Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:49:46AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:33:22AM -0400, Work Needing Prospective
>>Packages wrote:
>> >judy (#172772), orphaned 210 days ago
>> > Description: C library for creating and accessing dynamic arr
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 08:25:57AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> There's someone on d-mentors wanting to adopt this. As in the BTS:
>
> Debian Bug report logs - #172772
> ITA: judy -- C library for creating and accessing dynamic
Oh dear, Ted T'so just uploaded it and assumed maintainership...
Nenad Antonic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Apparently, there is a bug (at least from my perspective) which
> prevents initrd/cramfs in stock kernels, which has been arround for
> years. On the other hand, this bug gets fixed in every version of debian
Why are you trying to use initrd anyway
A message was sent from debian-devel@lists.debian.org to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
7/12/2003 3:03:38 AM. This message contained an attachment
(your_details.zip)which was infected with a virus named: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Violated Policy
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[junit-freenet (#165504), orphaned 264 days ago]
When I look at the cvs, two classes have been commited 8 month ago, the
other 23 month ago!..
I will adopt this package but I won't upload a new version. I have asked
for its removal instead (#200949). Let's see which other us
Hi, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> As of today, I've been awaiting
> DAM approval now for 155 days, with no end to the wait in sight. I've
> already adopted one orphaned package (Jabber) and made significant
> improvements to it. However, the 150+ day wait for DAM approval has
> deterred me from look
This strikes me as a good idea, unless someone has a legit reason to
include an empty documentations file in a package. So speak up if you
do. Maybe a zero length TODO could be considered to have some implied
meaning, but I've seen zero length everything including AUTHORS and
README and NEWS.
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> > >svgalib (#173471), orphaned 205 days ago
> > > Description: Console SVGA display libraries
> > Of all those people, someone surely has an interest in this. Or
> > perhaps it's time to just drop this crash-inducing security-scary
> > package?
>
> This one kind
After some more investigations:
1° this library is in classpath package and in the j2(sdk|re)1.4
package;
2° it's non-free (I knew but...);
3° it's needed by tomcat4 (by the way of libcommons-dbcp-java) but t4
will depend on j2(sdk|re)1.4.
-- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg
Formateur Ce
After some more investigations:
1° this library is in classpath package and in the j2(sdk|re)1.4
package;
2° it's non-free (I knew but...);
3° it's needed by tomcat4 (by the way of libcommons-dbcp-java) but t4
will depend on j2(sdk|re)1.4.
-- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg
Formateur Ce
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 06:04:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Nenad Antonic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Apparently, there is a bug (at least from my perspective) which
> > prevents initrd/cramfs in stock kernels, which has been arround for
> > years. On the other hand, this bug gets fixed in eve
Hello, guys. Here in Debcamp we decided that we're going to kill as
many bugs
as possible (and even releasing sarge if we work hard ;-) during the entire
Debcamp, so we'll apply approx. BSP rules and a DELAYED/4-day policy.
If anybody is going to start bitching...well, we decide
Hello,
by accident I discovered bug #200180 at the fdutils bug report page
http://bugs.debian.org/fdutils
I was surprised to see this, because I never got a notification for
this bug via email (despite the fact that I'm the package maintainer).
The BTS claims to have sent the norification m
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:07:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> This strikes me as a good idea, unless someone has a legit reason to
> include an empty documentations file in a package. So speak up if you
> do. Maybe a zero length TODO could be considered to have some implied
> meaning,
in my mind, i
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
> I was surprised to see this, because I never got a notification for
> this bug via email (despite the fact that I'm the package maintainer).
I've had this happen to me a few times in the past. I'd always ascribed
it to my personal e-
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
> by accident I discovered bug #200180 at the fdutils bug report page
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/fdutils
>
> I was surprised to see this, because I never got a notification for
> this bug via email (despite the fact that I'm the pac
Mark Brown writes:
> I've had this happen to me a few times in the past.
Same here (though not recently).
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jed-extra
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Many
* URL : http://jedmodes.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : Collection of useful JED modes and utilities
T
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 03:28:18PM +0200, David Martinez Moreno wrote:
> Hello, guys. Here in Debcamp we decided that we're going to kill as
> many bugs
> as possible (and even releasing sarge if we work hard ;-) during the entire
> Debcamp, so we'll apply approx. BSP rules and a DELAYED/4
I am unable to spend as much time updating the 'ntp' packages as they deserve,
and so I would like to find someone suitable to either join me in working on
them, or take them over outright.
