Re: GCC cross-compilation

Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On Jun 22, Galen Hazelwood wrote > > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Nope. What happens is most (single-cpu) developers upload the source > > and binaries for one architecture. Then helpful and nice developers who > > own other machines upload binaries for their cpu, built fr

Re: Hamm: Retracting request for chos to be standard

> > > "Christoph" == Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Christoph> Lilo 2.0 has the ability to display a file before the > Christoph> prompt and also the ability to boot something with a > Christoph> single keystroke. If someone could update the lilo > Christ

Re: Status of Debian Policy

> > "ghughes" == ghughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ghughes> True. However, it can't handle gzipped pages, and > ghughes> hacking it to do so seems a) special case (because > Ermm... on my system it can. lynx 2.7-1 (self compiled). > netscape also handles it very well. I can't say

Re: svgalib-dummy again

Has anyone considered writing a svgalib replacement that simply translates svgalib calls into X Windows calls? This would allow those of us with cards that are unsupported under svgalib to still use svgalib programs, though admittedly at a speed penalty. (My S3 card doesn't work a

dc and bc in Important?

It seems to me that dc and bc aren't vital to the workings of a system (when I deselect them, dselect doesn't warn about any dependencies), yet they are in Important. Why? -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL P

Re: Moving away from MD5

Thomas Koenig wrote: > An attractive alternative would be RIPEMD-160. SHA-1, another > alternative, has the main problem that its design parameters are secret. > Source code for RIPEMD-160 is avialiable, and the algorithm is in the > public domain. For more information, you can check out > http:/

Re: Bug: cross-device link

Mathieu Guillaume wrote: > > Package: cpp 2.7.2.2-5 > > This is the same kind of bug that was reported as #10753 > (update-alternative). > When I try to upgrade to this version, I get an error related to > cross-device links (/lib/cpp is a symlink to /usr/bin/cpp, which is > mounted on a differen

Re: Experiences with compiling Debian

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (joost witteveen) writes: > No, what I had in mind is changing chmod, chown and frends, and make > them log the intended permissions in a file (specified somewhere in > a environment variable), and then changing tar to look for that file > (agian in that environment variable), an

<    1   2