[Excuse the dodgy quality, I'm trying to construct a reply from DWN].
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:03:05 +0100, Michael Meskes scrawled:
> but since gcc 2.95 is still standard in Debian I guess the switch to 3.2
> will take much longer than the release of KDE 3.1 which is due next
> week.
>
> And the e
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Currently the following packages in testing provide
Stefan> java1-runtime: gij-3.0, gij-3.2, orp-classpath and
Stefan> sablevm. All of them include (or depend on) a Java virtual
Stefan> machine so if I add this depen
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, sean finney wrote:
> i agree. perhaps the X task should include these packages, and then
Definitely.
> the xserver-xfree86 package can check for these, and if they exist, before
I doubt this would help much. If I'm not missleaded the configure
script is called before the fil
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:05:43PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> I think this is hard to without switching to a format which allows us to
> include more metadata (like XML). So we can explicitly use stuff like
> and for lists, instead of relying on ASCII renderings. That
> way we can safely wor
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:43:55PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stefan> Currently the following packages in testing provide
> Stefan> java1-runtime: gij-3.0, gij-3.2, orp-classpath and
> Stefan> sablevm. All of them include
Has anyone created an Oracle 9i installer?
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:48:59PM -0800, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> Has anyone created an Oracle 9i installer?
what do you mean with >installer
(Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?)
pgp4SmyMaSD9k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
also sprach Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.05.0611 +0100]:
> On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 18:06, martin f krafft wrote:
> > the problem is that we also need the kernel patch.
>
> 2.4.20 includes HTB3
i saw. but that's a problem because it won't run on every system
therefore. it's kernel
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 07:58:58AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, sean finney wrote:
> > the xserver-xfree86 package can check for these, and if they exist, before
> I doubt this would help much. If I'm not missleaded the configure
> script is called before the files of packages
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Michael Banck wrote:
> Maybe what we need are people who read package descriptions prior to
> install
Debian picking it's users instead of users picking Debian.
*t
--
---
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole -
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:55:50PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> I think the package descriptions are a very important product of this
> project. They're going to be one of the first things people see when
> they use Debian, and their quality directly reflects on the quality of
> Debian. I've bee
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:29:47PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> I'm curious as to why was DDTP (Debian Documentation Translation Project)
^
Description
> was chosen for the project in helping transl
hi,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:04:21AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.04.1353 +0100]:
> > I'd be extremely surprised if the explanation wasn't something along the
> > lines of "we didn't get round to it" or "something more important came
> > u
hi,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:22:05AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:13:18PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > Dunno how you feel about this, but dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
> > > works quite fine here.
> > >
> > It does kinda assume you know what you want yo
Hi,
I have problems fixing kdenetwork for unstable. With gcc 3
get/setenv aren't detected through C but through C++ which doesn't
work. That's a bug in automake. It should be fixed with a patch
in the following source:
http://master.debian.org/~joey/NMU/kdenetwork_2.2.2-14.21.diff.gz
http://ma
Hi there,
I'm lost with a problem concerning the build of tetex-bin on potato/alpha.
This is a request for help. Could someone take a look at this problem
and perhaps explain it to me with a fix?
Both escher and lully have a potato chroot you can use.
Source files are here:
http://master.debia
Le jeu 05/12/2002 à 09:05, sean finney a écrit :
> > I doubt this would help much. If I'm not missleaded the configure
> > script is called before the files of packages are installed. Thus
> > I'm not really sure whether there is access to the tools which are needed
> > if they are installed all
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 05:17:19PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> First thing: KDE 3.1 will not be released this week. Expect a public
> announcement on this soon, but until then, I can say no more. Sorry, but
> it's out of my control.
I know what you're talking about as I just talked to Ralf.
> Se
您是否想提高您的企业的知名度？
您是否想创建自己的驰名品牌？
您是否想拥有一个随时出国商务活动的机会？
您是否想。。
注册一家完全属于您自己的美国公司无疑是一个理想的选择。
北京美中凯通信息咨询有限公司将全力帮助您实现您的愿望。
若您有兴趣，不妨点击：
http://www.mzkaitong.com
欢迎来电来访咨询，我们的联系方式：
（美中）凯通美国总公司
Kaitong Inc.
