"CW" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 05:58:39PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> "JV" == Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > for me the dhelp package does not work at all, because of the problem
>> > described in bug reports 109207, 10984
Itai Zukerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
> I'd like to do the following:
>
> $ chroot-get install --root=/var/root/mail exim cyrus-imapd
>
I don't know what you are trying to do, but
export EXTRAPACKAGES="cyrus-imapd exim"
pbuilder create --basetgz ~/cyrus-chroot.tar.gz
Is one s
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:05:10AM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> There has to be a standard way to at least have basic unix utils like grep,
> ed, diff and friends to work on files with multi lingual contents and still
> have a reasonable user interface and means to display their output.
diff and g
Hi,
it seems those two packages are depending on each other and are thus
stuck. php4-dev depends on autoconf2.13 and is also stuck therefore. Could
you move these two packages into testing manually?
Thanks,
Simon
--
GPG public key available from http://phobos.fs.tum.de/pgp/Simon.Richter.asc
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:09:54PM +0200, Massimo Dal Zotto uttered:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to get the full URL of a package (the one which is passed
> by apt-get to dpkg for package installation) from apt-cache or some other
> standard tool? What I would lite to do is something like this:
>
[E
I'm awfully sorry for the delay, but I wasn't able to work on this
earlier again.
Here's a list of questions and answers that came up with the posting I
made last week.
Q: Is a requirement being a Debian developer?
No. It is my understanding that it would be good to have "fresh
blood" in
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "CW" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 05:58:39PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >> "JV" == Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > for me the dhelp package does not work at all, because
On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote:
> > > Previously Steve Greenland wrote:
> > > > Stdout and stderr from the maintainer scripts. (This may be obvious, but
> > >> you didn't explicitly list it.)
> > >
> > > No, they should use debconf.
> >
> > Regardless of whether packages are using de
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 05:36:26PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> I intend to package the kernel patch for NSA Security Enhanced Linux.
>
> Below is all the details on licenses. My interpretation of the below license
> details (copied from the web site) is that the kernel patch is under the GPL
"SH" == Stefan Hornburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Christian, please make the NMU. It would be nice if the package is
> working now.
> If you are _really_ kind, put
> Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> as maintainer in changelog/control, send the packages to me, and
>
On 01-09-23 Martin F Krafft wrote:
> complicated for i did not know about the mount --bind option. sure,
> this only works with 2.4.x, but if any chroot changes to bind9 are
> going public, then this will be bundled with a 2.4.x kernel-image,
> right? will testing be 2.4.x?
So you want to force ev
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:00:48PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> > The social contract says "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software".
> > Such a win-port might indeed serve some users. But for my own part, I do
> > have some
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:33:29PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:17:47PM +0200, NORMAND Jacques wrote:
>
> > I want to pack the divx4linux codec on one hand and the transcode utilities
> > on the other. But I never packed libraries and docs aren't that clear with
> > that
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 12:15:43PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> Is there any problem keeping them from being included in Debian ?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200101/msg02634.html, I
guess.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PR
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:45:06AM +0200 , Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems those two packages are depending on each other and are thus
> stuck. php4-dev depends on autoconf2.13 and is also stuck therefore. Could
if php4 was stuck only because of autoconf I'd jump of joy
also sprach Christian Kurz (on Mon, 24 Sep 2001 10:31:54AM +0200):
> So you want to force everyone who is interested in running this chroot
> to use a kernel 2.4.x at least? That's in my opinion a not acceptable
> solution, since the decision which kernel is used, should never be
> depending on a c
On 21.IX.2001 at 05:48 Sulaiman Fahad Alhasawi wrote:
>
> who maintain arabic fonts/programs ?
> If yes , may i know who ? if no , can some one
>
> apply to do so ?
I would like to maintain Arabic fonts for Debian. Can you give me URLs
where I can find such fonts?
Anton Zinoviev, [EMAIL P
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 12:25:28PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 12:15:43PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
>
> > Is there any problem keeping them from being included in Debian ?
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200101/msg02634.html, I
> guess.
El Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 01:23:43PM -0400, Eloy A. Paris escribía:
BTW, Eloy
Do you know if version 2.2.2 is going to be released with passdb LDAP
support? I think that it is going backported from HEAD cvs version, but
I'm not very sure. Would you mind to compile SAMBA with LDAP support i
--- Begin Message ---
Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Hello,
Hi
>
>
> At Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:39:58 +,
> Sulaiman Alhasawi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello debian developers . Im from Kuwait and arabic is my language . i
> > have been searching in debian
> > for arabic support [ fonts , d
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:00:48PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> > > The social contract says "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free
> > > Software".
