JENNY’S（金洋吧）承接各类聚会

JENNY¡¯S£¨½ðÑó°É£©³Ð½Ó¸÷Àà¾Û»á Ç×°®µÄ¿Í»§£¬ÄúºÃ Èç¹ûÄúËùÔÚµÄÆóÒµÕýÏë¾Ù°ì¾Û»á£¬´Ó¶øÔö¼ÓÔ±¹¤Äý¾ÛÁ¦»òÀ­½ü¿Í»§¾àÀ룡 Èç¹ûÄúÕýΪ¸÷´¦¿ª³öµÄ¸ß¼Û°ü³¡·Ñµ£ÓÇ£»Èç¹ûÄú¶Ô½ìʱËùÌṩµÄʳƷ£¬¾ÆË®ÖÊÁ¿ÐÄÀïÎÞµ×£¡ Èç¹ûÄúÅÂÒò¾Û»áµØµãƫƧ£¬Ô±¹¤µ½Ê±Á¬¾Û»áµØµãÒ²ÕÒ²»µ½£¡£¡ ÄÇôÇëÄú¿´ÏÂÈ¥¡££º£©

我们的世界为何如此美好

welcome to legendb2b.com 这不是一封广告邮件，因为我并不打算向你推销任何产品。 这也是一封广告邮件，因为我要向你推销一个伟大的自由之梦。       传奇商务网http://www.legendb2b.com是全球第一个，也是全球最大的提供“组群发”服务的电子商务站点，服务于16个国家和地区。组群发技术可以大大提高您电子商务的成交率。我们提供的服务，包括“组群发”服务在内，一切服务都是免费的，请不要不相信。至于为什么免费，请查看信尾的（附录1：传奇与alibaba.com决斗的前后始末）       所谓的“组群发”服务，就是当您发布了供求信息后，系统

bill gates linux

I am going to try one last time on this and then I promise you won't here from me again. GIVEN THE FOLLOWING :- 1/ there are millions of Windows and Dos users out there. 2/ Ideally there should be equally millions of Linux users out there. 3/ many of us millions don't want to g

Bug#172189: ITP: openscenegraph -- C++/OpenGL based graphics development library.

Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-06 Severity: wishlist * Package name: openscenegraph Version : 0.9.2 Upstream Author : Robert Osfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.openscenegraph.org/ * License : LGPL Description : C++/OpenGL

Re: Bug#172158: ITP: rsxs -- Really Slick X Screensavers

Hi Ari! Not really relevant but www.reallyslick.com points to rss-glx.sourceforge.net which seems to be a second independant port to X11. Also, that page even supplies Debian-packages (though only for i386 and PPC). Did you compare the two ports and what are their differences ? cheers Uli

Re: Bug#172158: ITP: rsxs -- Really Slick X Screensavers

Apparently there are a lot of ports of the really slick X Screensavers, but all of them present the problem of integrating into the actual xscreensaver, which isn't really possible system-wide as far as I can see. And inclusion of the screensavers in upstream XScreenSaver is far from feasible b

Re: guaranteed non-interactive installation and upgrades

#include * Colin Walters [Sat, Dec 07 2002, 08:15:08PM]: > But no one has shown any interest in fixing exim. On the other hand I > was interested enough in Postfix to write the debconfiscation, and then > John Goerzen and LaMont Jones were interested enough to fix and > significantly improve it.

Re: bill gates linux

Hi, > 4/ many of us millions would very much like to have > the option of using both systems on our computer. They actually have. > 1/ we don't want to have to know the technical > details of how to get to the step4/ above (in the > given table above). This is being worked on. A lon

Re: guaranteed non-interactive installation and upgrades

Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 14:23, Bastian Blank wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:44:31PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: >> > And we could fix the exim issue by switching to Postfix as the default >> > MTA... >> >> the sollution is not to use other packages, i

Re: [console-data] upgrade problem in preconfigure

On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 11:29:37PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Oops. Yes, I did. I don't understand why it should hang; I'll log it as > a bug and investigate. Might it be due to what you installed next? (I > can't reproduce it yet; any further info would help). Something similar happens to

