> On 30 Dec 1997, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin) wrote:
>
> > So, timezone (7.48-3) is installed, and "required", so dpkg won't
> > remove it. timezones (2.06-1) is available, and "replaces/conflicts"
> > timezone, but dpkg (1.4.0.19) won't replace it, even with
> > auto-deconfigure. I
| On Sunday, 28 December 97, at 9:47:22 AM
| Richard wrote about "Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28"
> Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> wu-ftpd-2.4-27
Done. Waiting for account on master.
> wu-ftpd-academ-2.4.2.13-0
Done. Waiting for account on master.
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes:
> I volunteer to try rolling those patches into XEmacs 20.5. I think
> that configure ought to detect `liblockfile' and compile `movemail'
> accordingly. Sound right?
Sounds good, but perhaps it should just fail to build on a debian
system if libl
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The vendor, I think. kernel-header-x.xx and kernel-source
> packages have always assumed ownership of /usr/src; this is not a new
> libc6 thing.
It's new for anyone who has never had kernel-headers and kernel-source
installed before now (beca
Am 29.12.97 schrieb harpo # udel.edu ...
Moin Will!
WL> Would it be allowed for us to have a non-duetch directory, which just
WL> wouldn't get mirrored (be default) in Germany?
That's ok.
WL> That way, if a child gets
WL> it, they've got to get it from someplace outside Germany, which the
WL
Hi,
I received a message from a user that wants to know if I plan to
support xinetd in the installation scripts of the Samba package. I
need to enable/disable entries in /etc/inetd.conf to change the
behavior of inetd but this user uses xinetd instead of inetd.
Do I need to support xinetd as well
On Dec 29, Rob Browning wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The vendor, I think. kernel-header-x.xx and kernel-source
> > packages have always assumed ownership of /usr/src; this is not a new
> > libc6 thing.
>
> It's new for anyone who has never had kernel-headers a
On 29 Dec 1997, Marco Budde wrote:
> WL> Would it be allowed for us to have a non-duetch directory, which just
> That's ok.
> WL> It's going to get nuts if we have to have a non- directory for
> WL> every country, but maybe we'll have to do this. If that's the case,
> I would prefer a flag in
I was just upgrading a system from [hamm a few weeks old] to [hamm
today] using, for the first time, dftp (instead of a mirror and manual
dpkg -BORGiE runs.) I selected libnfslock, it created
/etc/ld.so.preload, and since then any attempt to run a dynamic linked
program gives a message, BUG IN DYN
On 30 Dec 1997, Mark W. Eichin wrote:
> I was just upgrading a system from [hamm a few weeks old] to [hamm
> today] using, for the first time, dftp (instead of a mirror and manual
> dpkg -BORGiE runs.) I selected libnfslock, it created
> /etc/ld.so.preload, and since then any attempt to run a dyn
| On Tuesday, 30 December 97, at 9:11:52 PM
| Eloy wrote about "Should I support xinetd in my Packages?"
> Hi,
> I received a message from a user that wants to know if I plan to
> support xinetd in the installation scripts of the Samba package. I
> need to enable/disable entries in /etc/inetd.conf
Hey!! Somebody give Adam an account on master!!! :-) He will port to
libc6 the remaining libc5 packages :-)
E.-
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: | On Sunday, 28 December 97, at 9:47:22 AM
: | Richard wrote about "Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28"
: > Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: >
Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> Hey!! Somebody give Adam an account on master!!! :-) He will port to
> libc6 the remaining libc5 packages :-)
Adam wrote
> : I wish I had a life outside Quake.
Hey Adam, you want to maintain quake too? Maybe you can port it to libc6. ;-)
--
see shy jo, just kidding
--
T
Cool. Thanks!
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
| On Tuesday, 30 December 97, at 8:53:16 PM
| Adam wrote about "Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28"
> | On Sunday, 28 December 97, at 9:47:22 AM
> | Richard wrote about "Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28"
>> Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> wu-ftpd-2.4-27
> Done. Waiting for account on master.