地址：2187 Country View Ln., Salt Lake City, UT 84121, US
After all I have readed in reply of my Post, I have understand, that I
can begin Porting this program to debian,
and I see if it could be integreted to debian installation process ;-) .
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 23:50, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:42:43PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > > > Install discover, read-edid and mdetect before you install X, and
> > > > you're set.
> > >
> > > Now explain that to my mother! :p
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Maybe what we wa
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:02:34AM +0100, Michael Meskes scrawled:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 05:17:19PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Secondly, ftpmasters have to add overrides for new packages, in case you
> > didn't realize. That takes time: their time adding them, and our time
> > waiting. We'r
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:44:08AM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> it's not userfriendly? that's the whole point of it actually. and
> X based GUIs are way nicer than text based GUIs.
> and it's also not userfriendly to go and say "go read the package
> descriptions".
Shure its userfriendly, but d
Amir Bukhari wrote:
Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
If i have to decide between nice graphical installer, and a nice Dialog
Setup, i will prefer the Dialg Setup !
but Xconfigurator has also Dialog setup. I have compiled it and it has
found my Graphic Card and my Monitor
frequency, but I should chang
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> This is false. If the package provides the core classes it
Ola> should provide java1-runtime but NOT java-virtual-machine. If
Ola> it provides the virtual-machine it should provide
Ola> java-virtual-machine. If this is no
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:28:20PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Nope - the 3.0.x packages just were not ready to go into sid. Any
> package where the upgrade strategy is to purge the old and install the
> new just doesn't work. 3.1.x will be the first packages where upgrades
> from 2.2.x are clean.
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ola> This is false. If the package provides the core classes it
Ola> should provide java1-runtime but NOT java-virtual-machine. If
Ola> it provides the virtual-machine it should provide
Ola> java-virtual-machine. If this is no
Stephen,
> Ola, we go round and round on this. Having java1-runtime only mean
> the java.* classes doesn't add anything. Packages shouldn't have to
> depend on two virtual packages; java1-rutime should be a superset of
> the functionality of java-virual-machine not a disjoint set.
I think the a
Hello,
It does not seem possible to build this source package using pbuilder.
The problem is that it build-depends on kernel-image-2.4.19-386, but
this package cannot be installed non-interactively.
Should I:
1. File a bug report againt kernel-image-2.4.19-386 saying it needs to
be installed
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:10:09AM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> Can anyone else shed light on fate of Jared "Solomon" Johnson:
I talked to him on IRC for the first time in 6 months about a month
ago. He said he had moved and has not had Internet access for the past
3 months. Ap
> "Simon" == Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Simon> I think the autobuilder argument is valid. Autobuilders
Simon> need the classes, but not the VM. If at all, you can make
Simon> the VMs depend on the core classes, so people can depend on
Simon> the core classes for c
Ok, I should stop reading mail at 3am...
> "Simon" == Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Simon> I think the autobuilder argument is valid. Autobuilders
Simon> need the classes, but not the VM. If at all, you can make
Simon> the VMs depend on the core classes, so people can
Stephen Zander wrote:
Depending on the core classes does not provide javac which is what the
autobuilders actually require.
The build dependencies for Java packages could be for example:
jikes, classpath, lib*-java (all other required Java packages)
If all lib*-java packages in main depend on java1
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:44:08AM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> > Install discover, read-edid and mdetect before you install X, and you're
> > set.
>
> it's not userfriendly? that's the whole point of it actually. and
> X based GUIs are way nicer than text based GUIs.
Didn't we have graphical d
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Amir Bukhari wrote:
> After all I have readed in reply of my Post, I have understand, that I
> can begin Porting this program to debian,
> and I see if it could be integreted to debian installation process ;-) .