> > > Such a win-port might indeed serve
On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Admar Schoonen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 03:05:59PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > quite a few people maintain their own aptable archives of packages -
> > whether for internal use or for publication. In that environment,
> > override files don't serve a purpo
"EVB" == Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200101/msg02634.html,
>> I
>> guess.
> IIUC, this message refers to using codecs from microsoft.com, while the
> divx4linux library provides equivalent,free codecs.
> I
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> > IIUC, this message refers to using codecs from microsoft.com, while the
> > divx4linux library provides equivalent,free codecs.
>
> > Is this correct ?
>
> Yes. Read legal archive:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:09:54PM +0200, Massimo Dal Zotto uttered:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is it possible to get the full URL of a package (the one which is passed
> > by apt-get to dpkg for package installation) from apt-cache or some other
> > standard tool
"GS" == Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Yes. Read legal archive:
>>
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200101/threads.html#00027
> While reading that discussion I do get the impression that OpenDivX is not
> DFSG compatible.
Yes, And this is why I
could we temporarily unsubscribe this dude until he clears out his
mailbox? please!
- Forwarded message from Tomek Zubilew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: 24 Sep 2001 14:42:30 GMT
From: "Tomek Zubilew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martin F Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: WiadomoÅÄ nie mogÅa
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:57:05PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> While reading that discussion I do get the impression that
>> OpenDivX is not DFSG compatible.
>
> Yes, And this is why I don't want to include transcode or x2divx or
> another in Debian. Whitout codecs these packages are unusa
"AM" == Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:57:05PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>>> While reading that discussion I do get the impression that
>>> OpenDivX is not DFSG compatible.
>>
>> Yes, And this is why I don't want to include transcode or x2divx
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 10:15:06PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 03:55:45 +1000, Anthony Towns
> wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 07:34:34PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 16:43:05 +0200, Admar Schoonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >apt-ftparchive is in
> > > Regardless of whether packages are using debconf, I have wondered for
> > > *years*
> > > why we didn't at least have the option of logging stdout and stderr from
> > > everything in the install/update process. I think it's a good idea.
> > >
> > > Bdale
> >
> > I have proposed this two yea
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-09-25
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libacme-poe-knee-perl
Version : 1.02
Upstream Author : Jos Boumans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://japh.nu/index.cgi?base=modules
* License : Perl Artistic License
Descripti
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 10:45:13PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Okay, if nobody objects I will start implementing support for it in
> > boot-floppies (dbootstrap).
>
> We already support all this. Please work with what we have - don't
> reinvent th
On Sep 24, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So you want to force everyone who is interested in running this chroot
>to use a kernel 2.4.x at least? That's in my opinion a not acceptable
Yes, since managing a chroot environment without bind mounts is way
harder and IMO cannot easily/cor
I was gifted with a 2 gig SCSI drive, so the first thing I tried was
installing a system.
I installed Potato from a set of CheapBytes CDs, but did not set up X at
that time. Then I upgraded over PPP to the latest Woody archives. The
"automatic" X setup failed, but then I've never had that work for
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 05:36:26PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I intend to package the kernel patch for NSA Security Enhanced Linux.
> >
> > Below is all the details on licenses. My interpretation of the below
> > license
> > details (copie
Russell Coker wrote:
> I intend to package the kernel patch for NSA Security Enhanced Linux.
> Below is all the details on licenses. My interpretation of the below license
> details (copied from the web site) is that the kernel patch is under the GPL
> and everything is fine.
> However is the
Hi all,
This question don't have nothing to do with Debian, but I will try.
I want to know if exists an MS-DOS Loader for Linux. There is any
tool that can load DOS under Linux? (Like loadlin load Linux in DOS).
Thanks,
Joan.
## #
* BERNARDES,JOAN (Non-HP-Brazil,ex1) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010924 13:33]:
> Hi all,
> This question don't have nothing to do with Debian, but I will try.
> I want to know if exists an MS-DOS Loader for Linux. There is any
> tool that can load DOS under Linux? (Like loadlin load Li
On 23 Sep 2001 21:36:12 +0100, James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >Any new tool that hypothetically gets written or packages isn't going
>> >to get put in potato either.
>>
>> Having spent four hours last night to try getting a debhelper 3
>> (unsucce
"BERNARDES,JOAN (Non-HP-Brazil,ex1)" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> This question don't have nothing to do with Debian, but I will try.
> I want to know if exists an MS-DOS Loader for Linux. There is any
> tool that can load DOS under Linux? (Like loadlin load Linux in DOS).
