On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:19:05PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:28:59AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:15:28PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >> -
> >> Shortly before Lenny is released:
> >> -
> >> Supported : Etc
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:28:59AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:15:28PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > -
> > Shortly before Lenny is released:
> > -
> > Supported : Etch(oldstable), Lenny(stable)
> > Not supported: bo, hamm, potato, woody,
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:15:28PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Debian is not updating packages in Woody, its now oldstable. Debian now
> has support for Sarge and will still support Sarge when Etch is released
> but when Lenny is near release Sarge will stop being supported like
> Woody is now (this
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:50:31PM -0800, Will Lowe wrote:
> Oh, and ... archive.debian.org doesn't seem to be rsync-enabled. Is
> there anyplace that has woody and *does* support rsync?
ftp.nl.debian.org::debian-archive
(archive.d.o does support rsync, but its host restricted, aiui)
Cheers,
Am Montag, den 08.01.2007, 21:50 -0800 schrieb Will Lowe:
> Oh, and ... archive.debian.org doesn't seem to be rsync-enabled. Is
> there anyplace that has woody and *does* support rsync?
http://www.debian.org/distrib/archive.html
mentions several rsync sites.
Regards
Thomas
--
To UN
Oh, and ... archive.debian.org doesn't seem to be rsync-enabled. Is
there anyplace that has woody and *does* support rsync?
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:48:13PM -0800, Will Lowe wrote:
> It looks like Woody has moved to the archives:
>
> http://archive.debian.org/dists/woody/
>
> ... I didn't s
It looks like Woody has moved to the archives:
http://archive.debian.org/dists/woody/
... I didn't see an announcment about it to any of the usual lists,
but perhaps I missed it. FYI, there probably still are companies
(like mine :) running large numbers of Woody boxes for legacy
applications wh
Hello,
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Mo den 8. Jan 2007 um 5:15 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> [flame]
>
> is it really necessary to start flames in this list? Kevin Mark did
> answer completely objective. To bring him down with this kind of answer
> is absolute below the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:15:13AM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-08 10:09]:
>
> > is it really necessary to start flames in this list? Kevin Mark did
> > answer completely objective.
>
> He didn't answer
* Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-08 10:09]:
> is it really necessary to start flames in this list? Kevin Mark did
> answer completely objective.
He didn't answer the question in case you haven't noted.
yours Martin
--
http://martin.wuertele.net/ -- Debian -- OFTC -- SPI -- [EMAIL PRO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Am Mo den 8. Jan 2007 um 5:15 schrieb Steve Langasek:
[flame]
is it really necessary to start flames in this list? Kevin Mark did
answer completely objective. To bring him down with this kind of answer
is absolute below the level cultivated
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:15:28PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > I am very much informed about the Debian release cycles and the
> > processing. I also know that non-US has been obsoleted by integrating
> > crypto-in-main and i was also participating those discussions.
> > The problem now is - Whe
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 05:01:32PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:39:48AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > > Is there a schedule for non-US and security fixes to disappear and where
> > > will they disappear to ?
> > After Woody, non-US was removed as it was not needed anymor
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:39:48AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > Is there a schedule for non-US and security fixes to disappear and where
> > will they disappear to ?
> After Woody, non-US was removed as it was not needed anymore. As for
> maintaining non-us repositories (for woody or any thing olde
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 03:03:48PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i just noticed woody is gone which is *aehm* a problem for me but thanks
> archive.debian.org not unfixable (Expect couple of hundret machines).
Hi Florian,
Debian supports each stable release for a set time(about a year aft
Hi,
i just noticed woody is gone which is *aehm* a problem for me but thanks
archive.debian.org not unfixable (Expect couple of hundret machines).
Is there a schedule for non-US and security fixes to disappear and where
will they disappear to ?
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROT
16 matches
Mail list logo