Re: private debian pools

Brian May (2002-12-07 16:36:58 +1100) : > I have a set of scripts for creating private debian package pools, > available at: Wonderful. We now have two tools providing almost the same functionality, except only one does package pools (bin2) and only one is mature (mini-dinstall, by Colin Walters

Re: [console-data] upgrade problem in preconfigure

At Sun, 8 Dec 2002 13:28:37 +0100, Jesus Climent wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 11:29:37PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > > Oops. Yes, I did. I don't understand why it should hang; I'll log it as > > a bug and investigate. Might it be due to what you installed next? (I > > can't reproduce it

各种建站应用系统

ÏòÄúÍƼö:Öйú×ÔÖúÍø×ÔÐпª·¢µÄ¸÷ÖÖÌØÉ«½¨Õ¾Ó¦ÓÃϵͳ: ×ÔÖúÍøվϵͳ3.0°æ (PHP+MYSQL) »¥ÁªÍøÒµÎñ´úÀíϵͳ (PHP+MYSQL) ÍøÉÏÉ̵êϵͳ (PHP+MYSQL) B2BÉÌÎñƽ̨ϵͳ (PHP+MYSQL) ÔÚÏß¿Í»§·þÎñϵͳ (PHP+MYSQL) ÓòÃû²éѯע²áϵͳ (PHP+MYSQL) ϵͳ¹¦ÄÜÇ¿´ó,ºǫ́¹ÜÀí¹¦ÄÜÍêÉÆ,½çÃæÃÀ¹Û.²¢¿É¸ù¾ÝÄúÍøÕ¾µÄʵ¼Ê

Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system which will be required by a Linux installation. This could include inf

Re: Bug#172158: ITP: rsxs -- Really Slick X Screensavers

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:49:10AM -0500, Ari Pollak wrote: > I suppose it would be possible to just include the binaries without > touching the XScreenSaver config file but instead including > instructions on including it on a user-specific basis, but I don't > know how well the changes would

Procura-se Profissionais!

Empresa multinacional está contratando interessados com internet, para trabalhar em período parcial ou integral com altos ganhos. Se interessar acesse: www.b2b-venture.cjb.net Marcia Nota: Caso não queira mais receber nossas mensagens, retorne este e-mail com o título: Remover.

started to make changelogs and copyright file online available

Hello, I started to make the changelog and copyright file of the Debian packages online available at: http://changelogs.credativ.org/ Its just a first run with daily updates of new uploaded packages (for example apt-src and kernel-image-2.4.20 today). I have to work on it (remove old ve

Re: private debian pools

On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Roland Mas wrote: > Brian May (2002-12-07 16:36:58 +1100) : > > > I have a set of scripts for creating private debian package pools, > > available at: > > Wonderful. We now have two tools providing almost the same > functionality, except only one does package pools (bin2) and

Re: started to make changelogs and copyright file online available

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 03:33:10PM +0100, No?l K?the wrote: > I started to make the changelog and copyright file of the Debian > packages online available at: > > http://changelogs.credativ.org/ We should be able to start using the lintian lab on gluck for this again now that lintian is run

Re: Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 15:25, John Lines wrote: > Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help > new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they > started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system > which will be re

提供自动准同期控制器

 (本信件是广告信件，不满意请删除，对你的打搅表示歉意）  您好： 本公司专业研究开发电力自动化辅助设备和自动装置，HTQ2002全数字自动准同期控制器以简洁的结构设计、完善的功能、最好的性能价格比获得广大用户的好评。已经广泛应用于火力发电、水力发电、变电站等需要同期的场合。 其特点如下： ☆ 精确、快捷、可靠地实现同期并网是其基本功能。☆ 由独立的硬件电路完成相角差测量，并提供合闸闭锁功能。☆ 采用DSP芯片为核心、全数字化设计。硬件简单、可靠性高、集成度高、功   能完善。☆ 免维护设计理念，自动实现装置内、外部信号校准及所有同期参数的整定。☆ 装置采用模糊酸法对合闸相角差进