I don't want to discourage you from porting
Am 4.12.02 um 15:15:53 schrieb David B Harris:
> If variable-width fonts are used, then line breaks shouldn't be
> preserved. If they're not going to be preserved, there needs to be a
> very specific set of rules as to how lines are joined. These already
> exist in code, actually; I believe packag
Am 4.12.02 um 14:38:07 schrieb Joey Hess:
> angband: "Sauron [...] most powerful of his servants"
Nice script, Joey, but perhaps you should have looked at the
description for yourself. :-)
Cheers,
Mike
--
|=| Michael Piefel
|=| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
|=| Tel. (+49 30) 2093 3831
²úÆ·Ãû³Æ£º Ì¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿²ÄÁÏ
-
ÖÆ Ôì ÉÌ£º ÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉç ÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉç
-
²úÆ·½éÉÜ£ºÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉçµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¼ºÍÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉçµÄ²¹Ç¿×¨ÓýºÔÚÈÕ±¾ÊÇ×îºÃµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿¹¤·¨µÄ×éºÏ²ÄÁÏ£¬Õ¼
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:04:21AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> you, oh my sponsor, advocate, and mentor. i thought that the bugs were
> automatically filed. wouldn't that be rather easy to accomplish?
It would be easy to file bugs when builds fail but it would be hard to
do this constructivel
also sprach Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.05.1228 +0100]:
> It would be easy to file bugs when builds fail but it would be hard to
> do this constructively. For example, there are basic things like
> checking that the bug isn't already filed which would be hard to
> automate. You need t
²úÆ·Ãû³Æ£º Ì¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿²ÄÁÏ
-
ÖÆ Ôì ÉÌ£º ÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉç ÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉç
-
²úÆ·½éÉÜ£ºÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉçµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¼ºÍÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉçµÄ²¹Ç¿×¨ÓýºÔÚÈÕ±¾ÊÇ×îºÃµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿¹¤·¨µÄ×éºÏ²ÄÁÏ£¬Õ¼
* Scott James Remnant
| These aren't included in the "X window system" task... Given that's
| how most users (most notably the non-technical who would benefit
| from them) install X - should these be added to that?
This is already taken care of for the next revision of b-f, AIUI.
--
Tollef Fo
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:19:38PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> In correct English grammar and typography the space after a full stop
> ("period" in Merkin) is supposed to be a wider space then that between
> words and after commas and suchlike.
There is no such thing as "correct" typograph
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:18:08PM +0100, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am 4.12.02 um 14:38:07 schrieb Joey Hess:
> > angband: "Sauron [...] most powerful of his servants"
>
> Nice script, Joey, but perhaps you should have looked at the
> description for yourself. :-)
Heh, I succesfully managed to :q!
One question I have is why DDTP does not use webwml. This is now part
of the Debian project (as it's under ddtp.debian.org), but it's
completely incoherent with Debian www style, and it also is the part
of the Debian web with less translations!
I hope you have this also in your TODO.
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:04:00PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Amir Bukhari wrote:
> > After all I have readed in reply of my Post, I have understand, that I
> > can begin Porting this program to debian,
> > and I see if it could be integreted to debian
²úÆ·Ãû³Æ£º Ì¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿²ÄÁÏ
-
ÖÆ Ôì ÉÌ£º ÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉç ÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉç
-
²úÆ·½éÉÜ£ºÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉçµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¼ºÍÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉçµÄ²¹Ç¿×¨ÓýºÔÚÈÕ±¾ÊÇ×îºÃµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿¹¤·¨µÄ×éºÏ²ÄÁÏ£¬Õ¼
²úÆ·Ãû³Æ£º Ì¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿²ÄÁÏ
-
ÖÆ Ôì ÉÌ£º ÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉç ÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉç
-
²úÆ·½éÉÜ£ºÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉçµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¼ºÍÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉçµÄ²¹Ç¿×¨ÓýºÔÚÈÕ±¾ÊÇ×îºÃµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿¹¤·¨µÄ×éºÏ²ÄÁÏ£¬Õ¼
²úÆ·Ãû³Æ£º Ì¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿²ÄÁÏ
-
ÖÆ Ôì ÉÌ£º ÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉç ÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉç
-
²úÆ·½éÉÜ£ºÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉçµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¼ºÍÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉçµÄ²¹Ç¿×¨ÓýºÔÚÈÕ±¾ÊÇ×îºÃµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿¹¤·¨µÄ×éºÏ²ÄÁÏ£¬Õ¼
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:03:27AM +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> also sprach Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.05.0611 +0100]:
> > On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 18:06, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > the problem is that we also need the kernel patch.
