Re: uploading new binary packages from a DM approved source package

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > if I want to packge a new upstream version of DM-Upload-Allowed > > library (for example [1]), it changes the name of the binary package > > and

Re: uploading new binary packages from a DM approved source package

Hi, On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: > if I want to packge a new upstream version of DM-Upload-Allowed > library (for example [1]), it changes the name of the binary package > and thus goes to NEW. > > Last time I asked it wasn't possible for me, as a DM, to upload i

uploading new binary packages from a DM approved source package

Hi, if I want to packge a new upstream version of DM-Upload-Allowed library (for example [1]), it changes the name of the binary package and thus goes to NEW. Last time I asked it wasn't possible for me, as a DM, to upload it and I had to search for a sponsor. Is there some policital reason for