My best friend went to Gentoo and came back to Debian. That should say
something
--
Phil
PGP/GPG Key:
http://www.zionlth.org/~plhofmei/
wget -O - http://www.zionlth.org/~plhofmei/key.txt | gpg --import
--
Excuse #52: Not approved by the FCC
pgpT98lU2ygwI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:22:42PM -0500, Mako Hill wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:28:05AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Sorry, correction: total liquid assets. SPI "owns" some hardware in the
> > U.S. on behalf of Debian (like the machine that is auric.debian.org),
> > but an exhaustive
"H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > Damnit, only last? ;)
>> >
>> > Drop out one of the names, and click on Large Set. Bang, Wichert shows up
>> > as #3 :-)
>> >
>> >
>> Uhm, with all the names and clicking Large Set, you will find also Bill Gates
>> in the list :)
> [snip]
>
> Unsu
#include
* Branden Robinson [Fri, Nov 22 2002, 10:34:21AM]:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:20:04AM -0800, Jim Lynch wrote:
> > (1) Why are you blatently insulting people on the lists??
>
> Why are you blatanly misspelling "blatant"?
Best example for the difference between you and most other "top"
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 12:56, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:00:29AM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >Exactly how much longer are we going to leave bonobo-activation
> > managled in sid? Certainly if there is no traction upstream on
> > resolving this issue we should at least regre
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 08:23:09PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Branden Robinson [Fri, Nov 22 2002, 10:34:21AM]:
> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:20:04AM -0800, Jim Lynch wrote:
> > > (1) Why are you blatently insulting people on the lists??
> >
> > Why are you blatanly misspelling "b
Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Branden Robinson [Fri, Nov 22 2002, 10:34:21AM]:
> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:20:04AM -0800, Jim Lynch wrote:
> > > (1) Why are you blatently insulting people on the lists??
> >
> > Why are you blatanly misspelling "blatant"?
>
> Best example for the differ
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 05:18:23PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> [...]
many thinks for help.
Bye
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Sauter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?)
pgp9YxRugF89o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Richard Braakman wrote:
>
> > We're not _removing_ anything, we're providing an integrated system.
>
> in this cotext, it seems that upstream galeon _includes_ those
> bookmarks (redhat, slackware, et al). to _remove_ those bookmarks is a
> _remov
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:35:19PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 08:23:09PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > #include
> > * Branden Robinson [Fri, Nov 22 2002, 10:34:21AM]:
> > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:20:04AM -0800, Jim Lynch wrote:
> > > > (1) Why are you blatently insulti
> "AT" == Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AT> To make it clear: I'm not in fear of a separate distribution.
AT> Everybody is free to do so. But in my opinion you could reach
AT> your goal more straightforeward if you do not.
I'd like to clarify a confusion introduced by
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:15:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> We'd need perhaps three different m68k varieties (two more than now),
> one more Sparc, one more alpha, no more powerpc IIUC, no more arm, one
> more mips, one more HPPA (or two?), no more ia64 or s390. So that's
> nine more
Greetings! Been waiting for over a week for 'valid candidate' package
maxima to get into testing. Has this process been suspended?
Take care,
--
Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:54, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > When I'm doing such package chang-over's it's generally just arranged
> > through private mail and the rest of the world learns about it through
> > the changelog.
> >
> > IMHO an arranged take-over like that requires no special announcements.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 08:23:09PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > > (1) Why are you blatently insulting people on the lists??
> >
> > Why are you blatanly misspelling "blatant"?
>
> Best example for the difference between you and most other "top"
> developers - stupid personal attacks when runni
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:03:40AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Roberto Suarez Soto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Nov/21, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> >
> > > Current cost of hard disk is something between $1.00 and $1.50 per
> > > gigabyte.
> >
> > I may be wrong, but I ass
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 05:40:39PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Nice, (btw, this is documented in man apt_preferences) but how do you know
> there is a new version available in experemental from apt-cache?
apt-cache policy
--
- mdz
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:39:31PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings! Been waiting for over a week for 'valid candidate' package
> maxima to get into testing. Has this process been suspended?
It depends on newer glibc on some architectures, so don't hold your
breath.
--
Colin Watson
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Say I have 6 36GB disks which cost me $100 apiece (USD600 / 216GB USD2.78
> per gigabyte). Naturally, I put them in a RAID-5 array, for 180GB usable
> space. Now we're at $3.33/GB, not counting filesystem overhead. This is a
> realistic server config
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 21:52]:
> Since satie.d.o has been destroyed, where does this leave the NM process?
I tried adding all applicants again. I have probably missed some, but
most should be there again. Your application can be reviewed at
http://nm.debian.org/amstatus
* Teófilo Ruiz Suárez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 15:06]:
> I was in the "Waiting for AM" step, and I don't know what will happen
> with me and the others in the same step, 20 last time I checked (the day
> before the fire).
