Ola Joao,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
> "JC" == Joao Cardoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JC> I know nothing about copyrights, so I include none in the
JC> sources. My intention is that plplot_octave could be available
JC> in a future release of Octave, if Octave's author wants
Hi,
>
> Therefore, I don't think this is laptop installation problems in
> general. I think that this may be specific to some laptops, but not all.
>
> -Seth
Agree.
If there were some Debian oriented database, where one could add his
experience about installation of Debian on some unu
Hi,
I build packages with "build -rfakeroot". I get this:
lincity_1.10-4_i386.changes 1.9 kB #, ok (1 s, 1.94 kB/s)
announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED])... Unbalanced ')'
Goerzen)... User unknown
, failed ]
-- Generating marker debian/RELEASED
-- Package successfully released
Mark Bug# 16416, me
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 12:19:30PM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> libmagick4-dev19332 libmagick: ldconfig-symlink-before-shlib-in-deb
> LI#67 [217] ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott K. Ellis))
I wish I would understand a message like that. :-)
> libpgjava 27753 libpgjava: depends on jdk1.1-r
I originally meant this mail to deb-dev to get feedback about this
issue, but it seems I did not.
Winfried Truemper writes:
> Package: e2fsprogs
> Version: 1.10-17
>
>
> The version of fsck.ext2 segfaults in criticial cases (complete garbage on
> the harddisk, left from a previous crash).
> "Michael" == Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 12:19:30PM -0400, Brian White
Michael> wrote:
Brian> libmagick4-dev 19332 libmagick:
Brian> ldconfig-symlink-before-shlib-in-deb LI#67 [217]
Brian> ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott K. Ellis
Can I move mutt-i from non-us to main?
There is no crypto code in the package, only SHA-1 (hash algorithm) and
code to run pgp or gnupg.
(Waiting to resolve this issue I haven't uploaded yet the stripped version
to main, I hope Brian will let it slip past the freeze, there are no
other differences
Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If there's a way of making multi CD installs work, then I'm all for it.
>
> One thing: Do people think it's important to keep the possibility of doing a
> one CD install, and still ending up with a useful system ?
"Useful" as in "boots", yes! But you
On 15 Oct 1998, Andy Mortimer wrote:
> Also, another data point (and BTW, please don't think I'm being
> defensive) is that last time I looked at it, apt still required a
> fairly clean system to start with. Hopefully this has changed while
> I've been out of touch.
Try -f
Jason
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:32:02AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > What do you think we should do with the Gnome stuff?
> >
> > The Gnome 0.30 stuff is still under rather heavy development. The
> > current packages in Slink are pretty much alpha-quality. Lots of
> > things don't work. It sounds l
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 03:07:19PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
> I've been considering packaging snes9x, and was just wondering whether it
> had already been done.
Yeah, they're done. the package names are snes9x-x, snes9x-svga and
snes9x-server
-- Stephen Crowley (Crow- on IRC)
-- "Ambition is a p
The intel version of debian packages are in some directory path
downstream from ../../i386/.. and the package names also carry i386.
While this is technically correct, it can be missleading to some that
the package only runs on an 80386 cpu. The current name for the cpu
family from intel (and cl
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 02:09:23PM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> The intel version of debian packages are in some directory path
> downstream from ../../i386/.. and the package names also carry i386.
> While this is technically correct, it can be missleading to some that
> the package only runs
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 06:55:36PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Can I move mutt-i from non-us to main?
> There is no crypto code in the package, only SHA-1 (hash algorithm) and
> code to run pgp or gnupg.
>
> (Waiting to resolve this issue I haven't uploaded yet the stripped version
> to main, I h
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 04:02:41PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:32:02AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > > What do you think we should do with the Gnome stuff?
> > >
> > > The Gnome 0.30 stuff is still under rather heavy development. The
> > > current packages in Slink
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 02:09:23PM -0700, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> The intel version of debian packages are in some directory path
> downstream from ../../i386/.. and the package names also carry i386.
> While this is technically correct, it can be missleading to some that
> the package only runs
Quoting Stephane Bortzmeyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Yes, the current Debian system is really inconvenient. Each time you
> want to do something useful with a documentation (print it, grep it,
> glimpse it, vi it, remember that not every program is able to read
> compressed files and "zcat file.gz |
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 02:29:04PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Are there any plans to merge this with apt? Seems gdselect has the frontend,
> and apt has the backend.
