On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:15:43PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> There seems to be a thread about rsync and Debian packages every
> couple of months. I've written up a document which tries to cover all
> of the questions and debates. It's pretty informal, but hopefully
> will be useful.
>
> http
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:07:10PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:52:10PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
> > I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
> > scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
> > as below :
>
On Apr 11, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> To make things worse, 3.0 contents will at the time of release
> already be about 6 months out of date.
Here's a challenge for you: identify the top date in the changelog for
the current version of every package in testing (3.0). I doubt
there's a single
Johnny Ernst Nielsen: Don't worry about flames launched by
cranky developers who didn't get what they wanted for their
birthdays. Many of us haven't read _every_ posting on _every_
debian list for the past six years and may therefore once in
a while bring up some issue that has been discussed pre
Ok that is it.
I have increased the limit size of spamc (with -s) and the message got a
nice :
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.3 required=5.0
tests=FROM_MALFORMED,FROM_NO_USER,BADTRANS_WORM,MISSING_HEADERS version=2.11
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 F
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Brian May wrote:
> I think some more details is required regarding rproxy.
>
> Why is nobody actively developing it?
>
> AFAIK, it solves all the problems regarding server load discussed in
> rsync, doesn't it???
No. I tested it out, and it still hits the server hard.
--
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:38:14PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Thu Apr 11, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> > on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy.
...
> I just tested it on all
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:35:31AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:38:14PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > On Thu Apr 11, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> > > on a CD and try boo
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:27:23PM -0400, Thomas Hood wrote:
> birthdays. Many of us haven't read _every_ posting on _every_
> debian list for the past six years and may therefore once in
> a while bring up some issue that has been discussed previously.
This isn't exactly every debian list for th
On 12 Apr 2002, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think some more details is required regarding rproxy.
I've added a lot more detail about rproxy, and my understanding of
Goswin's proposal. Let me know if they're unclear.
> Why is nobody actively developing it?
I'm not sure what kind of
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:27:23PM -0400, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Torsten Landschoff replied that "This was the whole idea of
> testing. Experience shows it does not work."
>
> I think testing is an excellent thing to have, since it
> provides a semi-stable proto-release. Unfortunately it is
> tru
gphotocoll just moved from non-US to main. It hasn't been compiled for
all architectures yet, and the source is actually in both archives at
the moment. The testing scripts rightly rejected it:
trying: gphotocoll
skipped: gphotocoll (152+1)
got: 8+0: a-8
* alpha: gphotocoll
But then it lo
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:39:54PM -0500, David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:27:23PM -0400, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > birthdays. Many of us haven't read _every_ posting on _every_
> > debian list for the past six years and may therefore once in
> > a whi
Hello,
I have bug #142292, #109237 and #106414 for procps. The common thing
is that if System.map file is a multiple of 1024 (or 4096 not sure
which) ps crashes. Thanks to Dark for getting me that far.
Can someone look at 106414 and Dark's analysis and help me out here?
I'm not subscribed to d
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