There are a number of open bugs that need to be addressed, and I'm completely
unhappy with the current defa
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:58:55PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 08:25:57AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > There's someone on d-mentors wanting to adopt this. As in the BTS:
> >
> > Debian Bug report logs - #172772
> > ITA: judy -- C library for creating and accessing dyna
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Oh guys. I'm waiting some 500 days now. I think that's a record (the
current is around 470). And I'm still working and contributing. Some nice
other DDs stepped forward and wrote mails to the DAM but that didn't cause
anything.
Robert.
As of today, I've been awai
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 05:06:45PM +0200, Robert J?rdens wrote:
> Oh guys. I'm waiting some 500 days now. I think that's a record (the
> current is around 470). And I'm still working and contributing. Some
> nice other DDs stepped forward and wrote mails to the DAM but that
> didn't cause anything
> No, you've been waiting 188 days (as of today) for DAM according to:
Hm, there are two possibilities:
a) I'm blind
b) You're wrong
because...
> 2002-01-04. I'm only referring to the time since the application was
its... *January*2002* and today is *July*2003* - its about year and half.
R
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 07:23:55PM +0200, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
> > No, you've been waiting 188 days (as of today) for DAM according to:
>
> Hm, there are two possibilities:
>
> a) I'm blind
> b) You're wrong
Ahh I'm indeed wrong, misread the year both times. You have amazing
patience if you
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:20:12AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Given that the check is done before asking any question in the
> postinst, if you do install all three of the packages, the first one
> whose postinst runs shall ask the question, and create the file;
> subsequently, the o
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : knutclient
Version: 0.6.1
Upstream Author : Daniel Prynych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.alo.cz/knutclient-pop-en.html
* License : GPL
Descript
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 06:40:04PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> As you said, we should make at least a silent transition. IMHO we
> should split netpbm to a netpbm-legacy (to where all the programms are
> transfered) and then substitut the programms on a step-by-step basis
> with wrappers to usabl
Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:58:55PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 08:25:57AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>> > There's someone on d-mentors wanting to adopt this. As in the BTS:
>> > Debian Bug report logs - #172772
>> > ITA: judy
Hi,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 03:28:18PM +0200, David Martinez Moreno wrote:
> > Hello, guys. Here in Debcamp we decided that we're going to kill as
> > many bugs
> > as possible (and even releasing sarge if we work hard ;-) during the entire
> > Debcamp, so we'll appl
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:56:55PM +0200, Michael Karcher wrote:
> Also usable means that the program is not imagemagick. I am really sick
> of tools that read any image they should process (even for something
> simple like shrinking) in 48 bit true color into memory. The netpbm tools
> are far mo
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 23:25 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:58:55PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 08:25:57AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> >> > There's someone on d-mentors wanting to adopt this. As
Anand, I know I'd be keen to see a Debian version of this:
http://www.everythinglinux.com.au/item/satchel01
as well as some decent t-shirts. Perhaps others'd be interested too?
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 17:36, Anand Kumria wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [ forward as required ]
>
> I'm planning on doing so
I'm running into difficulties getting vibrant6 [1] to comply with the
new policy requiring full inter-library dependencies. The source of
the complication is that two of the libraries come in OpenGL and
non-OpenGL variants, but certain intervening libraries are
OpenGL-agnostic and therefore come i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ho, it's time for another rant from me regarding the libqt3-compat-headers
split. This time my ex-housemate has been hit by the problem: she's just
started working with Qt, and lo and behold she received a missing header
compile error. She did
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 11:05:54PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> I'm running into difficulties getting vibrant6 [1] to comply with the
> new policy requiring full inter-library dependencies. The source of
> the complication is that two of the libraries come in OpenGL and
> non-OpenGL variants, but
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 01:51:07PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> It seems then that our options are as follows.
> (i) Wait for the Qt maintainers to upload a fix.
> (ii) Do an NMU for Qt, despite the fact that this bug is not release-critical.
> (iii) Resort to the technical committee.
> (iv) Keep t
37 matches
Mail list logo
