On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 21:19:36 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > upstream source. I don't know if we should upload it to frozen or if we
> > should remove xfce from potato and only upload the new version to woody as
> > suggested in the bub repo
Le Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 10:54:15PM +0100, Fabrice Gautier écrivait:
> XFCE 3 is very different from the xfce in potato.
>
[...]
>
> I think you should rename it xfce2 and it should stay in contrib, and
> be orphaned (but there is no known bug, so doesn't really need a
> maintener) at least while
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 09:19:36PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> the package xfce seems no more maintained by Kevin Donnelly, someone
> should take it over. The maintainer seems MIA ... trivial bugs are
> not corrected for more than 172 days.
>
> Anyone wants to take it over a
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 21:19:36 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> upstream source. I don't know if we should upload it to frozen or if we
> should remove xfce from potato and only upload the new version to woody as
> suggested in the bub report #60258.
I'd second that suggestion. Unlike the old ver
Hi everybody,
the package xfce seems no more maintained by Kevin Donnelly, someone
should take it over. The maintainer seems MIA ... trivial bugs are
not corrected for more than 172 days.
Anyone wants to take it over and package the new upstream version ? it
should be quite easy to do since there
5 matches
Mail list logo