Well, I could do with some apt in-built dependency handling :) There isnt
time before the freeze, and AFAIK there are no plans now (w
Robert Woodcock wrote:
> As featured on Bugtraq and recently Freshmeat, slocate is a replacement for
> locate/updatedb. It keeps track of UID's for files so that people can't see
> other people's hidden stuff, while still seeing their own.
>
> I'll have it create a diversion for /usr/bin/locate an
"Scott K. Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 1998 at 07:14:20PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> > I'm a little confused. freetype2-dev conflicts with freetype1 (<=
> > 1.0.0.1998-03-22-1) yet freetype1 is nowhere to be found in slink,
> > and the latest version in hamm is 1.0.0
Hi,
just in case you haven't noticed yet, I've uploaded a fixed
sysklogd package which is already installed in the archive.
I've reverted a patch that caused problems.
You can also find the package from:
ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-28_i386.deb
Michael Sobolev
Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Wed 14 Oct 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Thomas Lakofski wrote:
> > >
> > > Seems that the latest sysklogd package breaks sendmail's (and cron's, just
> > > checked) logging to syslog -- it works for a few minutes, and then no more
> > > logs. I don't know if this is u
Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > > The Gnome 0.30 stuff is still under rather heavy development. The
> > > current packages in Slink are pretty much alpha-quality. Lots of
> > > things don't work. It sounds like there will probably be a 1.0
> > > release coming up in a few months that will be thoroughly
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 October 1998, at 12 h 19, the keyboard of Brian White
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The following are packages I feel we can remove:
> ...
> > netatalk 25598 netalk: several problems (and the solution) [64]
> > (Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PR
Marc Singer wrote:
> I installed it yesterday to get a glimpse at what they are doing. I'd
> say it should be left out because it doesn't really work. It is a
> fine demonstration, but it doesn't add value to Debian until it can be
> used either a) to hack against, or b) to provide a workable des
Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> I've traced the problem to splogger blocking. If I kill splogger,
> everything is happy, but no qmail messages get logged.
The problem is that no new unix domain sockets are accept()'ed. I don't
know why.
> Furthermore, I've found that qmail writes to the l
On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 12:18:21AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Marc Singer wrote:
> > I installed it yesterday to get a glimpse at what they are doing. I'd
> > say it should be left out because it doesn't really work. It is a
> > fine demonstration, but it doesn't add value to Debian until it
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 03:24:23PM -0700, David Welton wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 12:18:21AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Marc Singer wrote:
> > > I installed it yesterday to get a glimpse at what they are doing. I'd
> > > say it should be left out because it doesn't really work. It is
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 02:39:05PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
> "Scott K. Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 1998 at 07:14:20PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> > > I'm a little confused. freetype2-dev conflicts with freetype1 (<=
> > > 1.0.0.1998-03-22-1) yet freetype1 is nowhe
theone wrote:
> Names after Slink is very simple. They should just be named after
> userfriendly characters.
Oooh.. that means our releases would even have their own geek code blocks
(http://www.userfriendly.org/cast/) ;-)
dust_puppy
pitr
aj
chief
cobb
erwin
greg
hillary
mike
smiling_man
stef
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 03:08:46PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
> Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de facto standard.
> I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a number of people use 2.6...
The Debian standard is RSA/IDEA (2.6.x compatible) keys, though Debian is
slowly adjusting to
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:23:38PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Dave Swegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de facto standard.
> > I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a number of people use 2.6...
>
> 2.x; we don't accept later stuff.
Dpkg
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Marc Singer wrote:
>
> I think that keeping it on the CD is spurious because the CD
> represents what we know works. Packages that don't work can be
> downloaded from the FTP servers by the people who want to fuss with
> them. Gnome is high profile because it has fancy scre
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 02:14:20PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > Can I move mutt-i from non-us to main?
> > There is no crypto code in the package, only SHA-1 (hash algorithm) and
> > code to run pgp or gnupg.
> >
> > (Waiting to resolve this issue I haven't uploaded yet the stripped version
> > t
> "David" == David Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> Well, what happens when lots of people try it, see that it
David> is broken, and associate Gnome with being broken and
David> unstable? That said, I don't think that will happen if it
David> is loudly declared to be *
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 03:29:34PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> theone wrote:
> > Names after Slink is very simple. They should just be named after
> > userfriendly characters.