>>
| On Tuesday, 30 December 97, at 10:39:46 PM
| Joey wrote about "Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28"
> Eloy A. Paris wrote:
>> Hey!! Somebody give Adam an account on master!!! :-) He will port to
>> libc6 the remaining libc5 packages :-)
Just to mention, I haven't received the message that was quoted above
Adam Heath wrote:
> Sure, why not. I am currently not maintaining anything. I have just had a
> lot
> of time(not much work currently), and my computer wasn't doing anything
> productive. Is this source available? BTW, that line is just part of my
> quote
> file.
There's no source, and I enj
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Just to mention, I haven't received the message that was quoted above, ie from
: Eloy Paris.
Give it sometime. master's load average was around 15 about 5 minutes
ago and I think master is the list server as well :-) Poor boy... I
couldn't even login via FT
I NEED PHISH SEND ME THE LIST
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Hi,
>>"Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The vendor, I think. kernel-header-x.xx and kernel-source packages
>> have always assumed ownership of /usr/src; this is not a new libc6
>> thing.
Rob> It's new for anyone who has never ha
9976dbview_1.0.3-3.1_i386.deb Libc6!
28442 mdutils_0.35-5.1_i386.deb Libc6!
418408 tkdesk_1.0b4-2.1_i386.deb Libc6!
110198 wu-ftpd-academ_2.4.2.13-0.1_i386.debLibc6!
90140 wu-ftpd_2.4-27.1_i386.deb Libc6!
88640 xinetd_2.2.1-1_i
On 29 Dec 1997, Rob Browning wrote:
> I think you overlooked part of my post. I mentioned that *I* had
> created /usr/src/linux as a link to /usr/src/linux-my-kernel-version.
> Then when I installed kernel-headers (because the new libc6-dev made
> me), kernel-headers saw the link, decided it was
Will Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> package (*) as you mirror it. This goes for CD images, too -- we'd have
> to release an 'Official Debian CD Set' and an 'Official Debian CD Set
> German Edition' because the former would contain any packages in the main
> distribution.
this won't work, b
Isn't there something *else* going on here as well? Namely, why does
libc6-dev suddenly want kernel-headers, and a particular version at
that, when neither it nor libc5-dev ever did before (and for
good reasons?)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PR
On Wed, 31 Dec 1997, Adam wrote:
Adam> 88640 xinetd_2.2.1-1_i386.deb Libc6! New upstream version
First of all this package is not orphaned, I am working on it's
libc6 version. Second, where did you find "New upstream version"?!
thks,
borik
__
Boris D. Beletsky
On Dec 30, Martin Schulze wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 1997 at 08:55:26PM -0600, David Engel wrote:
>
> > > today I upgraded the machine that hosts my debian mirror to libc6.
> > > Everyhthing went fine, only some partially resolved dependencies took
> > > some time but didn't meant a problem. Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yann Dirson) wrote on 30.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 30 Dec 1997, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin) wrote:
> >
> > > So, timezone (7.48-3) is installed, and "required", so dpkg won't
> > > remove it. timezones (2.06-1) is available, and "replaces/conflicts"
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Browning) wrote on 29.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I find this hard to believe. kernel-headers and kernel-source
> > packages write to the directories kernel-headers-X.X.XX and
> > kernel-source-X.X.XX. They create
Do we have any dates for Debian 2.0
release/code-freze/dead-line/anything?
If not, shouldn't we schedule one already. What are we waiting for?
thks,
borik
__
Boris D. Beletsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berger Financial
"Boris D. Beletsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If not, shouldn't we schedule one already. What are we waiting for?
Gee, I dunno, maybe it's, at least in part, for the developers who
still haven't upgraded their packages to libc6, despite it being
available since April.
