On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:45:35 -0400
"Matt Zimmerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:06:44AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > release is coming soon ... and we need a bit of feedback about
> > a new feature we plan to use on CD1 of Debian woody
Hi,
The following script is a script to obtain a shared library package name that
would be feasible to be used within Debian package.
It outputs a pseudo-debian/control file.
There are quite a few people, and quite a few packages that aren't currently
done
in this way (i.e. many library packag
> > http://rsync.samba.org/rsync-and-debian/
> >
> > I'd appreciate comments.
>
This is certainly a very informative page. I'd appreciate if the CPU
load problem could be solved somehow.
IMO the versioning patch from Paul Russell is not the right approach
since this is Debian specific and has
Most of the scripts/methods I've seen which downloads Debian packages
with rsync do only single file transfer. IMO this must be much more
server friendly than a multi file transfer (no filelist).
Is it possible run a rsync server with anonymous login but restricted to
single file transfer next to
On 13 Apr 2002, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:19:27PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > The big problem with rproxy is it's implemented in perl (perl: crypto for
There might be some other unrelated program called rproxy that's in
Perl, but the one I wrote certain
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:15:05 +0100, Carlos Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>testing is, in my opinion, the feature that sets Debian apart from all
>other Linux distributions. It's as if woody is released every day.
If we had a security team working for testing, testing would be the
distribution o
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > The burden of proof is on you, who want to make a change with such broad
> > effect so late in the release cycle. I have never even tried isolinux,
> > while I have used syslinux many times.
>
> Other distros (such as slackware and mandrake) a
#include
Pixel wrote on Sat Apr 13, 2002 um 12:40:43PM:
> FYI mandrake is still not using isolinux on its first CD. We provide isolinux
> on the second CD, but most people don't use it.
Well, you also do not use a code veteran as the default kernel.
Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
--
In /etc steht, was
libxml2 2.4.19-2 in unstable is broken.
All programs using this library fail with :
relocation error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: pthread_once
This could be harmless but scrollkeeper use this library and then the
upgrade of a few packages (gnome packages) fail.
Downgrading to 2.4.
retitle 128852 Ultra-newbie introductory documentation needed somewhere
reassign 128852 general
thanks
I honestly have no idea where this documentation ought to go. doc-linux
is not appropriate, as those packages contain documentation from the
LDP. The doc-debian maintainer isn't convinced that it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 128852 Ultra-newbie introductory documentation needed somewhere
Bug#128852: doc-linux-text: Suggested addition to package: rank newbie pointers
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 128852 general
Bug#128852: Ultra-newbie introductory documentation nee
Colin,
> retitle 128852 Ultra-newbie introductory documentation needed somewhere
> reassign 128852 general
> thanks
>
> I honestly have no idea where this documentation ought to go.
Why don't create one package named doc-newbie?
[]s
Otavio
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
Hi all,
since the 'ircd'-package is broken in various ways and last MU for it was in
December 1999, i plan to overtake to the package. I've already made new
packages available on http://gidentd.neveragain.de/debian/ircd.
Are there any doubts against this plan? If not, my sponsor will upload th
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 11:45:42AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Colin,
>
> > retitle 128852 Ultra-newbie introductory documentation needed somewhere
> > reassign 128852 general
> > thanks
> >
> > I honestly have no idea where this documentation ought to go.
>
> Why don't create one pack
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 11:45:42AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Colin,
> >
> > > retitle 128852 Ultra-newbie introductory documentation needed somewhere
> > > reassign 128852 general
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > I honestly have no idea where this documentation ought to go.
> >
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 12:22:25PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Yes... then, why don't create one new task to newbie
> documentation... is the easy way to this may installed by user.
Hm. I thought we used to have one of those.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: pgi
Version: 0.9.6
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
hi
I wanted to create an ISO image using pgi-build
I read some of the guide, gave a look at the options, and then said
'well lets try it and see what come out'
so I typed
TMPDIR=/media/tmp/ nice pgi-build
On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 19:42, Brian May wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:47:05AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > I like dput's DWIM features. For example, it figures out automatically
> > whether or not a package is in non-US, and uploads to the correct
> > place.
>
> This may not be as much
RISKO Gergely wrote in several bug reports:
> Your package's got a serious policy violation, namely it depends on
> debconf which has the priority: optional.
>
> Your package's priority is: important.
I should be encouraging you to use -maintonly for mass bug reporting
like you've done here, but
Hello!
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:04:15AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 04:50:31PM +0200, Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> heard to say:
> > --> size doesn't match for /home/debian/devel/sanduhr_1.0.orig.tar.gz
> If the .orig.tar.gz is a symlink, see #138821.
My sa
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 08:09:47PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> Package: pgi
> Version: 0.9.6
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
Just for the record: I got bitten by this, too.
(But I had a backup for most of the stuff :-)
Jochen
--
IMPRESION CON CALIDAD FOTOGRAFICA.
OBTENGA HASTA 10 CARGAS-POR EL PRECIO DE UN CARTUCHO
easyinkje
Les informamos que disponemos de kits de tinta, para todas las marcas de
impresoras,
por 28 EUROS (iva incluido) para negro y 34 para el de color mas 3 euros de
gastos de envio. Con un Kit tiene pa
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 10:57:57AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:15:05 +0100, Carlos Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >testing is, in my opinion, the feature that sets Debian apart from all
> >other Linux distributions. It's as if woody is released every day.
>
> If we had
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 11:18:14PM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 08:09:47PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> > Package: pgi
> > Version: 0.9.6
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: causes serious data loss
>
> Just for the record: I got bitten by this, too.
> (But I had a b
Well, I'm in the process myself, and I'm in Victoria. If I make it in,
I'll try to remember to contact you.
* Shaun Jackman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm looking for a Debian developer in Vancouver, Canada to sign my key. If
> you fit the bill, please reply!
>
> Thanks,
> Shaun Jackman
>
>
>
I am a developer in Victoria. I don't go to Vancouver very often but I
can sign keys for people in Victoria.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 04:52:05PM -0700, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> Well, I'm in the process myself, and I'm in Victoria. If I make it in,
> I'll try to remember to contact you.
> * Shau
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 03:10:35PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> You should close all of these bug reports, none of which would be worth
> holding up the release for anyway.
... and all of which can be overridden by the ftpmasters without
changing packages. In fact, even if a package does change its p
I'm in Seattle, Washington. I'll keep your addresses on file for when
I make my next visit to BC.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 05:10:46PM -0700, Norman Jordan wrote:
> I am a developer in Victoria. I don't go to Vancouver very often but I
> can sign keys for people in Victoria.
>
> On Sat, Apr 13, 20
28 matches
Mail list logo