Re: Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

On Sun, 08 Dec 2002, John Lines wrote: > Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help > new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they > started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system > which will be required b

Re: Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

Hi, On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 02:25:19PM +, John Lines wrote: > Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help > new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they > started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system

Re: Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:22:52PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > Hmmm, ok, on 2nd thought there's modems, printers, and old ISA cards. > Anything else? What about configurations for IP, DNS, mail and news? I don't see why it would be limited to hardware detection. Richard

Re: Problem with kdenetwork build for unstable

On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 20:39, Martin Schulze wrote: > Guillem Jover wrote: > > > Uhh, admin/Makefile.common is checking for '#MIN_CONFIG' in the first two > > lines to include there admin/configure.in.min. > > I'd love to have it work but now the build complains about: > > make[1]: Entering dire

project: vitual partial mirror with CGI/dpkg-repack

Hello developers, this is a small project proposal. The idea would be to write a cgi-script that automatically dpkg-repack the package it is asked to deliver, so that we can build a virtual apt-get'able partial mirror of the package installed on the box. This would allow to upgrade a box from an

Re: Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 02:30, Emile van Bergen wrote: > Another idea: why not support an installation in an ext2 filesystem > which is really a big file on a Windows VFAT partition, mounted using a > loopback device? That would do away with all the partitioning; that > would only be needed when the us

Re: Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:30:10PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote: > Another idea: why not support an installation in an ext2 filesystem > which is really a big file on a Windows VFAT partition, mounted using a > loopback device? That would do away with all the partitioning; that > would only be nee

Kernel update for Debian 3.0/i386

An up-to-date version is at . For the first update to woody the 2.2 and 2.4 kernel should be updated. In order to install a new one, an older one has to be removed, so the archive doesn't explode and CDs are still buildable. Hence, I propose the following a

Re: Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:04:46PM +0200, Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:30:10PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > Another idea: why not support an installation in an ext2 filesystem > > which is really a big file on a Windows VFAT partition, m

Re: description writing guide

On 07-Dec-02, 16:05 (CST), David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 11:51:03 +0100 > Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is a bad practice to repeat the package name as the first word in > > the long description. > > Why is that again? Because anything[1] tha

Re: account on IA-64 sought.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) writes: >12. http://testdrive.hp.com/ Yes, this can be a good resource. I also invite anyone working on ia64 porting issues to the #debian-ia64 channel on irc.debian.org. There is very little activity visible there, but people who can help are often lurk

Re: Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 02:25:19PM +, John Lines wrote: > Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help > new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they > started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system > whi

Re: guaranteed non-interactive installation and upgrades

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:06:19AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 14:23, Bastian Blank wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:44:31PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > >> > And we could fix the exim issue by switching to Postfix as the

Re: private debian pools

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 02:03:44PM +0100, Roland Mas wrote: > Brian May (2002-12-07 16:36:58 +1100) : > > > I have a set of scripts for creating private debian package pools, > > available at: > > Wonderful. We now have two tools providing almost the same > functionality, except only one does pa

Re: project: vitual partial mirror with CGI/dpkg-repack

> The idea would be to write a cgi-script that automatically dpkg-repack the > package it is asked to deliver, so that we can build a virtual apt-get'able > partial mirror of the package installed on the box. > > This would allow to upgrade a box from an already installed one without > any media.

Re: Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

Hi, On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:31:11AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > Why make it a separate program that runs under Windows? Why not mount > the Windows partition from the Linux installer, and read the registry > from there? Because it's easier for Windows to read its own registry and write a

Re: guaranteed non-interactive installation and upgrades

Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:06:19AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >> The packaging of Exim's new major version (v4) will use debconf, the >> preliminary test packages already do. >> Because the configuration file format has changed in a fundamental

Bug#172241: ITP: cl-sdl -- Common Lisp bindings to the SDL graphics library

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-08 Severity: wishlist * Package name: cl-sdl Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Matthew Danish, Timo Tossavainen * URL : http://cl-sdl.sourceforge.net/ * License : MIT/X style Description : Common Lisp bindings t

Re: Kernel update for Debian 3.0/i386

#include * Martin Schulze [Sun, Dec 08 2002, 06:06:42PM]: > There is no pcmcia-modules-2.2.22-reiserfs, which looks like an > oversight to me. AFAIK kernel-image-2.2.*-reiserfs is abandoned so do not wonder. Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- Uuuuhps! Wo is' se denn?!? Hat jemand meine Signatur gesehen

Re: Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:08:17PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote: > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:31:11AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Why make it a separate program that runs under Windows? Why not mount > > the Windows partition from the Linux installer, and read the registry > > from there?

