Well, I'm officially removing myself from any questions of what should
be on what CD and whether to use isolinux or not. So don't look at
me, I need to focus on making sure boot-floppies work for 3.0, 3.0r1,
etc.
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>
--
To UNSU
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:55:57PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> > IIS server because "we" were given money. I believe principles are more
> > important than money.
>
> So spend your time writing the scripts.
I will.
--
Carlos Laviola
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> after unsuccessful attempts to contact the maintainer of gnuchess, Martin
> Mitchell (he did not answer at all to my emails), I would like to propose
> a change to the packaging of gnuchess. Andreas Tille did at least do an
> NMU to update to version 5.03
There seems to be a thread about rsync and Debian packages every
couple of months. I've written up a document which tries to cover all
of the questions and debates. It's pretty informal, but hopefully
will be useful.
http://rsync.samba.org/rsync-and-debian/
I'd appreciate comments.
--
Marti
On Wed 10 Apr 2002, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Packages: dict-easton, dict-gazetteer, dict-hitchcock
>
> > The listed packages are still located in the Potato directory,
> > possibly because there wasn't any update necessary during the full
> > Woody develo
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:25:24PM +0200, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> My interest in gnuchess comes from the fact that I am co-maintaining the
> upstream gnuchess release. It seems to me that the maintainer has no real
> interest in the package and before the NMU of Andreas Tille it was
> completely broke
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> > from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
>
> [...]
>
> > dnrd logtrend-consolidation pptp-linux
>
> Could someone give a pointer where I can
#include
Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 09:31:12PM:
> > Well, no. :) idepci is known to fail for people with scsi and new ide
> > hardware, so it's not really the best choice either. There probably is
> > no best choice, but a system with a menu where you can choose a choice
> > is p
#include
Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 09:26:45PM:
> Do you follow those distributions' user and support mailing lists? I
> certainly don't, so I've no idea who can or can't install them. What I do
Oh, please stop talking about theoretical issues without any real
evidence.
> hea
Hello!
What's the status of newer imp packages for woody/sid?
- Pasi Kärkkäinen
^
. .
Linux
/-\
Choice.of.the
Peter S Galbraith:
> One of my packages disappeared from testing recently (not sure why)
Well, it was listed in the removal list that was posted on March 3rd:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2002/debian-devel-announce-200203/msg2.html
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.s
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:31:12PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 05:39:36PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> I have installed many SCSI systems (including the one that I'm using right
> now) with potato CD #1, which I assume has a similar configuration.
Potato CD#1 used the
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:12:28AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 09:26:45PM:
> > Do you follow those distributions' user and support mailing lists? I
> > certainly don't, so I've no idea who can or can't install them. What I do
> Oh, please stop talking
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:40:41PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > s/refused/discouraged/ and I would agree. Isn't the goal of Debian
> > providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free
> > software anymore? IMHO
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Isn't the goal of Debian
> > providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free
> > software anymore?
>
> No, no, nonono, no, no, no.
4. Our Priorities are Our Users and F
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > > Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> > > from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > dnrd logtrend-consolidation p
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > Isn't the goal of Debian
>> > providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free
>> > software anymore?
>>
>> No, no, nonono, no, no, no.
>
> 4. Our Priorities are Our U
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:37, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
> > the USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
>
> Yes, but often the line comes in many meters away from the system, and
> the simplest thing is then to run some UTP to
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:40, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > > Over the past few weeks most of the following packages have been removed
> > > from the upcoming release due to bugs and such [0].
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > dnrd log
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:14:41PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:37, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
> > > the USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
> >
> > Yes, but often the line comes in many meters
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> some solutions for it (namely using a good, free MUA). You just let
> the person helpless, I try to point him to the fix. However if you try
> to help somebody you should not be a debian developers because you
> said that non-free software is the problem
Hi Johnny!
You wrote:
> I am researching the Debian release cycle.
> Where can I find information about how long time there should be
> between a Stable release and the next Testing freeze?
> I have searched the Debian web site and the mailings lists, but I
> have not found any such information
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 06:32, Jon Eisenstein wrote:
> I'm trying to set up my Debian machine as a gateway to the outside network,
> with (for now) one windows machine going through it via a hub (Linksys
> router). I've followed instructions for both Debian and Redhat to set it up,
> but after I foll
I agree that debian doesn't have no fixed dates for the release. And I
think that's a good thing about debian, but i researched about this, and
I would like to know if there is a defined roadmap for woody becoming
frozen... What's the target milestone?
Em Qui, 2002-04-11 às 10:27, Bas Zoetekouw es
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
> > me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have
> > some time left for leisure or for working on stuff like free software.