> >
> > 2.
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:20:30AM +, David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Not only will most people only read the top level package description, i.e.
> x-window-system, but if they are using apt-get the suggested pacakged are
> not even offered as an option. Perhaps apt-g
ÄãºÃ,
Çëµã»÷ÒÔÏÂÍøÖ·,»ñÈ¡ÏêϸÐÅÏ¢:
http://www.inhao.net
лл!
Ó¢ºÀÉÌÎñÍø
Èç¹ûÄú²»ÏëÊܵ½ÀàËÆÐżþ,ÇëÖ±½Ó»Ø¸´´ËÐÅ,±êÌâ×¢Ã÷:Í˶©
ÄúµÄemailµØÖ·ÎÒÃÇÊÇ´ÓÆóÒµ»ÆÒ³ÖÐÊÖ¹¤»ñÈ¡
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:00:21AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> The configure script is usually launched before the Pre-Depends are even
> installed. There is currently no way to ensure a package is installed at
> configuration time.
A non-essential package, anyway. Essential is probably ple
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:37:13PM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> > In the past the only thing that stopped me from doing a build of my
> > own from the sources was that debian missed libical.. and now that
> > there appears to be libical-dev, i can't see any reason why not
> > package it..
>
> Re
PUBLICC
SOLUCIONES INFORMATICAS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unicos en el pais
Nuestros clientes: las empresas mas importantes
de Argentina, España y Mexico
Reconocidos por los diarios EL CRONISTA COMERCIAL y
LA VOZ DEL INTERIOR
Nueva oferta:
Un CD que contiene todos estos datos para realizar publicidad
> > "Instead of the developers learning to treat certain versions as separate
> > packages, the developers taught Portage how to handle and maintain several
> > versions of the same package though the use of SLOTs."
> >
> > It goes on to explain further with an example, basically they have an
> >
> Very nice. Does anyone know how to get apt to give locally
> compiled packages higher priority than official packages? I've been
> playing with the release pinnings, but haven't gotten it to work.
>
> Also, what apps do you think would make good benchmark cases for
> showing how much
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:09:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ari Pollak wrote:
> > I think the real issue here isn't so much actual package descriptions,
> > but the ITPs. Most package descriptions I've seen have been pretty
> > accurate, and tend to change a lot between the time of the ITP and
David B Harris wrote:
> If variable-width fonts are used, then line breaks shouldn't be
> preserved. If they're not going to be preserved, there needs to be a
> very specific set of rules as to how lines are joined. These already
> exist in code, actually; I believe packages.debian.org joins lines.
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:59:20PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
[snip]
> > Ooh, goody :) Does this mean #45943 will finally be fixed?
>
> Well, we obviously can't force anyone to do anything; but I hope that
> having the reasoning more clearly laid out will motivate people...
[snip]
Does submit
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:00:12PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:29:47PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > I'm curious as to why was DDTP (Debian Documentation Translation Project)
>
> It wasn't, the expansion is Debian
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libclass-trigger-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Tatsuhiko Miyagawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MI/MIYAGAWA/Class-Trigger-0.06.tar.gz
* Lic
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:23:33PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
>
> One question I have is why DDTP does not use webwml. This is now part
> of the Debian project (as it's under ddtp.debian.org), but it's
> completely incoherent with Debian www style, and it also is the part
> of t
I encountered several compiling problems on s390 and mips due to compiler
capacity error, and apparently disabling optimizations on s390 did the trick.
Unfortunately, it did not the trick on mips & mipsel archs:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DINET6 -DPREFIX=\"/usr\"
-DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\" -D
Hi Troy,
It appears that your Debian package, htget, has not been updated for a
long time, and there are some packaging issues with it. I have prepared an
NMU of this package (from version 0.94 -- I was unable to find 0.93 and I
needed a pristine upstream source to fix bug #44302).