Re: project: vitual partial mirror with CGI/dpkg-repack

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:05:16PM +0100, Robin Putters wrote: > > The idea would be to write a cgi-script that automatically dpkg-repack the > > package it is asked to deliver, so that we can build a virtual apt-get'able > > partial mirror of the package installed on the box. > > > > This would a

Re: started to make changelogs and copyright file online available

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 02:49:50PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > I started to make the changelog and copyright file of the Debian > > packages online available at: > > > > http://changelogs.credativ.org/ > > We should be able to start using the lintian lab on gluck for this again > now that

Re: bill gates linux

> 1/ we don't want to have to know the technical > details of how to get to the step4/ above (in the > given table above). > 2/we want one of the following:- > A/ to be able to insert a floppy disk into > our "a" drive , turn on the computer, > the comp

Re: project: vitual partial mirror with CGI/dpkg-repack

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 05:30:13PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > I will not do it myself since I know nothing about CGI programming, CGI programming is easy to learn ;-) CGI scripts or programs get whatever the client sends on his URL, starting after the '?' as a parameter, receive on their stdi

Re: private debian pools

On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 15:38:26 +0100 (CET), Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Why noone have ever packaged the actual debian set of scritps for >handling archives instead? Have you ever looked at katie, jenna and the other girls? They can do magic, 99 % of which unneeded in the case

Re: private debian pools

On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 06:41 am, Joel Baker wrote: I'd honestly prefer to see the actual archive scripts (The One True Archiving Tools, of which all others must, by definition, be emulations) packaged and useable by mere mortals, but the last I'd heard, this was a long way off, and not

Re: project: vitual partial mirror with CGI/dpkg-repack

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 09:26:55PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 05:30:13PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > I will not do it myself since I know nothing about CGI programming, > > CGI programming is easy to learn ;-) > > CGI scripts or programs get whatever the client s

Re: Bug#172189: ITP: openscenegraph -- C++/OpenGL based graphics development library.

* Hugo van der Merwe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Package: wnpp > Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-06 > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: openscenegraph > Version : 0.9.2 > Upstream Author : Robert Osfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.openscenegra

Bug#172271: ITP: japana -- HTTP proxy converting Japanese characters into ASCII

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-08 Severity: wishlist * Package name: japana Version : 2.0.2-5 Upstream Author : Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.h.shuttle.de/mitch/japana.en.html * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.) Des

Re: Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:04:46PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > Are VFAT partitions still common? I thought Windows 2000 and XP both > used NTFS by default. And last time I tried (about a year ago, I > think) mounting NTFS read-write on Linux was still flaky. But ISTR that _file_overwrite_ sup

Problems with XFS patch and SMP

Bug#171943 reports that dictd 1.8.0 fails to start with the following error message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/sbin/dictd -d nofork :I: 2535 starting dictd 1.8.0/rf on Linux 2.4.19-xfs Tue Dec 3 23:43:09 2002 dictd (dict_index_open): Cannot mmap index file "/dev/null(dict_index_open) Cannot

What should go into "How Software Producers can distribute their products directly in .deb format"?