>
> Is anybody working on it?
Those "waiting for AM" have been resto
* Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 16:48]:
> I believe a web mirror would not help at all. There were php
> scripts, and databases, and these _cannot_ (hopefully) be mirrored.
A web mirror would be _very_ helpful. The PHP scripts were in CVS
(still are ;) but the database is gone. We
> http://nm.debian.org/amstatus.php?&user=me%40andrew.net.au Just like
that's not working, it tells "You should not be here!!" :)
But I entered nm.debian.org, and put my email adres in the editbox. Of course,
my status is quite ok, but ... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received application 2002-01-
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 17:07, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Say I have 6 36GB disks which cost me $100 apiece (USD600 / 216GB USD2.78
> > per gigabyte). Naturally, I put them in a RAID-5 array, for 180GB usable
> > space. Now we're at $3.33/GB, not
> Tasks and skills has been checked (my package is rust), and there was
> AM report for me too, so I'm only waiting for DAM approval.
...
http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2002/debian-newmaint-200209/msg00021.htm
l
and there it is :)
M.
Please respect my Mail-Followup-To: header.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:07:26PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> 36GB disks? Why buy 36GB disks when you can buy big ones? See, the
> problem here is that things are in such frequent motion, that what seemed
> like a big disk once is now small.
* Mateusz Papiernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 23:23]:
> > http://nm.debian.org/amstatus.php?&user=me%40andrew.net.au Just like
> that's not working, it tells "You should not be here!!" :)
Sorry, http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=me%40andrew.net.au
> But I entered nm.debian.org, and
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 11:13:00PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-22 21:52]:
> > Since satie.d.o has been destroyed, where does this leave the NM process?
>
> I tried adding all applicants again. I have probably missed some, but
> most should be the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: linux-wlan-ng
Version :
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.some.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : Can't (re)build it for my own kernel
,
| Hi, atte
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 08:05:43AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> There is already a bug filed about this: #170292. The maintainer replies:
>
> "gphoto2 2.1.0 is not compatible with the new libexif in debian/sid.
> gphoto2 2.1.1 will be out soon, the package is ready.
> I will upload gphoto2 2.1.1
#include
* Branden Robinson [Fri, Nov 22 2002, 03:50:08PM]:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:20:04AM -0800, Jim Lynch wrote:
> > > > > (1) Why are you blatently insulting people on the lists??
> > > >
> > > > Why are you blatanly misspelling "blatant"?
> >
> >
> > Ah
reassign 170336 linux-wlan-ng
retitle 170336 linux-wlan-ng: Can't (re)build it for my own kernel
thanks
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 12:32:46AM +0100, Xavier MAILLARD wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: linux-wlan-ng
> Version :
> Upstream Author : Name <[E
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 12:59:32AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Making noise about spelling errors is extremely unpolite
> (with few exceptions).
> Please go away, learn something about tolerancy and come back when you can
> discuss sanely.
Interesting conflicting viewpoints.
--
2. That wh
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Bullshit. Making noise about spelling errors is extremely unpolite
> (with few exceptions). Making fun this way is a sign of personal
> problems. Doing this again and again, even trying to make this look as
> a harmles 'joke' shows the critical level. Ple
John Goerzen wrote:
> Grunt doesn't preserve any notion of a session
It doesn't need to: the unix filesystem already does. I said that was a
contrived example, but I'm sure you will find some real ones eventually.
Slightly less contrived:
1. notice that oops, the cd burning script will do someth
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:43:28AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> This could me especially amusing if the first, delayed email was:
>
> cd /tmp
>
> And the second was:
>
> rm -rf *
>
> (Dumb contrived example, but you get the idea.)
I think the lesson here is that grunt is not a transparent
rep
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:32:22AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> That's why I suggest using either a challenge/response authentification
> (if the mail is lost, you have to ask for a new challenge and the
> previous mail won't be accepted if it is delayed), or one-time passwords
> (every time yo
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Brian May wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:43:28AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > This could me especially amusing if the first, delayed email was:
> >
> > cd /tmp
> >
> > And the second was:
> >
> > rm -rf *
> >
> > (Dumb contrived example, but you get the idea.)
>
> I th
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 09:47:48AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:24:34AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > After verifying the signature on the data, the receiver does some sanity
> > > checks. One of the checks is doing an md5sum over the entire file
>
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About 8 packages in non-free are in the process of being removed
> entirely from both testing and unstable. After this happens, the
> difference in the number of non-free packages between slink and sid
> will be +1.
That probably doesn't count the on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is just a suggestion/idea, and if it's stupid, feel free to flame me.
Why not develop some sort of apt-build based net install that allows the user
to download source archives and optimize the packages to the architecture etc.
specified in the
101 - 141 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