This NMU fixe
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I'd be willing to invest some time in co-maintenance of a package
> description override list.
I've had a pretty good amount of response to my description bug reports.
--
see shy jo
pgpkDFlipLeZ5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:55:50PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think the package descriptions are a very important product of this
> project. They're going to be one of the first things people see when
> they use Debian, and their quality directly reflects on the quality of
> Debia
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:58:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I'd be willing to invest some time in co-maintenance of a package
> > description override list.
>
> I've had a pretty good amount of response to my description bug reports.
But do your bug reports keep up wit
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 12:13:57 +0100
Michael Piefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Line breaks already aren't preserved, and there already exist a very
> specific set of rules for that. Look into your documentation, and have
> a look at dselect.
I already have example applications which don't preserve
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 20:59:09 +0100
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a good search interface in our package interface UIs (good search !=
> search by words).
... as opposed to searching based on the contents of people's minds? :)
pgphxF5io44ke.pgp
Description: PGP signatu
Salut Xavier,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:01:22PM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
> Unfortunately, it did not the trick on mips & mipsel archs:
> /tmp/ccqDRzIw.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/ccqDRzIw.s:3315: Error: Branch out of range
I'm having the same problem with my texmacs package. See the mail
b
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My preferred option is 3. However, by itself it is still not sufficient
> as it kernel-image-2.4.19-386 fails to install when making the initrd
> image (which ironically isn't even required). I ended up hacking
> a simple /etc/fstab file to work around this
> Install discover, read-edid and mdetect before you install X, and you're
> set.
>
mdetect hopefully doesn't choke on an USB-mouse anymore!
O. Wyss
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:58:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > I'd be willing to invest some time in co-maintenance of a package
> > > description override list.
> >
> > I've had a pretty good amount of response to my descri
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Jim Penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021203 17:35]:
> > OK, now, supposing that the unicode license is found to be non-DSFG
> > free, and hence that UnicodeData.txt is non-free.
> >
> > Suppose a program implements either unicode collation, regular exp
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, this is all on *output* (display, whatever). The input text
> should have just a single space. The text has to be reformatted to fit
> the screen (display area) anyway (even on a terminal), and it's the job
> of the reformatter/text renderer/w
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Scott James Remnant
>
> | These aren't included in the "X window system" task... Given that's
> | how most users (most notably the non-technical who would benefit
> | from them) install X - should these be added to that?
>
> This is already taken care of for the next
Thomas Bushnel writes:
> A program can use the algorithms specified by Unicode without any copying
> of Unicode, and can thus be entirely free.
What is UnicodeData.txt for? Do programs actually use it in some way, or
is it just a reference for programmers, like the description of a protocol?
--
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:03:32PM +0100, tomas pospisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > But do your bug reports keep up with the flow of new packages into the
> > archive? That is, is the overall description quality increasing or
> > decreasi
On 05-Dec-02, 16:49 (CST), "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is not possible for an automated renderer to figure out where
> sentence boundaries are without some kind of help, and a mere period
> is not sufficient help. So, a good convention to establish might be
> that the s
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 03:21:24PM -0500, David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 12:13:57 +0100
> Michael Piefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Line breaks already aren't preserved, and there already exist a very
> > specific set of rules for that. Look into your
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:49:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> It is not possible for an automated renderer to figure out where
> sentence boundaries are without some kind of help, and a mere period
> is not sufficient help. So, a good convention to establish might be
> that the string ".
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 07:36:45AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > My preferred option is 3. However, by itself it is still not sufficient
> > as it kernel-image-2.4.19-386 fails to install when making the initrd
> > image (which ironically isn't even required). I ended up hacking
> > a simple /etc/fs
Steve Greenland wrote:
> (Of course, if this is the worst problem we have with Debian package
> descriptions, I say flip a coin and forget about it.)
I have a better idea -- just forget it altogether. It doesn't need to be
standardized in Debian; it certainly isn't standardized in the
publishing
David B Harris writes:
> Could you point me at the documentation in question?