Hi, (sorry for the overlong subject). I originally sent this to debian-doc but I got no answers, so I thought I'd post it here too. I'm interested in writing the "How Software Producers can distribute their products directly in .deb format" manual, as listed on http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-ma

Re: private debian pools

> On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 15:38:26 +0100 (CET), Fabio Massimo Di Nitto > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Why noone have ever packaged the actual debian set of scritps for > >handling archives instead? > > Have you ever looked at katie, jenna and the other girls? They can do > magic, 99 % of which unneeded

Re: private debian pools

On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Nick Phillips wrote: > > /me wonders whether some concept of namespaces in package names would > be useful before we make it too easy for world + dog to run large > repositories of .debs - Ximian was bad enough on its own, last I had to > recover a system from someone using it.

[Testing] Why isn't a52dec updating

I see that the testing scripts are running again. Now I wonder why a52dec isn't going in. In update_output.txt I find trying: a52dec skipped: a52dec (1014+21) got: 4+0: a-4 * alpha: ogle, ogle-gui which I read as if the new a52dec entered testing, ogle would be uninstallable. The old

Re: private debian pools

On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Joel Baker wrote: > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 02:03:44PM +0100, Roland Mas wrote: > > Brian May (2002-12-07 16:36:58 +1100) : > > > > > I have a set of scripts for creating private debian package pools, > > > available at: > > > > Wonderful. We now have two tools providing almos

Re: started to make changelogs and copyright file online available

On 8 Dec 2002, Noèl Köthe wrote: > I started to make the changelog and copyright file of the Debian > packages online Ah! Wondeful. Would be nice to have it integrated in the frontends ... "do I want/need to update this to the latest unstable version yet - let's check the changelog ..."? Very ni

Re: private debian pools

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 02:03:44PM +0100, Roland Mas wrote: > Wonderful. We now have two tools providing almost the same > functionality, except only one does package pools (bin2) and only one > is mature (mini-dinstall, by Colin Walters). Could we possibly hope > for a merger of those two? I'd

Re: private debian pools

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 09:19:52PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > Have you ever looked at katie, jenna and the other girls? They can do > magic, 99 % of which unneeded in the case of simple private archives. I looked at katie; it seemed to be a complicated and undocumented mess that was a total overki

Re: private debian pools

On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 10:48 am, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: I do not agree with you for different reasons. First of all noone forces people to add private archives to their sources.list. If users do that they should know that things can break more easily. Sometimes private archive are

Re: started to make changelogs and copyright file online available

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:04:00PM +0100, tomas pospisek wrote: > On 8 Dec 2002, No?l K?the wrote: > > I started to make the changelog and copyright file of the Debian > > packages online > > Ah! Wondeful. Would be nice to have it integrated in the frontends ... > "do I want/need to update this to

Re: started to make changelogs and copyright file online available

Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > see apt-listchanges, which is a great tool for looking at changelogs > before you install packages. Hardly everybody has got a full Debian mirror in the same rack. ;-) -- Florian Weimer[EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Stuttgart

Re: Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

Hi, On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 12:24:56PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:08:17PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:31:11AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > Why make it a separate program that runs under Windows? Why not mount > > > the

Re: private debian pools

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:48:30PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > I do not agree with you for different reasons. First of all noone forces > people to add private archives to their sources.list. If users do that > they should know that things can break more easily. Sometimes private > archi

Re: started to make changelogs and copyright file online available

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:44:08PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > see apt-listchanges, which is a great tool for looking at changelogs > > before you install packages. > > Hardly everybody has got a full Debian mirror in the same rack. ;-) If ther

Re: private debian pools

On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 20:51, Nick Phillips wrote: > /me wonders whether some concept of namespaces in package names would > be useful before we make it too easy for world + dog to run large > repositories of .debs - Ximian was bad enough on its own, last I had to > recover a system from someone

Re: Problems with XFS patch and SMP

It would be interesting to see an strace of the program and the output of "dmesg".

Re: private debian pools

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 12:42:15PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > > d-arch-builder?? (debian-archive-builder) > > Sounds good. I have renamed the bin2 directory to darchbuilder. (unfortunately Perl objected to the - in the directory name). The new location is now http://www.microcomaustralia.com.au/

Re: Problems with XFS patch and SMP

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:26:03PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote: > Bug#171943 reports that dictd 1.8.0 fails to start with the > following error message: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/sbin/dictd -d nofork > :I: 2535 starting dictd 1.8.0/rf on Linux 2.4.19-xfs Tue Dec 3 23:43:09 2002 > dictd (di

Putting .so symlinks in libs package for dlopen()ing?