>
> You r
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > > In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
> > > me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have
> > > some time left for leisure or for working on stuff like free software.
>
Good day Baz,
> > I am researching the Debian release cycle.
> > Where can I find information about how long time there should be
> > between a Stable release and the next Testing freeze?
> > I have searched the Debian web site and the mailings lists, but I
> > have not found any such information.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:43:22AM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > > > In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
> > > > me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have
> > > >
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is a document, and what is a program? How can Debian even begin
> to distinguish what makes free documentation different from free
> software when we can't distinguish whether a particular piece of
> data is software or documentation in the first pla
Hi Matt,
Le Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:45:35AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman écrivait:
> > release is coming soon ... and we need a bit of feedback about
> > a new feature we plan to use on CD1 of Debian woody for i386.
>
> On CD *1*? Surely you don't plan to introduce new features in such a core
> compone
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:15:08AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 09:31:12PM:
> > I have installed many SCSI systems (including the one that I'm using right
> > now) with potato CD #1, which I assume has a similar configuration. I've
>
> Your
> * #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
>security problem
>Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: "C. Scott
>Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tags: security.
So are there any objections if I clone this bug and reassign the grav
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:08:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > * #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
> >security problem
> >Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: "C. Scott
> >Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tags: security.
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:08:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > * #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
> >security problem
> >Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: "C. Scott
> >Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tags: security.
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:08:06AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > * #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
> >security problem
> >Package: mozilla-browser; Severity: grave; Reported by: "C. Scott
> >Ananian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tags: security.
> S
NOTE!
I am *not* talking about release dates.
(Anyone who starts talking release dates from hereon will be taken
out back and given an ice cold shower-down ;o))
Through time many people have criticised Stable Debian for having an
extremely slow release cycle, which causes an outdated distributio
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 04:55:03PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:45:35AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman écrivait:
> > On CD *1*? Surely you don't plan to introduce new features in such a
> > core component mere weeks before the scheduled release? There is no way
> > that it c
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>
> > > In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
> > > me some time. After all I want to get my job done and I want to have
> > > som
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:14:41PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> The method described on http://www.sateh.com/hacks/alcatel.php certainly
> looks like a hack. It basically describes a way to convert a Home model
> to a Pro model without paying. Given
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> Oh, and 1) the Hurd isn't a kernel
Wonderful news! Does this mean that we can expect the
'-the-linux-kernel-packages-should-all-have-linux-in-the-name-'
thread to not repeat itself?
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgp1zKoq
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:12:28AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Did YOU help introducing ANY new features in boot-floppies? I18n? Kernel
> 2.4, other filesystems, RAID support, lots of bugfixes in the existing
> code, etc. etc.? Either you can continue your mission of distruction, or
> you stop c
On Thu 11 Apr 2002, Joey Hess wrote:
> > * #142317: mozilla-browser: strange middlemouse behavior leads to
> >security problem
>
> So are there any objections if I clone this bug and reassign the grave
> clones to xchat, ssh, vim, lftp, galeon, ytalk, etc? I've found that
> middle-cl
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:15:24PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> > No. This is directed at the people who would mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > mesages like "Go home proprietary l0s0rz! j00 are l4m3! Debian doesn't
> > need you! Signed, [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> Well, it seems to me like you're impl
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of the
> USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
This does not make sence at all. PPTP is also a WAN Tunneling and VPN
Protocol. How can a Linux Router speek
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:02:28PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > 10 days != long enough to test a completely different _primary_ way of
> > > booting the installation system.
> >
> > a) isolinux is not completely new. It is syslinux, extended with ability
> >of reading iso9660. Show me on
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:57:26PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> These packages have not needed any updates.
[...]
> Is it really necessary to make a new upload, rather
> than copying or linking these packages to the pool?
>
> I will make a new upload before the woody release if it is
>
Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> Debian's current problem with old packages can be seen by the fact
> that a number of vendors have reportedly dumped the current Stable
> release in favor of the Testing distribution some time ago.
> That can only mean that currentness of content has become more
> i
>>"Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> I'd be happy to hear clarifications from the author and
Steve> contemporaries, then; to be honest, my memory of Debian
Steve> history isn't good enough to even know who to approach. (The
Steve> debian-doc package is conspicuously
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Are you being serious or was that rhetorical? [0]
> [0] There was a time when I wouldn't've had a second thought about
> the answer to that question, either... :)
I think "facetious" is the word you're looking for. :-P
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
>>"Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> The byte compilation should be done when the package is built,
Adam> not at runtime, not at install time.
