokes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.csun.edu/~eric/ocamldap-1.1.0.tar.gz
* License : LGPL
Descrip
Currently, BTS sends weekly two mails to debian-devel-announce - one about
WNPP and one about RC bugs.
I think it will help to improve Debian quality if several more lists will be
"broadcasted" by BTS:
- Bugs that have "patch" tag for (e.g.) 2 weeks (and don't have "wontfix"
tag). Broadcasting su
Previously Andres Salomon wrote:
> Despite claims otherwise, I'm actually alive, w/ experimental packages
> at http://sloth.voxel.net/~dilinger/lvm2/. Various things (bugs, loss
> of an internet connection, upstream developers going on vacation) have
> kept me from uploading; however, after talkin
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-28
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cryptokit
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Xavier Leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pauillac.inria.fr/~xleroy/software.html
* License : LGPL
Description : cry
I was actually asked directly at work today what I thought was
going to happen to Red Hat and whether Debian supported the AMD64.
I've seen a couple of posts on this topic since about March.
Anybody care to sum up in words suitable for a suit how well
Debian supports AMD64 / when it will be read
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 10:10:08PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Anybody care to sum up in words suitable for a suit how well
> Debian supports AMD64 / when it will be ready to support AMD64
In practical terms, Debian does support AMD64, because the architecture
is backwards compatible with x8
* Andrew M.A. Cater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030728 18:06]:
>
> I was actually asked directly at work today what I thought was
> going to happen to Red Hat and whether Debian supported the AMD64.
>
> I've seen a couple of posts on this topic since about March.
>
> Anybody care to sum up in words sui
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 04:44:44PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 04:45:33PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > It's also tagged "pending" since May... Matthew, do you need a
> > co-maintainer for ssh?
>
> Matthew's *got* a co-maintainer for ssh, as a cursory check of the
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
