Joe Buck wrote:
> > However, the output is redundant in many cases.
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:37:45AM +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Fixed now.
Terrific! I'm impressed at your bug-fixing speed; there's a quick "fixed
now" to almost every issue. This script is a huge contribution.
I have one
W liście z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 17:06, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> It is, IMHO.
IMHO not, because doesn't provide things I mentioned before.
> Who says it doesn't?
Like above.
> No, but lots of applications use it.
Yes, that's true. Nevertheless, it shouldn't be a brake in improving it.
Regar
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 05:19:17PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:26:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >> No, it's sitting there, waiting for someone to use it. After a year's
> >> neglect it might need some metaphorical oil on its hinges
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 05:48:15PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:09:08AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:24:14AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > > There is currently no consensus whether translated man pages should
> > > be shipped along with ori
On Thu, May 15, 2003, Victor Torrico wrote:
> I compiled and ran the debian kernel-source-2.5.69 package. It boots OK,
> however, none of he modutil functions work. I keep getting the following
> error message: "QM_MODULES: Function not implemented" whenever I try things
> such as insmod, ls
On Thursday 15 May 2003 08:31 am, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > In that case, I invite any maintainer with a security fix for their
> > package in 'testing' to upload it to testing for
> > testing-proposed-updates. Problem solved. Are you the one who will be
> > responsi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm in the process of applying to become a debian developer, and am having
a great deal of trouble getting my gpg key signed. I've checked the
keysigning coordination page, registered my request for keysigning, and
finally sent mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:08:02PM -0400, Victor Torrico wrote:
>
> I compiled and ran the debian kernel-source-2.5.69 package. It boots OK,
> however, none of he modutil functions work. I keep getting the following
> error message: "QM_MODULES: Function not implemented" whenever I try t
On approximately Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:08:02PM -0400, Victor Torrico wrote:
>
> I compiled and ran the debian kernel-source-2.5.69 package. It boots OK,
> however, none of he modutil functions work. I keep getting the following
> error message: "QM_MODULES: Function not implemented" wheneve
Steve Langasek writes:
> I dunno, I've always found use of Outlook to be a fairly good predictor
> of bug-reporting cluelessness (use of reportbug being another :).
What's your objection to reportbug?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:08:02PM -0400, Victor Torrico wrote:
> I compiled and ran the debian kernel-source-2.5.69 package. It boots OK,
> however, none of he modutil functions work. I keep getting the following
> error message: "QM_MODULES: Function not implemented" whenever I try things
Victor posts :
>> keep getting the following error message: "QM_MODULES: Function not
>> implemented" whenever I try things such as insmod, lsmod, or
>> depmod.
Please do an `apt-get install module-init-tools' and then try booting
into the new 2.5.69 kernel.
Best...
--
ragOO, VU2RGU :
On Thursday 15 May 2003 09:51 am, Joe Buck wrote:
> Joe Buck wrote:
> > > However, the output is redundant in many cases.
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:37:45AM +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> > Fixed now.
>
> Terrific! I'm impressed at your bug-fixing speed; there's a quick "fixed
> now" to almost
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:08:02PM -0400, Victor Torrico wrote:
> I compiled and ran the debian kernel-source-2.5.69 package. It boots OK,
> however, none of he modutil functions work. I keep getting the following
> error message: "QM_MODULES: Function not implemented" whenever I try things
>
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:40:57PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:25:56PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
> > * Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > > It has already been told more than once: in French, an itemized list is
> > > preferred over a comma separated list when i
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 11:31:56AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> just back from vacation I did a "apt-get upgrade" to testing where the
> following packages were update (amongst others but these might be
> guilty)
I just did a dist-upgrade to Sid on my box here at home, which means I
have the same
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:42:26AM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> On Thursday 15 May 2003 08:31 am, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > In that case, I invite any maintainer with a security fix for their
> > > package in 'testing' to upload it to testing for
> > > testing-prop
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:57:27PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> No one seems to have responded, or?
yes, i will file a bug report to remove the package from unstable/testing.
esecially since no upstream response was received.
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
( .. ) [E
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:06:21PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
> > I dunno, I've always found use of Outlook to be a fairly good predictor
> > of bug-reporting cluelessness (use of reportbug being another :).
>
> What's your objection to reportbug?
None whatsoever -- I use
Hi, Sven Luther wrote:
> Why ? is the migration from testing-proposed-update to testing follow
> the same rule as the unstable to testing migration, nothing is lost.
Well, it if's exactly the same rule, then t-p-u would be the same as
unstable, thus we wouldn't need it in the first place. :-/
-
Installed module-init-tools and this took care of the situation.
Thanks to the many who suggested this course of action.
Victor
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:51:15AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:37:45AM +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> > Updating fam makes 177 packages uninstallable on alpha: amor, ark,
> > bibletime, dcoppython, eyesapplet, fifteenapplet, galeon-nautilus, ...