That's certainly an opinion, though it does not address the
technical reasons that prompted the compile-at-install behaviou
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:12:28AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> Did YOU help introducing ANY new features in boot-floppies? I18n? Kernel
> 2.4, other filesystems, RAID support, lots of bugfixes in the existing
> code, etc. etc.? Either you can continue your mission of distruction,
> or you stop
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:43:22AM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> If there are only proprietary programs that do a specific job, and it
> is desired to have a free program for this job, then we are forced to
> reinvent the wheel by the proprietary programs licenses.
Forced to by whom? By Jeroen,
>>"David" == David D W Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> So far I've done the following
David> 1) Replaced the OLD key (42D8F306) with the NEW one (C5A76BF6).
Replaced where?
David> 2) Signed the OLD public key (42D8F306) with the NEW one (C5A76BF6).
David> 3) Posted the OL
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > That's fine with me. At least I'll have a lot more leisure when using
> > an available product instead of re-inventing the wheel. Even RMS used
> > commercial software when the GNU software for it was not yet written.
> > With you
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:46:12AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>
> > Oh, and 1) the Hurd isn't a kernel
>
> Wonderful news! Does this mean that we can expect the
> '-the-linux-kernel-packages-should-all-have-linux-in-the-name-'
>
Anthony Towns wrote:
Hi *,
[libusb-dependent packages not making it into Woody]
> sane-backends has two RC bugs, one of which has been open for more than a
> week. 139509 appears like it should get sane-backends to build on mips; it's
> not clear what'll fix it on alpha, but that needs to happe
hi.
just tested the woody-bootdisks (for a installation via network).
unfortunaly i can't load the driver-disks (driver-1.img and driver-2.img). i
always get a critical error with the message 'unable to mount the floppy
disk'.
this is why i can't install debian on the hard disks (scsi-disks on an
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:30:08PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The byte compilation should be done when the package is built, not
> > at runtime, not at install time.
>
> So you're saying that the maintainer should need to either create
> separate pac
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:18:42PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> What's the status of newer imp packages for woody/sid?
The first place to check when you have questions about the status of a
package is http://bugs.debian.org/. In this case, you would have
found:
* #92698: IMP3 yes it is a
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:20:27PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> At the current pace 3.0 may be out right around May 1St 2002.
> At that time it will have been more than 1 year and 6 months since
> the previous point release, which by then contains packages more than
> 1 year and 6 months
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> The membership also seems
> to have shifted towards a more radical^H^H^H^Henthusiastic support of
> _only_ free software, and helping people use whatever they wish on
> Debian, while providing them with free alternatives, seems to be on
> the wane
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:20:27PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> The main proposal is to introduce a fixed short Testing development
> period into the development cycle like this:
>
> 1. Feed Unstable packages to Testing for a fixed short period of time.
> 2. Freeze, bugfix, release.
> R
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 12:43, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Witness the response to Jeroen.
I don't think we can draw any conclusion from the response to Jeroen
other than "a lot of us think rudeness is a bad thing". (Including even
Jeroen himself, per his apology a few flames back in that thread.)
-
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > You only need pptp-linux if you use an Ethernet attached modem instead of
> > the
> > USB attached modem (which is E50 cheaper).
>
> This does not make sence at all. PPTP is also a WAN Tunneling and VPN
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:09:58AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:43:22AM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > > > > In such cases I sometimes decide to run the non-free tool if it saves
> > > > > me so
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:49:45PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> To clarify, not all of these packages are buggy in sid. The ones (by
> source package) that have a problem appear to be something like this at
> the moment:
>
> courier-ssl dbf2sql ddt gql gtksql guile-pg libch libnss-pgsql
> nets
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of "tom", an experimental programming language. The
archives contain a version from October 1999. Trying to recompile it now
on a sid machine fails.
Upstream development on this implementation was already dead, as they
switched to a new system writen in tom itself. And ther
On Thu Apr 11, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy. If it doesn't
> work on a machine where a potato CD does boot, please mail the lists!
I just test
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:33:34PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:43:22AM -0400, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > If there are only proprietary programs that do a specific job, and it
> > is desired to have a free program for this job, then we are forced to
> > reinvent th
I don't understand why all theses packages are not entering woody.
As Julien explained, everything seems to be clean.
I believe we need some manual help.
Thanks,
Christophe
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 07:11:32PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> Hi *,
>
> [libusb-dependent pa
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:39:33AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 07:10:28PM -0700, David D. W. Downey wrote:
>
> > Not much more I can do since the old secret key and public keyrings were
> > lost. It's going to have to suffice as I have taken every step possible
> > to ensure
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:47:33AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Have you done anything that I can't do as well right now? I
> mean, I can download your old key, create a new one, and do all you
> have outlined?
