I just split the subject of the previous to take more about politics in
Debian and let people discuss about the proposal.
I think we too much mess up with wordin like democracy and government.
Debian are neither. It's a bunch of volunteers trying to work together.
If voting let you think it's a de
Fabien Ninoles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just split the subject of the previous to take more about politics in
> Debian and let people discuss about the proposal.
>
> I think we too much mess up with wordin like democracy and government.
> Debian are neither. It's a bunch of volunteers try
On Tue, May 12, 1998 at 11:36:14AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> The freeze of Hamm is about to become much more solid. The installation
> has been determined to be stable and now testing is proceeding to the
> individual packages. This will start with the testing of those marked
> "essential" and
On Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 12:14:33AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 1998 at 11:36:14AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> > The freeze of Hamm is about to become much more solid. The installation
> > has been determined to be stable and now testing is proceeding to the
> > individual packag
Previously Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> Well, our news server (Diablo, #threehundredsomething in the top1000)
> crashed regulary with all the 2.0.x kernels but with the later 2.0.34pre
> kernels it has been rock-stable.
2.0.33 regulary hangs on newer Intel chipsets. I installed Debian on a
frie
Hi!
Recently, Santiago opened a bug against libpaper. This is one of the
RELEASE CRITICAL bugs, and we were not able to find a satisfactory
solution. Hopefully, you have some useful suggestion...
Here is the history:
On Thu, 28 May 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Subject: Bug#22942: libpaper depend
> SOLUTION 3
> --
> Well, we can also decide that to leave the situation as it is. In this
> way, however, users would not be able to install the new version of the
> library without also installing libpaperg (and libc6...)
That isn't the real problem, but the upgrade from an old system (
Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > SOLUTION 3
> > --
> > Well, we can also decide that to leave the situation as it is. In this
> > way, however, users would not be able to install the new version of the
> > library without also installing libpaperg (and libc6...)
>
> That isn't
So, where do I find the source? Helsinki only has 2.0.33?
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> > Well, our news server (Diablo, #threehundredsomething in the top1000)
> > crashed regulary with all the 2.0.x kernels but with the later 2.0.34pre
>
According to Dale Scheetz:
> So, where do I find the source? Helsinki only has 2.0.33?
I downloaded 2.0.34 from ftp.funet.fi yesterday morning (the patch that is,
I did not check to see if a complete kernel was there).
You can also find a copy of the 2.0.34 patch on
ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/li
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> According to Dale Scheetz:
> > So, where do I find the source? Helsinki only has 2.0.33?
>
> I downloaded 2.0.34 from ftp.funet.fi yesterday morning (the patch that is,
> I did not check to see if a complete kernel was there).
It was, I did.
Luis.
--
Luis Francis
Hi,
sorry for being such a nuisance :-/
On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 11:20:52PM +0200, Christian Meder wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 10:18:40AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > Christian Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > while testing the base packages I hit the critical bugs surrounding
>
Hello!
This is thereply I got from RMS about the copyright freeness issue.
I think it is clear that we should lay the license freeness issue ad acta.
Debian should include all licenses in whole, and the dfsg should not exactly
apply to them.
Note that we require the dfsg-freeness for the benefi
Martin Schulze wrote:
> dark: Could you run your script that checks each priority for
> completeness? (don't depend/... on packages of lower priority)
http://master.debian.org/~dark/lintian/reports/depcheck.html#i386 :-)
It's generated daily.
I was going to announce it together with a number o
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://master.debian.org/~dark/lintian/reports/depcheck.html#i386 :-)
Looks like libstdc++2.8 and libgdbmg1 should be required, and that
dpkg-dev, dpkg-perl, and libnet-perl should be standard.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looks like libgdbmg1 should be required, [ ... ]
No; perl shouldn't depend on libgdbmg1. libgdbmg1 is obsolete and
deprecated. I asked the perl maintainer if he could fix this back in
March or so, apparently it hasn't happened.
--
James
~Yawn And Walk
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No; perl shouldn't depend on libgdbmg1. libgdbmg1 is obsolete and
> deprecated. I asked the perl maintainer if he could fix this back in
> March or so, apparently it hasn't happened.
This close to hamm's release, we should probably rely on non-maintainer
I'm going on holiday until the 15th, feel free to make NMU of any packages I
maintain for hamm (and slink if it's really that urgent). None have
important bugs outstanding AFAIK.
Cheers
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett
Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing.
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> This is thereply I got from RMS about the copyright freeness issue.
>
> I think it is clear that we should lay the license freeness issue ad acta.
> Debian should include all licenses in whole, and the dfsg should not exactly
> apply to
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Marco Pistore wrote:
[libpaperg contains binaries also needed by libpaper -> libpaper depends
on libpaperg, which is undesired]
> The possible solutions are:
>
> SOLUTION 1 (Suggested by Wichert)
> -
> Create the packages:
>libpaper -
I was hacking around on xfstt earlier today. I decided that it was too
limited in that it would only accept 1 simultaneous connection
(ie for each xfstt you run you can only have 1 session of X using
it as a font path) so I decided to see if I could make it accept
multiple connections...
This tur
Hi,
I think I'm failing to follow something basic here. Does paperconf
depend on the libc6 shared libraries? If so, there is no way one
could use the binaries without loading libpaperg, right?
Secondly, Hamm is supoposed to be libc6.
>>"Marco" == Marco Pistore <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Stephen Carpenter wrote:
> This turned out to be almost trivial...simply a few mods, instead of servicing
> requests after connect, it fork()s and lets the child service that connection
> while the parent loops and waits fo rthe next connect. [I think I changed
> 10 lines of c
Hi,
>>"James" == James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The only remedy is to remove the old libpaper, and then to install
>> libpaper and libpaperg.
James> Where *did* you get this idea from? It's 200% bogus.
>> 14:20:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ~/temp $sudo dpkg -iEG libpaper_1.0.3-9.deb
>> l
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, in cases like this the order in which the deb files are
> presented to dpkg is relevant. So if a novice is upgrading a large
> set of packages, and the packages are not presented in the corect
> order, the upgrade process issues ominous
I've heard that somebody is packaging "twin". Does anybody know who?
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
---
Generated by Signify v1.04. For this and m
I'm getting unresolved symbol errors when cardmgr tries to insmod the
3c589_cs module for my 3Com PCMCIA ethernet card. Is this a problem with
the boot disks, and/or is there a solution for this? The laptop is an AST
Ascentia J series, and the card is a 3C589C.
Steve.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Steve Tonnesen wrote:
> I'm getting unresolved symbol errors when cardmgr tries to insmod the
> 3c589_cs module for my 3Com PCMCIA ethernet card. Is this a problem with
> the boot disks, and/or is there a solution for this? The laptop is an AST
> Ascentia J series, and the ca
Debian 2 ships with Gimp 1 take that redhat :-)
--
Edward Betts http://www.hairnet.demon.co.uk/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29 matches
Mail list logo