>
> Oooh.. that means our releases would even have their own geek code blocks
> (http://www.userfriendly.org/cast/) ;-)
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 03:29:34PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> theone wrote:
> > Names after Slink is very simple. They should just be named after
userfriendly characters.
Great - I liked the penguin idea, but the names aren't very practical
for directories... pity... Anyway - are we going to
James Troup wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > James Troup wrote:
> > > They don't compile from freshly unpacked source.
> >
> > How odd. Other maintainer must work substantially differently than I, then.
>
> If you're building foobar 1.1-3, do you really recompile from a
> fre
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Really? I use cvs, and hence all my packages are indeed built
> from scratch. I was under the impression that more and more people
> are etting converted to CVS, but I guess that is wishful thinking.
Well I don't use cvs, but my hand-crafted version control and pa
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote:
kushni>
kushni>If there were some Debian oriented database, where one could
kushni>add his experience about installation of Debian on some
kushni>unusual hardware, I would add mine about ThinkPad 380XD.
THERE IS ! FAQ-O-MATIC !
(Ex
Joseph Carter wrote:
> Dpkg now does support gpg though not by default (you might have still been
> away at the time this came up) and it was planned to modify dinstall to
> support both. Did the dinstall mod not happen or something?
Indeed not. It turned out that gpg was not consistent enough
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Stephen Crowley wrote:
crow>That is ridiculous, there is no reason to remove gnome before the freeze,
if you
FWIW, one of the slashdot commenters on the slink-freeze, commends
slink for including gnome ( he did install the packages, too) .
John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTE
Marc Singer writes:
> I was under the impression that putting hooks in to use crypto was enough
> to raise the hackles of the export hounds.
Standing near the border and thinking about prime numbers is enough to
raise the hackles of the export kooks. Ihere has got to be some limit to
the amount o
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Michael Meskes wrote:
meskes>On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 12:19:30PM -0400, Brian White wrote:
meskes>> libmagick4-dev19332 libmagick:
ldconfig-symlink-before-shlib-in-deb LI#67 [217] ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott K.
Ellis))
meskes>
meskes>I wish I would understand a message li
> This is characteristic of reading and writing outside of array
> bounds. (as determined by malloc)
I linked it with Electric Fence. It didn't report anything though...
M. S.
Martin A. Soto J. Profesor
Departamento de Ingenieria de Sistemas y Comput
Hi, John!
Thanks for reminding me about that. Part of the reason I forgot is that there
is no direct link to it from main Web page. Perhaps FAQ-O-Matic deserved it's
place on Main page.
Sasha.
> kushni>
> kushni>If there were some Debian oriented database, where one could
> kushni>add his ex
At 21:19 +0200 1998-10-10, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 09, "J.H.M. Dassen Ray\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I can see pcmcia (28-Sep-98 is needed) and netutils (so that IPv6 is
>> supported), but not "a lot of packages".
>IIRC, libc6 doesn't support IPv6; you need a beta version for that. So this
James Troup wrote:
> Who said they were bad?
You did. A few days ago you agreed that bin-only NMU's were not ideal. I
can't dig it up right now.
> They are very rarely necessary however, since
> 99.5% of the time (the only exception I know of is Hartmut's packages)
> i386 packages are already com
Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> 1. binary-only NMUs breaks policity
Probably.
> 2. every NMU must be with source
I hope.
> 3. Porters needn't to ask maintainers for permission
No-one has to ask for permission for a NMU. That's the point of a NMU. You
file a bug, you wait a reasonable time, if i
At the top of /etc/X11/Xsession, a comment is given:
# global Xsession file -- used by both xdm and xinit (startx)
However, neither xinit or startx appear to be aware of its existence.
Does anyone know whether this is a question of the comment being
obsolete, ahead of its time, or simply wrong?
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 06:02:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I was under the impression that putting hooks in to use crypto was enough
> > to raise the hackles of the export hounds.
>
> Standing near the border and thinking about prime numbers is enough to
> raise the hackles of the expo
Hmm, I think this is my first comment on this..
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Tom Lees wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 02:29:04PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Are there any plans to merge this with apt? Seems gdselect has the frontend,
> > and apt has the backend.
>
> Well, I could do with some apt in-b
101 - 152 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
