On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:27:56AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Instead could you skip step 1 and do it:
>
> 1. apt-get install foo
> 1.1 apt queries SQL server "SELECT * FROM packages WHERE package=foo,
> architecture=i386, operatingsystem=linux"
> 1.2 apt gets result, and installs package.
>
> Th
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 09:54:17PM -0400, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If you don't mind downloading the packages, you can just use
> > apt-listchanges. It will sort its output by urgency, and you can use that
> > information to decide which packages
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 08:38:23PM -0400, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> > These ideas sound great to me. In case they don't get implemented, or until
> > they do, would it be hard to cook up a script that does what I want, even if
> > it involves downloa
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 08:38:23PM -0400, Dan Christensen wrote:
> These ideas sound great to me. In case they don't get implemented, or until
> they do, would it be hard to cook up a script that does what I want, even if
> it involves downloading the packages to see the changelogs?
If you don't
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:12:24PM -0400, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to upgrade all currently installed packages which have
> > had an urgency=high version uploaded to the archive since I last
> > upgraded?
>
> I had an idea (and a w
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:01:44AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Matt" == Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Matt> I discussed the idea a bit with James Troup, and one of his
> Matt> concerns was that the database would be centralized, not
> Matt> distributed over many
> "Matt" == Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matt> I discussed the idea a bit with James Troup, and one of his
Matt> concerns was that the database would be centralized, not
Matt> distributed over many mirrors like the packages themselves.
Matt> This would be a scalab
On Wednesday 02 May 2001 02:27, Brian May wrote:
> > "Matt" == Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Matt> I had an idea (and a working script) to extract changelogs
> Matt> from source packages and insert them into a SQL database.
> Matt> My original intention was to allow
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 08:28:09PM -0700, Francois Gouget wrote:
>I know about apt-listchanges but, AFAIU, it extracts the changelog from
>the .deb files. So you cannot get this changelog before downloading the
>.deb packages. It's when I'm still in dselect deciding which packages to
>
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2001, Francois Gouget wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 1 May 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >Yum. I'd love to see the changelog in dselect before I decide whether
> > to upgrade a package or not.
> > :-)
>
> apt-get install apt-listcha
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 07:56:10PM -0700, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote: [...]
> > I had an idea (and a working script) to extract changelogs from source
> > packages and insert them into a SQL database. My original intention was to
> > allow apt-listchanges to
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> [...]
> > I had an idea (and a working script) to extract changelogs from source
> > packages
> > and insert them into a SQL database. My original intention was to allow
> > apt-listchanges to display change
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
[...]
> I had an idea (and a working script) to extract changelogs from source
> packages
> and insert them into a SQL database. My original intention was to allow
> apt-listchanges to display changelogs for packages before downloading them,
> but
> such
> "Matt" == Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matt> I had an idea (and a working script) to extract changelogs
Matt> from source packages and insert them into a SQL database.
Matt> My original intention was to allow apt-listchanges to
Matt> display changelogs for packa
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:10:32PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:44:21PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> > I had an idea (and a working script) to extract changelogs from source
> > packages and insert them into a SQL database. My original intention was to
> > allow
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:44:21PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: upgrading only urgency=high packages
> Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> On Tue, May 01, 2001
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:12:24PM -0400, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Is there a way to upgrade all currently installed packages which have
> had an urgency=high version uploaded to the archive since I last
> upgraded? (And any necessary dependencies, of course.) I'm thinking
> of this for the unst
Is there a way to upgrade all currently installed packages which have
had an urgency=high version uploaded to the archive since I last
upgraded? (And any necessary dependencies, of course.) I'm thinking
of this for the unstable distribution. The idea is to frequently do
such upgrades to get any
18 matches
Mail list logo