>
> manoj
Because I am not yet an official dd (I am waiting for the
Em Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:00:41 -0400, christophe barbé
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Would it be possible for the new 'David D.W. Downey' to hijack the
> identity of the old 'David D.W. Downey' and then upload packages without
> getting his new key signed by a dd ?
no no, he needs to get his key
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:18:42PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> What's the status of newer imp packages for woody/sid?
Beta packages can be found at:
http://tabaluga.ipe.uni-stuttgart.de/~nils/download/
Cheers,
--
Luis Bustamante[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
Anthony Towns writes:
> Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy. If it doesn't
> work on a machine where a potato CD does boot, please mail the lists!
I have a Digital Celebris GL180 that does not appe
Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few
moments and take this as a contructive proposal as other normal
grownups would do?
If you think I h
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
> thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
>
> Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few
> moments and take this
Good day Torsten,
thank you for your kind answer.
> > The main proposal is to introduce a fixed short Testing
> > development period into the development cycle like this:
> >
> > 1. Feed Unstable packages to Testing for a fixed short period of
> > time. 2. Freeze, bugfix, release.
> > Repeat.
>
>
Good day Matt,
thank you for your kind answer.
> > At the current pace 3.0 may be out right around May 1St 2002.
> > At that time it will have been more than 1 year and 6 months
> > since the previous point release, which by then contains packages
> > more than 1 year and 6 months old.
>
> Er, it
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 13:20, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:30:08PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
>
> > Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > The byte compilation should be done when the package is built, not
> > > at runtime, not at install time.
> >
> > So you're say
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:44:36PM +0200, Rune B. Broberg wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> > Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
> > thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
> >
> > Do you think you
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and
> thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal.
>
> Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few
> moments and take this
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: enigma
Version : 0.38a
Upstream Author : Daniel Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/enigma/
* License : GPL
Description : A game where you contr
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:46:55PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> I am not a developer, and I am not suited for code development.
> But I would like to spend untill 1St of May collecting additional
> information about the release procedures.
Currently that is black magic, mostly the relea
I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
as below :
# SPAMASSASSIN
:0fw
| spamc -f
:0e
{
EXITCODE=$?
}
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Flag: YES
junk
# End of SPAMASSASSIN section
And t
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:52:10PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
> I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
> scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
> as below :
>
> # SPAMASSASSIN
> :0fw
> | spamc -f
Could it be that spamd
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Martin Pool wrote:
> There seems to be a thread about rsync and Debian packages every
> couple of months. I've written up a document which tries to cover all
> of the questions and debates. It's pretty informal, but hopefully
> will be useful.
>
> http://rsync.samba.org/rs
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:52:54PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 13:20, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > And build-depend on all available versions of emacs...
>
> That'd be silly. Instead, we should just add them to build-essential.
Adding them to build-essential would take a po
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adding them to build-essential would take a policy amendment...but now that
> we've reached a consensus on debian-devel, they can be Essential: yes
> instead.
That's as it should be, anyway. Now to move at least emacs from /usr
to / so that it can rep
>>"christophe" == christophe barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
christophe> Would it be possible for the new 'David D.W. Downey' to
christophe> hijack the identity of the old 'David D.W. Downey' and
christophe> then upload packages without getting his new key signed
christophe> by a dd ?
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: med-imaging
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : local file
* License : GPL
Description : Debian Med imaging packages
Part of Debian-Med
Th
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: med-imaging-dev
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : local file
* License : GPL
Description : Debian Med packages for medical image deve
Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
> Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few
> moments and take this as a contructive proposal as other normal
> grownups would do?
Having discussed all this before in my 6 year old tenure with Debian,
no, I really don't have time to rehash it
quiero el read player ¿como le hago?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:29:04AM +, Wilmer van der Gaast <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> Julian [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:40:47 +0100:
> > I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
> > maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dup
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:52:10PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
> I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
> scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
> as below :
spamassassin, by default, does not check messages larger than 250k. Mess
On Apr 11, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > Seriously: everyone reading this mail, burn a copy of Raphael's test image
> > on a CD and try booting it in any computers you have handy. If it doesn't
> > work on a machine where a potato CD does boot, please mail the lists!
>
>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:40:47AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I am happy to take it. But a question: with the more actively
> maintained dput now being quite mature, do we still need both dupload
> and dput?
Dumb question, but what dput, and why is one better then the other?
(please leave lang
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