Debian Packaging Manual
---
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revised: David A. Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
²úÆ·Ãû³Æ£º Ì¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿²ÄÁÏ
-
ÖÆ Ôì ÉÌ£º ÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉç ÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉç
-
²úÆ·½éÉÜ£ºÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉçµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¼ºÍÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉçµÄ²¹Ç¿×¨ÓýºÔÚÈÕ±¾ÊÇ×îºÃµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿¹¤·¨µÄ×éºÏ²ÄÁÏ£¬Õ¼
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 11:05:05AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
>
> > Make sure your mkinitrd.conf has ROOT set to nothing and it will work.
>
> So anotherwords I should file a bug against pbuilder?
Yes.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL
From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problem with tetex-bin potato security build
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:42:15 +0100
> I'm lost with a problem concerning the build of tetex-bin on potato/alpha.
> This is a request for help. Could someone take a look at this problem
> and perhaps ex
From: Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: /tmp/root ???
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 11:20:41 +0100
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:40:27AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Try this on your machine. It might be a clue. Or it might not turn
> > up anything at all. But it is worth a try.
> >
> > c
John Hasler writes:
> Thomas Bushnel writes:
> > A program can use the algorithms specified by Unicode without any copying
> > of Unicode, and can thus be entirely free.
>
> What is UnicodeData.txt for? Do programs actually use it in some way, or
> is it just a reference for programmers, like the
²úÆ·Ãû³Æ£º Ì¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿²ÄÁÏ
-
ÖÆ Ôì ÉÌ£º ÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉç ÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉç
-
²úÆ·½éÉÜ£ºÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉçµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¼ºÍÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉçµÄ²¹Ç¿×¨ÓýºÔÚÈÕ±¾ÊÇ×îºÃµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿¹¤·¨µÄ×éºÏ²ÄÁÏ£¬Õ¼
starner writes:
> If you run most algorithms specified by Unicode, like normalization,
> capitalization or the bidirectional algorithm, you do it with the use of
> the data from UnicodeData.txt, whether you copied it from there or copied
> it from the Unicode book.
That's what I thought. Therefor
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:49:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However, this is all on *output* (display, whatever). The input text
> > should have just a single space. The text has to be reformatted to fit
> > the screen (display area) anywa
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 14:38, Joey Hess wrote:
> Your emphasis on audiences is very good, but I am leery of the treatment
> of package descriptions as advertisements. A package description that
> reads like an in-your-face advertisement can suck at being a package
> description. You're right in so
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: fontilus
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : James Henstridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/fontilus/
* License : GPL
Description : graphica
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In standard typography, it is to have extra space after a period ending
> a sentence. For fixed-width fonts, this often shows up as two spaces,
> as is fairly ugly.
Of course, that's simply an opinion, and depends a lot on exactly
_which_ fixed fonts
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-06
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mozilla-locale-da
Version : 1.21
Upstream Author : Robert Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Henrik Lynggaard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/l10n/lang
²úÆ·Ãû³Æ£º Ì¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿²ÄÁÏ
-
ÖÆ Ôì ÉÌ£º ÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉç ÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉç
-
²úÆ·½éÉÜ£ºÐÂÈÕ±¾Ê¯ÓÍÖêʽ»áÉçµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¼ºÍÈÕÃ×Ê÷Ö¬Öêʽ»áÉçµÄ²¹Ç¿×¨ÓýºÔÚÈÕ±¾ÊÇ×îºÃµÄÌ¿ËØÏËά²¹Ç¿¹¤·¨µÄ×éºÏ²ÄÁÏ£¬Õ¼
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 20:26, Simon Richter wrote:
> Colin,
>
> > http://people.debian.org/~walters/descriptions.html
>
> Well, I'm not sure there should be a template -- people will use it (and
> thus try to squeeze information into it). I usually tell my sponsees
> that a description should answ
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 14:59, Javier FernÃndez-Sanguino PeÃa wrote:
> Not only "users", software might use them too. We currently don't have
> a good search interface in our package interface UIs (good search != search by
> words). I tried to make (quite a long time ago and it's pretty much
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