--
James - xinted anyo
Pardon me for a nosy question. Does Debian have any money flowing in
from users that is used to compensate full-time Debian developers?
Another member of the League for Programming Freedom (LPF) www.lpf.org
---
Brian Bar
Hi,
>>"Christoph" == Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Christoph> I want to be able to change the kernel-headers a program is
Christoph> compiled with. Certain tools (especially in 2.1.X) are
Christoph> dependant on a certain kernel version. Nothing wrong with
Christoph> providing the
Hi,
>>"Brian" == Brian Bartholomew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> Pardon me for a nosy question. Does Debian have any money
Brian> flowing in from users that is used to compensate full-time
Brian> Debian developers?
Not that I'm aware of. Contributing to Debian, as a developer
or ot
---Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, the kernel header files are getting to be quite
> architecture dependent, and hence if libc development packages
> continued to include kernel headers explicitly, we would need
> different headers for different architectures
Hello Enrique:
Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is an "unofficial" deb package of the ultra driver. There is a link
> form Jaroslav's pages to the ftp site where you can download it. I've
> been using it for a while and it works fine, but the mantainer doesn't
> want to contribut
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark W. Eichin) wrote on 31.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Isn't there something *else* going on here as well? Namely, why does
> libc6-dev suddenly want kernel-headers, and a particular version at
> that, when neither it nor libc5-dev ever did before (and for
> good reasons?)
Hi Adam,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Heath) wrote on 31.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> adbbs
What for? Anything wrong with my adbbs package?
MfG Kai
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would prefer a flag in CONTROL. We have got a lot of programs with such
> problems. For example it's no problem to sell programs with GIF support in
> Germany, because there's not patent on this algorithm.
> The crypt programs are another group. You're
Please be aware that the GIF patent issue is for WRITERS only. Readers
do not use the patented algorithm. Often you can put the writer in non-free
and leave the rest of the program in main.
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 31 Dec 1997, James Troup wrote:
Troup> "Boris D. Beletsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Troup>
Troup> > If not, shouldn't we schedule one already. What are we
Troup> > waiting for?
Troup>
Troup> Gee, I dunno, maybe it's, at least in part, for the developers
Troup> who still haven
> "bruce" == bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
bruce> Please be aware that the GIF patent issue is for WRITERS
bruce> only. Readers do not use the patented algorithm. Often you
bruce> can put the writer in non-free and leave the rest of the
bruce> program in main.
So is it ok
> this won't work, because some CD distributions (i.e. infomagic) are
> selled international. Therefor the english version is sold in
> Germany. I don't thing that a game like doom is worth the trouble. Let
> it be in the non-free section, where it belongs to.
Yup. However, it doesn't seem very i
9980dbview_1.0.3-3.1_i386.deb libc6!
290268 defrag_0.70-3_i386.deb
40024 lurkftp_0.99-1.1_i386.deb
288158 majordomo_1.94.4-1.1_i386.deb
28442 mdutils_0.35-5.1_i386.deb Libc6!
69698 omirr_0.3-2_i386.debLibc6!
418514 tkdesk_1.0b4-2.1_i386.d
Have tried a couple of times to subscribe to debian-sparc using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but I'm being met by a
deafening silence. Is there something wrong with the list server?
If I couldn't spell, I figure the list server would have told me
so :/
--
Stephen
---
"Normality is a statistical illusion."
On Tue, 30 Dec 1997, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Robert D. Hilliard writes:
> > This is Bug#16260.
>
> Is this really a bug in timezones ? It seems quite similar to the
> problem I have myself (as the maintainer - never heard of anyone else
> speaking on this) while upgrading e2fsprogs to 1.10-9.
Moin Moin!
Today I've released the latest version of my HTML online help system for
Debian. Bugs reports are welcome :).
dhelp
What's dhelp?
dhelp is an online help system for Debian GNU/Linux. A Debian package
can register its HTML documents and dhe
46 matches
Mail list logo