[Please CC all replies to me] Hi all, I'm having issues with getting parted's reiserfs support to work in a way that complies with Debian policy. The issue is that parted dlopen()s libreiserfs.so and libdal.so (from the libreiserfs-0.3-{0,dev} packages) for its reiserfs support. This is fine, but

Re: started to make changelogs and copyright file online available

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 05:57:55PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:44:08PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > see apt-listchanges, which is a great tool for looking at changelogs > > > be

Re: Putting .so symlinks in libs package for dlopen()ing?

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:26:14AM +1100, Timshel Knoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > 2. Make parted dlopen() libreiserfs-0.3.so.0 rather than libreiserfs.so. >This will solve the problem, but is not ideal solution since a minor >version upgrade or SONAME change of libreiserfs wi

Re: location of UnicodeData.txt

John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell writes: > > The copyright is on the *file* and not on "the data",... > > Did I say it was? > > > ...and certainly not on the *information* which the file contains. > > An instantiation of that information could be considered a derivative

Re: Problems with XFS patch and SMP

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:09:51AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > that looks like it may be a configuration errorwhy else would it be > trying to mmap /dev/null? this is a elf function, not sure what it is used for but a lot of programs do this. Thats why you need /dev/null in most chroots for

Re: private debian pools

Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > Why noone have ever packaged the actual debian set of scritps for > handling archives instead? Probably because it's too complicated to be of use unless you're managing something on the scale of the debian archive. It's much easier to install mini-dinstall and make

Re: private debian pools

Joel Baker wrote: > And don't forget debarchiver, which doesn't (yet) support pools, but is in > use in a number of places for doing old-style archives, too. Note that mini-dinstall can generate "old-style" archives too. That's what I use for all my repositories. archive_style = flat -- see shy

Re: private debian pools

Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I looked at katie; it seemed to be a complicated and undocumented > mess that was a total overkill for my purpose (eg. I don't need a > database). That "complicated and undocumented mess" has been running the Debian archives successfully and without major i

shanghai airticket+hotel+transfer HKD1799

  Title: ¤¤µØ«È´Ì ·s¦~3/4¤Ñ¤W®ü¾÷²¼+°s©±+±µ°e  ¥u»Ý$1,799°_ Date   ¡G

Re: location of UnicodeData.txt

Thomas Bushnell writes: > I believe at this point you are raising FUD. I believe I was attempting to discuss the subject calmly and rationally while avoiding inflammatory language such as "you are raising FUD". > The license on Unicode explicitly grants permission to make such > derivatives, if t

Re: location of UnicodeData.txt

John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The license on Unicode explicitly grants permission to make such > > derivatives, if they even are such, in free programs. > > Reference? I don't recall seeing this mentioned earlier in this thread, > and it is not at all clear from a quick perusal of

Re: Putting .so symlinks in libs package for dlopen()ing?

On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 00:26, Timshel Knoll wrote: > I'm having issues with getting parted's reiserfs support to work in a > way that complies with Debian policy. The issue is that parted dlopen()s > libreiserfs.so and libdal.so (from the libreiserfs-0.3-{0,dev} > packages) for its reiserfs support

Re: What should go into "How Software Producers can distribute their products directly in .deb format"?

On Sunday 08 December 2002 13:29, Aaron Isotton wrote: > Hi, > > (sorry for the overlong subject). > > I originally sent this to debian-doc but I got no answers, so I > thought I'd post it here too. > > I'm interested in writing the "How Software Producers can distribute > their products directly i

Re: private debian pools

On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 12:03 pm, Scott James Remnant wrote: I disagree that this is needed, not for any of the usual reasons, but for the simple reason that this functionality already exists. In part; it's not visible to the user, and it's not possible for a package to specify that it de

Re: What should go into "How Software Producers can distribute their products directly in .deb format"?