>
When using the Gnome frontend for debconf to configure the latest locales
upload, I get a list of checkboxes that's about 3 times the height of
my screen. I don't know whose fault this is (which is why I'm not filing
a bug), but it should be fixed, either by having debconf handle this
sanely in
On 01-09-24 Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 24, Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >So you want to force everyone who is interested in running this chroot
> >to use a kernel 2.4.x at least? That's in my opinion a not acceptable
> Yes, since managing a chroot environment without bind moun
On 01-09-24 Martin F Krafft wrote:
> also sprach Christian Kurz (on Mon, 24 Sep 2001 10:31:54AM +0200):
> > So you want to force everyone who is interested in running this chroot
> > to use a kernel 2.4.x at least? That's in my opinion a not acceptable
> > solution, since the decision which kernel
First of all, I doubt that you're going to have too much trouble getting a
response from SElinux. They've been pretty good on responding to their
mailinglist: which, I might add, I see more than one Debian Developer has
contributed to, yet you have not. It would behoove you to actually look
as i
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 11:53:38AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> I copied XF86Config from my old Woody system into the newly upgraded
> system and, while startx works just fine, wdm starts up but doesn't start
> the server, or log any messages in /var/log/wdm.log. (the log file exists,
> but is empt
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> When using the Gnome frontend for debconf to configure the latest locales
> upload, I get a list of checkboxes that's about 3 times the height of
> my screen. I don't know whose fault this is (which is why I'm not filing
> a bug), but it should be fixed, either by having
Hi this is a message for Martin Quinson.
Unfortunately, his private email address seems to be broken. Martin, can you
provide me with another address ?
Thanks.
- Forwarded message from Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martin Qui
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
This message was create
On Tue, 2001-09-25 at 01:36, Joey Hess wrote:
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > When using the Gnome frontend for debconf to configure the latest locales
> > upload, I get a list of checkboxes that's about 3 times the height of
> > my screen. I don't know whose fault this is (which is why I'm not fili
It's web site is http://lsm.immunix.org/ .
License is GPL (see the note in include/linux/security.h in the patch).
LSM stands for Linux Security Module, it is used as the base of a number of
projects on improving Linux security including the NSE Security Enhanced
Linux project (which is the on
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:20:23AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> GNU inetutils is a FSF implementation, ours is the original BSD.
>
> The FSF is re-implementing long existing code so that they can GPL it.
Uh, this is dead wrong, at least in the case of inetutils. The GNU inetutils
started
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Francis ANDRE wrote:
> Hi DDG
>
> I check out the www.gnu.org inetutils against debian inetutils and I found
> them out of sync??
>
> Could anybody tell me why??
Because we lack behind. Jeff Bailey worked on repackaging the latest
snapshot, but work wa
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
> Hm, that doesn't make much sense too me. I think the best thing would be
> to have /etc/bind inside $CHROOT and having no symlink.
And scratch the second-most important feature of Debian (the first one being
the DFSG)? Do Not Move Config Files Out Of
Previously Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Of course the package is GPL'ed (just like sysklogd is GPL'ed, although it
> is forked from the BSD code), but that is not the motivation.
How can it be GPL'ed if it is modified BSD licensed code? Or has
every line been rewritten?
Wichert.
--
_
Previously Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> And scratch the second-most important feature of Debian (the first one being
> the DFSG)? Do Not Move Config Files Out Of /etc. Ever. If you need it
> elsewhere, at least leave a symbolic link in place.
bind mounts.
Wichert.
--
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 03:43:27AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:20:23AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > GNU inetutils is a FSF implementation, ours is the original BSD.
> >
> > The FSF is re-implementing long existing code so that they can GPL it.
>
> Uh, this
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:12, John Galt wrote:
> First of all, I doubt that you're going to have too much trouble getting a
> response from SElinux. They've been pretty good on responding to their
> mailinglist: which, I might add, I see more than one Debian Developer has
> contributed to, yet you ha
Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> just add a GtkScrolled at the top level. i'll do that for you (it is
> quite easy) if you tell me were the widget is built.
Well this is perl gtk, but if that's no obstacle, see
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Gnome.pm, the new() method. You might
do better modifyin
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Of course the package is GPL'ed (just like sysklogd is GPL'ed, although it
> > is forked from the BSD code), but that is not the motivation.
> How can it be GPL'ed if it is modified BSD licensed code? Or has
> e
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 09:08:32PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> >I've back ported any
> >number of unstable things for potato and not once been affected by
> >debhelper 3.
> Most sid packages have Build-Depends: debhelper 3 and DH_COMPAT=3 in
> debian/rules.
find pool/main -type f | grep '/.*/.*.dif
61 matches
Mail list logo