> I can't figure out why this
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:32:02PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 01:45:30PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> >> (a) Repackaging lm-sensors 2.6.5, which would just have libsensors1
> >> 1:2.6.5-1, which in turn would Conflict: w
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:24:58PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
>> On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:56:18PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>>
>> > > Rsh-redone is a reimplementation of the remote shell clients and
>> > > servers. It is written from the ground
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 06:53:51PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
> W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 17:06, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> > It is, IMHO.
>
> IMHO not, because doesn't provide things I mentioned before.
>
> > Who says it doesn't?
>
> Like above.
You can just add field types, if required. It w
Just a brief note to draw people's attention to the following RFAs
I filed a few days ago:
#193116 ap-utils -- Access Point SNMP Utils for Linux
#193117 igal -- online image gallery generator
#193118 tcpflow -- TCP flow recorder
Please see the bugs for more information about the status of each
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 07:07:16AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
But we don't advertize this, so it is natural that people make the
mistake and use testing instead of unstable.
People say this all the time. Then other people go around telling
everyone to run testing. I'm not sure how to fix misplaced a
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:22:28PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> has no official support from Debian security team qualifies as not
> for public consumption in my eyes, but fo course there are braver
> souls than I out there.
So you are saying we should tell people to live with the disease,
I have a neural net program (
http://www.nongnu.org/libann/doc/libann_6.html#SEC26 ) which does something
similar:
Given a text file, it will attempt to guess the natural language in which it was written.
I'm sure it would be fairly simple to modify it to guess the charset. If you point me
to a
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:06:47AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:19:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >> Do you honestly think would be a good idea to use testing-security this way
> >> on a continual b
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:40:25AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> An upload to testing-proposed-updates is not the same as an upload to
> testing-security, AFAIK (different upload queue, different machinery).
> But it was my understanding that both were in working order, they just
> aren't used --
以下是翻译稿名表：（可提供稿件以供测评）
中译俄
-单张PS版生产线说明（2000字）
-外国留学生平安保险险种及条例（2500字）
-发电机生产合同（3000字）
-医药合同、委托书、证明书等相关文件（2000字）
-旅游景点专业导游词（7000字）
-铝制酒瓶盖生产厂家介绍（500字）
-货运期刊（4000字）
-影象机用户手册及使用说明书 （3字）
-环境认证 （1000字）
-按摩器原理说明 （2字）
-中医药类产品说明 （5000字）
-石油勘探企业章程 （15000字）
-海尔电视机使用说明书 （1字）
-机电成套产品介绍（4字）
-网站厂家信息
Em Tue, 13 May 2003 06:57:45 +0200 (CEST), Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > Now Apache maintainers are telling us that they chose another layout
> > and we are bound to it.
>
> Yes because the official maintainer is responsable for the description of
> a package. Including
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-15
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libtest-manifest-perl
Version : 0.91
Upstream Author : Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/
* License : GPL, Artistic
Description : Per
>> On Thu, 15 May 2003 10:08:37 -0800
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fielder George Dowding) said as follows:
>I use LaTeX2e and friends (almost daily).
I know that LaTeX-2.09 is obsolete, however I need it to process
ancient TeX sources without modification.
>Perhaps I could lend a hand here if you woul
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Assuming the mail client pays attention, of course.
>
> I guess using MIME structures like that more would make more people complain
> to devlopers of MUAs that don't handle this properly...
>
> I don't know many MUAs, but perh
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 10:40:10AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:06:47AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > There's that "we" again. Why not unstable, too?
>
> I'd have no problem with that.
You don't seem to have any problem suggesting that other people do more
work.
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:57:58PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:14:53AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> >I'm sorry, I am on a public terminal, and can't quite remember where I
> >read it - But testing should always be close to a releasable state.
> That assumption is both fa
On Fri, 09 May 2003 02:31:43 +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Bob Hilliard wrote:
> > 1. How can I determine what character encoding is used in a
> > document without manually scanning the entire file?
First off, for the examples you mentioned (foldoc and the jargon file)
the iso-8859-
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-16
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-sqlobject
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Ian Bickin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sqlobject.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description : An object-relation
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:28:48PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 10:40:10AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:06:47AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > There's that "we" again. Why not unstable, too?
> > I'd have no problem with that.
> You don'
On Fri, 16 May 2003 01:37:14 +0200, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:22:28PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> has no official support from Debian security team qualifies as not
>> for public consumption in my eyes, but fo course there are braver
>> souls than
On Fri, 16 May 2003 10:40:10 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:06:47AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:19:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>> >> Do you honestly think would be a
On Thu, 15 May 2003 11:08:32 +0200, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:17:50PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino
> Peña wrote: [...]
>> >As a package developer I hold veto powers over anything
>> > shipped in my package, since it is my signature that goes wit
On Thu, 15 May 2003 09:52:06 -0400, Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Um, when we all agreed to be Debian Developers, we agreed to the
> following from the social contract:
> * Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software
> We will be guided by the needs of our users and the
>
101 - 145 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