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 06:06:41PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > In the end it makes very little sense for a3rd party to provide debs. It makes sense for the debian user, dont u think? Greetings Bernd -- (OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ( .. ) [EMAIL PROTECTED],linux.de,debian.org} ht

Re: private debian pools

On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 14:44, Joey Hess wrote: > Joel Baker wrote: > > And don't forget debarchiver, which doesn't (yet) support pools, but is in > > use in a number of places for doing old-style archives, too. > > Note that mini-dinstall can generate "old-style" archives too. That's > what I use f

debian-devel您好！大船过海！！！

深圳市新联美术印刷有限公司 本公司成立十余年，承蒙社会各界人士的厚爱，发扬“以诚为本”“团结拼搏”“科技创新”“不断进取”的企业精神，跨入深圳十强印刷企业。 本公司引进全新日本小森四色机，拥有世界最先进的西德进口电脑遥控罗兰四色彩印机，采用最先进电脑设计排版系统为客户提供设计、印刷、装订一条龙优质服务，以质量好，价格优，交货快，信誉佳，送货上门的服务宗旨赢得广大客户的信赖。 本公司业务范围：精美画册彩页书刊、产品说明书、宣传海报、手提纸袋、吊牌、酒标、不干胶贴、信笺信封、表格单据、挂历、台历、包装彩盒等。 本公司曾与TCL王牌、中兴通讯、华为集团、茂业百货、外国语学院、创维集团、中国电信

Re: What should go into "How Software Producers can distribute their products directly in .deb format"?

On Sunday 08 December 2002 18:12, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 06:06:41PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > In the end it makes very little sense for a3rd party to provide debs. > > It makes sense for the debian user, dont u think? > Which is why I ask for the second option

Re: private debian pools

On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 17:26, Brian May wrote: > When I last looked at mini-dinstall it didn't seem to try to cater for > many of the tasks required for pools, because it doesn't appear to > support pools. > > eg. with pools you need tools to install packages, maintain multiple > Packages files fo

Re: Pre-linux Windows program - was Re: bill gates Linux

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:45:04PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote: >> Actually, I would find it significantly easier to borrow code from Wine >> to do registry parsing and run a tool against a Windows partition >> mounted read-only to extract the information we need, than I would to >> write a Wind

Re: DAK

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:37:39AM +1100, Brian May wrote: > Maybe one day these tools will get better documented, I will be I would assume the first step might be to give postgresql the init_pool.sql file, and somehow configure the programs to use this newly created database? I would also assume

Re: What should go into "How Software Producers can distribute their products directly in .deb format"?

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:03:05PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > Which is why I ask for the second option -- a tarball. Let Debian, Gentoo, > BSD, whoever do their own packaging. This includes any of those groups' > users. Debian wont package most of the non free software. Greetings Ber

Re: Putting .so symlinks in libs package for dlopen()ing?

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:02:12AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote: > I don't see why this is a problem, you'd only need to change the > dlopen() code if there's a SONAME change - and that should only change > if there's a binary-incompatible difference. A difference that might > not be picked up

Re: Putting .so symlinks in libs package for dlopen()ing?

Hi again, I forgot to mention: what if a backward-compatible API change is made to libreiser? libtool library versioning is designed to deal with all of this... can we use it somehow? Cheers, Andrew

Re: Putting .so symlinks in libs package for dlopen()ing?

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 04:01:29PM +1100, Andrew Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:02:12AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > I don't see why this is a problem, you'd only need to change the > > dlopen() code if there's a SONAME change - and that should

Re: project: vitual partial mirror with CGI/dpkg-repack

Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 05:30:13PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: I will not do it myself since I know nothing about CGI programming, CGI programming is easy to learn ;-) CGI scripts or programs get whatever the client sends on his URL, starting after the '?' as a parameter, r

Re: Putting .so symlinks in libs package for dlopen()ing?

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 12:16:44AM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote: > So reiserfs has an internal mechanism for reporting whether stuff > is really compatible? Yes. An internal version numbers policy. You call a function (via dlsym) asking if the interface you (i.e. parted) is using, and reiserfs